In post 70, RadiantCowbells wrote:I've seen such comments from scum before, especially given that we are likely pressuring his buddy if he's scum.
Not saying he's scum, just saying that it's pretty possible to go either way.
Thought about this (in reference to
63) and it's the "until" that makes me read it as town. Without that word, you'd be right, it'd be null or even leaning scum, but the way it's phrased he's just trying to push you for content and it seems town to me.
In post 76, Kyubey The Kid wrote:While I'm not saying Catboi is 100% scum, the fact that he's been the one getting people reactive isn't very pro-town. Spreading confusion and distrust is something that would only be advantageous for scum. Of course, maybe thats just how he plays and we really shouldn't be looking too deep into it, but it certainly looks shady.
You seem misguided. Getting people to react to things is the best way to evaluate them, to try to get a genuine response. Otherwise, in the early game, you have essentially nothing to go on.
That said, how does "getting people reactive" equate to "spreading confusion and distrust"? What does the latter even mean? I don't really know what you're trying to say by this. (I'd argue that confusion and distrust is the default state of the game, but that feels like an unnecessary tangent.
In post 82, Shinobi wrote: In post 68, catboi wrote: In post 57, catboi wrote:Not really doing anything on page 2 is a scumtell?
Great argument, that.
Please try to explain how this applies to me, and not every single player in the game.
As for not explaining my vote,
when do scum actually vote someone without explanation?
Again, what's the actual scumtell here?
Lol. You've named off some things, but none of that poses an actual connection to, you know, scum motivation.
You're ducking these. Hard.
And talking about scum motivation is everything given you can't seem to come up with a decent explanation for
why anything I've done makes me scum
despite seemingly having a strong conviction. I'm looking for a clue as to whether you actually believe anything you're saying.
Where's the scum motivation in being useless?
Seriously?
Stop harping on semantics and tell me who is mafia.
You are, given that you continue avoiding giving answers to some very straightforward questions and respond with ridicule instead. It shouldn't be that hard at all to explain why the reason you're voting someone is an actual tell but you seem unwilling to do so, which is giving me a strong sense you don't actually believe any of the crap you're peddling. Instead you're just pushing on packaged "scumtells" in the hope people will follow them.
In post 83, Shinobi wrote:If you really want an explanation as to why I picked you over everyone else, it's because you were around and posting but not moving the game forward.
It's really simple.
Nyaa, not buying whatsoever that you're some master puppeteer and your vote on me was le epic reaction test, given the circumstances and around it and the way you pushed it it looked like a sincere attempt to lynch me using extremely crappy reasoning that you're now trying to back your way out of.
Already explained Jean, scorp read is primarily a meta one, from games of his i've seen as scum he's much more stiff and awkward in his posts where here he's much more genuine.
In post 96, LexTrew wrote:Shinobi strikes me as town. His frustation seems genuine and I can certainly understand it.
Lol, how? If anything, the fact that he got frustrated with an unerexplained page 1 vote makes him more likely to be scum.
