Open 757: Panic Room!
-
-
High Risk Gamble
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Were you expecting a game solve from me with it? Or would you just appreciate I say, "this name sounds scummy" with the vote? Does a comment as irrelevant as that help with not being a 'lazy' vote.In post 36, ejjinami wrote:
yeah, I doIn post 35, High Risk Gamble wrote:I think the question is do you have an issue with it?
it's lazy
I can understand all of those who posted random votes at the beginning, but people (I) have beenshitpostingposting stuff, that might be slightly more informative than RNG, yet you decided to just ignore it and passively wait till someone else does the job for you
I feel ignored
If you feel ignored, you should try and change what your doing, unless that's your actual goal here?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
The impression you have on me from my 1st post is irrelevant to me. I'm looking for scum, I'm not here to entertain individual players.In post 37, ejjinami wrote:from experience I can tell that is isn't AI all that often, but I'd say my first impression of you isn't very good-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I'm not going to shit post, but you do you.In post 38, ejjinami wrote:You have 2 choices rn, either shitpost with me, or scum-read me
The other players haven't done anything till now, so choosing to do anything else is not allowed-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
If you declare it's only for pressure, then the pressure doesn't exist.In post 46, rosterfoster wrote:Do you think he'd post more if we voted him?
Maybe it would convince him to vote you.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I just don't have a sense of humour therefore I'm ignore the typical day 1 jokes, even more so with this player list. I'm not against it, knock yourself out, I'm just not participating.In post 51, ejjinami wrote:yeah. I was, lol
you completely ignored all of the posts which "could" be considered jokes, which I think should mean that you wanted to skip it and get so scum-reading as soon as possible
if so, I find your choice of action suboptimal
Yes, writing "XXX is scummy" would have been more helpful imo.
and if your vote was based on a real read, do you mind elaborating on it?
My vote wasn't based on a real read. I was calculating to what kind of reaction I was looking for. I was considering a vote on you while you were self voting to see the response of opportunist, but given it was you self voting it weakens the reaction.
I wanted to see how Orfhz acted on a my vote there, but that's irrelevant now.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I know every player here.In post 56, ejjinami wrote:/shrug, ok, I guess
I'm still self-voting btw
do you know anyone else here?
I think I've seen roster play before, but that should be it....
if you don't have anything else to do, I don't really mind you filling me in, or sth
I'm not using meta in regards of reads on this account though, so it's going to be purely how everyone plays in this game.
There's not a rush to do things, but at least it's some sort of progression from you.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Do you actually believe the claim?
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
If fumuki, yes.In post 62, Lawliett wrote:does that include me?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Unless I'm reading wrong, lynching the bomb day 1 means scum win?In post 66, Lawliett wrote:i think there is the possibility of being scum theatre
it is a good vote for now and i`ll try to look up how ejjinami plays afterwards-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Okay I mis understood it then and thought it meant PT's in general.In post 69, Lawliett wrote:no?
it kills everyone out of the neighbourhood and that includes the mafiosos?
since in day 1 only town is inside the neighbourhood (town recruiter, town recruit), i imagine we instantly win by lynching bomb day 1.
So why do you think scum claim it here if that's the case? For the town credit?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Wouldn't the recruit or recruiter being killed right after the adding of another player just out someone as scum, or at the very least give reasonable doubt to not let them have say in who to recruit?In post 71, Lawliett wrote:best mafia strategy is to sound townie in day 1, get recruited, recruit his partner in day 2 and afterwards buss the bomb
it`s a insta win that way as far as i know
if two mafia get into the neighbourhood, it`s very dangerous for town, because they can begin killing inside the neighbourhood and by bussing the bomb later, win the game.
i was thinking about what we should do to prevent that, but didn`t want to break my newbie theatre but well...now it doesn`t really make a difference.
I don't think that your idea is breaking.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Wouldn't the bomb still die though? Making it 2:1 in favour of town.In post 76, Lawliett wrote:as far as I am understanding the setup here, they don`t need to kill anyone in the neighbourhood until it`s already day 3 for they to win.
from what i`m understanding, they add another person in the neighbourhood during the day. that means that by the end of day 1, there is 3 people in the neighbourhood.
if a goon is the first one recruited, they can simply add their mafia partner in the begin of day 2, and that would make a ratio of 2:2 in the hood. if they buss the bomb in day 2 in that scenario, they win.
But to prevent additional chance of both scum making it into the hood, the original 2 should have full say and just note down influence made by others in the hood.
If they are both dead early on it's a good chance that scum are in there. And in that case to cover that it might be worth the player recruited to confirm that they have been.
This needs to be heavily looked into though because it could easily lead back to who is town reading them.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
There's a huge difference of not being cautious and out right throwing the game.In post 77, Lawliett wrote:ejjinami kind of looks like the kind of player that doesn`t give a fuck about being cautious as far as i see?
they might just be the bomb and thought `i`ll claim bomb there, self vote and all, then no one will think i`m the bomb since that would be very anti-mafia`
it wouldn`t really be about gaining town credit, it would be about making us think that there is no way that he is the bomb.
not sure how probably that is, would need to check how he plays normally
Ejj doesn't know majority of the player list, so would be unfamiliar with how they react to things. It would essentially be game throwing.
That doesn't mean not scum of course. This could just be a goon going for a gambit. The bomb though? I highly doubt.
I can see your line of thinking with it, the whole WIFOM play, I just think it's not that.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I understand now. Makes a lot more sense what you were saying.In post 80, Lawliett wrote:maybe i`m the one misunderstanding how setup works, but let me explain again how i see the worse case-scenario:
town recruiter recruits mafia goon during day 1
mafia goon recruits another mafia goon in day 2
lynch bomb in day 2 -> only the four people in the hood survives and mafia has a 2:2 ratio.
So if scum are recruited they will most likely be looking to not get the bomb into the hood.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
In post 87, ejjinami wrote:actually,
VOTE: flubb
can you do sth more useful than that?In post 85, Flubbernugget wrote:Makes quick read flips very telling I would thinkUp to this point Orfhz hasn't posted anything other that a basically naked vote and calling out someones alt.
Originally you had an issue with my vote on Orfhz because it was naked, or lazy as you say, but you never question any of the naked votes before mine including Orhfz.
The second part is you're voting Flubber for what I can only assume to gain more pressure but question yet another vote on Orfz who as I said, hasn't posted anything of relevance.
What is it about that particular slot you feel the need to try and instantly stop any focus there? Are they town for you, and were they at this point?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Purely because of putting your alt?
Do you think you that putting you benefits scum?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I think the only way to rule Ejj out as a potential lynch is if you town read them.In post 90, TemporalLich wrote:I'm gonna avoid voting ejjinami in case she is the bomb and the recruiter hits scum.
Or she ends up just being town.
Lawliett is town.
Meh.
VOTE: ofrhz
I'm going to assume that you misunderstood the setup like I did at this point?
I like the town read on Lawliett as I'm probably in the same view right now.
Are you voting orfhz because you think they're scum or because you are just sheeping your town read?Last edited by Jingle on Sun Apr 21, 2019 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I don't have a scum read I just placed my vote as RVS.In post 97, ejjinami wrote:Can someone explain the SRs on ofr to me?
I have no freaking idea what’s going on
Thx
And @jingle I voted flub in post 87
~Fixed, Jingle
But this refers back to why Orhfz in particular?
I would be surprised if anyone had any genuine read on them.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
What Fumiki posted was town motivated.In post 109, Eyes without a face wrote:
Not afraid, but they don't need to. If they didn't have day chat this would have looked like giving instructions to partners though.In post 106, ejjinami wrote:Why exactly would the scums be afraid to share it?
And yes, scum do want to be in the bunker, but so do town. The more townies protected the better for us, and the more scum in there the better for them.
If you think that's scum trying to go for that look sure, but the post itself is far from worthless (@Ejj this part).-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
So are you saying that this is Eyes trying to look town as scum?In post 113, ejjinami wrote:
Fun fact, if you take this post apart, you’ll see that there’s a surprising amount of stuff written in there.In post 103, Eyes without a face wrote:
I had to go back and check if mafia had daytalk. If they didn't I would have really scum read this. It still feels anti-town but I don't see why mafia would want to put the strategy out in the open rather than share it with partners only, so I guess you're town.In post 71, Lawliett wrote:best mafia strategy is to sound townie in day 1, get recruited, recruit his partner in day 2 and afterwards buss the bomb
it`s a insta win that way as far as i know
if two mafia get into the neighbourhood, it`s very dangerous for town, because they can begin killing inside the neighbourhood and by bussing the bomb later, win the game.
i was thinking about what we should do to prevent that, but didn`t want to break my newbie theatre but well...now it doesn`t really make a difference.
“he had to check the OP”
“he had a read in case the scums didn’t have daytalk”
“they have daytalk so it doesn’t work”
“it doesn’t work so much, that it’s townie”
and it’s rather obvious that he didn’t have to put all of that in here, especially the parts that make him look more townie / earnest.
It’s not always AI, but it makes me feel that he puts quite a bit of effort into making sure that his posts look good.
I'm unclear to how your stance is here.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I'm really liking Roster as town here.In post 114, rosterfoster wrote:
That's not really what he said though? I feel like you just said the first word and then wanted to say something about that post.In post 110, awestfie wrote:Trying hard isn't alignment indicative.
Pedit: Same with eyes as Lich. I feel like the way they post feels scummy sometimes but it's not necessarily AI.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
This chain of events is just really bad.
I understand Ejj voting and my previous post can be ignored.
As pointed out Roster was just soft defending Eyes here but instantly jumps on without acknowledging that Ejj could be right here.
If this was town motivated as pressure I feel that more would have been added. It currently looks like Roster is just going with the flow.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
So you think that Eyes plays different as town, or have you looked at this to make your judgement?In post 126, rosterfoster wrote:Yeah, but then I remembered that he was actually scum in the game I was thinking about .-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I'm just going to point out that the game they are talking about is Fire and Ice mafia.In post 128, maadneet wrote:If it's the game I'm thinking about, I'm going to trust roster's read for now.
VOTE: Eyes without a face
Both Rooster and Eyes were scum and Maad was doctor.
I think from this reason alone the read provided by Roster should be null and void.
Maad what makes you believe Roster isn't just using this to his advantage to have a read and vote where looks easier?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
This just feels like Roster trying to justify his Vote without sitting on a strong read.In post 135, rosterfoster wrote:He was under a lot of suspicion as town in a couple of his games so I think the sounding scummy part is true (I might have gotten this from a conversation in one of my games with him). No LAMIST stuff that I can see though with either alignment, although there might be something there. I do feel like this depends heavily on the player, but we don't have a better wagon rn so I'm sticking with it.
What makes Eyes a better wagon over anyone else at this point?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
That's a bad way to see things.In post 150, Flubbernugget wrote:Saud should stay out of the bunker as either alignment
If he's town and calls scum correctly or town correctly then scum are just going to push this kind of view to keep him out.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Thanks for the confirmation.In post 157, ofrhz wrote:
If it helps your reaction test, I probably would’ve just glossed over itIn post 53, High Risk Gamble wrote:I wanted to see how Orfhz acted on a my vote there, but that's irrelevant now.
It doesn't have anything to fall with now regardless though.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Because he was scum in a previous game?In post 211, rosterfoster wrote:^Btw this is why I voted him.
I don't understand your point here?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
In what way? How I will be reading him?In post 219, Flubbernugget wrote:
Tell me more about how you read himIn post 213, High Risk Gamble wrote:
That's a bad way to see things.In post 150, Flubbernugget wrote:Saud should stay out of the bunker as either alignment
If he's town and calls scum correctly or town correctly then scum are just going to push this kind of view to keep him out.
Down to his play.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
So we should by policy ignore him even if he provides solid reads or content?In post 222, Flubbernugget wrote:His incredibly careless attitude is easy to fake as scum and I think that makes him hard to read
No.
If he's town all you're doing is giving scum an extra opportunity to get into the hood with this attitude.
If you think that something looks scummy and backs this up I'll happily listen.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
What reasoning do you have to suspect Maad?In post 244, Fumuki wrote:Voting me instead of Maad might be pretty telling.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Okay that's fair.In post 248, Fumuki wrote:Roster/Maad interactions looks like SvS
It was mainly Roster, then he began to squirm and voted Maad out of nowhere
I`m saying that I`ll only getafter around 2 or 3 RL days.serious
Unexplained gut reads are fine to give for now right?
After all, lots of player only play with gut reads anyway.
So your reads are gut possible scum on me, Maad and Roster?
I can see the S v S here. Roster could just be looking for town credit/pocketing if commenting on players as town.
Roster, what's your read on Eyes now?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Does Maad look town independently for you?In post 250, TemporalLich wrote:
Your process of thought is very confusing, and possibly even confrusing.In post 249, Fumuki wrote:
Why you think so?In post 247, TemporalLich wrote:Fumuki is not worth reading
FYI I townread RF, and RF/Maad is likely TvT in my eyes
Or is it purely because of others?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
In post 128, maadneet wrote:If it's the game I'm thinking about, I'm going to trust roster's read for now.
VOTE: Eyes without a faceIn post 133, rosterfoster wrote:Oh he was scum in fire and ice too.In post 134, rosterfoster wrote:He was mostly shitposting that game but got away with it. In the large normal he wasn't though, I think he just sounded scummy and got a big wagon on him which scum managed to deflect.
On a quick recap I don't see any LAMIST stuff from there though, so I don't know if that is really a scum tell.
So Maad looks town from Roster's side of the posting?In post 257, TemporalLich wrote:
Remove that interaction and Maad becomes neutral.In post 256, High Risk Gamble wrote:Does Maad look town independently for you?
Or is it purely because of others?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
But for it to look TvT you need to town read both parties.In post 263, TemporalLich wrote:That interaction doesn't look SvT to me, bur maad should post more either way.
I'm feeling TvT since I TR roster
Roster calls Eyes scum because of a game they were.both scum in, Maad says that he will take Rosters word for it and votes with him.
What town motivation does Maad have here to blindly follow like this?
The problem with saying the interaction was TvT is.Maad gave very little to go with to even find this route.
I'm also unsure what warrants a Rosters town read after the flip read on Eyes. Not to mention that he originally forgot about the Fire and Ice mafia game when he was making that comment.
What point does Roster stand out as town for you?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Was this your entire catch up or do you have more?In post 282, maadneet wrote:Aaand I put this off until right before bed, so I'll make it brief. I really don't like 176. Even if TL always takes things too seriously, he put Eyes at L-2. It feels like something opportunistic scum would do to get an early mislynch.
VOTE: TemporalLich
If TL is town are you still expecting scum voting there? How about Roster and myself voting you for what seemed like an opportunity vote?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Although I'm obviously on favour of any town reads this is a really positive town tell from Fumuki.In post 290, Fumuki wrote:HRG as the towniest in your read list is honestly why I find considerably easy to play scum as long as there is no cop or clear/guilty roles in a game depending on the playerlist.
HRG has done exactly nothing to warrant a town read imo. His posts are all logic + logic what it`s not bad but it`s not something to town readat all.
He is being reasonable and it`s easy to be reasonable as scum.
You seem to be calculating how town someone is considering how reasonable they are and that`s the 101 fallacy in mafia.
the reads just feel forced and in favour of the current posting before rather than actual reads.
Orfhz being town because of being ofrhz makes little to no sense and seems to be just a name chucked into the mix.
The only thing I'm unclear.ofmhere is.do you think I'm scum, Fumuki?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I can see Flubber here. He seems to be more concerned on shading people out of the hood without giving an actual negative read of scum.In post 302, Fumuki wrote:Actually forget for now Roster/Maad
It might simply be Roster/Eyes/Flubb or something similar.
Let`s see. That`s just where my mind would be right now but I might change of idea.
Roster moving off Eyes for Maad could have easily been distancing.
I really want to see.Maads thoughts more on the situation.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I'm pretty sure I can follow up with this as a vote.In post 305, Fumuki wrote:I`m not as sure in Roster anymore
This might be better
VOTE: Flubb
Let me mull over...-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I think this is a pretty solid pair of reads to have scum in.In post 309, Fumuki wrote:If the two are town though this will be a sad game...
But I guess I need to stick with my reads so...
I`m confident that there is scum in [Flubb/Roster]. Opinions?
If Flubber is scum I'm confident enough to think he's a goon over the bomb.
Roster I wouldn't really know which one.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
This is what threw me off.In post 314, Fumuki wrote:But you just finished Ice and Fire Mafia and Eyes was scum there, and you apparently had forgot about that game?
And it comes back to why is Maad blindly following Roster who was scum for him?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
This is false.In post 316, rosterfoster wrote:Eyes replaced out of that quickly.
IDK on Flubber. I played with scum him once but only really caught him via actions (others caught him though, making me jail him as last scum left).
It wasn't quickly as day 1 was nearly as long as the rest of the game.
He also had huge impact in the game day 1 to people having reads or mentioning him.
I'm going to confirm that I'm not using any sort of meta, I just wanted to point this out.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Oh? How come?In post 341, Saudade wrote:well I think eyes is scum actually-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Okay that's fair enough I just wanted to make sure i wasn't mis reading your stance.In post 342, Fumuki wrote:
Depends on who else flips scum I thinkIn post 339, High Risk Gamble wrote:The only thing I'm unclear.ofmhere is.do you think I'm scum, Fumuki?
I`m kind of neutral in you right now but I already have some secret associatives that I`m of course not telling
Also i apologise for what ever that was i posted, I'm currently on some heavy medication.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Because the shading seems to be trying to control with less players being accepted into the hood.In post 351, rosterfoster wrote:What makes you think he’s more of a goon? The floating seems more bomb to me tbh.
Removing Saud and Fumuki from the pile would indicate he is still trying to get in but if called out or pushed for it, scum don't just lose.
Also shade/vote/scum tell can easily be on the bomb at this point so Flubber flipping goon isn't a bad thing at all over bomb.-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
I'm surprised with that since your scum partner was discussing him in both PT and game.In post 354, rosterfoster wrote:
Seriously? He replaced out of that early. I forgot he even played in it until Maad brought it up.In post 352, High Risk Gamble wrote:This is what threw me off.
And it comes back to why is Maad blindly following Roster who was scum for him?
But it's not something that I'll argue further.-
-
High Risk Gamble
-
-
High Risk Gamble
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
Well basically. I also mentioned before that its shade.In post 371, Flubbernugget wrote:This?
I'm town reading fumuki now so it wouldn't make sense to keep them out of the hood. When they were trolling they were more null and that made sense.
Still hold saude stays out. What's your problem with that now?
Why do you think I'm trying to get into the hood? I know I don't locktown well and never have.
No clue what your shade vote scum bomb thing is getting at
You are now saying that Fumuki is a town read but that could just be to get out of the reasoning or to try and get someone off your wagon.
You never actually answer my question here though.
Given the information I had from you when posting my concerns and vote, do you think my opinion isn't justified with the vote?
Do you think trying to control where the hood should recruit early on should be read as town?
Also, I asked if you think there are 2 scum on you, or is it scum within?
If you think its 2 and that 2 is me and TL, isn't that just OMGUS?-
-
High Risk Gamble Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 172
- Joined: March 30, 2019
If you have any disagreements with what I'm saying or asking you can address it and we can talk it out.In post 379, Fumuki wrote:The more HRG posts the more I want to vote him to be honest, but seeing my historic of voting scum early and afterwards getting talked out off it, I`m going to stick with Flubb here.
I would rather be completely wrong than hop off a scum read again.
If your objective is to try and get me to back down or to stop posting how I am, you're going the wrong way about it.
-
-
-