probably not any longer~In post 12, Korina wrote:Is that also suppose to be a reaction test?
@Pinturicchio show me you're town so we can co-author wild conspiracy theories.
VOTE: Pinturicchio
probably not any longer~In post 12, Korina wrote:Is that also suppose to be a reaction test?
Korina - I believe Korina "joined in." The way he gets into the act does not feel staged. His different imaginations for their "plan" vs Fumuki's doesn't feel coordinated.In post 112, the worst wrote:Why KorinaIn post 94, Oxy wrote:@mutantdevle Where did Quick claim scum?
Initial town reads: korina, alonzo, fumuki
I agree,in theory, on policy lynching the scum claimers. I would rather win the game, though.
Why Alonzo
Why Fumuki
Why do you agree with that policy
I like other things you are doing, but this is a terrible nickname for Sordicchio. =(In post 167, the worst wrote:Elaborate, pintchorizo?
Why did you say this?In post 103, ceejayvinoya wrote:And I don't believe someone would attempt a slayers this early in the day.
Have you played games on another site?In post 246, ceejayvinoya wrote: I think its suicide and the guy trying to do it will end up getting lynched. I haven't played enough games to see it actually work.
^snipped for vertical space. There are at least two of these info posts about this topic by The Worst so far. To those of you who know the duckling, is he usually so darn helpful as either alignment?In post 186, the worst wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... 27s_Gambit
Be careful with that shit Fumuki, it's an ok place to start but has a knack of -- as I said earlier -- sorting playstyles rather than sort alignments.
Hey, chin up little guy.In post 187, Fumuki wrote:@Oxy .... "I especially like the very last bit" hurt me a little...
Uh...I didn't thought I utterly sucked at it....*sniff*
I read every word of this.In post 211, Quick wrote:Many words
0 games with fumuki plus I don't find a meta reason to scumread, and I would town lean him. (like i said in the line about him)In post 291, Quick wrote:OK, so based on these "conditions" how would you read them
Nah. I thought the post had already been responded to, and have interrupted enough. Let them have their interaction.In post 293, the worst wrote:If you had to guess what Quick wanted to achieve with this post, what would your guess be?In post 265, Oxy wrote:I read every word of this.In post 211, Quick wrote:Many words
What were you hoping to achieve with this post?
I'm enjoying talking to you btw
No, I think I'm probably going to bed soon. Maybe tomorrow. =)In post 301, the worst wrote:Quick Oxy is scum before poignantchips here imo, want to vote him with me?
Just haven't gotten around to it yet, so it is not factored in.In post 320, Sando wrote:You disagree with the meta read, or just not a big meta read kinda guy?In post 267, Oxy wrote:sando - He and I independently arrived at the same conclusion about mutantdevle, at least until Sando did the meta read through
It's a light town read based on him getting drunk and memeing and having fun in his game on his birthday. There are no statistics about the correlation between getting drunk, getting older, and having fun in one's mafia game and ones alignment, but I have a hunch it comes from town more often than scum. This is probably my softest read, but I see no reason for it to change over a period of time in which alonzo hasn't posted.In post 342, mutantdevle wrote:Can you explain why you town lean Alonzo despite him posting essentially entirely shitposts? I can hazard a guess at your reasoning but I want to see if that's what you see.In post 267, Oxy wrote:Alonzo - no change
This is not the game of scum!fumuki claiming scumIn post 372, Korina wrote:In post 267, Oxy wrote:
Strong town read
fumuki-I know he claimed scum, but this guy is obv!town.
town reads (less light, not strong)
vivi - reasons
Wut even is this? What am I reading? This isn't RVS, this is the serious phase. Please explain everything you mean by this right now. I don't even know where to start on this.
sorry for ambiguity =)In post 389, Quick wrote:Why is CJ Town?
The answer, while directed at you, wasn't actually meant for you either. ;PIn post 394, Quick wrote:Wasn't asking you???
Yeah, still null. Could you point me to the posts that make you think he's town?In post 397, ceejayvinoya wrote:Yay fellow FF fans! You all get bonus townlean points
Kidding aside,@Oxyis duckling still null to you? So far I think he's pretty helpful for town.
@sando same question to you. =)In post 399, Oxy wrote:Yeah, still null. Could you point me to the posts that make you think he's town?In post 397, ceejayvinoya wrote:Yay fellow FF fans! You all get bonus townlean points
Kidding aside,@Oxyis duckling still null to you? So far I think he's pretty helpful for town.
Answered this already above.In post 409, Sando wrote:114 is probably the first strong townread of the game.
165 is a strong push against a quick wagon who had one of his townreads already on it, this is what I'm getting at with anti-groupthink
His clarity and laissez faire attitude don't really have any specific post, it's more of a trend than any particular post.
I'm gonna leave it there, Oxy what are you trying to gain through this interaction?
Reading through Duckling Iso, I realize I misread this, lol. I thought you wanted me to vote Quick, and not the reverse.In post 306, Oxy wrote:No, I think I'm probably going to bed soon. Maybe tomorrow. =)In post 301, the worst wrote:Quick Oxy is scum before poignantchips here imo, want to vote him with me?
I'm sorry. It's difficult to build conclusions from questions until people answer them.In post 417, Sando wrote:Got any conclusions there or are we just gonna keep playing the questions game and pretend you're contributing content?
This is bunk becauseIn post 417, Sando wrote:No I'm saying a confident town-read early in the game is anti-scum. Scum don't want to clear people, and they don't want to put a spotlight on their scumpartners, the easiest and simplest way to do this is to say little of note about them. One of the hardest and probably most dangerous for scum ways to do this is to give confident townreads.In post 411, Oxy wrote:So you're town reading him for giving a town read without explanation in a confident fashion?
And this is bunk because the vote was based on a potential town slip being misunderstood to be a scum slip (or a reaction test, w/e) and the only reasonable view from either alignment is that the vote was bad.Sando wrote:165 is a strong push against a quick wagon who had one of his townreads already on it, this is what I'm getting at with anti-groupthink
You want to talk about my not having sorted you yet?In post 426, the worst wrote:Oof...IV is my favourite. Guess I'm foreveralone.
I'll have a better read of Oxy when he talks to me (if he isnt scared of me. ). Pardon me for being dismissive but any case or explanation I give now would be lacking compared to one I can give shortly.
here's a stanceIn post 373, Oxy wrote:This is not the game of scum!fumuki claiming scum
claiming slayers
Executing the switch from trolly posts to more serious posts, back to a middle ground in an emotionally and tonally manner consistent with town.
Have strong reads - You're too confident in your reads! You must be scum because only they could be that confidentIn post 437, the worst wrote:See thats a big problem. I notice you've got townreads/leans on a number of players, but it feels like every reason you give comes with a reason you could be wrong. This is a scummy behaviour. It indicates avoiding accountability which comes from a survival>gamesolving mindset.