In post 1403, Ranger wrote:Imperium wrote:I also made the same exact argument concerning your knowledge of BB and that I believed you were an alt and that's how I was reading you and your reaction to your partner.
In Mafiaception, I did have meta on BBMolla:
Blitz 2. I was scum, yes. I was exaggerating, yes. I was also not lying.
You ignore that I clearly said that you were displaying knowledge you wouldn't have as a new player to claim that I asked you to talk about ongoing games, which I never did.
Except yes you are. You're saying I have knowledge I wouldn't have as a new player. I gained that knowledge through ongoing games. So, by making the accusation that I gained it through other means, yes you were. Because the only way I can answer truthfully is to say that it comes from ongoing games.
That you actually tried to claim I was trying to get you modkilled shows how much reaching bullshit you're putting into the game.
Who's writing words onto me now? I never said you were trying to get me modkilled. I said that you were deliberately making an argument I could not defend against without breaking rules. (Which probably would not result in a modkill.) It's something I don't see you, or ANY town player, do as town, but it IS something I've seen scum do. Multiple times in fact! Scum have tried to force rulebreaking or punishment of rulebreaking which town do not.
Um not this is you continuing to be obtuse as you're trying to assign some deliberate nefariousness to something which isn't. Since, in another game, mafiaception, I've already pointed out the alt thing (as did multiple other people in that game) and that I was reading you as that alt and talking about how your approach and read was in relation to the alt thing, it's well established. I mentioned it in the post you responded to. You've acknowledged that people have pointed out that they believe you're an alt.
If you want to keep claiming you're not an alt, that's fine, but my intention was very obvious. All you had to say was "I'm not an alt, people think I am but I'm not. I've read some of his games and I think I understand what type of player type he is." Simple as that. It reads to me as you going overboard trying to cover up your slip and you trying to make me look scummy in the process.
By the way, I don't think of Red Coyote or Titus at all being player types similar to Magna. Like at all. Anyway this is not a productive line of discussion. Anyone could look at the conversation and see that I was talking about you being an alt not trying to get you to talk about ongoing games, and I think it's more productive if you try to actually discuss our scum motivations in what we did yesterday.
ranger wrote:
Point out that little stuff here and there why don't you?
The summary is already there in
1308. The little stuff all ties back to the SnarkySnowman issue. Most of your play revolves around SnarkySnowman's slot.
How is being noncommittal about a snowman lynch mean we're scum?
Yeah, this question really answers itself.
What do we gain out of it in the event he flips scum?
I don't know. (Skipping the next one since that takes time to show.)
How does Snarky make up a signficant majority of our iso?
Everything you're doing is basically going back to SnarkySnowman. Your interactions with me, your interactions with RadiantCowbells, your reads on other players, most of it revolves around SnarkySnowman.
Flesh this out please. Yesterday, I'd say the majority of our iso is about CoM as they were who we were trying to get lynched.
The question really doesn't answer for itself. We're voting Snarky while saying we're not sure about him but yeah he's probably scum. Other than the jmo stuff that we didn't like, we have absolutely no idea how to read Snarky. I read through his iso of a few games last night and I have no idea how to read him. (I think I might have a couple ideas based on partner interaction after looking at a scum game but without that I have no clue.) What are we doing? You think we're scum, what are we doing? What do we have to gain or lose?
My interactions with you over Snarky is because you're trying to claim we're scum for our treatment to him. Our interaction with RC about Snarky is because he has a very strong scum read there. Our reads on other players don't have anything to do with Snarky? I have him as a probable scum read due to his predecessor and am listening to RC there, but none of my other reads have anything to do with Snarky.
Well maybe a part of my read on you is due to Snarky but that's how you are trying to tie us to Snarky without seeing if it actually makes sense, so this just looks like hot air.
ranger wrote:
Try to answer the question.
I don't know. It's something I'd expect Nacho to do. I don't know his mind well enough to guess. Testing the waters. Thinking he can get away with it. I could go on all day figuring out potential reasons, but I wouldn't know which of them would apply or not.
What experience with Nacho has led you to believe that he would behave in this way on day one? Because as we've been in a state of disbelief over your accusations, he's been just as incredulous as I am. What games has he done this in? I mean if you're going to call us scum for this you have to be able to answer why you think we'd do this.
And before you keep just going oh I don't know he's nacho, you have to remember that we are in a hydra. Yes, Nacho will push limits, but to what we did yesterday? If partnered with Snarky? And the entire scum team is vanilla? I don't see it. But any type of recklessness that Nacho might have in his scum game would automatically be tempered in a hydra with me. And I'm the one who started hard pushing CoM yesterday, that was me. I'm the one who was about to flip a table if I didn't get my lynch, that was me. He was posting too and he was very clearly wanting it as well, but a large part of that was me.
ranger wrote:
That would mean that we considered the rest of our team mates expendable and would want to keep ourselves under the best light possible, which would mean not shooting ourselves in the foot day one.
And there's plenty of material where you call SnarkySnowman('s slot) suspicious and plenty of material where you call Lowell suspicious if I recall correctly, so if my scumteam theory is correct you could in fact get away with it interactions-wise.
No, Lowell's been a decentish town read for us. I did think of him as a potential busser for CoM, but Nacho had him as town and today I posted about why I thought he was town.