I'm sad that I can not defend against this argument . All hillbillys do have dogs.
for sounding like he ain't from these here states.
I can understand redneck. I have trouble speaking it fluently, but I do have lots of practice.In post 20, Dry-fit wrote:This may be a slight towntell from CooLDoG. I think scum would be less likely to talk as if they are a hillbilly.
I live in Kentucky. It comes with the territory. Although the worst rednecks come from Tennessee, everyone knows that.In post 25, Mr_Ree wrote:I have no idea what to do with this ^.
my point.In post 28, MrObvious wrote:If you're from Kentucky, I'm sure your redneck is fluent.
My thoughts on the self vote are basically null. Neither town nor scum have motivation to self vote at this point in the game. In my opinion it is just jebus having some fun.
Why are we talking about jesters right now? Do you know something I don't?In post 30, MrObvious wrote:Is this some kind of ploy to gain a jester free pass?In post 26, Jebus wrote:Clearly that means I'm a jester.
BULLSHIT META INCOMING!!!! Close up the barn. Our horses might gets outs. I'll be a gettin the four-wheeler!
never
So you make a post to clarify your stance but you still don't explain why ree>obvious (the person who you think is scummy)... This needs clarification.In post 43, MaraPim wrote:And to make it clear, yes I voted Ree.
And yes, my gut tingles with Obvious's posts.
~PM
yeah, your meta argument is stupid. The reason it is stupid is because you basically admit here that you are playing specifically towards your meta. This is why self-meta is fucking pointless and I'm happy with my vote.In post 62, Mr_Ree wrote:
@cooldog: that's my typical response to Ms. M's question.You can reference our last game together,Slenderman, for proof that it doesn't indicate alignment. I assure you I have read my role PM. I'm just not going to claim my role at this time.
Appreciate the misrep though.
I agree with this. ree has so far only been on the defensive. He has yet to go on the attack, which is the main goal of the town.In post 77, nopointinactingup wrote: Seems like he's spending more time trying to make himself look town rather than scum-hunt.
My vote was an rvs vote, so you could say that I was not happy with it. But here is the actual post I was referring to:In post 91, Mr_Ree wrote:I'll start with Cooldog
I take this to mean you didn't like your vote before. The analysis is faulty as was pointed out. I didn't say I didn't read my role PM and it was a far jump to assume that.In post 57, CooLDoG wrote:ree's last post is really awkward. He seems like he is trying to gain town points by saying that he hasn't checked his role pm and thus can't be operating off of scum motivation. Hmmm... I like my vote now.This is a blatent Misrepwhich is why I answered it by explaining why it was a misrep.
It is impossible for me to misrepresent something that you actually said. Here you were trying to gain town credit by say that you had to check your role pm. This is a fact.In post 55, Mr_Ree wrote:
Of course you can trust me, I'm the town gynecologist....or was it psychologist... day vig maybe? I should really check my role PM again...
wait, wait wait. This is how it goes down:This is GOLD! You say my arguement is stupid, because it completely contradicts yours. All I was saying is that I used the exact same response before when asked a similar pointless question.In post 76, CooLDoG wrote:yeah, your meta argument is stupid. The reason it is stupid is because you basically admit here that you are playing specifically towards your meta. This is why self-meta is fucking pointless and I'm happy with my vote.In post 62, Mr_Ree wrote: @cooldog: that's my typical response to Ms. M's question.You can reference our last game together,Slenderman, for proof that it doesn't indicate alignment. I assure you I have read my role PM. I'm just not going to claim my role at this time. Appreciate the misrep though.
The question goes nowhere, the answer goes nowhere, yet you try to fashion it into a tell using a misrep. Let's disect this post a little, shall we.
"Yeah, your meta arguement is stupid" - translation: screw you for making me look bad by calling me on my misrep.
"The reason it is stupid is because you basically admit here that you are playing specifically towards your meta" Translation: you just admitted that you have done the exact same thing before and it had no bearing on your alignment which makes my analysis of it look bad.
"This is why self meta is fucking pointless and I'm happy with my vote" Translation: I have nothing else to call you on so I'm just going to keep pushing this crap meta angle and hope someone buys it.
By being on the attack, I mean going after people for doing scummy stuff. Although this argument has been defeated by the fact that you are now attacking me. I have tried town hunting, I have found it less effective in the early stages of the game due to the fact that one must have reads onI have been on the attack, I've just been building my reads and biding my time.In post 81, CooLDoG wrote:I agree with this. ree has so far only been on the defensive. He has yet to go on the attack, which is the main goal of the town.In post 77, nopointinactingup wrote: Seems like he's spending more time trying to make himself look town rather than scum-hunt.
I believe I've taken several jabs at you. I've stated that Mr. Obvious has been becoming increasingly suspicious, I voted Timewarp for his ridiculous post that he never followed up on.
Of course, I don't believe that the main goal of town is to constantly be on the attack. The main goal of town is to build reads on all the players in an attempt to find scum. To that effect, I've given dry-fit town points and attempted to get some serious responses out of Jebus, while building reads on several other players.
Are you trying to tell me that townhunting does not give the same quality of reads or PoE that scumhunting gives? Are you telling me that a balanced approach to both does not net scum? You have to be out of your mind.
I think my link to my first game gives a pretty good response, don't you think? Also I don't really care about that. If I get lynched over "talking like a hill billy" in a hill billy game, that is not a game I would like to be in.I have news for you, so is your scumhunting. Your views are to narrow to see the bigger picture.In post 83, CooLDoG wrote:my replies are always out of focus.
Now, speaking of meta, well done ignoring the back and forth between dry fit and myself regarding our views on "acting like a hillbilly" by giving your location. It completely ignores the spirit of what we were saying. I have news for you, with the advent of shows like Duck Dynasty and Swamp People, everyone can now be fluent in redneck. I haven't seen anyone else pull the "act like a hillbilly act", why do you feel that you have to. You do realize town is hunting hillbillies this game right? How would you react if i was in a game with you hunting mafia and I started talking like a 1930's gangster? Would that make me seem more town or more scum to you?
Shorry Sham, you killed my brother, shee...
It was joke. I actually do not have a souther accent when I speak normally. I can force a pretty good one though. And sometimes in my posts the word "sorta" does creep in a little. But the point was that it was a joke for a hill billy themed game... it was a rvs vote.In post 91, Mr_Ree wrote: "People speak in the vernacular of the region where they grew up involuntarily" Do you really believe this?
so does that means you won't put any effort into scum hunting? Come on, 5 pages and nothing thor?In post 110, Thor665 wrote:I'm glad that we're back in RVS.
I wasn't talking about you. I was talking to ree...In post 120, Dry-fit wrote:Sorry I haven't been able to post, having internet problems. Hopefully will get that fixed tomorrow.Why not do something about it then?In post 110, Thor665 wrote:I'm glad that we're back in RVS.
Have you been paying attention? I was saying that talking like a hillbilly made you seem moreCooLDoG wrote:If I get lynched over "talking like a hill billy" in a hill billy game, that is not a game I would like to be in.town.
If meta is your only defense then 100% yes. I will lynch your ass every game for saying the words "I did it in xyz game and I flipped town, therefore I am town here".In post 124, Mr_Ree wrote: I just skimmed through Cooldog's post. Are you using a Meta argument to say that you always vote people who use Meta arguments because you think Meta is only used by scum?
Really?
So is he saying he is scum for doing it? seriosu question. If he wasn't trying to prove he was town by his self meta, why did he bring it up in the discussion of his weird non-reading/helf-read/sorta reading... rolepm thing?In post 125, MaraPim wrote:First of, Mr Ree's self meta argument.
CoolDog mentioned that he thought Ree meant that he hadn't read his role PM. To disprove this, Mr Ree mentioned that he has done it in a different game and he shows how and why. He's not saying that he's town for doing it before as town. Huge difference
wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. So you aren't trying to prove you are town, eh? You defense is just a load of hogwash. get over it and get yo ass lycnhed plox.In post 129, Mr_Ree wrote:I'll bite. I was trying to say it was null. Did you not see that? It's in the same post.
My answers, no, no and no
Nice misrepresent.
Not about meta. Going back to rvs means that you have no reads, which I found to be unbelievable.In post 135, Thor665 wrote:Whut?In post 116, CooLDoG wrote:so does that means you won't put any effort into scum hunting? Come on, 5 pages and nothing thor?In post 110, Thor665 wrote:I'm glad that we're back in RVS.
People who hate meta have a weird concept of what meta is.
okay, now I understand your post. You were talking about others not you.In post 146, Thor665 wrote:I would agree that seems odd.In post 144, CooLDoG wrote:ohh okay.
getting out of rvs, presumably with reads, and then going back to rvs, presumably without reads, seems odd. Especially on page 5.
better now?
Which is why I was annoyed so many people did it.
So...yes?
because mara is ree's buddy... that is a possible explanation. Although it is a touch too early to start talking about buddys and fulls scum teams.In post 152, Dry-fit wrote:If each post he makes gives us a stronger read on him, why should he stop posting? Especially since you seem to think there's a good chance Dog is scum.In post 147, MaraPim wrote:I think Dog should stop talking, he gets scummier and scummier with each post. will talk to Pim about moving the vote again
bullshit. You are defended ree for no reason. It is 8 pages into the game and you already have an obv town read who also happens to be aIn post 174, Ms Marangal wrote: have a chance at loosing a strong town player with Ree gone so...
~Mara
Wow, this is so bad. This is really bad. You want the town to have a hard time finding scum. Wow.In post 181, MaraPim wrote:D
Anyway, I told him to stop talking because it's making the victory that much more easier for us. I dunno about you, but I like challenges. it's no fun when something is an easy gain, especially when it comes to mafia.
why are you defending mara on page 8?In post 185, Mr_Ree wrote:Odd that you people would vote a player who is going VLA and is therefore unable to defend themself for the next 3 or 4 days. Not classy.
no, he/she/it is scum for obstructing the towns scumhunting. Wanting the game to be harder IS NOT pro-town.In post 202, havingfitz wrote:So is MaraPim town?In post 199, CooLDoG wrote:you wanted the game to be harder for you and thus harder for the town to find scum.
except that is not what she said. IF she had said, "CooLDoG can now stop posting becuase I know he is scum" then it would have been an entirly different story.In post 224, Mr_Ree wrote:To me it sounded like she already was pretty sure about him and his responses were just reinforcing the read. She/it had the vote down already and seemed fairly confident of his alignment when Mara said that.
And you say exactly what ree just said. Except for one small fact. YOU DIDN'T SAY THAT THE FIRST TIME.In post 227, MaraPim wrote:Because I wasn't at that point? I already felt like I could effectively pin Cooldog as scum to the point where, it would be safe for me to also look for partners. His response that I quoted where I told him to be quiet made my scum-read on him that much more realisticIn post 223, Dry-fit wrote:No. It's that Mara's suggestion doesn't make any sense from the perspective of someone trying to determine CooLDoG's alignment.
also this.In post 235, T S O wrote:It just seems odd that Mara found the need to actually chainsaw you. If I thought someone was strong Town, then I'd presume with such a strong read so early, said person could handle themselves without me chainsawing them.In post 180, Mr_Ree wrote:
Regarding Ms M.'s post: I don't see anything wrong with it. Sounds about right to me.Is it scummy to defend someone you have a town read on?Please tell me what specifically you find wrong about it.
we lynch mara or ree today and when one of them flips scum we lynch the other.
cool, back to ree.
Fruit can also symbolize sexuality in art. [/only thing I learned from that art class]In post 245, Mr_Ree wrote:You said good fruit. Fruit is a derogatory term for homosexual. That's an insult. Insults are scummy. Fake vote: Thor
because it would have given you a possible way to disengage from my wagon and possibly disassociate from me if needed... But this does not answer to my point that town would not want to make the game harder. You have yet to defend that.In post 252, MaraPim wrote: I even do it myself.
Also, if we’re scum and you’re town, why would we ask you to shut up when you’re painting yourself scummy?
~PM
okay, seems like you will have to give up then.In post 254, ThAdmiral wrote:If ree gets lynched over cooldog I give up on this game.
hmm.. I guess your points aren't as good as you thought they were... also, "WHHHHHHYYYY MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
Don't need to read the rest of the post. GG everyone, we have two scum dead d1.In post 263, MaraPim wrote:I never said Ree was 100 percent scum, I'm fairly sure I used 95%.
I think your own words twist all by themselves...In post 268, Mr_Ree wrote:@Obvious: So you agree that twisting people's words is scummy right?
the problem is that you are the one who is being attacked. You are simply viewing this game from a different perspective. With that said, I don't put any stock in meta, so if you think that my actions in this game merit a vote, then by all means vote me, but at this point I think you are just grasping at straws with a rather comical attempt at omgus.In post 270, Mr_Ree wrote: Do you realize that in that game he never tried to twist anyone's words in order to get a lynch?
He took a completely different stance on defense.
This is NOT the same cooldog. Look at the iso's. I can actually read THAT Cooldog as town.
mara.In post 289, ThAdmiral wrote:Ok there are a bunch of us that want to lynch cooldog, and others that want to lynch ree, but it looks like both wagons have stalled.
Who does everyone think is the best compromise/potential third option?
mara and ree are equal to me. I keep my vote on the highest of the two... whenever one gets equal to the other I hop.In post 297, Thor665 wrote:So vote her then?In post 296, CooLDoG wrote:mara.In post 289, ThAdmiral wrote:Ok there are a bunch of us that want to lynch cooldog, and others that want to lynch ree, but it looks like both wagons have stalled.
Who does everyone think is the best compromise/potential third option?
what do you think of the relationship between mara and ree?In post 303, T S O wrote:@Dry-fit: I believe scum is one of {Cool, Ree} and I'm trying to see who I would prefer. Mara isn't quite scummy enough for lynch -yet-.
this post is pretty ironic.In post 293, T S O wrote:I've posted.
Instead of trying to get prods, how about contributing? You're doing your best to look busy without actually doing anything.
what exactly?In post 307, T S O wrote: Mara-Ree is odd but Mara believes he is hard town and isn't faking it IMO. Whether he is...
same. Thor seems to take a really weird position. It seems hard to want to lynch mara and not ree. The two are so connected they are literally the same person it seems like.In post 313, nopointinactingup wrote:I have no idea why the Ree wagon is stalling up
firstly I'm sorry for no posts yesterday. I was a little bit busy, and I will be today too.In post 325, Aj The Epic wrote:
Cooldog, can I get some reads on people BESIDES Ree/Marangal. I need these for when they flip, you can't simply change them.
also this was wrong. I'm in another game with some of the same people, and I got confused between the two games. With that said If I get to l-1 I will claim both my role and flavor.
you are an idiot. Plane and simple. There is no way that you could possibly construe and argument against meta to mean taht I am for it. The my posts are always out of focus is a joke, if you think jokes should be taken seriously then vote your fucking self, because you actively wanted to make the game harder. Secondly, how the fuck. How the fuck, could you some how say that me using meta to illustrate why meta is bullshit=I luv meta ( <3 ?). How the fuck.In post 350, MaraPim wrote: and you used initially stated Ree was scum because he used self-Meta... yet, when you state that "your replies are always out of focus" and by stating " I Never use Meta in games" you do the exact same thing that made you think Ree was scum, which is why your scum.
and your argument is still, literally, fucking stupid. literally: fucking stupid.In post 373, MaraPim wrote:....In post 372, MrObvious wrote:You're ridiculous. First, I didn't refer to any game where I was town and use it as a defense for myself like Ree did. Second, my read on Cooldog is partially based on meta from the last game I played. Third, the meta I used from the games I've played was illustrating that more times than not, there are no safe roles. Get your facts straight before you start making false claims.In post 369, Ms Marangal wrote: and I didn't construe the fact that you using self-meta means you love it, I came to the conclusion that you are a hypocrite for calling Ree scum for using self-meta when you used it yourself.
that was for Cooldog
bread crumb vt? Why would I do that?In post 355, MrObvious wrote:At the time of your jump off of the Ree wagon, you didn't.In post 350, MaraPim wrote: Obvious, yeah but you were saying that I didn't explain myself at all.
------
Cooldog did you breadcrumb your role anywhere?
In post 356, Bacde wrote:breadcrumb vt?In post 355, MrObvious wrote:At the time of your jump off of the Ree wagon, you didn't.In post 350, MaraPim wrote: Obvious, yeah but you were saying that I didn't explain myself at all.
------
Cooldog did you breadcrumb your role anywhere?
lol
not meIn post 358, Aj The Epic wrote:Who breadcrumbs either of that?
have you breadcrumbed your flavor ree? If you are going to call me scum for not doing you sure as fuck had better have.In post 361, Mr_Ree wrote:Because he claimed VT?
How does a sample Role PM and lack of flavor breadcrumbs (who does that?) convince you of anything?
exactly. For example, It is like trying to make an argument against the existence of a god without using the word god. It is nearly impossible, and stupid to expect one to never use something they don't believe in as an example to prove their point. I was giving mara an example of why I don't believe in meta by using an extreme example of how using the "meta logic" (which was correctly applied btw.) is quite possibly the dumbest thing you can do in a mafia game. Specifically regarding self meta.In post 371, havingfitz wrote:I have been in a few games where CoolDog has given people crap about meta. How is he supposed to illustrate his habit of giving people shit about using meta if he doesn't refer to his meta for doing it? It does come across as hypocritical but it can't be avoided and is, iirc, about the extent of his use of meta. Using that point against him is weeeeeak.In post 369, Ms Marangal wrote:I came to the conclusion that you are a hypocrite for calling Ree scum for using self-meta when you used it yourself.
actually you are right, that was a misrep there. But T S O what do you think? You haven't posted much at all.In post 376, T S O wrote:Horrific misrep there. No-one said you were scum for lack of breadcrumbing. Your play all game has been the issue. Ree's argument is that a VT claim doesn't clean you but you twist his words into saying he's calling you scum solely on lack of flavour breadcrumbing when that's not it at all. There's also an element of role fishing there - "why didn't you breadcrumb your flavour?" is a hard question to answer without revealing something.In post 375, CooLDoG wrote:bread crumb vt? Why would I do that?In post 355, MrObvious wrote:At the time of your jump off of the Ree wagon, you didn't.In post 350, MaraPim wrote: Obvious, yeah but you were saying that I didn't explain myself at all.
------
Cooldog did you breadcrumb your role anywhere?
In post 356, Bacde wrote:breadcrumb vt?In post 355, MrObvious wrote:At the time of your jump off of the Ree wagon, you didn't.In post 350, MaraPim wrote: Obvious, yeah but you were saying that I didn't explain myself at all.
------
Cooldog did you breadcrumb your role anywhere?
lolnot meIn post 358, Aj The Epic wrote:Who breadcrumbs either of that?have you breadcrumbed your flavor ree? If you are going to call me scum for not doing you sure as fuck had better have.In post 361, Mr_Ree wrote:Because he claimed VT?
How does a sample Role PM and lack of flavor breadcrumbs (who does that?) convince you of anything?
By ree's own logic both me and him are scum. And we are letting this guy live.
Yeah, except that it always happens.In post 391, Aj The Epic wrote:Dueling wagons, or counter wagons, are inherently scummy.