[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7244458 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 532: Anything UPick! (Day1) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #30 (isolation #9) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:10 am
Postby Luna Fox »
Because i said it was serious?
What if i had said it was a joke?
Would bulge have felt threatened by it?
Obviously everyone's reacting to the vote for it being serious
This is effectively a decent end to RVS.
I'd argue that my vote has achievemed more than all those "joke" votes posted during RVS
Post
Post #34 (isolation #11) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:15 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 33, Vedith wrote:I think it's as easy as one another.
Scum want to make a reason to vote a town. If a chance comes up great, but I can see it swinging either way.
I'd think voting someone for sheeping a reason to vote someone is something scum are more likely to do during RVS, of course, they might be town, but it's a chance that's worth enough of a vote for a page 1 read.
Post
Post #41 (isolation #12) » Mon Sep 28, 2015 2:59 pm
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 40, Tetaes wrote:Also, @Luna. Why do you think that scum would do such a risky move? Why would, in your opinion, anyone that forms a wagon in RVS is likely to be scum.
To me it's more of a way to push the game, like what you did.
Also, saying that it's 'opportunism' doesn't cut it. Forming wagons in RVS isn't really a scumtell for me.
It's not about the wagon per se, it's RVSing for the exact same reason on the exact same person, it's not a risky move because scum will just say "Bah that was just RVS you're reading too much into it", which is why im saying that i always take RVS seriously, otherwise RVS is pointless. When you sheep someone onto a wagon for their exact same reason it counts as opportunism imo, as i said tho, it's not that strong of a read that Bulge is like 100% scum and i'll push him with the holy fire of justice.
It's enough of a Page 1 read to push for more info tho, specially with the OMGUS reaction taken.
Or do you think that voting seriously onto someone at page 1 is a legit reason to be scumread?
^
Possibly scum excuse here, scum have more tendency to have static reads over dynamic ones. Feels like one of those "Oh hey look i have been scumreading her so this is obviously not clashing with any reads i have had"
In post 43, Tetaes wrote:@Luna I agree with you. I just needed reasons and no, I don't think seriously voting someone on page 1 is a legit scumtell.
Voting seriously early? That's fine. Voting seriously because someone parroted a stupid joke? Now that is scummy.
>Stupid Joke
Why do you think that "Stupid Joke" was their reasons for voting?
People in RVS have only the information given by their Role PM, and they will act in instinct as such, the act of Parroting was made with scum motivation due to a player they know to be town. I can seriously believe that you would think that you can joke throughout RVS and get any sort of information when everyone will just say "Oh but it was just a joke why are you taking it seriously"
Meh, at this point im just repeating myself, my argument has been made, i am scumhunting, you are just voting playstyles you dont like.
^
Possibly scum excuse here, scum have more tendency to have static reads over dynamic ones. Feels like one of those "Oh hey look i have been scumreading her so this is obviously not clashing with any reads i have had"
um
no
what it was is he didn't want to vote to put you at L-1, but since someone removed their vote he put it on because he was no longer putting it at L-1. That's not scummy. That's sensibility.
This implies that nothing i did changed such read, since i have answered his questions in full, this means he has other questions or didnt like my answers, in whichever case you'd think he'd be either posting more questions or a case, i don't see either, do you?
Post
Post #54 (isolation #16) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:23 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 52, Vedith wrote:Now, do you think it's standard me to do this, or unusual me to do this? - Serious question.
I come from the basic assumption that town will try to sort people, this is usually done by interaction, asking questions, making cases, etc.
You asked me some questions, I answered them, your vote still went to me, So i assume that you still think im scum despite my answers, you are not asking me any further questions nor are trying to sell my case to anyone so they follow you, so i assume you're not trying to sort me, rather you saw something weak you could push and went along with it.
I thought that you didn't really scum hunt and you town hunt instead?
It depends on the game, but since i was outed i decided to just go back to my old playstyle anyway, Townhunting hasn't really worked for me as much as i'd have hoped.
In post 43, Tetaes wrote:@Luna I agree with you. I just needed reasons and no, I don't think seriously voting someone on page 1 is a legit scumtell.
Voting seriously early? That's fine. Voting seriously because someone parroted a stupid joke? Now that is scummy.
>Stupid Joke
Why do you think that "Stupid Joke" was their reasons for voting?
People in RVS have only the information given by their Role PM, and they will act in instinct as such, the act of Parroting was made with scum motivation due to a player they know to be town. I can seriously believe that you would think that you can joke throughout RVS and get any sort of information when everyone will just say "Oh but it was just a joke why are you taking it seriously"
Meh, at this point im just repeating myself, my argument has been made, i am scumhunting, you are just voting playstyles you dont like.
P-Edit: That was directed at Davsto
Okay, so what you're saying is that any player who is the second vote on any other player is totally scum?
Yeh
thought so
My silly "Comic Sans" joke was bound to draw RVS votes.
The point you're trying to make is that "people can go back and say it's just a joke" but it was a joke
while they made it
and is very clear about this, thus you've sorta hit a (il)logical wall.
Post
Post #56 (isolation #18) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:27 am
Postby Luna Fox »
So, since you think what im doing is scum motivated, let's play a little game:
Why would Scum me, not simply have followed suit and voted for the same "comic sans joke" reason that everyone else was doing.
I can clear myself with the excuse of "Oh it was just a joke", and blend myself in with the voters.
However while i made an non-RVS vote, that's caused enough reactions to get us out of RVS.
I already explained my reasonings further in the post i just linked to you.
Unless you can explain why there's a clear scum motivation in the actions im doing, your case ammounts to "playstyle clash" or just "scummy town" but not "scum".
Post
Post #57 (isolation #19) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:29 am
Postby Luna Fox »
Im so certain, that you wont find any scum motivation on my actions, that i'll even dare to say that if you find one single scum motivation for my actions that are clearly more beneficial to scum me as opposed to other possible actions i could have taken at that point in time, i'll self vote and let you guys speed lynch me.
Post
Post #60 (isolation #20) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:31 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 58, Vedith wrote:As scum, you don't need to town hunt as you already know all the town (Or at least who isn't Mafia).
It's funny, back when i mentioned my playstyle was townhunting people saw i was scum because it's easy for scum to townread the town.
Now that i reverted back to townhunting, apparently im scum for the same reason.
In post 56, Luna Fox wrote:Why would Scum me, not simply have followed suit and voted for the same "comic sans joke" reason that everyone else was doing.
The primary reason you would do this is because your scum partners are not on the wagon or did this reason.
So you try to push for a mis lynch.
If i were doing that then i would've voted along bulge, not against him, do you disagree?
Post
Post #65 (isolation #23) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:33 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 64, Vedith wrote:I disagree. You just want to draw attention to people rather than yourself or scum partners.
Might not be the case but you did ask for a scum minded reason.
And who would be these supposed partners? Unless you think Davsto is scum and i didn't want to bus, then his vote on me doesn't make any sense, disagree?
Post
Post #68 (isolation #24) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:35 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 66, Vedith wrote:Your argument was actually that you always town hunt.
Now you are scum hunting... I've never seen you scum hunt before this game.
In post 64, Vedith wrote:I disagree. You just want to draw attention to people rather than yourself or scum partners.
Might not be the case but you did ask for a scum minded reason.
And who would be these supposed partners? Unless you think Davsto is scum and i didn't want to bus, then his vote on me doesn't make any sense, disagree?
I don't think that you are getting what I am saying.
This is why I try not to waste many comments with you because it's always the same with you...
I'll let others have an opinion but I'm going with scum on you.
Your argument is that i wanted a mislynch.
If i wanted a mislynch i would have jumped on Davsto, this is only not a mislynch if Davsto is scum with me.
So no, i don't see what you're saying.
In post 57, Luna Fox wrote:Im so certain, that you wont find any scum motivation on my actions, that i'll even dare to say that if you find one single scum motivation for my actions that are clearly more beneficial to scum me as opposed to other possible actions i could have taken at that point in time, i'll self vote and let you guys speed lynch me.
okay
How about by trying to start a wagon on town and trying to appear townie for having the "first serious post" in the game and trying to move the game along?
I'd argue that the former i wouldn't need to "start a wagon" and would've rather "jumped onto the already wagon" for "moving the game along reasons" too.
Why would my scum motivation be "appear townie" instead of simply because "i am town"? this still doesn't make any sense.
Post
Post #74 (isolation #27) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:43 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 71, Peptobislawl wrote:Here's a question for you. Why would scum care to push a wagon in RVS? The only wavy the wagon would get to L-1 would be with both the scum on it and 2 town, and that would immediatly throw suspision on on the wagon, leaving town with only 4 players to sort through to find scum on D1, which is HORRIBLE for them.The basic assumption of your read requires that the wagon might lead to a Lynch, which is false. Your vote, on the other hand, is serious and intended to lead to, if not a Lynch, suspision thrown on (I forgot who it was and also phoneposting) by the rest of the town. Your vote seems more suspisiius, then, due to the tenuous logic. Enough for a page 1 read, at least.
1) They would care because it's the easiest way to blend in with town, by copying their actions.
2) RVS wagons never lead to a lynch unless the wagoned scumslips or something, it's a perfectly safe spot for scum to be in.
3) Cool to know that im suspicious for my actions, but i don't see how those "actions" are suspicious or scum motivated, try again.
Post
Post #77 (isolation #28) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:46 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 73, Davsto wrote:Look, you made an absolutely bullshit push on someone Page 1.
I know it was bullshit, you know it was bullshit, so does everyone else.
That is enough to make me scumread you.
I'd argue we've gained a lot of info from this "BS push" as you're saying it.
Look at the person that sheeped me, if im scum, he's my partner? COULD BE! if im town, he could be scum? POSSIBLY!
Look at the votes that have piled on me and look at the arguments behind them, no one has still provided a valid reason why i would do that as scum instead of doing it simply... because i'm town.
As for "everyone else" i'd argue that there's at least 2 people that have at least agreed with my arguments or not voted me.
9p scumteam is 2 ppl, so you can't possibly be thinking all 3 of us are scum.
In post 74, Luna Fox wrote:2) RVS wagons never lead to a lynch unless the wagoned scumslips or something, it's a perfectly safe spot for scum to be in.
It looks to me like you're saying that anyone who takes part in RVS is scum. This is the stupidest thing I've heard.
This is misrepresentantion.
I said that it's easier for scum to blend in RVS, than push the way i was pushing, do you disagree?
In post 80, Davsto wrote:But when you're using that as a reason to scumread someone it is utter bollocks.
Parroting and opportunism are the reasons im scumreading someone.
Not RVS wagoning, I already went through this.
There is no opertunism because there is no opertunity. If scum wanted to stay hidden in RVS they'd vote literally anyone, same as town. So the only other opertunity would be a myslynch, which wont happen in RVS. So your argument, adjusted for logic, is "he told the same joke as pepto"
Explain to me how that is good scumhunting, cause I don't get it.
Did you even read my 41 at all...
I'm not only looking at the person i'm voting, i made a push for reasons i found were enough for a scumread on page 1, im looking at everyone and everyone's interactions with me/my reasons/etc.
Considering you think im so scum for this.
What do you make of the 2 ppl that have either "not voted me" (notscience) or unvoted me because they liked my reasons (Tetaes).
Post
Post #87 (isolation #32) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:07 am
Postby Luna Fox »
Sigh... im tired of explaining, lynch me or whatever if you think that's scummy.
All i feel here is we're going in circles and scum are rejoicing on jumping on an easy target.
Post
Post #89 (isolation #33) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:24 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 88, Peptobislawl wrote:Saying you must be town because 2 others (seem to) agree with you doesn't fly because it implies town can't disagree with town.
I'm not saying that, quote where i did, i'm not implying it either.
I'm saying we are getting info in the form of how people are reacting towards me and my wagon, we already know what a lot of you think of me, but there's a couple of people that think differently, if you're scumhunting you need to have a broader scope, not a tunnel.
Post
Post #94 (isolation #35) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:46 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 91, Vedith wrote:The problem is Luna, other people are not participating right now. I agree that we need to make sure that we don't tunnel over this, but possibly (and only possibly) the inactivity of this game so far gives you off as the biggest scum read.
Problem is that you guys are only looking at me with Scum painted glasses.
Critical thinking comes from looking at the possibility of me being town and whether my actions also make sense with that mindset (since apparently you guys think it makes sense as scum).
See, this is why i wanted to drop my scumhunting strategies in favor of townhunting ones.
Everytime i do this with my unconventional scumhunting methods people scumread me, because i scumread people for batshit crazy reasons, and for some reason, im usually accurate, i don't know why or how. Believe what you want to believe, multiple times i've correctly scumread someone off entirely their RVS post and been correct, but with attitude like this people tend to drive me into second guessing myself and losing the game afterwards.
Post
Post #96 (isolation #36) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:16 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 95, Peptobislawl wrote:As a side note, if that is your real meta, it looks like you got lucky fingering someone at might-as well-be-random a couple of times and started to trust your methods despite the myslynches.
I wouldn't count might be random when i have an accuracy rate of 70% out of about 80 games.
But of course all you have for me is my word
In post 95, Peptobislawl wrote:As a side note, if that is your real meta, it looks like you got lucky fingering someone at might-as well-be-random a couple of times and started to trust your methods despite the myslynches.
I wouldn't count might be random when i have an accuracy rate of 70% out of about 80 games.
But of course all you have for me is my word
This is such bullshit. XD
If you wanna know what is bullshit, i would point at you at the reason, the guy above me is scumreading me for.
Post
Post #100 (isolation #38) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:23 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 99, Vedith wrote:That's 10/10 defence right there.
What gets me is if people always scum read you for your bad scum reads, why are you scum reading in this game rather than town reading.
Keeping in mind you don't get seen as scum much when you are town reading.
Yeah that's a good point, i don't know why i did that, nevertheless, i did, that still, doesn't equal i'm scum.
Now i'll ask you a question.
Considering we've verified that is true that when I scumhunt i get scumread more often than when i become obvtown by townhunting, why would my super awesome scum strategy be to come... and scumhunt?
Post
Post #102 (isolation #39) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:36 am
Postby Luna Fox »
So another thing i've been noticing, some ppl, pretty much pepto but i dont remember if i saw another one mention it.
Says that Tetaes is scum for agreeing with me, so since he's scumreading me, means everyone else is town, which is the people scumreading me.
This goes back to the faulty logic that "I'm right, therefore everyone that agrees with me is town and everyone that disagrees with me is scum", while we all would love that scum would be that obvious because games would be as easy as pushing someone and whoever defended them = scum, then town would win the vast majority of the games.
I'm pretty sure i don't have to point out why this isn't true, and if you think this is then you should go back to The road to rome and play more newbie games.
All that argument shows is that you have convinced yourself so much that im scum, that you're either (Scum that can't back off of a mislynch) or (Conf bias town), do i have to spell it out why both of these are bad?.
If i was scum my partner wouldn't have issue blending in in a bus, and since im town, im pretty sure i dont have to mention why there's a high chance the people voting me already are scum.
Post
Post #104 (isolation #40) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:52 am
Postby Luna Fox »
Anyway, as a last comment about my meta, i'm pretty sure you can already see why a lot of people hated me for it (Assume i'm town).
This will probably be the last time I use this playstyle, it is not fun for me, nor for the gamestate.
In post 106, Luna Fox wrote:Anyway i'm the fox, a town even-night tracker, a role that can be easily verified.
Make of that what you will
So explain to me why you are role revealing at L2?
Short Explanation: To break the loop
Spoiler: Long Explanation
We've been circling around the reasoning and motivations of my vote on Bulge, to the point that this is now beating a dead horse, I've been trying to shift the discussion elsewhere for ages, and people keep looking back at it, i made the claim as a ways of a roleblock in the loop, because 1) People will believe my claim and move on or 2) They won't, but in either case, people now have something NEW to talk about and will stop beating a dead horse.
Post
Post #110 (isolation #43) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:07 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 108, Peptobislawl wrote:And a role that requires we keep you around till D3 to verify.
Either you believe the role, or you don't
This is a Black/White argument.
If you don't believe it, then lynch me today, it's obvious my presence is a distraction at this point.
If you believe the role, then stop voting me, and do something more productive.
Post
Post #112 (isolation #44) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:10 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 111, Vedith wrote:But how can we ever verify it rather than you saying - Yeah I checked the guy who died last night, he visited/didn't visit.
That would mean that we got unlucky, and town will lose unless you've lynched scum, because then that will be LyLo.
I never lie however, But i wouldn't want to go to the grave without claiming.
So despite of whether im actually town or scum, i am indeed an Even-Night Tracker.
In post 116, Luna Fox wrote:Anyway, now that you've unvoted me i got a question for you
Do you think my push on Bulge was because i legit had a scumread there, or to get us out of RVS.
Out of the 2 I would expect because you had a scum read even if it had no logic to it.
It was actually both, i did say i never lie, so if you were paying attention to my posts you'd know this.
I've mentioned both in Page 2 and why, in addition i mentioned how strong my read on Bulge was, the strength was "enough for a page 1 read", i'll leave to your interpretation how strong that means.
Anyway, who else are you scumreading/townreading, why?
Post
Post #122 (isolation #49) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:13 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 121, Peptobislawl wrote:I don't really buy a role that would take the magjority of the game to verify. It's a very conveniant role for you to have in your position.
In post 121, Peptobislawl wrote:I don't really buy a role that would take the magjority of the game to verify. It's a very conveniant role for you to have in your position.
VOTE: Luna to put you back at 3
Cool, let's keep helping scum kill PRs.
Then where should he vote?
Sell us something that is logical.
Woohoo! Great job voting, guys! Keep those scumhunting instincts sharp! Go team! \o/
I, like, totally don't have Comic Sans on my phone! So I, like, literally can't even sympathize with you, betch! VOTE: Davsto
\o/
I don't care for your attitude.
VOTE: Bulge
In post 14, Luna Fox wrote:But the first person pushing the wagon is usually town, so Bulge jumped in for oportunism
Vote: Bulge
I don't care that you beat me to the punch!
V! O! T! E! Lynch some scum and vote with me! \o/ VOTE: Luna Fox
I'm totally feeling you Davsto gurlfrand, 19 like totally hits the nail on the head. I'm getting freaky vibes from Luna too, ugh she's just so like unnatural!
Post
Post #130 (isolation #53) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:24 am
Postby Luna Fox »
In post 129, Vedith wrote:I also don't understand your case here... Because he said good vote to you then voted you?
Ok so im going to explain it to you in very simple terms.
Bulge sheeps this p guy onto Davsto
I vote Bulge
He likes my vote
Davsto asks me whether my vote is serious or not.
I say it's serious.
Davsto votes me because my vote is serious.
Bulge also votes me because my vote is serious.
This hits 3 things. A 180 flip on his stance re: my vote, parroting/sheeping Davsot AND bordelrine OMGUS
Post
Post #136 (isolation #56) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:31 am
Postby Luna Fox »
I think bastard games would normally be advertised as specifically Bastard, no?
Or do you think we are going to expect alignment changes, cults, jesters, what not.
I doubt it.
I also doubt there are any post restrictions in this game, from what i've seen so far, considering how basic my role is, i can just assume, that this game was, attempted to be balanced, and so, bastard mechanics, are not in play.
Post
Post #140 (isolation #58) » Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:33 am
Postby Luna Fox »
I really love these games, I'm always at the spot light and nothing i say matters, no matter how many times i explain something, people never trust anything i say... yaaay.