Wow. Ok.
- Acryon says a lot of stuff that seems rushed. I can only mostly gut read this now, cause that was a lot of back and forth and wtf is this, but to me acryon seems more townish than scummish through his defense.
- His push on Thor reads townish to me (agree with Blair) unless he and Thor are scum together. I don't at all agree with him insisting on that you HAVE to vote your #1 scum read, and if anyone has the time this would be something to meta him on. Or if acryon himself has a done game where he is town and is insisting that? That would make the push pretty townish to me.
- The fact that he just pulled together a top of the head read post also seems townish to me, if like he says he thought he was going to be hammered at any moment.
- But then there's a lot of things that just doesn't make much sense.
- I don't understand the scum motivation for not voting Phil, unless they are scum together. I don't understand it as town either though, especially since Phil is indeed a scum read of his (weaker than Thor, but still).
- Don't get acryons scum read on me, cause that's new and not explained, acryon?
In post 738, Fink wrote: In post 297, Phillammon wrote:my reasoning is, the more posts you make, the more likely you are to make a scumslip
@ DCLXVI, Droog, Acryon, Shaddowz, Thor
So what do you guys think of this earlier comment given Phil's recent play? It seems suspicious to me that he's playing with so little commentary, especially now that he's suspected. He seems to be minimizing his responses, or is this just in my imagination? He still hasn't moved his vote OR explained his vote on me. I think it all fits with my over-cautious scum explaination, given that he agrees that that is how scum should play?
And he is basically hiding now.
In post 753, Thor665 wrote:@Acryon - why do you rule out Dys as my partner? Since they are 2nd or 3rd most likely scum, but if Phil flips town then #4 DC jumps into being my partner - why not #2-3 Dys?
I can think of lots of reasons >_>
@Fink - I see your point about Phil there. I will point out that whether or not he thinks the best way to scumhunt someone is to get them to post a lot does not mean that he thinks the best way to play as town is to post a lot - that isn't exactly an either/or situation. So, I'd give it a minor scum twinge, but nothing more. I feel like you think it's a solid hit out of the park - I am very much not with you on that.
You've been way too lenient on Phil, especially given how you've been barking at other players. He's actively avoiding questions, saying he's going to get to them, and saying he's going to continue this and that, and then nothing happens. His posts are more and more brief. It reads scum half given up all the way.
Also, your whole argument that Phil was an easier wagon. Obviously not. Someone comes in and offers acryon as an alternative and now he's way ahead. It's like Phil is coasting on one pretty post at the start that wasn't really that pretty anyway.
In post 761, acryon wrote:If I didn't know that lynching me doesn't help town at all, I would tell you to just lynch me, because I have unfortunately probably done town a lot less good than I intended at this point =\
This isn't convincing me though =/
Wow, we might almost agree on something here. O.o
Although, maybe I'd want Blair instead of you.
In post 796, Phillammon wrote: In post 789, Fink wrote:So Phil, why aren't you voting for them? Or if you are, why haven't you explained your vote on me any of the times I've asked you?
I have explained. Judging by the responses to your other points made in the next post, reading what people say rather than accusing them of not responding might be a good idea.
(Incidentally, may as well throw that on the pile. While I can see town motivations for trying to rile people up, I can see a hell of a lot more scum motivations for it)
If you're not lynched today I want you to get back to the questions you promised.
In post 676, Phillammon wrote:I responded to part of that in #659, I'll handle the rest shortly, apologies for missing the other question
---
I could see acryon being scum with specific partners (mostly Thor or Phil), obviously not both which is the problem.
I'm gut reading him town. I just am.
If Phil is not lynched I'm fine with lynching acryon, there's enough doubt and things I don't understand and things that are unexplained. Why are we not lynching Phil though? With the danger of being lazy I think both of them need to flip, but my scum read is so much stronger on Phil (if anyone was in any doubt about that).
I didn't like shadow's vote on acryon at all.