In post 3633, Shiro wrote:But like.
Varsoon rp is obviously town. Give me something else here. We need to get scum
Please look at itle at end of day yesterday.
He dies.
In post 3633, Shiro wrote:But like.
Varsoon rp is obviously town. Give me something else here. We need to get scum
In post 3643, Shiro wrote:In post 3642, Jeanne11 wrote:But Cerberus, if there's no doctor, then Shiro is lying.
I am not lying. That is what my pm says, worst case scenario is that I can't actually be healed >.>
In post 3653, Jeanne11 wrote:If more than one mafia remains, even if I track one of them, the other member can send in the kill, thus useless.
In post 3659, Learned Hand wrote:Mass claim is bad. Like really fucking bad here. Tomorrow, let's do it.
If I am wrong in trusting EAP, lynching EAP is the best move for me personally. Either a) I will act as a universal doctor or b) Jeanne will track me to visiting her and get a result off.
So I either become confirmed fucking town or universal doctor heal. I am ok with that if EAP is group scum.
I just don't happen to think he is and Roleplay is.
This scenario makes me want to intend to hammer because believing I am wrong is the best thing for my own game. I just don't think I am.
*shrug* I just am not like extremely confident.
In post 3670, Learned Hand wrote:@roleplay,
Supposing you're town for a moment. You're claiming communist miller. (Hilariously Unbalanced 2 reference). We're on Day 3. If there was a delayed kill by one night, we would have seen it.
You're throwing out "could haves" based on role PMs that have no verification in thread. That's the very definition of confbiased moonlogic.
If evidence of that delayed kill appears, then we can doubt my status as conftown, not before.
Now, try to look at this from my perspective.
I know I am town that enables Jeanne's ability.
I find a setup that confirms this to be true.
When the facts would otherwise confirm me as town, RP claims that there's a mysterious delayed killer that has zero support in thread.
So yeah, I think you're scum. I Am willing to desperado you if that's what the group wants. I just think it's foolish and stupid when we could give you the desperado to shoot me if there were doubts. We'd also get confirmation about this mysterious 3rd party killer.
In post 3696, Firebringer wrote:In post 3689, Cerberus v666 wrote:There's no reason why FB couldn't be scum with him and give a gun to LH that appears to be a desperado, but in reality always explodes and kills the person who used it.
Paranoia suits you my friend.
In post 3729, Davsto wrote:I'll attempt to kill myself when the time comes which I would need to be lynched otherwise
But honestly I doubt the game will get to that point
In post 3733, Cerberus v666 wrote:LH, 3dice, hammer? RP is going off on aspects of what's been said that he misunderstood again, and I simply do not have the energy to correct him this time.
In post 3737, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:Oh shit. That really WOULD be clever. Why wouldn't I have claimed that? Maybe something stops me from claiming that. Whoooooooo caaaaaaaaan saaaaaaaaaay
In post 3738, Cerberus v666 wrote:Hmm. I'd really like it if a lot of people were talking more. I hate seeing the disconnect, it feels like we have apathy on day fucking 2 already. :-/
In post 3747, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:In post 3746, 3dicerolling wrote:EAP - Let's say, theoretically, you are a reflexive compulsive bodyguard survivor. You win with whoever. Why should we assume that muffin isn't scum? It would be more beneficial for you to survive if scum targets you because you know scum isn't going to kill another scum.
Hey, man: You can cop muffin if you wanna. Then he will probably be double confirmed and bullet proof. Oh fuck, can someone just cop muffin and then not kill me if he flips town?
In post 3793, Mass Flop wrote:no unexpected messages; 3dice why are you still tunnelling
In post 2290, Titus wrote:RC, I wasn't open to discussing reads solely because I had not really read the thread at all. My reads would be hollow and fake. :nod: Usually as scum, I LOVE verbal sparring because 99/100 I immediately get the upper hand but when I am town it takes me forever to do so, if at all.
In post 2104, RolePlay25 wrote:Okay, for Titus - why Itle need to die for being scummy mc scum
It's been a long fucking day, and I meant to make this hours ago, but you earn the last of my energy for the day. Yay you. See, when I move my vote, I do actually check it's going to a good place.
Lets talk a few eyecatching statements:
In post 712, itlepip wrote: I really don't see the DS wagon as scum here. Jeane and roleplay are my 2nd and 3rd scum reads right now. TN's wagon was fairly terrible and was made up of awful people. I'll with the Elbrin read. My gut is saying that this whole conversation is scum banter, I think that it is probably a conspiracy theory, but...
In post 666, itlepip wrote:
Wee random wagon if nonsense but won't explain why...
Will finish catching up tomorrow, not excited to read a day of posts without my scumreads though.
Now again, bad reads aren't scumreads, but man does he grab the chainsaw hard for TN. Very, very hard, because TN was a viable lynch candidate at that point (and would damn near confirm Jeanne-town just by flipping).
All of his reads are generic "mafia theory" reads. They're very, very non-judgmental reasons for voting people, hard to argue with, useless. Anyone can go through someone's ISO and find a list of the plays that are against site meta, and again and again all his reads are for people beingbad town.
In post 808, itlepip wrote:Holy shit that reasoning sucks. "I know I'm town, and voting confirmed town is scummy, so therefore anyone that votes me is scum". One of the very keys development for humans, and what mafia is based around, is that other people don't know what you know. One of the my pet peeves is when people say "I know I'm town and that gives me an advantage over everyone else" in lylo settings. It means nothing and doesn't actually help with analysis since everyone knows that they are town, even scum. Come on Jeanne...
In post 816, itlepip wrote:No I wouldn't. There literally isn't a role in the game that I would ever do what you have been doing this game. If people voting me somehow damaged the role, which is what you seem to be implying here, you say that instead of 'OMG STOP GUYZ' and only ever OMGUSing. The fact is that Titus right now apparently know your role, which means that if she is scum scum know your role. Now there are a few instances where that is okay. 1 if you are sure that Titus is town or your role lets you know that Titus is town, 2 if you are scum which means you know Titus is town and are using her to vouch for you.In post 811, Jeanne11 wrote:Also, you keep ignoring the fact that I said you would do the same if you had my role. Address that point too instead of skirting around it.
You have played this game before right? Scum only gets lynched day 1 about 30% of the time. Yes you are only saying this to save yourself, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever except as an excuse to save yourself. You are allowed to point out why we should think you are town, but you can't just say 'don't do this please'.In post 812, Jeanne11 wrote:And my biggest pet peeve is when people try to lynch townie even if said townie has high utility to town. And no, I am not saying this just to save myself, but I sincerely believe it. For instance, if you were trying to lynch one of my townreads, I would be saying the same thing. In this case, it just so happens that I have utility.
Look, I'm trying not to go too far with this, but please try to look at your posts from the perspective of someone that doesn't know you are town to see what I am talking about.
Pedit: I thought you thought I was scum? Like you were voting me and everything. If I figured out your role (which I think I might've) then this whole gambit thing was dumb and anti-town. Why do you want me to know who you are if you think I am scum here?
I can just go on, and on, and on. These aren't scumreads, these are apologies for lynching the people he's voting.
In post 817, itlepip wrote:I'm pretty sure Jeanne has scumslipped in this whole business. I am certainly not unvoting here, but I will reread to make sure that there isn't any town reason for her to do what she just did.
"No town reason..." Yep, sorry Jeanne, had to lynch you, there was just no town reason. Not "scum" just, "no town reason". It's constant.
Oh yes:
In post 1034, itlepip wrote:VOTE: Sharky the fact that you still haven't voted TN is setting off some serious warning bells in my head.
I'm not sure if I actually want you to claim here,
If we go with the theory that Sharky = 3rd party then, well. Look at this again, from the perspective of the scum team.
All he posts is theory, Titus. Theory, theory theory.
Shall I do what you did with Elbirn and yell for a 1v1? I'm pretty damn certain when I looked. It's all just... empty. It's all empty talk with no purpose or point. Discussions of how the game works, discussion of how to play mafia properly, nothing that actually resembles scumhunting. And the interactions with TN are pure, pure scumbuddy. Shiro thinks, Itle talks.
In post 3808, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 3805, Learned Hand wrote:@Roleplay25, You got high at noon. Cool.
@Cerebus, MassFlop or Roleplay?
For what? Which one is a better lynch today? Mass Flop I believe. I need to read a shitload of the game again. 3p flip doesn't help us much.
In post 3815, Learned Hand wrote:Stopping this kind of nonsense is what Desperadoes were meant for.
In post 3817, Cerberus v666 wrote:Seriously RP. Fucking trust me. Wait until everyone has shown up, and this will be resolved 100% without this stupid idea happening.
In post 3815, Learned Hand wrote:Stopping this kind of nonsense is what Desperadoes were meant for.
In post 3804, RolePlay25 wrote:So now Titus' role claim is hyper unconfirmable again.
In post 2290, Titus wrote:RC, I wasn't open to discussing reads solely because I had not really read the thread at all. My reads would be hollow and fake. :nod: Usually as scum, I LOVE verbal sparring because 99/100 I immediately get the upper hand but when I am town it takes me forever to do so, if at all.
Titus: I am getting tired of yelling at you. That being said, you now know exactly who I am. If Drixx doesn't, tell him. I have argued Fate into a grave, I have lynched Kuribo, I get what I want. And I have the considerable advantage that I am town here.
You refused to engage anything I said on Itle day 1. I specifically reached out to exactly you:
Anyone can go read the post. It's quite long. I like the logic. zMuffin didn't. But he engaged me on it. You claimed to like facts and cases, you never did. It's not that you were "wrong about Itle" - it's that you never engaged me about Itle.
I made a case as to why I thought you were scum on day 2. You didn't engage me about it. You voted me over a claimed third party. You are that convinced I am scum.
Do we do this again? I can go another 10 rounds, I ain't even tired. Or do you see if you can cash the checks your mouth is writing?
High. Noon.
In post 3830, Cerberus v666 wrote:Mine isn't really a reads list. It's more a list of all the claims so far, because I think a mass claim might be good at this point. I'm not certain though.
In post 3840, Cerberus v666 wrote:Is there any reason beyond them defending itlepip to believe they're scum?
In post 3847, Drixx wrote:We don't have the mislynches to spare you death tunneling us RP. Just talk to me and not Titus. I'll pick this up in the Hydra when the browser I use for the hydra stops freezing on me. This is not an ego post.
In post 3881, Cerberus v666 wrote:Hey fire, wanna dream a cop investigation/public cop investigation over to KC? Then she can use it on LH, and either prove me naive, or force us to consider a multiple godfather scum team?
I mean there's more thought that should go into it than that, but you get what I mean.
In post 3885, Cerberus v666 wrote:RP: because I'm pretty damn certain both LH and yourself are town, and if one of you shoots the other with a desperado gun, town loses no matter what.
In post 3892, Cerberus v666 wrote:But....if we give the desperado to someone who is of questionable alignment, that's okay. The stupid thung I care about preventing is a desperado going to RP or LH or someone else who I feel is likely town. I don't mind if they get shot with it, assuming firebringer actually requests it properly (which is another concern with the stupid desperado thing), but I have an issue with either of them using it.
In post 3901, Cerberus v666 wrote:Sure, there are better ways to do investigative. My point is that an investigative is better than this stupid obsession with desperado gunning everything,unless the person shooting is ALSO suspect.
In post 3908, Cerberus v666 wrote:Meh, just because you all believe something doesn't mean you're right! :p
Also, why do you keep putting muffin in there? EAP flipped as a compulsive bodyguard, with other stuff in there that would indicate his claim is true (the whole in need of guidance thing). Do you think he would have, as a neutral survivor in a game with a decimated scum team, not outed the zmuffin if he were scum? ESPECIALLY when he could have at least tried to do so in order to save himself from getting lynched if zmuffin were scum? Way more likely he lives as as neutral survivor if he feeds us scum to kill.
In post 3922, Cerberus v666 wrote:Firebringer, you can ask the mod. I know he told me I could just post word for word something I said to him. You guys don't know if I actually said it.
RP, that's untrue. It makes his life harder, but he was bp, so his bodyguarding didn't increase his risk. In a 3 man lylo he could always vote with whoever he wanted to lynch and win the game. It didn't get in the way of his win con in any noticeable fashion, especially since he told everybody zmuffin was now BP. That means scum wouldn't waste shots on him.
Again: do you believe 3p EAP was lying about zmuffins alignmenr, when he could have saved his life with that information?
And, tell me wtf the unexpected thing was last night RP. seriously. Stop ignoring me when I mention it.
In post 3930, Cerberus v666 wrote:Your answer makes me believe you are mistaken about what occurred RP.
In post 3929, Cerberus v666 wrote:Rp, you realize how suspect it is that you insist LH be given the desperado, rather than yourself? You want to ensure they die, NOT ensure that scum dies. If you wanted to ensure scum died, and were certain of their alignmenr, you'd ask for the gun yourself and shoot them.
In post 3932, Learned Hand wrote:Roleplay, you want to claim 3p when Lh dies but you cannot murder me? Like lyncher?
In post 3934, Cerberus v666 wrote:Cool. Means you're town. 100%. Your reference to it as a gadget made me think perhaps someone else did something, and I didn't want to confirm what I was looking for before you were explicit about it.
This is why I don't want LH given a gun, because without me confirming you're town, she'd shoot you and thus die, and I think they're town.
Also, you're welcome.
In post 3938, Cerberus v666 wrote:Really making me regret not working on LH instead last night just to stop this shit, but I knww tend just try to get you lynched because theyre more suspicious of me than you. Seriously, I want to end this noise about the two of you. :/ let's focus out attention elsewhere please.