I'll lead the charge again then...
ABR tomorrow please, for the love of God...
I'm not going to explain it at length again.In post 2426, Morning Tweet wrote:@BM You only find me scummy because you think ABR is so confirmed scum that anyone defending him must be doing so disingenuously. I'm finding it increasingly pointless to try and debate with you
You allow your own tunnel vision on your ABR read and setup spec to shape the way you view the entire game. For example, my defense of ABR is somehow invalid because I townread him prior to having that reaction to you pushing him. I townread him before, i am still townreading him now. it makes sense to anyone who isnt currently locked into a deathtunnel
Now now nowIn post 2429, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Total capitulation. Pathetic.In post 2425, Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: BBMolla
I'll lead the charge again then...
ABR tomorrow please, for the love of God...
Don't worry, you ain't gonna make it anywhere close to endgame after today, so your time will come, thanks to me.In post 2432, Albert B. Rampage wrote:What? I thought he meant it when he said I was scum and wasn't changing his vote forever. I didn't know forever just meant 48h.In post 2430, Vecna wrote:bro....In post 2429, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Total capitulation. Pathetic.In post 2425, Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: BBMolla
I'll lead the charge again then...
ABR tomorrow please, for the love of God...
i'm specificallyIn post 2442, Morning Tweet wrote:(一ω一)In post 2440, Battle Mage wrote:MorningTweet, I didn't discredit you, you discredited yourself. I don't care about you beating this dead horse, everyone else has moved on. are you going to vote for somebody? or do anything besides be a cheerleader for ABR? I'll settle for the pretense of scumhunting.
you make me want to take a dozen naps
Spoiler: Beating a dead horse
All im doing is responding to you. why ask me why i think ABR is town or tell me you don't believe im being genuine, if you also feel like we're beating a dead horse? furthermore, i would never participate in an act of animal cruelty
dont try to make me feel like im dragging this issue on and on, and being so terribly useless just to get me on your new bandwagon. it's just sort of annoying at best
it is true we haven't had any other straight neighbour claimsIn post 2462, iDanyboy wrote:Has this been addressed, because I don’t see how a neighbour is a PR in a role madness game.In post 2065, SirCakez wrote:This game is confirmed Role Madness, there are no Vanilla Townies or Mafia Goons.
erm….momo was scumIn post 2465, Morning Tweet wrote:Considering momo role was neighbour, it's possibleIn post 2462, iDanyboy wrote:Has this been addressed, because I don’t see how a neighbour is a PR in a role madness game.In post 2065, SirCakez wrote:This game is confirmed Role Madness, there are no Vanilla Townies or Mafia Goons.
going to reread later but for now:
VOTE: Drixx
I've like, already done one. Several times. Have I not been clear about who I want to lynch today?In post 2499, Eddie Cane wrote:I'll get there when I'm not mobile posting later.In post 2498, Albert B. Rampage wrote:?In post 2497, Eddie Cane wrote:I'm surprised people aren't talking about the one actually scummy thing I've seen from ABR.
@BM, Drixx, MT, Molla
I would like a full reads list please. Explanations are a plus but at least town to scum.
In post 2507, Morning Tweet wrote:@Eddie Cane
-===================-Spoiler: Readslist
Spoiler: iDanySpoiler: davesazSpoiler: pisskopSpoiler: BBMollaSpoiler: DrixxSpoiler: Blake
Feel free to share it - I'm still keen to lynch scum today, although I may be the only one!In post 2503, Eddie Cane wrote:Nope.In post 2502, davesaz wrote:Is it the one where he manipulates people into sheeping him by threatening anyone who doesn't go along?In post 2497, Eddie Cane wrote:I'm surprised people aren't talking about the one actually scummy thing I've seen from ABR.
In post 2483, VaultDweller wrote:VOTE: BBMolla
You've gone for two of the easiest scumreads in the game
if so, she never said or indicated she thought she was scum, so my suspicion stands.In post 2512, Albert B. Rampage wrote:MT said from the start she didn't know how to read Blake. Never said Blake was town.In post 2509, Battle Mage wrote:MorningTweet has U-turned on her neighbour Blake Belladonna, who she earlier thought was probably town or something?
BBMolla? great, time to put the chips in! I'll take Pisskop as a compromise if absolutely necessary.In post 2469, Morning Tweet wrote:he's also dead, which confirms that neighbour is a possible role in this role madness game, thereby answering iDany's post. so.. yeahIn post 2468, Battle Mage wrote:erm….momo was scumIn post 2465, Morning Tweet wrote:Considering momo role was neighbour, it's possibleIn post 2462, iDanyboy wrote:Has this been addressed, because I don’t see how a neighbour is a PR in a role madness game.In post 2065, SirCakez wrote:This game is confirmed Role Madness, there are no Vanilla Townies or Mafia Goons.
going to reread later but for now:
VOTE: Drixx
If Drixx is scum, I'm considering this the fluke of the year, because there's nothing about his play which suggests we should be lynching him today.
your defense of drixx reminds me of something i could say to you about ABR. as I said i haven't really looked thru yet but my inital lynchpool is something like Drixx/dave/Blake/pisskop/BBMolla
Has ABR blacklisted you from the scumchat? Sorry, couldn't resistIn post 2518, BBmolla wrote:IF I HAD ONE
Ok dude, would you be up for lynching GuiltyLion instead?In post 2523, BBmolla wrote:Battle Mage I’m not scum
If I was scum, and ABR was town, I guarantee I'd have trapped him on Night 1. No scumteam wants a loud influential townie running the show. And the beauty of having night-kills is that you can get rid of people like that easily. So I think your assertion here is incredible.In post 2515, Morning Tweet wrote:1. No..?In post 2509, Battle Mage wrote:Main takeaways from this:
1. MorningTweet has U-turned on her neighbour Blake Belladonna, who she earlier thought was probably town or something? Not sure what has led to that, given Blake has barely posted? Could do with explanation.
2. I'm somehow less townie than VaultDweller?? Little bit harsh, given I'm the towniest townie of all.
3. Surprised at her view that "if ABR was town, someone on the scumteam would try to bring him down" when ABR has, so far, been untouched by any of the traps at night. Add it to the list of weak ABR defences which don't stack up.
Overall, pleasing to see some actual suspects here.
2. Sorry BM i still love you though <3
3. By bring him down I mean in thread, not at night. Sort of a baseless theory sure. I just have a sneaking suspicion that opposing ABR's leadership is something somebody on the scumteam would have to do at some point. I can see him as being easier to oppose in day rather than just killed at night
I think of being on a scumteam as being a power role, coz u get to do shit, innit?In post 2528, Morning Tweet wrote:"Scum" is an alignment. "Neighbour" is a role. The fact he was on the scumteam does not make his role somehow more special than a town neighbour.In post 2521, Battle Mage wrote:he's also dead, which confirms that neighbour is a possible role in this role madness game, thereby answering iDany's post. so.. yeah
your defense of drixx reminds me of something i could say to you about ABR. as I said i haven't really looked thru yet but my inital lynchpool is something like Drixx/dave/Blake/pisskop/BBMolla
BBMolla? great, time to put the chips in! I'll take Pisskop as a compromise if absolutely necessary.
I think you misunderstood my point about Momo - he wasn't a normal neighbour, he was ascumneighbour. So that is a "role" which is not a standard vanilla role. Clearly there are a couple of those in the game, so it seems obtuse to suggest the existence of scum in the hoods proves there must be vanilla town neighbours in the game. Personally, I don't buy it, and once again you've made a deduction which seems objectively unlikely and portrayed it as fact. This is not conduct which feels protown to me.
Momo's flip proves that neighbour is an acceptable role in this role madness.
ISO meIn post 2540, Eddie Cane wrote:You want to lynch ABR, and Molla, and apparently as of the newest page GL, and I believe you gave Pisskop and someone else as compromise lynches. I do not remember seeing a full reads list from you other than EoD1In post 2508, Battle Mage wrote:I've like, already done one. Several times. Have I not been clear about who I want to lynch today?
This is a misrepresentation, I've been clear on my view that I don't believe there are plain old town neighbours in the game. Conceptually there could be. But I don't think there is. So ABR would then be lying, duh.In post 2533, Morning Tweet wrote:I think BM is the one using that as evidence against ABRIn post 2531, BBmolla wrote:Just a reminder that this is the mods definition so a neighbor is perfectly acceptableIn post 2065, SirCakez wrote:This game is confirmed Role Madness, there are no Vanilla Townies or Mafia Goons.
ABR might be scum regardless of that but a case built on that is foolish
FOOOOLIOIISSHH
ABR hasn't been the most widely townread player at any point in the game. Except in your own mind.In post 2545, Morning Tweet wrote:ABR is like, the #1 person I'd expect to be protected. Do you always nightkill the most widely townread (or at least most influential) townie? I wouldn't.Battle Mage wrote:If I was scum, and ABR was town, I guarantee I'd have trapped him on Night 1. No scumteam wants a loud influential townie running the show. And the beauty of having night-kills is that you can get rid of people like that easily. So I think your assertion here is incredible.In post 2515, Morning Tweet wrote:1. No..?In post 2509, Battle Mage wrote:Main takeaways from this:
1. MorningTweet has U-turned on her neighbour Blake Belladonna, who she earlier thought was probably town or something? Not sure what has led to that, given Blake has barely posted? Could do with explanation.
2. I'm somehow less townie than VaultDweller?? Little bit harsh, given I'm the towniest townie of all.
3. Surprised at her view that "if ABR was town, someone on the scumteam would try to bring him down" when ABR has, so far, been untouched by any of the traps at night. Add it to the list of weak ABR defences which don't stack up.
Overall, pleasing to see some actual suspects here.
2. Sorry BM i still love you though <3
3. By bring him down I mean in thread, not at night. Sort of a baseless theory sure. I just have a sneaking suspicion that opposing ABR's leadership is something somebody on the scumteam would have to do at some point. I can see him as being easier to oppose in day rather than just killed at night
re: Blake - it would be helpful for you to explain why her not posting made you change your read on her to such a significant extent? You indicated her replacing out was suspicious, so maybe start there.
plus as we found out, ABR did get protected lmao
As scum I would probably avoid ABR n1, then shade him really hard d2 and onwards in order to make protectives second guess themselves, and then get him lynched (or possibly nightkill him if his reads are too accurate and people are still mostly trusting him)
Where are you getting the idea that Ievertrusted Blake? Not only that, but I said her replace out isn't something I want to focus on.
Pine was a double neighbour. His special ability was being in 2 hoods. Let's not go round in circles on this please.In post 2549, Morning Tweet wrote:Are you forgetting that Pine was a town neighbour?In post 2543, Battle Mage wrote:I think of being on a scumteam as being a power role, coz u get to do shit, innit?In post 2528, Morning Tweet wrote:"Scum" is an alignment. "Neighbour" is a role. The fact he was on the scumteam does not make his role somehow more special than a town neighbour.In post 2521, Battle Mage wrote:he's also dead, which confirms that neighbour is a possible role in this role madness game, thereby answering iDany's post. so.. yeah
your defense of drixx reminds me of something i could say to you about ABR. as I said i haven't really looked thru yet but my inital lynchpool is something like Drixx/dave/Blake/pisskop/BBMolla
BBMolla? great, time to put the chips in! I'll take Pisskop as a compromise if absolutely necessary.
I think you misunderstood my point about Momo - he wasn't a normal neighbour, he was ascumneighbour. So that is a "role" which is not a standard vanilla role. Clearly there are a couple of those in the game, so it seems obtuse to suggest the existence of scum in the hoods proves there must be vanilla town neighbours in the game. Personally, I don't buy it, and once again you've made a deduction which seems objectively unlikely and portrayed it as fact. This is not conduct which feels protown to me.
Momo's flip proves that neighbour is an acceptable role in this role madness.
Seriously though, the point is not whether it's conceptually possible to have a town neighbour, but whether you actually believe there is 1. I do not. You evidently do. But we are getting to a point where it becomes less and less likely as more and more claims come out.
Maybe we can cut to the chase - if ABR purported to be the only vanilla town neighbour in the entire game, would you believe him?
I would expect somewhere between maybe 1-3 town neighbours. It will not surprise me AT ALL if there is multiple. 75% of the game is in PTs.
It was fricking multi-coloured. gimme a break dude.In post 2547, Eddie Cane wrote:Quote it please, not seeing it.In post 2544, Battle Mage wrote:ISO meIn post 2540, Eddie Cane wrote:You want to lynch ABR, and Molla, and apparently as of the newest page GL, and I believe you gave Pisskop and someone else as compromise lynches. I do not remember seeing a full reads list from you other than EoD1In post 2508, Battle Mage wrote:I've like, already done one. Several times. Have I not been clear about who I want to lynch today?
Also, I remember you doing some in-depth setup spec about amount of scum per hood; I asked in my hood and they said there's no list of who's in it, could you quote that stuff again please? I'm I think its called police officer or FBI or w.e.
less likely to be scum. I'll do you a deal though - if you get a decent wagon on GuiltyLion, I'll join you on it. Otherwise, I'll continue to assume you're scumbuddies and just lynch youIn post 2529, BBmolla wrote:Why not Gamma or DannyIn post 2526, Battle Mage wrote:Ok dude, would you be up for lynching GuiltyLion instead?In post 2523, BBmolla wrote:Battle Mage I’m not scum
In post 2555, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Never give BM a break.
In post 2552, Albert B. Rampage wrote:That's it guys, if BM doesn't have you convinced with his superb scumhunting, I don't know what will. Only reason I'm not helping him vote the scum with a town neighbor role is because I have one too.
Somebody not getting enough attention?In post 2548, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Revolutionary.In post 2546, Battle Mage wrote:This is a misrepresentation, I've been clear on my view that I don't believe there are plain old town neighbours in the game. Conceptually there could be. But I don't think there is. So ABR would then be lying, duh.In post 2533, Morning Tweet wrote:I think BM is the one using that as evidence against ABRIn post 2531, BBmolla wrote:Just a reminder that this is the mods definition so a neighbor is perfectly acceptableIn post 2065, SirCakez wrote:This game is confirmed Role Madness, there are no Vanilla Townies or Mafia Goons.
ABR might be scum regardless of that but a case built on that is foolish
FOOOOLIOIISSHH
I think BM just cracked this game wide open guys.
vote BBmollaIn post 2558, Eddie Cane wrote:I don't want to vote you, I think you're town.
I didn't say "you wouldn't do that as scum, because you're not doing it here". Regrettably, you have misinterpreted me once again.In post 2559, Morning Tweet wrote:What kind of reasoning is "You wouldn't do that as scum, because you're not doing it here."In post 2550, Battle Mage wrote:ABR hasn't been the most widely townread player at any point in the game. Except in your own mind.
Influential, absolutely. But I don't buy that he wasn't hit because he was protected, we've had loads of traps each night, you don't think there could have been MORE surely?? Again, this stretches credulity.
And I don't believe for a second you would employ that strategy as scum, from what I've seen of your play here.
ABR was the most prominent, loud players on day one, in my opinion. He had a decent town backing. Plus, you and him seem to have driven up a scum lynch. The game was feeling pretty good about him at that point in time.
It is not a reach to expect that they didn't try to NK him and instead shade him the next day so he'd either be easier to kill, or potentially set up for a mislynch later. Yeah it's still possible ABR is scum, but you are letting yourself be absolutely consumed by your setup spec and NK analysis like that mechanically confirms him. i can't take you seriously like this
Mathematically, we have more chance hitting scum with BBMolla. And you'll note ABR scum has been keen to lynch pretty much anyone today, except BBMolla.In post 2567, Eddie Cane wrote:I think Dany is more likely to be scum, Molla is not a town read but Dany is actively scummy.In post 2562, Battle Mage wrote:vote BBmollaIn post 2558, Eddie Cane wrote:I don't want to vote you, I think you're town.
I'm confident. I think if I was wrong, at least 1 scum would have leapt on it. But the only way to find out is to try, and I'm a big fan of giving town the best chance to win.In post 2563, Morning Tweet wrote:you do not know this. this is coming entirely from your setup spec. try reading the game outside of it and see what comes of itIn post 2553, Battle Mage wrote:It was fricking multi-coloured. gimme a break dude.
there's only 1 scum in your hood, don't think it's you.
you should know your own hood flavour from your role pm.
scum is ABR, 2 of (BBMolla, GuiltyLion, Pisskop), and 1 from your hood (probably Danyboy)
I suppose in the vain hope you stop digging that hole for yourself.In post 2573, Morning Tweet wrote:why do you keep commenting on my ABR read if you don't want to hear about it? seriously dudeee (*ノω-)
In post 2751, Morning Tweet wrote:you could just mention the people you do have an opinion on. I'm unsure who to ask about.In post 2749, Drixx wrote:You apparently missed the part where I said use a sniper rifle instead of a shotgun. In other words: ask for a specific person instead of all people.In post 2747, Morning Tweet wrote:you arent the only person im considering voting for. im voting you in the hopes that either you're scum, or the lynch pressure makes you want to contribute and show you're townIn post 2742, Drixx wrote:Yeah we're just past the point where the effort is worth it. Sorry to be so blunt. I could spend all night reading and make all sorts of notes and I'm still on the list of people the scum hope to mislynch. If I'm eating a lynch then I'd rather do it while there's a chance it doesn't end the game in a scum win.In post 2695, Vecna wrote:if you want people to stop scumreading you, do stuff worth townreading?
Just sitting there indignant is doing nothing to help your case buddy
you passed on even giving a readslist. What am I supposed to think? Also even if you're town and get mislynched, we can look back at your input in a new townie light
I'd like to hear more about your evaluation on Battle Mage. You said you got super duper scum vibes on him. You likened him to a blind squirrel (good one btw). Why'd you find that to be scum-indicative for him?
Or if that wasn't the scum-indicative bit, what was?
In post 2753, Morning Tweet wrote:well you're not wrong
Have you found anyone besides BM scummy? Like if you had to do a top three or four lynchpool, who'd be in it
lovely thanks guysIn post 2752, Drixx wrote:BM appears to be trying to drive the game but doesn't appear to actually be applying much rational thought to it. Literally the entirety of BM's "pushes" have been wildly speculative.
it's a mechanics heavy game? Can you try telling that to...ok pretty much everybody?In post 2830, Bingle wrote:Additionally, he’s a member of my hood which has a flipped cop, a cop claim that can only target in hood, an innocent by cop and an innocent by friendly neighbor adjacent role. Assuming my role isn’t a red herring for town, there should be at least one non jigsaw scum in the hood. The other options in that hood are me EC and drixx.In post 2828, Eddie Cane wrote:A lot of people are townie and he is hard null, which makes him more likely scum. I also like who I'm voting with.In post 2816, VaultDweller wrote:Can anyone, preferably the naked votes, tell me why davesaz is scummy?
I also don’t like that he’s been very mechanics lite in a mechanics heavy game when he’s a self professed mechanically oriented player.
Hey, nobody's perfect! 1/2 is not bad and would have been 2/3 by now if we'd got you over the line.In post 2791, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're also the only person that lead an unquestioned mislynch on xtoxm day 2. You lost all of your credibility.In post 2789, Battle Mage wrote:I should add that, despite the fact I apparently have no credibility and am just getting buried by everyone... 112 pages into the game, I'm the only individual who has actually successfully identified and lynched scum (based on the most rudimentary scumhunting). So if my cases have been "wildly speculative", I can't imagine what folk like Drixx and MorningTweet have been smoking.
But please, continue to ridicule me, and pat yourselves on the back for your excellent results so far...
I think we should get things straight at the outset - if you've got things to "push me on" you're barking up the wrong tree, as I'm not a suspect. I don't think there's any scenario in which I'm a viable lynch today, given my play and attitude so far, the fact I led a scumlynch on Day 1 from nowhere, the fact I got targeted by scum Night 1, and the fact that my 4 person hood has already flipped 1 scum (which everyone else seems to think makes me town - although I disagree completely with the logic!). Am I confirmed town? No, but I'm pretty much the towniest town you can get without being actually confirmed. Do I massively care if I do get lynched for some reason? Not really, as long as when I flip town, people actually smell the coffee and lynch ABR-scum.In post 2797, Eddie Cane wrote:He's had the Drixx town read since here, with their only interaction before being Drixx pushing him (idk the details didnt read this part of the game), and Drixx had the worst popin during BM vs ABR. I want him to explain why he has it maintained the whole game.In post 1106, Battle Mage wrote:Almost50 is TOWN - meta
Drixx is TOWN - open post reveal of hood, and subsequent near-obsession with hood, as well as general inquisitive tone reads strongly town.
Blake Belladonna is PROBABLY TOWN - meta
Gamma Emerald is TOWN LEAN - marginal, but townie vibes from ISO so far.
Remaining suspects:
Pine*
momo*
Morning Tweet
Elsa Jay
VaultDweller
Vecna
Hectic
iDanyboy
GeorgeBailey
davesaz
farside22
BBmolla
GuiltyLion
pisskop
Albert B. Rampage
xtoxm
On the BM note I also had a few other things to push him on but it's been radio silence.
MT is not even close to a universal townread. The only reason anyone would think MT is town is because she is in a hood which probably doesn't have any scum (which to me, counts for something). In terms of play, she has been as scummy as anybody still living with the exception of ABR.In post 2770, GuiltyLion wrote:Eddie if you feel strongly that Ank slot is town or at least the wrong lynch today, I can defer to you on that since tbh your assessment of her meta/playstyle feels more nuanced and built off a lot more experience than I have with her. I think I'm just struggling to see a lot of clear scum candidates here if Bingle claim is legit. I definitely do not want ABR today, but trying to hit right between Bingle/Drixx/Blake feels like a crapshoot especially since two of the players can't really justify or explain their predecessors play.
What do you think of Bingle discreding MT as a universal townread? Is that scum just trying to have a nice 'against the grain' fake read to try to sound original or is that likely to be genuine?
In post 2790, Eddie Cane wrote:Do you intend to respond to me?
In post 2793, Eddie Cane wrote:It is so frustrating to have no player willing to engage live, cant call people scummy dodging it if everyone does....
In post 2795, Eddie Cane wrote:BM's town read of Drixx, which seems like nonsense, is my current flavor.
This is what is eating you up inside? Me thinking Drixx was town, 30 something pages ago?In post 2799, Eddie Cane wrote:I'm not pushing Drixx with that post, though I dont see how pushing Drixx would be unwise.
VOTE: guiltylionIn post 2836, Ircher wrote:No they aren't.In post 2818, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Stop voting Dave. Bingle or Firebringer are far better lynches.
VOTE: GuiltyLion
saying "please explain" when you know I've already explained, at length, over the course of numerous posts, is lame. You're better than that. You're probably the smartest dude in this game. The post above isn't the best illustration of it, and targeting me just because I'm voting for you is pretty cheap.In post 2839, GuiltyLion wrote:... which game are you reading, lmaoIn post 2834, Battle Mage wrote:In terms of play, she has been as scummy as anybody still living with the exception of ABR.
please explain what MT has done that is scum-indicative
I'm just desperate to lynch someone who actually has a decent chance of being scum today, and gives us a foundation to work with tomorrow.In post 2841, GuiltyLion wrote:also, me becoming a sudden counter wagon to Dave is interesting and makes me feel more confident that Dave is scum
It's not my job to go back and quote my own posts for you, it's your job to read them, as you are very capable of doing.In post 2844, GuiltyLion wrote:quote the posts then if you've already explained it, because I don't remember you ever making a good case for scum!MTIn post 2842, Battle Mage wrote:saying "please explain" when you know I've already explained, at length, over the course of numerous posts, is lame. You're better than that. You're probably the smartest dude in this game. The post above isn't the best illustration of it, and targeting me just because I'm voting for you is pretty cheap.
it's not a personal reflection on you at all fella! You've played great here, and I'm certainly not planning to go and make some elaborate case against you, because that sort of thing ain't gonna fly in this game anyway. But I think you might be scum, and that's all there is to it.In post 2846, GuiltyLion wrote:why me instead of Dave
I think in the most neutral objective sense, you should agree he is more likely to be scum than I am
Because if GuiltyLion flips town, you could be lynched tomorrow? A surprisingly honest perspective, but I welcome it.In post 2848, Morning Tweet wrote:Okay well now i'm feeling better about voting dave
I don't know if you remember, but we lynched Momo on Day 1 for little slips like these?In post 2850, Morning Tweet wrote:BM I'd almost prefer you forget your flavour-mechanical solve and push me, cause i'mgenuinelycurious why i'm nearly as scummy as ABR to you
All i know is that you dislike that i mostly just get townreads instead of scumreads + my defense of ABR is 'exceptionally scummy'
It wasn't too long ago you declared it had already been proven false, but it's pleasing to see you backtrack here. Won't be long until you're in the palm of my hand!In post 2853, Morning Tweet wrote:Oh i guess i can save the anticipation of you coming after me for after your solve is proven false, then
….acting scummy doesn't necessarily mean you are scum. If this is really where we're at, I'm off to sleep.In post 2854, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 2842, Battle Mage wrote:saying "please explain" when you knowIn post 2839, GuiltyLion wrote:... which game are you reading, lmaoIn post 2834, Battle Mage wrote:In terms of play, she has been as scummy as anybody still living with the exception of ABR.
please explain what MT has done that is scum-indicative. You're better than that. You're probably the smartest dude in this game. The post above isn't the best illustration of it, and targeting me just because I'm voting for you is pretty cheap.I've already explained, at length, over the course of numerous posts, is lameIn post 2847, Battle Mage wrote:It's not my job to go back and quote my own posts for you, it's your job to read them, as you are very capable of doing.In post 2844, GuiltyLion wrote:quote the posts then if you've already explained it, because I don't remember you ever making a good case for scum!MTIn post 2842, Battle Mage wrote:saying "please explain" when you know I've already explained, at length, over the course of numerous posts, is lame. You're better than that. You're probably the smartest dude in this game. The post above isn't the best illustration of it, and targeting me just because I'm voting for you is pretty cheap.
because I don't think the FBI hood has scum in it. I can't imagine how anyone else who is actually reading the game could come to the conclusion MT is town...And I never made a case for "scum!MT" as such - as I clearly said in my post which you originally responded to, I said MT's play has been exceptionally scummy, but I don't think she's scum
If my mechanic solve turns out to be completely wrong, I expect MT to be a pretty high priority lynch, but we're a little ways off that.
so I ask you to explain why you think MT is scum
you say I need to just read your posts where you've explained it at length
I ask you to quote these posts
then you say you never actually made a case for MT as scum explicitly and you think MT is town mechanically
so what were you even on about when you responded to my first question by saying that you already explained"at length"why MT is scummy when you don't even claim she's scum now?
10,000 is an exaggeration. If you were town, would you find it so difficult to be honest, and not resort to hyperbole?In post 2857, Morning Tweet wrote:i hope the 10,000 shades you've made on me over the course of this game don't factor into your case. they're quite weakIn post 2855, Battle Mage wrote:It wasn't too long ago you declared it had already been proven false, but it's pleasing to see you backtrack here. Won't be long until you're in the palm of my hand!In post 2853, Morning Tweet wrote:Oh i guess i can save the anticipation of you coming after me for after your solve is proven false, then
You don't seem to think it's proven false. A disfavourable flip would prove it false in your eyes, yes? do you even try to interpret things i say as anything other than scummy?
and you still haven't answered the emoji question. im getting grumpy about it >:(
I wouldn't waste your time - I solved the game like 30 pages ago, and it didn't make a lick of differenceIn post 2890, Vecna wrote:I really want to solve this game, but theres just nothing to really work with here.
All that we can do is make weak ass assumptions based on the little that like 6 slots have given us
A couple things:In post 2887, davesaz wrote:FTFY. Day 1 went from about L-4 to hammer while I was sleeping IIRC.
Day 2 started and ended without me even getting a chance to read. I want to scumread BM over that but it seemed like a perfectly reasonable case when I skimmed it. Today BM vs ABR turned me off completely. I hate 1v1s. I hate voting claimed PRs. I don't have any mechanical results that are +town to reveal.
On the contrary, I'd suggest resolving your neighbourhood is literally the least important thing for this day phase, given it's the largest pool and it's not obvious that it has a higher proportion of scum than any other pool. So lynching in your hood is "dumb" to use your words.In post 2870, Bingle wrote:TBC, I'm not really townreading either of them, I just think resolving my neighborhood is literally the most important thing for this day phase and lynching outside of it is dumb.
I doubt the mod puts me in a neighborhood with another cop where I can't get any guilties. The living non inno'd people in my hood are BINGLE DRIXX EC DAVE.
Of those, Dave is the only one I don't think is town.
In post 2732, pisskop wrote:Please dont judge Fire based on his 'content' or 'contributions'
In post 1179, pisskop wrote:idk, but I was just about to come in and say I was sorry for not reading the last . . . 12 or so pages when an egosearch turns this up.In post 1175, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wait did people change their minds and decide to out hoods fully now?
In other news, could somebody please post a list of everyone who has claimed, and what they claimed? If not, I'll do it myself later when I have time.In post 2871, pisskop wrote:I have to give this a read. Im sorry guys
...You literally quoted me in the post aboveIn post 2906, Bingle wrote:There are 4 living people who have not had innocent results on them in said hood. One of them is me. I am townreading 2 of them. 3/4 of them are highly proficient mafia players. I'm literally counting on there being 1-2 scum in that neighborhood.In post 2897, Battle Mage wrote:if there is a cop who can only investigate in their own hood, which has only 7 other people to start, does anyone really think there are more than 2 scum there? It's probably more like 1, otherwise it's a pretty powerful role in a game which is already chock-full of town PRs.
Just a hot take, as I do need a re-read to get to grips with who has claimed what...
Go ahead and tell me again why this isn't a good place to spend our energy?
You know you've messed up when even ABR won't back your BM vote.In post 2951, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Dude...no...I don't see what advantage BM has of turning on me day 3 when I 100% townread him.
3 scum in a 4 person hood? That is wacky dude...In post 2943, VaultDweller wrote:Why? The more I read the game the more this feels plausibleIn post 2913, Morning Tweet wrote:If ABR and BM are scum together i'd lose my shit