In post 1918, Succinct wrote:Additional clarification:
The Persivul posts I'm sheeping are
282,
285,
323/
328,
360/
401 (the premature claim is scummy particularly given it's an Angel),
372/
384/
385/
394,
398 (incredibly valid point),
408/
411/
429 (when do we lynch the Angel claim if not now?),
416,
426/
433,
427,
437/
448 (today
is
the day before xylo),
449 (Angel isn't a role which should be claimed, least of all prematurely),
452 (Persivul advocated for Lamees's death D2),
454,
503 (what was Lamees going to claim, Doctor? That's a worse claim because it requires proof whereas Angel does not),
786,
791 (that mess goes to endgame unless dealt with today),
870, and
889 (leaving Angel alive is useless because Angel is never getting NKd).
I highly recommend reading them, as he was rather on-point; scum must have killed him for a reason not role-related because Persivul near as I can tell left absolutely no breadcrumbs at all. No breadcrumbs, not killed for role, must have been killed for reason other than role. Was Persivul considered widely obvtown? I genuinely don't know as I am a replacement, but if the answer is no, then process of elimination: not killed because he bled town, not killed because he bled PR, must have been killed because of his reads.