NY 187: Pariah's Mafia [/FIN]
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 39, dragonspawn wrote:So he omgus and you vote for me? And you guys don't offer any reasoning. Interesting. I'll have to make a note of that for later.
Defensive reaction to fun rvs action noted think I may be keeping my vote here for a while.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 89, dragonspawn wrote:In post 84, Garmr wrote:Defensive is your reaction to multiple RVs votes on yourself
Btw how can you make me being defensive the justification for your vote if you vote for me before the post that is supposedly defensive?
My vote was for fun your response made it cereal simple stuff.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 113, Keyser Söze wrote:A pre-flip associative read:
In post 108, Garmr wrote:If dragon spawn flips scum this game it wouldn't surprise me if boon flips scum
Can you explain this please.
Boonskies seems to be fighting against A ds lynch/wagon even through wagons this early and early wagons tend to drop really fast. Boons post have been attacking the wagon.
In post 48, Boonskiies wrote:NOOOOO.
DRAGONSPAWN IS MY BESTY.
VOTE: The Cow
For voting my other main man.
In post 53, Boonskiies wrote:But...but...but...Dragon. How about I make an actual vote?
VOTE: Garmr
He basically started this pile on wagon. Sword was just jokingly OMGUS'ing.
And after those votes attacking the wagon he posts this.
In post 65, Boonskiies wrote:Eh, I won't fight the lynch, but I'm not going to join it unless he's L-1.
This feels like boonskies backing off from dragonspawn and I don't feel boon is competent enough as scum to not make mistakes like these.
Tbh I feel boon and dragon spawn seem connected and if they were connected in a townie way boon skies wouldn't of posted the post above and If boon skies was just town reading dragon then he wouldn't be posted this post. Post 65 Is a scummy post tbh I am happy with getting rid of boon and dragon Already easy game is easy.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 136, dragonspawn wrote:But I am looking at the context that's my point. I joke around and they respond with serious votes. So I give them a serious response noting their behavior and I'm taking it too seriously? I understand the context fairly well.
There were two back to back serious responses to my jokingly pointing at omgus. And to this point there has been no real attempt to explain why they responded that way. And when I try to ask question and notice this, I'm told I'm being defensive. How was I supposed to respond? I asked that a while ago but no one has answered.
VOTE: keyser[\v]
I want to see a respond to who you think are scum whether you vote for them or not. If you haven't guessed I don't like my questions being dodged
You know my initial vote was a rvs and your response to it was when it got serious. Judging by aeronauts replies I think his the same not sure.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 145, Kitty Galore wrote:Hey there, so in watching the dragon wagon show, I have a couple of thoughts. I like keysers and aeronauts analysis and questioning.
My opinion of dragons response is that it is not an OVER reaction, it is a dragon reaction. I have played with him before and it seems like a typical dragon response. I don't see it being alignment indicative. I think serious votes on the wagon are bad.
No your bad hmmppphh-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 181, RadiantCowbells wrote:In post 178, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 102, RadiantCowbells wrote:Spreading awareness of a tell decreases it's value.
I'd rather keep this one for myself.
You would rather weasel out of explaining anything at all.
That is, inherrently, anti town at best.
VOTE: RC
Share what you have or don't bother posting it.
What the fuck did you just say to me you little shit?
I'll have you know I'm the top scumhunter in the entire MafiaScum and have over 300 confirmed scum lynches.
I'm extensively trained in VCA and have conducted numerous secret raids on the Werewolves.
You are nothing to me but anotherhated townie.
I did something like this to crumb a hated role once are you crumbing one?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 227, Bellaphant wrote:@kitty - like what? 'Coz that wasn't it. Who is your no1 lynch rn?
@Gamr, can you explain about your comment on associative before a flip?
Already answered that in my post right after maybe read my iso-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 231, RadiantCowbells wrote:Everyone took my navy seal copypasta so seriously, jesus.
No, I am not hated. No, I'm not claiming to be the best scumhunter on MS.
Nor have I got over 300 confirmed scum lynches.
It's just a joke. chill
I was hated scum recently waited till day 4 to claim but crumbed day 1 won the game with one vote on me which was during day 1 So that's why I asked-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 236, Bellaphant wrote:@Gamr - fine, but associatives before a flip weirds me out. I was more interested in the 'why' than the what, but ok for now.
Meh I have done it before-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 225, Kitty Galore wrote:In post 179, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 134, dragonspawn wrote:
So I have to ask you this, why do you feel the need to construct straw men to attack? In fact, why are you attacking in the first place? Your pushing the wagon pretty hard for someone who isn't voting for it.
You're pushing my wagon at the same time as questioning those on the wagon not voting for any of us. Who exactly are you scum reading? Because right now it looks like you are trying to look like you are scum hunting without actually putting your money where your mouth is
This is good.
In post 141, Aeronaut wrote:
Also, this brings up a good point. BBT, do you have reads on any other people right now besides Dragon?
Yes, I do! Dragon is probably town. Oh no, wait, that's still about Dragon. Ummm...can I phone a friend?
In post 145, Kitty Galore wrote:I think serious votes on the wagon are bad.
Are you planning on doing anything about those serious votes that you dislike?
Yes.
Oh your so lucky to have a at rc gets a town read-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@aero hated town should always be claimed so me asking the role isn't a bad thing but only a competent player would know that.
Also that game when I was hider I started off bad but then I got two town confirmed and lynched two scum which included you so don't be bitter you made shit choices and got screwed over because you under estimated also you were kinda obvious scum-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@aero sorry I misread what you were saying thought that was aimed at me personally.
@BBT
In post 299, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 242, Garmr wrote:I don't remember dragon spawn being this oblivious in my mason game with him he demonstrated the ability to think I even understood his thought process in my mafia game against him he was logical this feels like a act to play off as dumb
Can you quote where Dragon is acting dumb because I don't see it?
Well I'm to lazy to quote it but the whole rvs scenario when he thought my vote was serious and over reacted. When people were playing him off as lacking the ability to read post efficiently he then acts if rc was being serious lol I know dragon spawn is more perspective than that, his not titus he can read emotions in post.(That may be titus's defense lawyer training through not to read emotion.) Also his reply to shazam saying how is rc against me.
@Boon I am in no hood the hood life joke was just for fun.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
No I understand But what I'm saying is dragonspawn is smarter than what people are giving him credit for and it seems like his playing along with I'm dumb concept. Once off I understand and I could see happening but for the entire game nope nope nope. The DS I remember is pretty competent and isn't like this.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 510, davesaz wrote:In post 376, davesaz wrote:In post 368, Garmr wrote:I feel quite comfortable now just sitting here thinking and taking note of reads to myself. large games are like that through I can always sit back and analysis things at my own pace.
My turn to ask... my earlier impression of your play was to pick something and tunnel it. Did I misremember or something?
@Garmr, don't think I got an answer on this.
Anyone know Garmr well enough to comment on meta?
Tbh I find that staying back and keeping things to myself lets me apply more pressure but at times I can't resist to lay it down I tend to to say one thing and do another. Like after day 1 I was going to vote aero at the start of the day but changed my mind after anaylising the night actions..-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Well I keep playing a couple of scenarios in my head.
1.dragon is town and scum don't want to push his wagon -they don't want to be at the end of it with a double vote or they couldn't because it was losing support-
2.the reason that dragon wasn't pushed to l-1 was because he is scum.
I'm personally leaning towards the second scenario but Taking both into consideration BBT looks the worse to me.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 609, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 551, Garmr wrote:@fa-q2
Not by itself but there are other things that add up and nothing really is irrelevant in a game of minds. But fa_q2 your on my to lynch list after ds and bbt.
Oh no.
Why bother stating this if you are not going to bother with a case. There is nothing to respond to. How about you bother to construct a why rather than blanket (and useless) statement? Looking to find out how well that idea will fly before actually committing?
Shhh it's ok little faq2 I will say my thoughts latter after the lynches unless you kill me first.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 612, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 611, Garmr wrote:In post 609, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 551, Garmr wrote:@fa-q2
Not by itself but there are other things that add up and nothing really is irrelevant in a game of minds. But fa_q2 your on my to lynch list after ds and bbt.
Oh no.
Why bother stating this if you are not going to bother with a case. There is nothing to respond to. How about you bother to construct a why rather than blanket (and useless) statement? Looking to find out how well that idea will fly before actually committing?
Shhh it's ok little faq2 I will say my thoughts latter after the lynches unless you kill me first.
So how they flip does not seem to matter to you either - interesting.
And this shows how obvious of a scum you are because I never said that. Is this your first scum game-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
1.Yes stand firm with that thought.
2.Kling felt off I guess I was wrong. Was mostly gut and I wanted to see her reaction shame the day ended so fast and unexpectedly. ;/
Am going to say my bbt scum read is independent of dragonspawn. But going to say I could care less which one I lynch first as view them both as strong scum reads.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 826, davesaz wrote:It's still afternoon on aworkday for me.
This is not alignment indicative for BBT, I've seen similar from him as both town and scum. The point on FA is good because even if multiball screws with "one extra kill" vs "two extra", SK is already expecting 2 and might be surprised by 3. In fact, I think that's good enough to vote for now. I can always read deeper after work.
VOTE: FA_Q2
So your calling faq sk yet there's other possibilities like him being faction scum or a vig.
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 845, Garmr wrote:In post 826, davesaz wrote:It's still afternoon on aworkday for me.
This is not alignment indicative for BBT, I've seen similar from him as both town and scum. The point on FA is good because even if multiball screws with "one extra kill" vs "two extra", SK is already expecting 2 and might be surprised by 3. In fact, I think that's good enough to vote for now. I can always read deeper after work.
VOTE: FA_Q2
So your calling faq sk yet there's other possibilities like him being faction scum or a vig.
Forgot to mention the possibility he even might of just guessed multiscum from the size of this game and the behavior of people day 1.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 860, TheDominator37 wrote:Spoiler: fingers crossed spoiler will work for garmr
So if you look through these posts garmr has these short, fluff, easy town cred go with the flow kind of posts. None of his reads have any original opinions nor does he have any original scum reads himself. Also if you look at this post again. (Posting it again so you know what I am talking about)
In post 465, Garmr wrote:Could be some ones a double voter
Here garmr brings up the possibility of a double vote during the evening phase. A BBT garmr scum team in my opinion is a very probable setup
Anyone with half a brain could of drew that conclusion don't feel bad that you couldn't.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I think that people that are town on the prolapsed wagon were stupid or just misreading prolapsed noob vibe. Tbh just got to figure out the town from the scum. Second the scum on it are probably bluewaffle,dragonspawn,davesaz I was annoyed with faq for some reason and but his more a null at this stage.
I'm going to post another post so I will answer more questions after it. I just don't want to get caught up replies.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 205, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm town reading you Aero. That was unfair of me, I hope you accept my apology. I couldn't resist.
This makes me feel like like bluetoffee didn't want to step on aeros toes and get scum read off him. If they are buddies it could be a way of trying to avoid drawing attention to aero I feel like its the former rather than the latter.
In post 498, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Anna was fairly obviously town; Kling was the vig shot if there is a vig.
Mykonian was 100% the scum kill. Could be multi-ball with scum also looking for other scum and killing Anna, that should be considered.
Seems to have intimate knowledge of the kills with reasoning behind it. Tbh Mykonian wasn't even universally read as town. I can name a few that scum read him (kittygolare,kling,rc)
Also this is extremely scummy behaviour
In post 735, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Another important comment for you to add;
BBT gives 0 fucks about this game.
Discuss.
UNVOTE:
This contradicts the mind set of someone with a power role as bbt claims he has.
In post 740, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I appreciate it but unfortunately I won't be lynched Today.
This indicates a powerole claims and his quite happy to announce the intention. His trying to scare people off his wagon.
It's pretty obvious your going to claim vig through I don't believe your actions are that of a vig more of a sk or mafiaso trying to draw out a claim. Your behavior is focused on survival so that pushes way more into the sk/mafia realm than town.
VOTE: Bluewaffle-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 900, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't think I have the energy.
Garmr has already called my role. The fact he is still willing to lynch me should speak volumes to his alignment.
I'm the vig. I killed Kling on last night.
Please lynch me.
Why kill kling you showed little to no interest in her on day 1. In fact you showed little interest in anyone other than prolasped.
I feel you are more likely to be the sk or mafia than you are town and being a power role doesn't mean you should avoid a lynch that logic lead to a couple of mislynches in my last scum game and probably helped us win against 6 confirmed towns.
Also you claiming that could be a way to try and bait out a power role it doesn't mean you necessarily made the kill.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@boonskies Your right about the night kills bit nearly everyone on this site tends to shoot N1 I see no reason not to. But what makes BBT scum is his behavior and I have listed reasons why what he has done and how he acts makes him scum.
Also to those idiots yes complete idiots saying he has to be a vig. You should think about retiring from mafia. This has multiple kills in one night suggesting a multiscum game If it's multiple faction game then scum wouldn't know if BBT is lying or not (including Sk). He could easily Be a SK or a rival faction scum. Hell he could be lying about shooting kling.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread