I know my predecessors are town and I can't defend their actions/reads/etc, so why should I care about what they did?In post 365, Josh_B wrote:Your predecessors were extremely scummy. Is there anything you want to say about that?
This is the post of reads I was working on during night (I read the whole game but just skimmed some of the larger walls).
Josh_B: I honestly have no idea what to make of this guy. Super-early VT claims tend to be legit from my experience, but his argument with (mainly) mafioso just seems all sorts of convoluted. In the end I have him on the town side of null, but it's shaky.
Not_Mafia: Predecessor was lurk-null, N_M himself has nothing really alignment-indicative as far as I can tell. Even his posts today, not 100% sure what to make of it.
imkingdavid: Getting a town vibe from this guy. He seems to match a decent amount of my thoughts on various things.
goodmorning: Eh town-null. Seems to be saying all the right things but something in my head is tweaking.
saturnine: Also town. Nothing in that ISO looks like scum to me.
I Love Fairies: I kinda like this slot for scum. I see needless cruft and a decent amount of somewhat distracting "I'm bad mmmkay". I had a gut feeling of "something's not right here"; GM then said today "It's all been fluff, theory, WIFOM", which fits right in.
Looking back I have only one "scum read". Ergh. Let's say I'm caught between N_M and GM for a #2.
I don't currently feel like commenting on the nightkill, it's just WIFOM city and won't help anyone.