Newbie 1765 | URW | Endgame
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
It seems to be working rnIn post 23, Rautherdir wrote:The goal for day one is to create conversation. A self-vote doesn't really have the ability to do that. Which is why it's considered scummy to vote for yourself.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Then what started it if my wagon didn't?In post 201, Nachomamma8 wrote:
I don't like this attempt to take credit for starting conversation; it should be obvious that very little (if any at all) discussion is centering around your self-vote.In post 110, TheDominator37 wrote:
It seems to be working rnIn post 23, Rautherdir wrote:The goal for day one is to create conversation. A self-vote doesn't really have the ability to do that. Which is why it's considered scummy to vote for yourself.
I also don't like the vote on Superhaus; seems like an easy vote to make with LQ backing you up.
Vote: TheDominator37-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
But there is still a chance that your "solid town read" can be scum right?In post 293, Nachomamma8 wrote:
If I have solid townreads on three people and I lynch a lurker, I have a 40% chance of lynching scum. If I have solid townreads on 5 people and I lynch a lurker, I have a 66% chance of lynching scum. You point out that the odds are against us early but that shouldn't mean anything; when we lynch we aren't lynching randomly and waiting for information to fall into our lap is silly when there is no guarantee it will ever do so.In post 113, Lovesick wrote:Personally in my opinion, the only right moment for lurker hunting is if they had contributed nothing at all and half of our given time has gone. I mean otherwise, hunting for lurkers is a very easy way of lynching players and if done right, can be an advantage to the scum more so than the town as the ratio of mafia to town is 2:7.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
This post doesn't really sit well. Almost halting town discussion.In post 296, Superhans wrote:
Nacho, we've kinda moved on from discussing the Lovesick Wagon, as it wasn't really that fruitful.In post 292, Nachomamma8 wrote:
You keep framing the wagons like they have no purpose unless they are perfectly justified - nothing in mafia will be perfectly justified. Oftentimes you will catch scum for the wrong reasons. Content generation is about putting people in positions where they will have alignment-relevant reactions; maybe everyone votes you and you simply flake out (not alignment indicative), or maybe you get fired up and try to read the people voting you (what you did). I'm fine with giving people room as far as lynching is concerned, but I have no problems with pursuing a lead whenever and wherever I might find them.In post 113, Lovesick wrote:So Nachos, how is it a good idea to start hunting for lurkers when 24 hours hasn't past, not giving the players enough time to post as they may have things going on in their lives or are simply asleep? Also for the others which had jumped the wagon on myself, explain to me what type of evidence are you trying to gather from this?-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Doesnt mean its not fruit full.In post 305, Superhans wrote:
Huge amounts of arguments in which Lovesick was ONLY commenting large amounts of defensive content, and not actually offering anything original at all.In post 302, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Why wasn't it fruitful?In post 296, Superhans wrote:Nacho, we've kinda moved on from discussing the Lovesick Wagon, as it wasn't really that fruitful.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Good point. I've got mixed feelints on hans so null for me.In post 344, Superhans wrote:@Nachomamma8, in answer to your questions on why isn't it fruitful to talk about the Lovesick Wagon and my reads on Lovesick.
Lovesick's first comment was:
Calling for more activity, yet offering nothing herself to help initiate the activity. After the Lovesick wagon, she certainly provides content, but it the kind of content that clogs up your drains and makes sewege spill out of your toilet when you try and flush:In post 13, Lovesick wrote:ICs can be any alignment I believe, they're here to help the new, troubled players with the ways things work and etc however no more than that - correct me if I'm wrong though. Hopefully we have a spike of activity at one point otherwise this game may get difficult.
#113 Game theory & Defensive talk.
#131 Game theory.
#132 <-- After this I remove my vote on her for her scum readings on you (or so I thought)
#157 Buuut her next post actually takes back what I thought was a scum reading on you
Post 157 also contains this nice little passage which I have already commented on in #268
#160 Actually a scum read on me, which would be good, but I don't think contributes that much, as there is no examples, or further evidence.
#163 Game theory.
#165 Game theory.
#166 Game theory.
#173 Game theory.
#180 Game theory.
#207 Scum read on me, but also not very in depth. & Defensive
#211 Scum read on Nacho, but honestly its really not very deep.
#216 n/a
#223 Game theory.
#226 Game theory.
#229 Game theory.
#231 Defensive
#236 Game theory.
#237 Game theory.
#241 Game theory / Defensive (?)
#244 Good questions.
#248 n/a
#251 n/a
#261 n/a
#271 Scum read on me for being too jumpy, doesn't expand upon this. Has reads on Nacho, Connor and Rauth.
#272 Game theory.
#276 Defensive.
I whipped this list up quickly, and Game theory is a really really loose term, basically I used it to label her posts that didn't analyse other peoples comments, didn't ask other people questions or offer reads. If Lovesick implicitly mentioned someone as being scummy/towny/suspicious etc I put the scum read next to it.
You can see that most of the posts are on game theory.
Common Lovesick Game Theory Themes
By game theory I just mean discussions that are often imho not very constructive and look into the best way we should be playing the game.
Lovesick emphasises:
* Playing it slowly on other servers.
* Whether you should target multiple suspicious players at once
* Whether it is productive to target lurking players.
I basically disagree with most of what Lovesick believes. I think that early game lurk wagons are a good idea, Lovesick doesn't;
Lovesick is playing it far too safe for my liking, and even though she does make scum reads, they are all 'on the fence' scum reads, like Superhans you're suspious for x reason, but I need more evidence.
If Lovesick thinks I'm suspicious she should interrogate me, or provide quotes as evidence or offer examples of my "jumpy behaviour".
tldr
I think that Lovesick is town, but is offering virtually nothing of value to the conversation. I think she is town just because of how defensive she became when we were on the Lovesick-is-a-lurker wagon.
I thought that she had made a scum read on you in post 132, but when then takes it back, saying it wasn't a serious suspicion.
Fixedbrokenposttags.Youwant[post]1[/post]not[post]#1[/post].the#1means"ontheentiresite,theveryfirstpost"andthe1means"inthisthread,thefirstpost".
--P-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
The self vote was RVS and the hans vote was a pressure voteIn post 358, Rautherdir wrote:So what I get from the past few posts is that LQ votes based on his gut and not specific reasons. Which would make it extremely difficult for him to answer my question.
UNVOTE:
I still don't know for sure if you're town, LQ, but I noticed something a bit more disconcerting.
VOTE: TheDominator37
Somehow you've gotten away with three posts, two of which were votes. One of those votes was an RVS self-vote, and the other was an unexplained vote for Superhans. An explanation would be more than appropriate.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
ILYTIn post 379, ConnorJC wrote:
Are you kidding me? I thought TheDom at least made 2 more posts, but I guess I read wrong.In post 366, TheDominator37 wrote:
Then what started it if my wagon didn't?In post 201, Nachomamma8 wrote:
I don't like this attempt to take credit for starting conversation; it should be obvious that very little (if any at all) discussion is centering around your self-vote.In post 110, TheDominator37 wrote:
It seems to be working rnIn post 23, Rautherdir wrote:The goal for day one is to create conversation. A self-vote doesn't really have the ability to do that. Which is why it's considered scummy to vote for yourself.
I also don't like the vote on Superhaus; seems like an easy vote to make with LQ backing you up.
Vote: TheDominator37
TheDom is either a horrible town player or scum.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Awww I love you as wellIn post 381, LicketyQuickety wrote:
So quick to judge the wrong things...In post 379, ConnorJC wrote:
Are you kidding me? I thought TheDom at least made 2 more posts, but I guess I read wrong.In post 366, TheDominator37 wrote:
Then what started it if my wagon didn't?In post 201, Nachomamma8 wrote:
I don't like this attempt to take credit for starting conversation; it should be obvious that very little (if any at all) discussion is centering around your self-vote.In post 110, TheDominator37 wrote:
It seems to be working rnIn post 23, Rautherdir wrote:The goal for day one is to create conversation. A self-vote doesn't really have the ability to do that. Which is why it's considered scummy to vote for yourself.
I also don't like the vote on Superhaus; seems like an easy vote to make with LQ backing you up.
Vote: TheDominator37
TheDom is either a horrible town player or scum.
Yes, Dom has been sub par so far. But yes, I think he might pick his play up at some point. He is playing his game right now, let him do his thing (At least I will be pressuring him vicariously through other people, watching and waiting).
No, Dom is not either a horrible Town player or Scum. Not necessarily at least.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
A little hypocritical naked voting nacho isnt it?In post 406, ConnorJC wrote:UNVOTE: TheDominator37
VOTE: Nachomamma8
I think it's time we got some scum.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Yeah if han is scum we're lynchng rauth and vice versaIn post 469, Rautherdir wrote:Superhans seems noob town to me. My explanation for us being polite with each other is that we're both new players and realize that about each other.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
I disagree. My vote and more people talling about it and had more of a lasting impactIn post 559, Nachomamma8 wrote:
LQ's 6 created more meaningful conversation than your self-vote did.TheDominator37 wrote:
Then what started it if my wagon didn't?In post 201, Nachomamma8 wrote:
I don't like this attempt to take credit for starting conversation; it should be obvious that very little (if any at all) discussion is centering around your self-vote.In post 110, TheDominator37 wrote:
It seems to be working rnIn post 23, Rautherdir wrote:The goal for day one is to create conversation. A self-vote doesn't really have the ability to do that. Which is why it's considered scummy to vote for yourself.
I also don't like the vote on Superhaus; seems like an easy vote to make with LQ backing you up.
Vote: TheDominator37-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
It seems like you are trying to discredit me and I don't know whyIn post 560, Nachomamma8 wrote:Connor, why do you think that Dom is a bad line of pursuit? So far, the only contribution he's managed to make is attempting to take credit for starting the game, which doesn't really seem like a town mindset to me.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Is this a PR claim?In post 675, Rautherdir wrote:I'm not scum though. Though the other Power role could probably realize something I've left out and hinted at a few times.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
But a chocolate teapot is usefullIn post 808, toblerone187 wrote:I am now inclined to vote Dom. I don;t know what his game is - it just seems nuts either as town or a scum.
I will not put him on L-1 though until it has been discussed more. I am going out in 30 mins and won't be back for the rest of the evening
I assume that Dom will now not be replaced as he has posted - if not then I would agree with a lynch as he is about as much use as a chocolate teapot.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
I wasn't really active enough to pursue it correctly but if anything I thought you were a little defensive. Your slot is too confusing though I'm getting town and scum vibes from you so nullIn post 824, Superhans wrote:@Dom can you answer my question from 127,
"can you explain why you voted for me?"
What do you mean by pressure vote? Can you elaborate.
What results did this pressure vote yield, e.g. any reads as a result?-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Misrepresented- when someone says one thing and another person distorts that to acheive a goal. In our case you had your readlist and nacho said that you should vote for me because I was your biggest scum read.In post 835, ConnorJC wrote:
Misrepped? I'm not familiar with that term.In post 832, TheDominator37 wrote:Nacho why the push for my lynch? You misrepped connor to try and get him to join me.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
ConnorJC- Sheeps nacho way to much for my liking but the way he's being manipulated by nacho makes me think xthat if nacho is scum than connor is town. So overall slight town lean
Rautherdir- I'm still confused whether or not it was PR claim so idk.
toblerone187- Kind of mixing in with the crowd but has mae a few good points. Town
Superhans- Getting mixed feelings so null but most likely is the same allignment as rauth
Lovesick- I little to much IIOA for me. Slight scum lean
FancyPants- A little lurky at the start (heh) but had a nice sentrance slight town lean
LicketyQuickety- Can not ever find scum intentions in his posts. Moves town discussion along. Town
TheDominator37- My PM is green so Town
Nachomamma8- Is tunneling me and is manipulating others into voting me. Scum
VOTE: nacho-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
A site I used to play on had only role madness and no duplicate roles so the first people to claim were almost confirmed town. I could see someone thinking ms is the same and coming out with a PR claim.In post 863, Nachomamma8 wrote:
And instinct of a player who is new to playing scum isn't to claim PR immediately.In post 856, LicketyQuickety wrote:Err... not its not? Its based on instinct which is pretty much as basic as it gets?
When you first started playing, your instinct when you were overwhelmed by pressure was to disappear completely; this is a far more typical reaction than "claiming PR out of the blue". Off the top of my head, I can remember about 2 extremely premature claims (both VT claims, both town); extremely premature claims are pretty rare in the first place and the risk that the move carries for a scum player,especiallyfor a PR claim, makes it that much more unlikely that it's coming from scum.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
I don't really see a town motive in this post :/In post 858, LicketyQuickety wrote:AND, oh baby did you see that read I gave on Dom. That was one of the sickest Town reads I have ever given on someone.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
The enemy of my enemy is my friend so yesIn post 866, Superhans wrote:Question addressed to both LQ and TheDominator.
You're both voting for Nacho (on board a Nacho Wagon so to speak) but you are both basing your votes on completely separate lines of logic.
What do you think of each other's line of logic? LQ do you agree with Dom's reasoning, Dom do you agree with LQs reasoning?-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
-You assumed in that post that if a person is a solid town read tgat are for sure town.In post 873, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Yes.In post 799, TheDominator37 wrote:But there is still a chance that your "solid town read" can be scum right?
What does this have to do with anything?
Why?In post 826, TheDominator37 wrote:Yeah if han is scum we're lynchng rauth and vice versa
I disagree, but I'm not particularly interesting in this point because I don't think it's that meaningful. Why bring it up? Why was it when you came into the thread in 110 that you felt that the most important thing for you to do was to pat yourself on the back for generating discussion? What was the lasting impact that you believed that it created?In post 827, TheDominator37 wrote:I disagree. My vote and more people talling about it and had more of a lasting impact
I'm scumreading you. I don't think that when you post, you're doing so because you want to find and lynch scum. I aim to make it as transparent as possible so that if I'm wrong, people can correct me, and if I'm right, you can get lynched. Was there some huge contribution that you made at that point that I unfairly missed?In post 828, TheDominator37 wrote:It seems like you are trying to discredit me and I don't know why
I didn't misrep connor; I was unfamiliar with Connor's top suspect at that point because I wasn't fully caught up.In post 832, TheDominator37 wrote:Nacho why the push for my lynch? You misrepped connor to try and get him to join me.
What questions have I left unanswered?In post 834, Rautherdir wrote:Nachomamma. You've left a few questions unanswered. I'd be on the fence regarding you otherwise.
Why is Dominator almost a townread for you; what has he contributed that you agree with or think comes from a town mindset?
-their interactions between each other are weird like they were town reading each ther out of the gate. I guess that doesnt really matter anymore because he is conf town.
-It lasted a few pages and then the game was off but like you said this is irrelevant.
-Sure but I have been hunting today and I couldnt in the past because was out of town.
-But still why didn't you read the thread before pushing for my lynch?-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Pls. Make it stop
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
I didnt actually join a game until that summer soIn post 908, LicketyQuickety wrote:Funny that Dom and I joined 4 days apart and yet we don't run into each other until over and year and a half later in a newbie game.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Shhhhhh dont tell themIn post 911, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Dom and I are the Scum team.In post 909, ConnorJC wrote:This is very interesting. I feel there's at least 1 scum in Nacho/TheDom/LQ, but I don't know who it is.-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
I was at two Christmas parties out of town and then when I tried to catch up I fell asleep and forgot about his threadIn post 937, ConnorJC wrote:Ok, so I'm going to guess either Nacho or TheDom are mafia, with a high likelihood that LQ is scum if TheDom is.
@TheDom, you haven't really addressed this: What was the purpose of your extended lurking?-
-
TheDominator37 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: May 18, 2015
- Location: Dowisetrepla
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.