VOTE: house
This setup looks super cool!!! Its basically an intro to mafia for those newbie stumps, i hope they have fun
This week also gonna be vla thurs-sun, but back to normal after that
Uh i actually think this post comes from scum more often than not, esp. if malefactors are actually scum's flavorIn post 46, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:P sure Locke already scumslipped. I'm town and my pm doesnt mention the word malefactors at all. Assuming that's scum's flavor name at least.
Oh i misswd it was at me, thought it was at pooky and cephIn post 88, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:You didn't answer my question, ceph and pooky didIn post 83, skitter30 wrote:Oh, *please* explain that
Infinity sre u talking abt rousseau or ssbm here?In post 67, Infinity 324 wrote:Hmm that's actually townslippyIn post 58, rousseau wrote:there's a sample pm? but also ehIn post 57, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:You think that I with a red PM know that the word malefactors is not in the green PMs?
- i dont know if scum would call out your post there - i dont know id they *want* to call attention to the fact that they know scum flavorIn post 107, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Vote-worthy because scum would look to pounce on me for this if they actually are malefactors. At first I was thinking this pointed to Pooky, as he was the second one to it (it will look scummy to have started this push if I ever flip), so sheeping it is something scum would want to do I think. I also think though that it's scummy as the person that started the push to not respond to the question, and I didnt want my vote on Rousseau anymore, as I'm TRing her a bit now.
I just think it's weird to read that one of the callers is scum and then not go back and analyze the callers' posts. I came into the game expecting from the description there would be anonymous messages that were sometimes pro-scum, sometimes pro-town. This is different so after I caught up I went back and read the caller messages again, to see if there was any hidden message for scum because immediately the scum caller reminds me of a traitor. I was expecting them to try to signal scum in some way, so I was specifically rereading for crumbs when I noticed it.
Her vote on me seemed omgus-y and reactionary, and i dont think she has a good reason for itIn post 110, Roden wrote:VOTE: SkitterIn post 83, skitter30 wrote:Oh, *please* explain that
I was gonna vote Ydrasse since I don't believe in town slips but this was a weirdly sensitive response to a single vote.
Also why would your first instinct in the game be to look for traitors in the messages as town? That also sounds like its coming from a scum mindset to meIn post 124, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I thought the scum team didnt know the scum caller and wanted to check for traitor crumbs in the radio messagesIn post 112, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i mean malefactor is just a word, why would you think that's the scum role from reading that?
i have a town role pm and i didnt get that thought at all when i read the dialogue in the beginning
Gi back to ssbm?
i mean i believe that i found scum so i'm pushing her, yesIn post 176, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: skitter i think her thought process here seems much more geared towards finding someone to push than sorting ssbm
normally she's very sensitive to looking for limbait, here she doesn't really consider that scenario or really look into ssbm's mindset with much depth
this if anything seems like a townslip tbhIn post 214, Tetrina wrote:Idk it feels like 10 town and 4 scums would be more fair, but I'l trust that the game was reviewed or somethingIn post 211, Gamma Emerald wrote:Ah
Well generally I don’t feel like the numbers town has offer that big an advantage when scum have the information advantage
oh good point i misread that, i thought they said scum might *have* 4 players and she'd know that wasn't the case if town, so i retract this pointIn post 222, Gamma Emerald wrote:How so? It’s just balance talk, not saying she thinks that’s actually the case
yes exactly! and if someoen said 'oh i'm voting player X because theyr'e sketchy' and later says 'i'm townreading X' they better be able to explain that readIn post 232, Tetrina wrote:Thanks Having the evidence never go away is cool actually, like you can't lie about how you voted before which can happen irl when scum says they voted for another scum day 1 but no one remembers (and ofc they didn't)
- sorry i'm not really getting the first point you're making, that's basically what i'm pushing you forIn post 245, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:- Scum dont have to push me "because she knows the scum are malefactors", that would give away that they know the flavor when I have only speculated at it. All they have to do is push me for talking about it, or faking a townslip
- I thought, when I saw your push, that scum would sheep it. That's why I asked all 3 of you about why scum would post that, because town will sheep too. I wanted to coax a little bit out of you 3, especially Pooky, because he was just like "good point"
- If you start it but dont end it, and arent too involved, it could easily be forgotten that you started it later on. That could explain why you didnt vote with your push, or why you didnt answer my question in your next post, if that was intentional.
- if you're scum, I do think you skipped answering on purpose, but there's no way to prove it so I'm not really bringing it up anymore
- I think the discussion around the callers has been worthwhile. Whether the current caller messages themselves are significant, I dont know. But I do think the thread's kicked off regardless of how important the messages are at this point.
- I spotted it the second time through when I was actively looking for something. Up to you whether you believe that.
eh ok, i guess that could make some amount of sense and is semi-plausible. and that's what you were thinking the first time you read the messages?In post 246, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Because I didnt read the setup correctly and thought the 1 caller that knows the identity of scum was not known by scum, like a traitor. I feel like in that situation the caller would want to signal scum so I wanted to look for that signal.
ok, i still don't get why you think i should be viewing her as limbait? can you spell out how/why you think i should have been having that thought in this context?In post 247, Infinity 324 wrote:to me, it doesn't seem like you considered whether ssbm could be limbait, or really anything about her mindset. if you did, i think you were uncharacteristically quick to jump to a conclusion based on shallow reasoning. i sort of understand where you're getting the idea that it's likely that ssbm approaches the "malefactors" thing this way as scum, but i have no idea where you get the idea that it's unlikely for her to approach it this way as scum. i felt her explanation was pretty robust and would've at least taken some doing to replicate and scum, and i actually feel like you recognized that too, but you brushed it aside because it didn't fit with your narrative.In post 215, skitter30 wrote:i'm not really sure why you think i ought to be viewing ssbm as flipbait? that's not how i view her and i'm not sure why that's relevant to the situation
i don't think she truly scumreads my push on her (as i still dont' think i got a satisfactory explanation for why she's voting me rn) so her vote on me seems somewhat fake to meIn post 249, Infinity 324 wrote:i also think you should know that omgus/reactionary behavior isn't actually scummy, and i see nothing in your reasoning that makes you think this is a special case.
noIn post 250, Infinity 324 wrote:this part feels like "you're towny but i want to push you anyway" in scumspeakIn post 168, skitter30 wrote:- ig reading it looking for a traitor could make sense but i'm still rather suspicious that you keyed in on the word 'malefactor', as i think it would stand out to scum more.
a large part of your current content is defending someone i'm scumreading + i'm not getting townie vibes off of you yet (and i feel like in other games that usually happens p early)In post 252, Infinity 324 wrote:oh this is gonna be fun :)In post 218, skitter30 wrote:infinity i'm not getting good vibes from thus far
elaborate?
sigh, ok why
infinity if you want to just answer this bit, i'm not sure the rest of it is really going to go anywhereIn post 276, skitter30 wrote:and ok, sure. why do you think i would be townreading you here as town? what parts of your play ought i recognize as town-you?
infinity if you want to just answer this bit, i'm not sure the rest of it is really going to go anywhereIn post 276, skitter30 wrote:and ok, sure. why do you think i would be townreading you here as town? what parts of your play ought i recognize as town-you?
literally either alignment could fail to realize this tho >.>In post 294, Infinity 324 wrote:to me the whole thought process of "i didn't know there was scum in the NPCs" is very level 0 towny
but my point is that i'm not sure that she *was* replicating a town mindset so much as those were her true (scummy) thoughtsIn post 294, Infinity 324 wrote:i thought that it was pretty obviously not the first thing that scum would think of when trying to get into a town mindset.
i'm not 100% sure what you're referring to here but yeah basically my issue was that she was voting me (i.e. implying she had a reason to scumread me) but as best as i could tell when i prodded a bit it didn't look like she really had any reason to, so it looked like more of a retaliatory vote than because she actually scumread my pushIn post 294, Infinity 324 wrote:at this point what i have the most problem with is the "omgus and reactionary" comment, which you later explained that it was the way in which she was omgus/reactionary that you had a problem with (correct me if i'm misinterpreting). if you had said that to begin with, i'd feel much better about it.
i'm somewhat baffled that you think i ought to be townreading you but also can't really point to anything that i ought to be townreading you for ...In post 294, Infinity 324 wrote:i don't think there's anything in particular that you should be townreading me for here, except perhaps for the fact that i'm pushing you right out of the gate, but you tend to be quite good at recognizing town!me
idk if my opinion here, like, matters but i would p unhappy rn if i had rolled scum after tarot + that mini normalIn post 296, Infinity 324 wrote:ydrasse you were in perpetual melo? i used this exact argument to townread her there and she was scum.In post 286, Ydrasse wrote:for skitter i don't think she would have this wim as scum after getting it and getting kicked around like a soccer ball a few times over
okIn post 299, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I was surprised they were actual people rather than mod-controlled anonymous messages. I just sort of read them and didnt think that much of them except that it was interesting that one was named Locke when we have Rousseau in the game. I thought the font thing tweetie did to show the static was cool, and after I saw the pronouns listed I scrolled back up to try to commit the pronouns to the avatars/usernames.In post 260, skitter30 wrote:eh ok, i guess that could make some amount of sense and is semi-plausible. and that's what you were thinking the first time you read the messages?In post 246, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Because I didnt read the setup correctly and thought the 1 caller that knows the identity of scum was not known by scum, like a traitor. I feel like in that situation the caller would want to signal scum so I wanted to look for that signal.
That's all I can remember thinking when reading it the first time
ok fair enuf, can you take a look at the rest of her content and lmk what you think when you have a chance plz?In post 303, House wrote:Mostly skimming through the first 10 pages.In post 244, skitter30 wrote:house did you read the rest of tetrina's posting?
my intial thought was partners with ssbm and that you were like casually defending her and didn't expect this to spiral into as much of a Thing as it didIn post 311, Infinity 324 wrote:as far as the read on me goes, we can start with: why do you think i'm picking a fight with you right off the bat?
i don't think you should be townreading me necessarily, but i did say i thought it was likely you'd be townreading me as town here. i don't really think specific towny things i did are necessary for that because the things others townread me for are usually not the things i think are towny anyway.
!!!!!In post 337, skitter30 wrote:yay
uh so yeah i do find this to be somewhat problematic/troubling even after perpetual elo, just sayingIn post 340, Infinity 324 wrote:i may be too scared of skitt and just trying to shut down any reason to tr her that i don't like. for perspective, i'm probably not going to tr her this early almost no matter what.
that was a game >.>In post 359, Infinity 324 wrote:@skitt sure, i'll try to stop myself if i notice myself doing that again.
if you think i wouldn't feel that way as town, i'm not sure what to tell you. that game kinda tore my soul out.