Mini 1652: Sweet Dreams - Game Over!
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 44, bji wrote:I have a role claim to make: I'm a time travelling cop. My role allows me to receive the PM response to my investigation before I even ask it. Turns out I already got my Night 1 PM response, and apparently I had asked whether or not pisskip was scum. And the answer was that he is.
By the way, that was a joke
keep your day job
In post 77, bji wrote:JohnnyFarrar wrote:
and in this game there's a user called West. Fuck West.
Ah yeah, I forgot about him/am not used to the user names in this game yet. Why the animosity?
johnny i demand an answer to this
VOTE: bji
Don't like how the pisskop vote was snuck in there behind Victor's vote, and then surrounded by questions and joke-talk/clarificaitons-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 195, bji wrote:
West9 wrote:
VOTE: bji
Don't like how the pisskop vote was snuck in there behind Victor's vote, and then surrounded by questions and joke-talk/clarificaitons
Can you explain the mechanics of "sneaking" votes in on a forum where every vote is plain to see and additionally posted in every vote count?
Can you explain why I would use the much more obvious reverse video font for my vote tag when I could use the much easier to miss bold font for my vote tag, if my goal was to "sneak" a vote in?
Can you explain why I would go through the trouble to also put a big reverse video announce of my unvote also (which I do every time I vote just so it's clear whom I am unvoting at the same time), if I wanted to "sneak" my vote in?
Your accusation makes literally zero sense. Is this weak push really the best you could come up with?
i'm not saying that you tried to, like, camouflage a vote into a post. The timing of your pisskop vote felt like you were trying to use the momentum from Victor's vote to cast suspicion on him for questioning you. The whole thing read to me as opportunistic - which probably would have been a better word to use than "sneaky," but still.
wtf was with the time gap between my vote and your reaction to it?
i hate to do this whole "only addressing the thing about me" thing and then go, but it's 2am and i'm tired and i want to watch the new aziz special so goodnight.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
JohnnyFarrar wrote:Pfffft. I know West from a few other sites, he's a friend of mine.
LIES. ALL LIES.
In post 266, bji wrote:In post 261, evilpacman18 wrote:Eh I guess I ended up responding to the bulk of that post without really meaning too.
I know, it hurts your attempt at discrediting me because I'm a newbie, to take my post seriously enough to respond to it, right?
the problem with 208 is that when pacman said "today" he meant "before this day is done" and you just straight up did not understand that.
Bji, your newbieness is honestly throwing me off super hard at this point. I still don't like your pisskop vote, and I hate that you were trying to imply scum motivation in something as banal as pisskop changing his avatar, but I'm gonna take a break from you for a while.
VOTE: Silverwolf
I'm reading pisskop as town, and 96 is exactly how I imagine scum reacting to an early quickwagon on town.
P-EDIT: Cheet's too cool to modkill people, i think
Are you sure?~Last edited by Cheetory6 on Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
oh right i forgot, cheet's not cool at all and is actually the worst.-
-
West9
-
-
West9 Goon
-
-
West9
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 310, SilverWolf wrote:In post 306, West9 wrote:got game links you'd be willing to share?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=59720
Post 118 in that game I voted for the person putting a player to L-1.
ech. This looks alright. I guess my vote was a bit too playstyle-y. UNVOTE:
In post 311, bji wrote:In post 290, West9 wrote:
the problem with 208 is that when pacman said "today" he meant "before this day is done" and you just straight up did not understand that.
That's not really relevant, I don't think. He's making a claim that if Nickname were at L-1, he'd hammer him. That's basically what he's saying. That's a stronger statement than any one vote, and his claim that town is "vote happy" when he's "lynch happy" seems inconsistent.
This is wrong, right? *looks back at post* yeah, this is totally wrong.
In post 311, bji wrote:My pisskop vote started as pressure. Pisskop has responded to that in a way that only solidified my resolve on the vote. If he had responded less defensively, I would have unvoted him. What's to not like about that?
The timing of the wagon jump was opportunistic. I think I said this already?
In post 381, bji wrote:I'm liking JohnnyFarrar less and less every day. He seems to like to stir things up but doesn't look to be working in any coherent direction or really trying to scum hunt with any sense of urgency. That's just how it looks right now.
How come this is okay when you do it but it's not okay when Johnny does it?
I would vote bji, but this wagon has merit and seems like it'll be really fun to analyze tomorrow. VOTE: Nickname-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 381, bji wrote:Given that I agree with Dooku that scum are probably lurking and taking advantage of the pisskop/Aero fight to allow a favorable scum outcome to develop, I'll park my vote on my least favorite lurker for the moment.
UNVOTE: pisskop
VOTE: West9
"He's probably going to do something scummy in the future, so i'll vote for him now."-
-
West9
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 392, bji wrote:Also, why beat up on a player (Nickname) who isn't even playing right now? I'd like to hear a good summary of the case on Nickname that has everyone voting him when he's not even here to defend himself.
The L-1 PK vote was scummy and the reactions to people saying that they have suspicion on him are great.
In post 403, bji wrote:In post 401, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 399, Count Dooku wrote:If we lynch Nickname and if he flips town, I am pretty sure that at least one of West and Brain is scum. They followed my vote too quickly.
Your logic is impeccable.
I still haven't read post 381. Every time I look at it I get dizzy. I'll be back later with thoughts or a medical bill.
Still too cool for school, I see.
too be fair, johnny is entirely too cool for school.
In post 393, bji wrote:So SilverWolf pointed you to some meta that gives evidence for a position that could easily be faked knowing that the meta will support it. And you just accept it. That seems really bad to me.
So, you think that Silverwolf is scum, then?
@bji saying that evilpacman said that he "would hammer Nickname if Nickname were at L-1" is incorrect. My previous post conveyed this. I would explain why but it's nothing more than "that's not what he said" so it would honestly be easier for you to just to read pacman's 208 again.
Also, talk about why your vote on me isn't just what I said it was in 387-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 408, bji wrote:Secondarily, it's because you seem like a <redacted> and I don't like you.
This is really rude. I have responses to the rest of your stuff drafted, but I'm going to wait a while so that you can calm down.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
@bji
Oh, okay, this whole Silverwolf thing is about your views on meta.
I think in that instance, viewing meta as evidence was okay. I understand that you think that all meta is invalid or whatever, but you have to understand that not agreeing with you on that point doesn't indicate scumminess.
regarding 208, your line of reasoning goes like this:
1) Evilpacman would be fine with a Nickname lynch.
2) Evilpacman wants Nickname to be dead right now.
3) Evilpacman would hammer Nickname if he had the chance.
The link between 1 and 2 is what is wrong with your logic.
In post 408, bji wrote:At the time I put my vote on you it was primarily because I felt like your degree of participation was just enough to seem active without really doing anything, which made you a satisfactory place to put my vote since I am becoming suspicious of anyone with a certain degree of nonparticipation in this game given Dooku's arguments which I think make sense.
Yeah, but the Dooku arguments were based on the idea that scum would do a specific thing. You said "West will probably do that specific thing" and then voted for me.
In post 421, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 386, West9 wrote:I would vote bji, but this wagon has merit and seems like it'll be really fun to analyze tomorrow. VOTE: Nickname
Gross. You saw he was replacing out, right?
At the time I made that vote, no. I'm fine with my vote being on Ari, though. I'm doubtful that we're going to get a wagon that'll be as fun to analyze.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 438, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Is that why you're voting him?
Yep, pretty much. I do think there's a decent chance that he's scum, but I also think that we get some interesting stuff to look at regardless of the outcome of the flip, which I view as ideal for a D1 lynch. The Pisskop wagon, the weird votes the wagon has gotten, the statements of suspicion (accompanied by no votes) that Nickname got, the direct defenses from some people - there's a lot here already.
Ari, from what I can tell, most of your reads are based on the wagon that's on you? Would you call that a correct statement? Also I think I answered most of your questions with the response to Johnny above.
440 is helpful.
Oh hey Gliffie.
Johnny's opinions on BJI's newbiness has made me reconsider, or at least think harder about, BJI-scum. Trying to act all voice-of-reason-y is in line with what I usually consider to be townJohnny, so that's where I'm at with him right now.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 471, Aristophanes wrote:@West
Yes, I would agree that my post focused on the votes and voters who targeted myself/Nickname. I replaced into a spot at L-2 and felt that was the best place to start.
I am not trying to hide this in my post at all.
What do you gain from this?
Wasn't trying to imply that you were being deceptive. Just wanted to know what you reads are outside of that wagon. I asked the first question in case i missed something in your first post-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
I got prodded. Sorry bout that. I'm here now.In post 513, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Inactivity. Everybody tell me why their vote is better than P Brain
I think my 469 does this. What's your case on P-Brain again? Were 440 & 457 the "scummy things" you were waiting for?-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 536, pisskop wrote:Ari Wagon is good wagon.
. But where is the alternative? Not the counter wagon, the other scum who's wagoned.
confused about what this means.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 569, Gliffie wrote:@JohnnyandWest, could you please help me out with Ari meta (appeasy and whatnot)?)
"appeasy" sound Ari-like, yeah. Johnny should answer this question too though because my understand of Ari's meta isn't always the best.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 495, Aristophanes wrote:@Dooku
I think your push was scummy. Johnny agreed with me, btw, that the vote due to subbing was shitty. I'm not the only one.
I don't think it's smart or fun to try and get alignment clues from a person's decision to replace out. I don't see how it's scummy.
In post 575, bji wrote:I have failed horribly, several times already, it's in the thread history. I pushed on pisskop, and on evilpacman18, and perhaps most ludicrously of all, on West9.
How are you calculating failure? And I wasn't under the impression that you view your push on me to be ludicrous?
In post 559, bji wrote:Prolapsed Brain is looking like they might be a lynch candidate and I'd go along with that.
You still having these doubts?:
In post 551, bji wrote:I would like to vote for [Prolapsed Brain] but I don't want to just OMGUS vote, and I don't feel like just not liking his play is necessarily a good scum case against him.
In post 445, Gliffie wrote:West...Lots of dealings with bji, which are not very interesting.
My bji interactions had to have been more interesting than your last few posts. What are you trying to get out of this?-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
Silverwolf/bji: eh. this isn't really fun to read. I need a reader's digest version of 632. bji's cluelessness and Silverwolf's exaggeration seem real. That tells me little about alignment.
At face value, I super don't feel comfortable following VDA, PBrain, and bji into this wagon, so we should kill Ari instead.
In post 607, bji wrote:There has been some hypocrisy with people telling me that being anti-town is not the same thing has being scummy, and yet using basically that same reasoning themslves (Ari for example recently basically said that we should lynch Prolapsed Brain if he continues to be so anti-town).
anti-town is not the same as scummy. Ari is using this reasoning because he doesn't want to die and he thinks he can get people behind a PBrain vote. Kinda like he did with the whole "Dooku voting for Ari after Nickname replaced out" thing.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 663, bji wrote:In post 662, West9 wrote:I need a reader's digest version of 632.
It should take you less than 10 minutes to read. This is a FORUM game where READING is a prerequisite. I never understand when people complain about having to read in a game that is all about reading.
we have three days left. cut the fat and give me the core points.
??In post 664, bji wrote:Do you have reasons other than slandering players for not wanting to vote SilverWolf?
He made the vote in hopes of creating a counterwagon to himself. It's not "you shouldn't kill be because Prolapsed Brain is scum" it's "you should kill Prolapsed Brain because Prolapsed Brain isn't me."bji wrote:anti-town is not the same as scummy. Ari is using this reasoning because he doesn't want to die and he thinks he can get people behind a PBrain vote. Kinda like he did with the whole "Dooku voting for Ari after Nickname replaced out" thing.
Should Ari want to die?-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
EBWOP
In post 665, West9 wrote:He made the vote in hopes of creating a counterwagon to himself. It's not "you shouldn't killmebecause Prolapsed Brain is scum" it's "you should kill Prolapsed Brain because Prolapsed Brain isn't me."-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
ugh. I liked this wagon, too. UNVOTE:
789 is kind of a compelling point.
I agree that SW looked genuine but the fact that she replaced means to me that the exasperation was alignment-neutral
In post 820, Count Dooku wrote:In post 816, pisskop wrote:In post 788, Count Dooku wrote:I will not lynch the SW/Titus slot.
In post 815, Count Dooku wrote:To make it clear I didn't say that I didn't want to lynch her, because you may be scum.
mmhmmm
Is that a reak mmhmm because you understood me, or a sarcastic mmhmm, because you don't believe me?
How is pisskop's post here even remotely unclear.
In post 828, bji wrote:West9
...whereas the above have done so but are not participating in a meaningful way in this game, and have all done nothing lately. Probably I'm going to be told that I am naive/unfair, but I think people who have demonstrated that they have a thought process but choose not to use it are better lynch candidates that Prolapsed Brain.
Bitch, calm down. I got finals. Also welcome back to the game.
In post 847, Gliffie wrote:For the record, I've been neighborized by scum and I've been a scum neighborizer. Scum neighborizer isn't that outlandish. Would confirming the role make Ari more or less confirmed town for you, pisskop? I don't think it will. Ari lynch is still the best option, so my vote stays.
Ari, how many shots do you have?
In post 850, Gliffie wrote:http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/vXXP2L36YPX. This is the game where I was scum neighborizer. I don't think Cheetory knows about the other one.
funtimes-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
Not feeling the lurker quickwagons. Willing to follow pisskop into this. VOTE: Titus
My count says that's L-2
@Ari
@Dooku
In 872 I asked you guys questions that you have yet to respond to.
In post 878, bji wrote:If you had to choose between lynching a troll like Pea Brain or a lurker who can play but doesn't, which would you choose?
If I had to choose? Probably lurker. Would depend on situation.
But I don't have to choose between those two, soooo what is the purpose of this question?
In post 903, Titus wrote:Yeah. That's what I thinknow Ari but that scum!kop could have been hiding behind "joke" because if someone says joke they get away with scummy shit.
nahhhh he's not hiding anything scummy behind the joke. The post after the joke claim says "I shouldn't joke around like that."
Why now? For Tjoe or PB?-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 948, bji wrote:I am going to bet the game on SilverWolf's character. She cannot be scum because to be scum and replace out in that way would be unethical. SilverWolf is not unethical. Therefore she is not scum
I'd argue against this. Her frustration reads to me as alignment neutral, as did her replacement. It is possible for scum to actually get frustrated enough to want to replace out. ScumSW wanting out doesn't depend on her being unethical at all.
And I don't think that I've been contributing at an unreasonably or uncharacteristically low level.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
When I say that her frustration seemed alignment-neutral, I mean that she seemed frustrated with tone more than anything else.
Honestly, the more we talk about this, the more it seems like it's a difference in opinion about playstyle between us that is unlikely to be resolved.
@Cheetbji and I are doublevoters apparently?-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 961, bji wrote:When you come in as scum you already have a warrior attitude, knowing that you're one of the minority that the town majority is gunning for. When you come in as town, you do not have this mentality.
Generalizations like these really hinder your ability to persuade.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
I've been accused of being "casual" or "underwhelming" before.
haha this post maybe isn't the best example. The demand for an answer here is a wry joke.In post 987, Titus wrote:In post 102, West9 wrote:In post 44, bji wrote:I have a role claim to make: I'm a time travelling cop. My role allows me to receive the PM response to my investigation before I even ask it. Turns out I already got my Night 1 PM response, and apparently I had asked whether or not pisskip was scum. And the answer was that he is.
By the way, that was a joke
keep your day job
In post 77, bji wrote:JohnnyFarrar wrote:
and in this game there's a user called West. Fuck West.
Ah yeah, I forgot about him/am not used to the user names in this game yet. Why the animosity?
johnny i demand an answer to this
VOTE: bji
Don't like how the pisskop vote was snuck in there behind Victor's vote, and then surrounded by questions and joke-talk/clarificaitons
Second post. Demanding an aswer. Highlighting what he likes and doesn't.
bji, this is a small point but for someone who read my iso you seem to be purposefully ignoring 581. Also, speaking of demands, you refused my demand for a concise summary of your Silverwolf points.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
I think have to do this again.In post 984, bji wrote:As opposed to just giving up and saying that nothing is alignment indicative?
1) West doesn't think that the Silverwolf replacement stuff is alignment indicative
2) West doesn't think that anything is alignment indicative.
This is one hell of a jump.
My vote is where I want it to be. I'm fine that it's not on a wagon that I started.bji wrote:@West9: are you happy letting other people make wagons for you?
bji wrote:I am not ignoring it. Perhaps we have different ideas about what the phrase "feel free to X" means. I think it means, "you can do X if you want to, but you don't have to". I guess you think it means "you must do X"?
I honestly thought you just didn't read it. It seemed like a small request; I didn't really think that people would just read it and just go "nope. West9."
In post 991, bji wrote:Do you really want to revisit that? OK, if you demand it. I'll summarize post 632 for you.
The point is that you accused me of not playing while ignoring a thing that I asked you to do. If you didn't want to summarize the points, whatever, but you can't refuse to interact with me and then accuse me of not interacting with the game.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
Skimming thread. Seems like I need to re-ask this question before I read back:In post 872, West9 wrote:Ari, how many shots do you have?-
-
West9
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
Ah, forget about the name thing, bji. I was a dick for harping on it in the first place.
VOTE: EPM in the meantime while I wait for Ari.
bji wrote:I still believe that the interchange between SW and West9 where West9 voted SW, then asked for weak meta evidence, then SW gave it, then West9 unvoted based on that weak evidence, was fishy.
Ugh. This horseshit again. Clearly, me repeatedly telling you that not agreeing with you doesn't mean that I'm scum has not been effective. So, let me try to find some other way to talk to you about this.
You think that this exchange was planned out by scumSW and scumWest so that I could distance myself from scumSW. So, you assume that I went into that vote knowing that particular aspect of Silverwolf's meta. This whole chain of events is super unlikely, especially when you consider the number of games I've played on this site and the number of times I've played with Silverwolf before this game (if you researched my meta, you would find that the answer to these inquires are one and zero, respectively).
Also, you have to assume that Titus and I were scumbuddies, which is a hard theory to pair with my support of/jump onto the titus wagon at a time when I could have helped the PB/Tjoe lurker wagons gain momentum.
I unvoted for the reason I said I unvoted: Silverwolf provided meta-evidence for her read made me question whether or not my vote was any good. So I bailed on the vote.
bji wrote:Now we know SW was scum. Why would she have tried to dissuade me from associating West9 with her if West9 was town?
This is a pretty shallow interpretation of events. She was clearly trying to earn townpoints by giving advice to a newbie. Plus, why would she encourage a scumSW/scumWest associative read? Or, to get to the point, why would she want to encourage a scumSW read?
I wasn't even close to getting lynched in anyone's mind except for yours, bji, and if Silverwolf wanted to make a West/SW connection, she honestly could have done a lot more than disagree with you about playstyle things.-
-
West9 Goon
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
SORRY FOR THE NOTEWALL I HOPE THIS ISN'T TERRIBLE TO READ.
In post 1228, bji wrote:In post 1227, West9 wrote:I was about to say, why remove Gliffie?
I like Gliffie. Gliffie replaced Aero, who I also liked.
You should take a look at his iso. It reveals some pretty sketch interactions with Titus. A bunch of weird, waffle-y "Titus is bad but so is this wagon on her" things and some attempts to encourage a wagon swing towards PB and Ari. I wanted to look more into this after people told me about what they usually expected from scumtitus, but that didn't happen, so bleh.
In post 1239, evilpacman18 wrote:Prolapsed should've been playing enough to know that both Ari and SW were really unlikely to be scum.
huh?
In post 1239, evilpacman18 wrote:So we have a pretty limited pool of potential scum to complete a trio starring Titus and Prolapsed.
Shouldn't you be waiting for a flip before doing this?
With this post, EPM seems to be sort of just assuming that Prolapsed was scum with not conclusive evidence.
In post 1250, bji wrote:In post 1249, evilpacman18 wrote:I literally just posted the first of a series
I think you post may have been too long. Apparently if a post takes more than 10 seconds to read, no one wants to read it.
Man, it's so annoying that you say stuff like this when you and VDA make long and redundant posts about how long and redundant you both are being.
In post 1264, evilpacman18 wrote:Before I start, I wanted to point out that it occurs to me that there is probably a significant reason why SW's very frustrated freak out involved yelling at bji and Prolapsed in particular...[insert paragraph]
Reading into a freak-out that made her so frustrated that she decided to replace out doesn't seem like a helpful or fun thing to do.
In post 1264, evilpacman18 wrote:Gliffie's concern with the wagon reads as legitimate even though it's unfortunate as a defense of now-flipped scum.
You should elaborate on this.Random question that just popped into my head: bji, why do you like Gillfie again?
In post 1264, evilpacman18 wrote:the thing is bji seems always to work way too hard to be scum.
huh? p-edit: okay I guess bji knows what this means? This point is very lost on me.
In post 1265, Tjoe Min Ja wrote:
Thats barely explanation. I think you deserve more attention.
YAWWNNNNNNN how about you play the game instead of telling people how they should be playing the game.
In post 1270, bji wrote:And the two conclusions I could draw are that either SW is really unethical or that it's not unethical for scum to replace out in situations like that. I'm giving her the benefit of the doubt and assuming it's the latter.
it's the latter.
So, basically, evilpacman is setting up a Prolapsed/bji dichotomy? Based off of associated reads from Silverwolf's freakout? I don't like that at all. I'll leave my vote here, at least until Gliffieslot gets here.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 1280, West9 wrote:Random question that just popped into my head: bji, why do you like Gillfie again?
Whoops. This is a dumb question. Instead, you should comment on Gliffie's Titus interactions because I see them as being sketch.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
Pacman vote feels like it's doing nothing at this point. VOTE: Gliffieslot even though TMJ's definitely dying.
In post 1282, pisskop wrote:West, whats your opinion of Johnny and TJM?
Johnny is hitting the "Johnny is town" boxes for me. I should probably be a little more worried about that, but I haven't spent the time to look at him in-depth yet.
I'm not gonna cry over TMJ's death. I agree that it's the best lurker lynch, and right now is probably the best time for the best lurker lynch.
In post 1284, bji wrote:Also it was possibly weird that he encouraged me to make another shot at reads and said he'd be interested in them, and when those reads ended up being against SW he never said anything to me about them.
Ha! This is an awesome thing that you found that I missed. Putting it on the "gliffieslot is scum" billboard.
In post 1289, evilpacman18 wrote:west, did you not also find my response to Titus "waffle-y?" I mean I kinda soft defended her in a similar manner to Gliffie. I thought she was town. That's what I read in Gliffie's defense of Titus too. Sincerity about not liking the wagon.
I mean, your interactions of her aren't great, but Glffie's were worse. More defenses + more attempts to shift the wagon
Ugh. I know I'm sheeping pisskop hardcore, but whatever.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 1385, texcat wrote:You were defending her most of the day, right up until the time you voted her.
that's one hell of a stretch.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 952, West9 wrote:In post 948, bji wrote:I am going to bet the game on SilverWolf's character. She cannot be scum because to be scum and replace out in that way would be unethical. SilverWolf is not unethical. Therefore she is not scum
I'd argue against this. Her frustration reads to me as alignment neutral, as did her replacement. It is possible for scum to actually get frustrated enough to want to replace out. ScumSW wanting out doesn't depend on her being unethical at all.
And I don't think that I've been contributing at an unreasonably or uncharacteristically low level.
And this? You think this is a defense to?-
-
West9
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 1392, texcat wrote:It's awfully close. You say that it's alignment neutral.
Yeah, so that I could make the argument that Titus could still be scum.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
Egh. I was kinda thinking that this was one of those "newb-bji trying to back-up a scumread and in the process seeing every action that someone made in a scummy light" things again, but this is actually super gross. As is his ignoring of most of 1417.In post 1417, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Then comes post 915 (which I wil not quote here in the interests of brevity, please follow the link earlier in this sentence to read it), with reasons not so strong that I would call TMJ "obvious" scum.
Now you're concerned about brevity. The short post, where I made the case for a TMJ lynch is suddenly the one thing not worth quoting. The post I list my fucking reasons. No, fuck it. This was sort scumminess needs to die.
unvote, vote BJI
@texcat
In post 1399, West9 wrote:YAWWNNNNN hey let's get back to the part where you forgot to research context while trying to find dirt on me to add to your fabricated case and then misrepped my pushes against Titus as defenses of Silverwolf.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 1426, bji wrote:I'm not voting VDA, but I'm not backing down when he asks me why I found him suspicious.
But apparently backing down once he pokes some pretty significant holes in your case? Also, are we really already going to the past tense there
lololololol now texcat is trying to get others to make her scumWest case for her. Apparently avoiding her scummy error isn't enough?-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 1434, pisskop wrote:The Johnny kill was odd, but perhaps the scum was trying to eliminate more PRs.
Texcat came straight out of the gates pushing for a West lynch. Johnny would have been maybe the hardest person to get to support a West lynch. Therefore, Johnny needed to go.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
In post 1129, JohnnyFarrar wrote:West had several options for a vote here and chose to hop on a diminishing Titus wagon. Could be good foresight in bussing, looks more likely town to me.In post 1226, JohnnyFarrar wrote:West over Gliffie?In post 1175, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Gliffie, Why would a phantom SK kill Dooku? Why would you assume additional killing roles at this early juncture?In post 1178, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I mean I was setting the trap to say that and now you ruined it
*insert puffy cheek angry anime girl image*
At the very least, this stuff shows that Johnny would have been hesitant to a West lynch (the first one and maybe the second one) and relatively open to a Gliffieslot one (maybe the second one and the last two). Texcat needs people who are the opposite of that right now.-
-
West9 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 30, 2014
-
-
-
-
-
-