Mini 1758: Game Over

[UpTooLate]

It'd be nice if UpTooLate provided half as much material as they demanded of others.

I got hit with some appointments and am working on catching up, not just skimming. Why wouldn't I ask questions in the mean time?

[Some Random Mafia Player]

So, coming into this game, I was hoping we would be in the same team. I still am!

so you mean, you know your on the same team as tictac?

[Lokiben]

It'd be nice if UpTooLate provided half as much material as they demanded of others.

I got hit with some appointments and am working on catching up, not just skimming. Why wouldn't I ask questions in the mean time?

If it's real life, then it's real life. Sorry.

[Elyse]

@lokiben

I still think you're scum...I think you're misunderstanding me. Your vote was scummy, but not in a strategic way.

[Lokiben]

And what the flip does that mean?

[Elyse]

I think you're scummy because your entrance was awkward and stilted (deja vu), like you were trying to provide a serious reason because it's the townie thing to do. Instead, it came off as forced and weird, especially since your reason was awful. (triple post is a no-no???)

Make sense?

[Some Random Mafia Player]

especially since your reason was awful. (triple post is a no-no???)

RVS vote, RVS reason.

[camn]

So, coming into this game, I was hoping we would be in the same team. I still am!

so you mean, you know your on the same team as tictac?

*you're

[Elyse]

especially since your reason was awful. (triple post is a no-no???)

RVS vote, RVS reason.

I thought so at first but his response made me think otherwise. Plus he never said why a triple post is a no-no.

[Lokiben]

And you never said why you thought I was serious when I prompted you to.

I'll respond more in depth tomorrow because I'm going to sleep now but boy do I have some words.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

So, coming into this game, I was hoping we would be in the same team. I still am!

so you mean, you know your on the same team as tictac?

*you're

fuck grammar, answer the question.

[camn]

That's a real question?

[camn]

Alright, its time to find tictacs partner. Ima put this down now while I have the time.
Prediction: if I actually get run up today, it will be 2 scum in the wagon, 1 or 2 off.
So lets predict. I'll start with the bottom half- they tend to get neglected.

Is it Zulfy?
I like his entry into the game actually. I don't mind the light hearted talk about chaining lynches... I think maybe I haven't caught up with the site meta yet... But to me if its too obvious, its not as scummy. He really has disappeared this last couple days though, which I want keep an eye on. Not sure..probably not tictacs partner.

Is it UpToLate?
Not enough info. Lurkerslot. Getting better.

Some random mafia player?
Maybe yes here!
My early vote was a thin, page one vote. Tictac piling on, and then the whole thing gets written off as "reaction testing" in 106 and 110. It sounds like tictac set that up in their scumchat.
And now this "lol I asked you if you were scum" nonsense... Too much distancing.

SirCakez?
This could DEFINATELY be one of tictacs off-wagon partners...maybe with the flip to on-wagon.
He just is too fixated on prompting tictac to give us a real case... Like if the wagon runs off he's ready to white-knight me. . but if it needs some help he is SO READY to "be convinced"

SilverWolf/Ika
Also to little meat here to say anything.

Cowbells?
I just think it would be so ironic and unlikely....its hard to consider at this stage in the game.

[Elyse]

And you never said why you thought I was serious when I prompted you to.

I'll respond more in depth tomorrow because I'm going to sleep now but boy do I have some words.

I was asking you...because I didn't know...that's how questions work.

[SirCakez]

SirCakez?
This could DEFINATELY be one of tictacs off-wagon partners...maybe with the flip to on-wagon.
He just is too fixated on prompting tictac to give us a real case... Like if the wagon runs off he's ready to white-knight me. . but if it needs some help he is SO READY to "be convinced"

I was the third vote on the tictac wagon, how does that = offwagon partner?
I wanted RC to share his case since everyone was sheeping that and he had (and still hasn't) given next to no reasons. I'm not "fixated on tictac".
And I have no intention of whiteknighting you.

[a plain farmer]

@ CKD:

who here do you supposed will "read the iso"?

Anyone who is interested in finding scum?

Lets be real tho- pressure votes are pressure votes.
I gotta get back to bussing

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tictac

wait a minute, what the fuck? who is scum?

What prompted this question?


@ SirCakez
Do you have #2 scumread after tictac?


@ camn

I'll preemptively let everyone know that I'm an indecisive person, so changes in my reads should be considered null tells.

Huh.

I said that in hopes to minimize time wasted on town-on-town accusations.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

My early vote was a thin, page one vote. Tictac piling on, and then the whole thing gets written off as "reaction testing" in 106 and 110. It sounds like tictac set that up in their scumchat.

It was obvious it was a reaction test, that reason was bad.

[curiouskarmadog]

I wanted RC to share his case since everyone was sheeping that and he had (and still hasn't) given next to no reasons.

can you explain this a little further, where did you ask RC to share anything?

[Lokiben]

And you never said why you thought I was serious when I prompted you to.

I'll respond more in depth tomorrow because I'm going to sleep now but boy do I have some words.

I was asking you...because I didn't know...that's how questions work.

Serious question- Did you ever see post 231, in which I answered that already in-quote in bold? Because if not, then your 247 makes much more sense to me, as my 248 should to you.

[SirCakez]

I wanted RC to share his case since everyone was sheeping that and he had (and still hasn't) given next to no reasons.

can you explain this a little further, where did you ask RC to share anything?

186, it was an open question for the people wagoning camn but RC was leading the wagon.
Second scum read is probably ika right now, don't like how he just came in, dropped a RC vote and left.

[acryon]

Alright, its time to find tictacs partner. Ima put this down now while I have the time.
Prediction: if I actually get run up today, it will be 2 scum in the wagon, 1 or 2 off.
So lets predict. I'll start with the bottom half- they tend to get neglected.

Is it Zulfy?
I like his entry into the game actually. I don't mind the light hearted talk about chaining lynches... I think maybe I haven't caught up with the site meta yet... But to me if its too obvious, its not as scummy. He really has disappeared this last couple days though, which I want keep an eye on. Not sure..probably not tictacs partner.

Is it UpToLate?
Not enough info. Lurkerslot. Getting better.

Some random mafia player?
Maybe yes here!
My early vote was a thin, page one vote. Tictac piling on, and then the whole thing gets written off as "reaction testing" in 106 and 110. It sounds like tictac set that up in their scumchat.
And now this "lol I asked you if you were scum" nonsense... Too much distancing.

SirCakez?
This could DEFINATELY be one of tictacs off-wagon partners...maybe with the flip to on-wagon.
He just is too fixated on prompting tictac to give us a real case... Like if the wagon runs off he's ready to white-knight me. . but if it needs some help he is SO READY to "be convinced"

SilverWolf/Ika
Also to little meat here to say anything.

Cowbells?
I just think it would be so ironic and unlikely....its hard to consider at this stage in the game.

I didn't hate you before camm but this post sucks. Specifically the prediction part which essentially means nothing and reads as town-posturing, and the idea of devoting the whole rest of this post to pre-flip associations on Day 1.

I wanted RC to share his case since everyone was sheeping that and he had (and still hasn't) given next to no reasons.

can you explain this a little further, where did you ask RC to share anything?

186, it was an open question for the people wagoning camn but RC was leading the wagon.
Second scum read is probably ika right now, don't like how he just came in, dropped a RC vote and left.

What part of ika's posting do you think is scummy? Do you think his vote lacked initial/follow-up reasoning, or do you have an issue with his 1 day absence since then?

[Performer]

VOTE COUNT 1.06

tictac (3): a plain farmer, SirCakez, Camn
Camn (2): tictac, RadiantCowbells
SirCakez (2): Elyse, curiouskarmadog
RadiantCowbells (2): ika, acryon
Some Random Mafia Player (1): UpTooLate
Elyse (1): Lokiben

No Vote (2): Zulfy, Some Random Mafia Player

With 13 players alive, it takes 7/13 votes to lynch.

For deadline & notes, please refer to this post – post 3 !

[camn]

Your face sucks.

[acryon]

Your face sucks.

Do you not see the issues with that post?

[RadiantCowbells]

Well, no, but she clearly sees the issues with your face.