[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 9155133 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 707 | Finding Flavor - Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #45 (isolation #2) » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:26 am
Postby BlackStar »
In post 44, Gamma Emerald wrote:OML
I'm going to hate this game
Apparently everyone here secretly has a troll play style and decided to break it out here.
Because I don't buy the miller claim. But if it turns out to be true (or if Gamma is fakeclaiming town which I sincerely hope he isn't ), then 46 sounds like an awkward scum reaction to a town claim.
Post
Post #72 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:19 am
Postby BlackStar »
In post 68, Something_Smart wrote:Because you're not sure if it's real and you don't want to be caught out assuming one thing when everyone else assumes the other.
I only asked because everyone was making a lot of joke posts and I wasn't sure if he was being serious
In post 103, Something_Smart wrote:Srceen what are your personal thoughts on BlackStar? Do you agree with Wheme's vote?
He is null to me.
He hasn't really engaged with anyone until wheme voted him.
Other than that a couple one liners.
My vote was for NM. He seemed to me to be purposely trolling trying not to be sorted.
Wheme didn't like that vote. He seems to think that's just the way he is. Doesn't make him scum.
Other then Han that Tess started trolling but switched gears. Now he is asking legitimate questions.
So far he is my only town lean.
Questioning the Miller claims isn't engaging with people?
This is considered questioning people on the miller claims?
It looked like an open question not directed to anyone in particular to me.
Only 2 people made Miller claims. It wouldn't make sense for anyone other than those two people to answer the question. And whether it's an open question or not, it's still engagement.
Tes is probably town because of his early questioning, particularly toward me. WhemePlay is probably town because the hydra dissonance indicates genuine and not faked feelings.
N_M is ever so slightly a town lean because at least he's engaging.
BlackStar is a scum lean because his posting seems a bit disconnected and could easily be made by either alignment. You are a scum lean mostly off of gut in regards to your attitude.
Gamma is a scumread because I don't believe the miller claim and because his reads seem lazy. (Scumread on you for not liking your attitude, townread on Tes for analyzing, townread on me for answering his question without having to be reminded.)
I don't like your reads overall. What makes you say that Aristo is playing to his town meta? And what makes questioning people inherently townie? Anybody could ask a lot of questions to look like they're engaged. I'm actually finding Tes' posts a little unsettling because of how hard he was trying to defend me against you. It doesn't feel quite right to me but I'm not sure if its just paranoia. Its easy to fake hydra dissonance so I'm not sure how that's indicates that wheme is probably town. NM hasn't done anything besides that unexplained fake claim, so he's pretty null. The way that you described me sounds like the way that I play in every single game lol. I'm not sure if I believe Gamma's claim either, but I also don't know how it would benefit scum. Even though I don't like your reads, I get the feeling that you believe everything you're saying, so I have you as a town lean. Writing all this out really helped me organize my thoughts lol. VOTE: TesXX This feels right
I don't like your reads overall. What makes you say that Aristo is playing to his town meta?
Because... he is? I have a lot of experience with his towngame.
And what makes questioning people inherently townie? Anybody could ask a lot of questions to look like they're engaged.
Only town have to sort people to achieve their wincon. And yes anyone could ask a lot of questions but the specific questions he's asked strike me as genuine attempts to determine motivation.
I'm actually finding Tes' posts a little unsettling because of how hard he was trying to defend me against you. It doesn't feel quite right to me but I'm not sure if its just paranoia.
What about it doesn't feel right?
Its easy to fake hydra dissonance so I'm not sure how that's indicates that wheme is probably town.
Is it? It's hard to fake it in a convincing way, and theirs seems genuine.
NM hasn't done anything besides that unexplained fake claim, so he's pretty null.
Won't disagree with this. He trolls all the time as both alignments.
The way that you described me sounds like the way that I play in every single game lol.
Which is why I'm unsure on you; IIRC you've been like this before.
I'm not sure if I believe Gamma's claim either, but I also don't know how it would benefit scum.
He won't get cop guiltied? That's a pretty big benefit. (Though to his credit, he trades the possibility of a cop guilty for the possibility of a rolecop, gunsmith or tracker guilty.)
Even though I don't like your reads, I get the feeling that you believe everything you're saying, so I have you as a town lean. Writing all this out really helped me organize my thoughts lol. VOTE: TesXX This feels right
As I said before, I'd like you to elaborate a bit on what felt off about Tes. Also I don't believe you talked about CH and ZZZX, what are your thoughts on them?
Explain how Aristo is playing to his town meta so that the rest of us can understand what you mean. Tes's posts don't feel right because of how intensely he was arguing against you reasoning earlier. He was defending me hard but there shouldn't be any reason for him to go that hard. It hasn't been long enough to form really strong reads, and your posts weren't that unreasonable so to me it felt a little bit like scum trying to earn townie points by defending me. I feel like it's very easy to fake hydra dissonance, but I haven't actually been a part of a hydra so maybe I'm wrong. If you know that this is how I always play then why would my play so far give you a scum lean on me? CH and ZZZX are null because they haven't really said much so far so it's hard to judge them. The same goes for Sonia because she hasn't posted yet
Tes is probably town because of his early questioning, particularly toward me. WhemePlay is probably town because the hydra dissonance indicates genuine and not faked feelings.
N_M is ever so slightly a town lean because at least he's engaging.
BlackStar is a scum lean because his posting seems a bit disconnected and could easily be made by either alignment. You are a scum lean mostly off of gut in regards to your attitude.
Gamma is a scumread because I don't believe the miller claim and because his reads seem lazy. (Scumread on you for not liking your attitude, townread on Tes for analyzing, townread on me for answering his question without having to be reminded.)
I don't like your reads overall. What makes you say that Aristo is playing to his town meta? And what makes questioning people inherently townie? Anybody could ask a lot of questions to look like they're engaged. I'm actually finding Tes' posts a little unsettling because of how hard he was trying to defend me against you. It doesn't feel quite right to me but I'm not sure if its just paranoia. Its easy to fake hydra dissonance so I'm not sure how that's indicates that wheme is probably town. NM hasn't done anything besides that unexplained fake claim, so he's pretty null. The way that you described me sounds like the way that I play in every single game lol. I'm not sure if I believe Gamma's claim either, but I also don't know how it would benefit scum. Even though I don't like your reads, I get the feeling that you believe everything you're saying, so I have you as a town lean. Writing all this out really helped me organize my thoughts lol. VOTE: TesXX This feels right
I played on a scum team with her once and she pretended to play erratically throughout the entire game. So you can't really say that she always plays one way when she's town or scum
In post 236, Something_Smart wrote:Should probably warn you that she's experienced on Epicmafia and is therefore very good at faking tone.
This is a bs statement to try and discredit anyone townreading my slot yes I'm from EM but how does me being from EM mean I can fake tone well? I'm not saying I can't fake tone well as scum but saying it's because I'm from EM is outright wrong so why don't you go into more detail on this sr.
because people from EM play tons of games which don't involve deep analysis but rather significant tonereading. You, gerryoat and Transcend are all like that and I've attributed it primarily to your experience there. (In that you three, particularly you and Transcend, seem to win games in mysterious ways by just becoming magically townread.)
If that's wrong then sorry I'm not giving you the credit you deserve but the relevant point still stands; tonereading IS a bad way to read you and thus townreads on you based on tone SHOULD be discredited.
(also you should know that you're the type of player whom I'd be very afraid of as scum and there's no way I would single you out like that when I'd have perfectly easy targets in BlackStar and ZZZX-- if you recall in Walking Dead Season Finale I pussyfooted around you all game )
In this game so far, it seems like you're relying a lot on past meta and your beliefs about game theory instead just looking at this game itself. I don't think I like that
In post 292, BlackStar wrote:@tes Why are you so hung up on Wheme posting after he's been prodded?
Already explained.
Not really. Everyone stopped posting. It's true that he called Sonia out earlier for low activity, but since everyone stopped being active I don't get why you felt like singling him out. And then you said it's "convienient that he posted after being prodded". Lol why wouldn't somebody start posting again after they got a prod? If you don't then you'll be kicked out of the game. The most interesting thing about this to me is that you're trying to make him look bad yet it doesn't took like you're going to move your vote to him.
Gamma Emerald wrote:Tes why are you making such crude jabs?
I apologize if things I say come off as rude, it's not intended to be. I'll be more considerate about this.
In post 128, BlackStar wrote:I'm actually finding Tes' posts a little unsettling because of how hard he was trying to defend me against you. It doesn't feel quite right to me but I'm not sure if its just paranoia. {snipped} VOTE: TesXX This feels right
This is a bullcrap reason to vote someone. So what if someone defended you a lot? I debate with what I disagree with.
It just gave a bad feeling to me. It felt like you had ulterior motives.
In post 130, BlackStar wrote:Tes's posts don't feel right because of how intensely he was arguing against you reasoning earlier. He was defending me hard but there shouldn't be any reason for him to go that hard.
Explain how I was "intensely arguing" with him.
You went back and forth with him for a long while over something that wasn't that big of a deal. You were defending hard. It wasn't something worth that much effort. That's why it felt off to me.
Spoiler: I may have missed some(I don't think I did) but I
In post 68, Something_Smart wrote:Because you're not sure if it's real and you don't want to be caught out assuming one thing when everyone else assumes the other.
How would it be scum indicative to assume something different from someone else? Why would scum want to avoid assuming something others don't assume?
In post 80, TesXX wrote:
How would it be scum indicative to assume something different from someone else? Why would scum want to avoid assuming something others don't assume?
Mostly because backtracking out of something like that can be awkward and painful and can lead to getting lynched as either alignment, actually.
In post 80, TesXX wrote:
How would it be scum indicative to assume something different from someone else? Why would scum want to avoid assuming something others don't assume?
Mostly because backtracking out of something like that can be awkward and painful and can lead to getting lynched as either alignment, actually.
But I'm wondering, how come you called it
an awkward scum reaction to a town claim
if it can happen as either alignment?
It's awkwardly trying to avoid the thing that can happen as either alignment, in a way that scum are more likely to do.
How is the specific way blackStar responded a way that scum is more likely to do?
It hasn't been long enough to form really strong reads, and your posts weren't that unreasonable so to me it felt a little bit like scum trying to earn townie points by defending me.
Scum defending a townie wouldn't get townie points(it can on some occasions, but this was not one of those). Either alignment can do it.
Yes, they would. When someone defends you, you tend to think positively of them. If scum defends someone and they don't get lynched, then that person will probably return the favor and try to keep you alive. If you defend them and they get lynched and flip town, then you look good because you weren't pushing for their lynch.
In post 310, BlackStar wrote:You went back and forth with him for a long while over something that wasn't that big of a deal. You were defending hard. It wasn't something worth that much effort. That's why it felt off to me.
This is so wrong. That exchange is the main reason Tes is obvtown.
Post
Post #314 (isolation #26) » Sun May 07, 2017 8:32 am
Postby BlackStar »
In post 313, Something_Smart wrote:Defending you was secondary. His primary purpose was to sort me by attempting to catch me in a contradiction.
What was the contradiction? He was saying that he disagreed with your viewpoint, not that you were contradicting yourself. Whether his primary objective was defending me or disagreeing with your views, I just didn't like the vibe they gave off
Lowest hanging fruit? How so?
The argument not to lynch someone because they are lynchable is dumb. The only exception I could see that in is a newbie player.
He hasn't posted much and the few posts he has made gave either been fluff or unexplained. So it's easy to just park a vote on him and call it a day. I'm not saying not to lynch him. I was just saying that the votes on him look lazy to me
In post 385, BlackStar wrote:I was just saying that the votes on him look lazy to me
Under what circumstances would a vote on Not_Mafia not look lazy to you? (i.e. is it the way the votes were made that seem lazy, or is it the fact that they exist at all?)
It's the way they were made. I don't get the impression that anyone actually believes he's scum. Nobody has really pushed a case on him or anything. What do you think about the votes on him?
In post 385, BlackStar wrote:I was just saying that the votes on him look lazy to me
Under what circumstances would a vote on Not_Mafia not look lazy to you? (i.e. is it the way the votes were made that seem lazy, or is it the fact that they exist at all?)
It's the way they were made. I don't get the impression that anyone actually believes he's scum. Nobody has really pushed a case on him or anything. What do you think about the votes on him?
I think they're perfectly justified. How would you expect someone to generate a case on a player with as little content as him?
Why would you park a vote on a player with little content?
Post
Post #394 (isolation #36) » Wed May 10, 2017 6:50 am
Postby BlackStar »
There's nothing dumb about. Voting helps you sort people out. But the people who voted for not mafia just dropped a vote on him and then didn't question him or try to understand him at all. They dropped a vote a ran. That's the very definition of lazy.
In post 391, BlackStar wrote:Why would you park a vote on a player with little content?
This is a really dumb question.
Keep the insults to yourself
I'm not trying to be insulting (and my comment was certainly not directed at you personally). But think about it... if there was never a reason to vote lurkers, then scum would just always lurk.
And in case it wasn't clear, I'm not voting Not_Mafia to sort him. I want him dead.
In post 391, BlackStar wrote:Why would you park a vote on a player with little content?
This is a really dumb question.
Keep the insults to yourself
I'm not trying to be insulting (and my comment was certainly not directed at you personally). But think about it... if there was never a reason to vote lurkers, then scum would just always lurk.
And in case it wasn't clear, I'm not voting Not_Mafia to sort him. I want him dead.
Why do you want him dead?
Because he's being useless which means he's more likely to be scum (given his meta) and because
if he is town he's the best possible mislynch because he's not contributing anyway.
Can one of you unvote Tes please because he's L-1 and also because he's obvtown.
he also did this awful early game play to come off like he was joking and he over did it on so many levels
SOME GUY TROLLED IN RVS WE NEED TO LYNCH HIM AND IF YOU THINK OTHERWISE YOU ALSO NEED TO GET LYNCHED BECAUSE TESXX HAS NEVER OVERDONE TROLLING IN RVS AS TOWN AND OBVIOUSLY TROLLING IN RVS IS TO MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE TOWN.
#MakeTheStrawberriesOfIlluminatiGreatAgain
You're way overacting which makes me feel like we're onto something
In post 439, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Why tf does the hydra of 2 people have the lowest post count in the game dear god S_S you gonna talk more on this meta of Ari or na
Pedit: I just did what you gonna do about it?
I realized I still don't like hydras
But are you really going to SR someone for not posting a lot?
-W
Ok, you guys most likely didn't know that I RVS trolled in my first town game. But that doesn't mean that it's 1% good reasoning to scumread someone based off of RVS trolling and this:
In post 399, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Given that I'd policy lynch NM for him being NM not really but I'd much rather lynch the shade posting
non game solving Tesx
Uh you want to lynch people for not gamesolving. So you choose me over N_M.
Everything else was you just going "Sonia's posts are bad! They're so stupid! They're stupid and bad!" That's not a case. Making a point means explaining what you don't like about a post and pointing out scum intent behind it. You haven't done that
Post
Post #533 (isolation #54) » Wed May 10, 2017 2:32 pm
Postby BlackStar »
In post 531, Something_Smart wrote:Can we stop arguing and start cooperating? Like this is not how towns win games. Towns win games by being reasonable and talking stuff over and having the members that are actually town coming to a mutual agreement.
If anyone would like me to make a case on BlackStar, I can, but don't expect it to accurately reflect my feelings since cases are a poor way for me to explain what's going on in my head. But if people will at least consider my points then I'll do it.
You don't need to ask for permission. If you want to do it then do it
Ok, you guys most likely didn't know that I RVS trolled in my first town game. But that doesn't mean that it's 1% good reasoning to scumread someone based off of RVS trolling and this:
In post 399, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Given that I'd policy lynch NM for him being NM not really but I'd much rather lynch the shade posting
non game solving Tesx
Uh you want to lynch people for not gamesolving. So you choose me over N_M.
Everything else was you just going "Sonia's posts are bad! They're so stupid! They're stupid and bad!" That's not a case. Making a point means explaining what you don't like about a post and pointing out scum intent behind it. You haven't done that
I am pointing out scum intent in Sonia's posts
, which is trying to get me lynched. She's using complete bullcrap logic to get me lynched.
Yes, I have been saying that Sonia's posts are stupid and bad, because they're stupid and bad in ways that it would be ridiculous for her to be town if she made them.
Post
Post #546 (isolation #56) » Wed May 10, 2017 2:53 pm
Postby BlackStar »
In post 543, TesXX wrote:If somebody literally uses alternative facts against you and you point out that it's complete bullcrap and scumread them for it then it should be pretty obvious that you think their scum motivation is trying to get you lynched.
In post 543, TesXX wrote:If somebody literally uses alternative facts against you and you point out that it's complete bullcrap and scumread them for it then it should be pretty obvious that you think their scum motivation is trying to get you lynched.
he also did this awful early game play to come off like he was joking and he over did it on so many levels
SOME GUY TROLLED IN RVS WE NEED TO LYNCH HIM AND IF YOU THINK OTHERWISE YOU ALSO NEED TO GET LYNCHED BECAUSE TESXX HAS NEVER OVERDONE TROLLING IN RVS AS TOWN AND OBVIOUSLY TROLLING IN RVS IS TO MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE TOWN.
#MakeTheStrawberriesOfIlluminatiGreatAgain
You're way overacting which makes me feel like we're onto something
I may have been overreacting but that's a way I prove points.
If I act like an idiot and use a bunch of sarcasm + also summarizing people's logic it puts the point in people's heads. And yes I extremely exaggerate but you get the point of what I'm calling them out on.
Also, if you push against someone for RVS trolling and act like town can't easily joke around and pretend to scumslip(after they've already
said
that
it was RVS trolling
)then you shouldn't be surprised if they overreact.
Also
, you haven't called out
your partner
Sonia for overreacting, so don't use me mimicking bullcrap logic as a way to direct attention off of her.
You overreacted first and it didn't feel justified. As soon as you got more votes on you, you went into full meltdown mode and I saw it as scum flailing which is why I called you out. I understand why Sonia got mad at you. Your questions are asnine, you're brushing off the truth over and over again by calling it alternative facts and you're acting as if everyone else is wrong for calling your posts fluff even though they are fluff. It's annoying and dumb and frustrating. It's funny though that you keep on OMGUSing and saying that Sonia and I are scum just because we scum read you