In post 528, Taly wrote:
1) the worst
, what are your reads at the moment? A quick look through your ISO and I see a lot of responses and some fluffy posts. What do you think of
Ausuka
at the moment, in retrospect to your vote on her
276 - and what about
Almost50
gives you townvibes?
I'll quote this so it sticks into your memory.
I'd also like to know why you'd want to lynch
mutant
, I still don't fully see the scumreads on him?
Mathdino wrote:- ALL scumhunting is luck. Using calculations based on empirical evidence is no different. I show my work when appropriate.
If someone's draft number makes them 15% more likely to be scum, how is that any different from the tone of someone's post making them 15% more likely to be scum?
How do you deduce percentages of someone being scum FROM RANDOMIZED NUMBERS?
You're completely ignoring any information that someone can use to detect someone as scum or town that DOESN'T come from mathematical probabilities or subsets from numbers. Simplying scumhunting as complete luck is a DIRECT simplification of a subjective game. Right now, you're coming to me based off semantics and not off the idea of trying to UNDERSTAND something in a subjective realm where we can communicate our ideas.
This mentality does little to nothing in helping someone see your point of view in this game.
Mathdino wrote:- Your Ircher townread is based off of agreeing that you don't like my shit
Stopping you right here, because you're wrong.
I never said that the setup spec was inherently wrong to do; I stated that there's no practical reason for discussing it off NO defined information.
Me Saying-
"I don't like what
Mathdino's
doing here"
and
"I don't see the point of what
Mathdino's
doing at the moment, and I agree with this other person's approach"
ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
Reread my post.
Mathdino wrote:and on the notion that effort is alignment-indicative.
And instead of trying to UNDERSTAND my townread, you're minimizing MY OPINION.
- Did I say I townread Ircher because of effort?
Yeah, to a degree.
- Did I say that that was the SOLE reason I townread him because of effort?
Fucking no. I saw no scum-motivation from the depth within his reads and he wasn't using his developed reads as a source to create WIFOM or unnecessarily scumread or townread someone WITHOUT REASON.
Mathdino wrote:Ircher is doing nothing to move the game forward or to push his agenda.
I disagree, he's provides tons of content to look at later in the game when flips have been discovered.
But I do agree in the fact that he doesn't have an agenda... because what the fuck agenda would town need in this game other than townhunt and scumhunt?
Mathdino wrote:His reads list reads to me like he wanted to dump a massive amount of effort while under pressure to get one or two suckers off his back.
This sounds extremely overconfident and highly tunnel-minded.
You're making the assumption that someone ENGAGING with the people suspecting them are coming from a scum mentality?
What the hell are you hoping to figure out by pushing
Ircher
with this mentality?
Another thing is, I REPLIED with a better elaboration of my Ircher townread in the first place. If you disagreed with me, you could ask me questions on my explanations or put up a case LIKE I WAS PRODDING PEOPLE TO DO.
Mathdino wrote:- There are certain people that are straight up bad lynches for a variety of reasons. Confidence in a scumread doesn't mean I'm willing to take the gamble of lynching them. Lynching an A50 who I think is scum with, say, >40% confidence (which is about the threshold it takes for me to lynch someone) is high-risk low-reward. Scum A50 is not difficult to lynch and only has as much influence as town gives him.
This still doesn't give any game evidence or intrinsic reasoning behind why you wouldn't pursue a confident scumread.
Are you genuinely looking at other people to find more general confidence in your reads, or are you unsure of Almost50? I don't understand your thought process here.
Mathdino wrote:- I can't think of anything to say or ask to you that would harden a read. Your posting style is easy to hide behind as scum. It's difficult to gauge the sincerity. I need associatives and flips for you. Kind of like A50 actually.
If you can't figure out anything to say or ask me, then ISO me until you do. It's really not that difficult from my perspective.
Or just keep engaging with me like this and hopefully I don't rip my hair out. I elaborated on my townread, and I'm not fond with the way you tried deconstruct one of the few reasoned townreads on
Ircher
.
And I'm taking this a step further and saying that I think
Ircher
could be town because there's literally NOBODY from what I've been reading the past few pages - correct me if I'm wrong - that's actually trying to assess the points of any case against him outside of agreeing or taking a neutral stance.
And I'm guessing you're not certain of your
Almost50
read?
...