Open 610: Kill all Townies (Mafia Win)
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 23, wgeurts wrote:In post 22, Vedith wrote:What do you mean? I was explaining how much I enjoyed the start.
A - If I feel like I want to post I will.
B - Define useful. 20 is not useful.
Let's continue this A/B thing:
A- That just leads to threads getting cluttered and stuff getting buried. If we had more content and less fluff per post and less posts in general it would make following games a lot easier.
B- Which brings me to the point that my post was useful as I'm trying to keep this game easy to follow as I know once certain people get lost they never recover.
Anyway, if you disagree with me on this then that's fine. There's no point in continuing a useless argument on more/less content/posts as nobody will change their oppinion.
I was going to respond back with some sort of snarky comment. But there's no need to.
I'm just going to say that if people only post content in these games, then you will have a lot of lurkers. Lurkers are town and scum so it just makes it hard to keep the game moving as it only gives a null read and people are participating a lot less.
I agree that my comment wasn't helpful at all, but neither did it hurt the game.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 31, Sinsun1 wrote:We have an interesting first day already between wgeurts and Vedith.
Elaborate please.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 48, Ricastle wrote:VOTE: wgeurts
Kari and, uh...Empire are my early townreads. Vettrock's probably the SK. And the above person is striking me as off, especially with that previous post - a fluctuation in confidence mid-retort is a bad sign for me. I really don't see why adding a shrug at the end there was necessary unless it was a scum passive-defensive maneuver.
What's your view on him trying to hard though? 44I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 53, Ricastle wrote:@Vedith: He's come in all guns blazing, no doubt about it. I'm not making anything of that specifically though. What's your view on it? As you brought it up I assume there is a point you wished to make regarding it?
I''m just trying to understand FB's comment since he didn't follow up. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't the only one null reading his entrance and as you posted about him, I thought you would be the best shot for a response.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 65, Sinsun1 wrote:Look at both wagons, I can promise there's more than likely at least 1 mafia/wolf on each. Now my gut comes in and I am going to push ShadedMelee. It's a hunch and thus gut feeling.
But I only have 1 vote on me which is RVS I believe?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 119, Professor Bozo wrote:cus it was discussed last game where i was outed seer on day 1 in rvs
so i was asking should we do it or not. not about the idea itself
Yeah then we rely on scum not being scummy and going ahead with the plan. It was worth a shot trying to out the Seer I guess though.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Wait... What? How on earth did you get this read?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 143, wgeurts wrote:Also revalista is someone we should watch and not vote yet, he's a newb I recon so his play may be contraversial.
Yeah 101 would suggest this as well. New or not, comments like this is not what you want to draw the attention to you.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Oh that's kind of them...
Still doesn't sound like a decent plan. Takes 1 side to not follow it and you have a dead cop or seer (unless you are going for the fear effect of wasting a kill). Then it just gives the other side the advantage of keeping the opposite alive while they roam freely.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 151, wgeurts wrote:
Read my posts and give me your thoughts, I've ranted walls on this point.
Let me check.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I assume you mean 102?
In post 98, Sinsun1 wrote:You know, if you are town and you believe I am scum, perhaps you should sit back and see who guns for me. Because if I am indeed scum, then the other faction will want me gone. So that's at least 3 people wanting me dead whether I am the other faction or I am town. Either way, no matter which I am, it is better to watch how the others react to me than set upon yourself to react in a rather rash way.
I didn't understand this point. It's just implying that if he is scum the entire opposite team will be voting him. If he's town then he thinks that the entire team (possibly both?) would be on him?
Makes no sense trying to assume wagon bussing to this level so early on.
I didn't see much else wrong with his post.
However, I do see the town call list as a 'butter me up' tactic.
Hopefully there are explanations on those reads.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Talk to us Smudger, convince me to remove my vote.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 348, Lalendra wrote:Have you never changed your vote from your first scum read to your second, particularly when your second is being more actively scummy, and the wagon on the first isn't going anywhere?
Well I was going to review the case on you and possibly vote to you, but I'm not liking that wagon so far.
There was a reason why I kept my vote after the replacement but I can't remember why, I have to look into this again later.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Then what's with the dramatic approach?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Ummm, I think that you are town?
And you think that I am town?
Ummm?
Still just looks like you are sweet talking people. Anyone that find you town is town?
And people that think you are scum are scum apart from wg?
Explain to me why the 4th scum is in Ika, Shaddow or Ricastle when you null read them just like Performer, Silver and Alma?
VOTE: SinsunI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 503, Sinsun1 wrote:why the hell would I draw attention out to me by calling you and Vedith town right off the bat?
To buddy us?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Okay, all I really have are the following.
Pisskop was reckless with the voting so easily. That's more scummy than not because if you were scum he would have given the game away straight away before proper discussion.
The vote on FireKari was late (considering that he used the argument of me voting late is pot kettle). At the stage of voting FireKari was more or less the lynch here, it would make sense for scum to jump onto this.
The vote on Lalendra was the hammer, no chance of getting out of the lynch.
Now, here's what I find interesting... 661 - I am town because of meta reasons, 824 - Then says he doesn't know what scum me is like, meaning that he can't meta me?
Apart from that, he hasn't done much apart from buddy town and distance from scum except when he was leading wagons that were not scum.
@Ricastle - You can either decide on what we have given, or if you want to interact about anything, then lets do that.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 838, Ricastle wrote:Vedith, give me a reason I shouldn't just leave this to a coin flip.
Because that's just stupid.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 839, pisskop wrote:want to win?
No, voting before someone even puts a case forward is a scum minded move. And you have played enough to know this.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 841, pisskop wrote:I just couldn't pass this up.
1) My vote was otherwise on Dave or Lal that day. Dave was acting differently than usual and fire was scum. You're trying to argue my points against you back at me, but I voted for firekari; if he was the lynch of the day why were you not on him?
Yeah exactly, you knew he was going to be scum so you jumped on. I didn't think scum as I wanted to discuss with FB first. Why would I vote someone who I have doubts on being scum. Your position on this wagon is so obvious.
2) What's your point here? My vote was on her D1, its not like suddenly suspicion.
Yeah,
You mean, you voted for your scum buddy when the wagon died off? How very towny of you. All game you have been trying to distance yourself from your 2 scum friends, if Ricastle can't see this, then there's no hope.
3) Again, waht is the point here? Putting aside the fact that I don't have to have actually played with you as scum to be able to metadive you, what does this imply?
What's the point? The fact you try and say I am town because you know my meta, then you decide today that you don't know my meta? It's a fucking contradiction.
4) Could you show us some of my buddying? Buddying is such a vague term.
Well, you haven't got a lot of posts, so you and Ricastle can just check... You buddy a few people, including Ika.
Btw, what's your case on me being scum again?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 842, pisskop wrote:NY 181 We won because of my lylo vote.
Mini 1652 Kind of lost this one.
Micro 466 This game . . .
This has no relevance to this game...
Self meta like this is always scummy.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Because doing that could easily be game throwing... If you vote wrong and lose because you actually believe Pisskop is town then that's different.
And no, he should be trying to convince you why he's town or why I'm scum. For you to sit there and say that he just needs to go "Yeah he is scum" is so fucking stupid. XD
Sorry to say.
Ask yourself... How often do scum bus each other?
Where was he on the wagons? He was on the end. of them.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 850, Ricastle wrote:Why is listening to you less potentially game-throwing than relying on luck? Tell me that. 'Because I'm town' isn't going to cut it.
If we're going to lose, I'd prefer to lose because Pisskop out smarted us rather than to a coin flip, if that's your general thought on this, then so be it, I'll just avoid joining games with you in the future.
In post 850, Ricastle wrote:I didn't say that. Yes, constructing a case to convince me is the optimal thing to do, but I don't think it's scummy for not having yet done so. I'm assuming we're not counting the VCA here.
So explain where I said it was scummy?
My comment to him was where is his case against me, and you responded with, why should he have a case if in his mind I am confirmed scum...
I mean, how the fuck did we end up with someone like you as the confirmed town.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I don't care what position you are in. If you playing like the way you are, I'm going to say my thoughts on it.
You obviously won't understand what I am saying, so I really can't be arsed to waste my breathe on someone like you... As I said, how the fuck did we end up with you as the game decider?
I think I'm done here.
Flip your coins, do whatever, it then falls to you and your great coin flip.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 856, pisskop wrote:dont tell anyone, but my play in any game is largely depndent on how I feel at the time
So much bollocks right here.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 855, pisskop wrote:will you stop trying to shit onplayers? theres no reason for it. If ric wasg going to flip a coin he wouldnt be talking with us
Oh, aren't you the friendly town giving the white knight power.
Do you always talk so much bollocks as scum?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 857, Ricastle wrote:Yeah, okay. Just ignore everything I said then. Do you really want to win with me?
What do you want me to say then?
I give you reasons to why he is scum, but apparently we don't need to do this as we are both claiming scum on each other. Then you compare me being pissed off from you suggesting the worst options to your scum game...
And you wonder why I'm pissed off over it?
Of course I want to fucking win with you... Reason I am so against the coin flip.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 865, pisskop wrote:why arent you addressing my csse on you or my response to yours?
845
I'm pretty sure I responded to your response.
I didn't see a case on me apart from I was late to voting? Which I already addressed.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 864, Ricastle wrote:This question too tough for you, Vedith?In post 853, Ricastle wrote:Why did you bring it up if you weren't making a point? Do you find it necessary to argue with who is from your perspective confirmed scum? Because I've done the exact same as scum in lylo before.
Yeah it actually was tough for me not to insult you here...
It's even tougher right now for me not to insult you...
But somehow, I an managing to keep it peaceful...
Why did I bring it up if I wasn't making a point?
- Lord help me with not insulting...
Why did I bring it up if I wasn't making a point?
I was making a point to Pisskop who has nothing that is legit. Apart from I didn't vote for scum day 1, while he joined the wagon late.
I wasn't making a point to you, otherwise I would have said it was a comment to you, not in a response to Pisskop.
*Remove insult from here*
That's good enough, eh?
Can you just decide already, I've honestly had enough of you.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 867, pisskop wrote:No. you dodged my response to your case and then dismissed my own against you.
Yeah, that's exactly what happen.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 871, Ricastle wrote:How is that not making it out as scummy, which is what I originally said and you denied? Do you WANT to argue?
Making something out as scummy, and discussing a point are different.
You obviously do, I'm telling you that I am done and you just want to bicker over something that shouldn't even exist... I mean, ready your excuse to why you fucked up as you like, but I'm really not going to argue further on it.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-I did vote for scum. But now I had day chat with scum, 10/10
-wg being killed means I am scum, 10/10 there "although as a conftown that weakens a bit" as if he was not going to be the target killed.
-I'm using avoidance tactics 10/10
-I dodged your case of me not voting scum day 1 and you trying to do VCA, 10/10
Oh boy, with that case I'm close to self voting and throwing away the key, as I'm confirmed scum. (Sarcasm none the less).I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 874, pisskop wrote:why the hell is 845 quoting my response to your case by responding to my original case?
Lets start again, what?
My understanding is that you were unhappy that I didn't respond to your comments for the case I put on you?
Is this correct, or no?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
But you wanted me to reply to your case... I'm at a loss here, if I don't reply I'm avoiding it, if I do, I'm a scumbag. XD
Seriously, I'm done caring. but I do agree that Ricastle should end it because frankly, this game is making me pissed off in general which I don't want spoiling the game site wide.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey