Mini 1761: Red Neighborhood - Day 2
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:Still waiting for that sheep though. :3
What do you think of skull master dwlee.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 59, Dwlee99 wrote:They're leaning town rn. I am bad at reading people from my home site on here though, so don't 100% trust me. >http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=63747< Yea I don't want to remember this game..
VOTE: Skull master
I disagree I think they are scummy.
In post 27, Skullmaster4 wrote:Did.. Did we almost just hammer right at the start of D1?
Thanks for giving me a heart attack.
That could of just been REALLY bad.
Is unvoting possible in Mafiascum, or do you have to keep a vote on somebody at all times?
In post 51, Skullmaster4 wrote:In post 28, Aristophanes wrote:Nopers.
Once you vote, you can't revote for the cycle. It is now locked in for all of D1.
Just use the unvote tag. UNVOTE: <--- no space, obviously
^ Highlight that to read it, Skull.
Good to know, thanks. I have no confident leads at the moment, so I'm just going to keep my vote on dwlee for the time being.
(Sorry dwlee.)
Apologizes about keeping his vote on you. Even if he thinks he has to vote someone constanly he could easily move his vote off to someone else. It makes me think his concerned about his image.
In post 55, Skullmaster4 wrote:Oh.
UNVOTE: Dwlee99
Misread aristophanes said. I was on a phone, so I couldn't highlight the black text. I just assumed it was unimportant lol.
sigh
In post 52, Dwlee99 wrote:Skull you know I am town so why instead of sheeping me are you voting me?
I legitimately thought there was some sort of thing where you can't unvote, so you have to have a vote on someone at all times.
Seems concerned with his image here a little to much.
VOTE: Skullmaster4-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 78, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I think Number 1 might be town. If I had a scumread I'd be voting them.
Who's number 1 I am confused-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 94, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Ugh
@Dwee does Skull's newbiness here match what you've seen of him before? Also is he generally this friendly? If the answer to either of these is no then I'll join the wagon. If not these Skull votes are garbage.
Why are you trying to disable the wagon with no reasoning you just been a hipster this game.
Ok complains about the easy town reads being giving out for no reason when pushed,
Gives no reason as to number 1 could be town and hands him a easy town read.
Starts the game with nothing but questions that look like
Multiple attempts at smearing peoples imagaes who are commonly read as town.
In post 80, JohnnyFarrar wrote:It's so sexy when you ask for my rhoughts
Dwee's confident which tells me nothing. Reactions to his reactions are cool though. A bunch of people just don't know how to read him so they talkathim without accomplishing much. Good for associatives later when people start flippin'
[quote="In post 76, JohnnyFarrar"
@Garmr "These wagons tend to die" is a weird observation and I'm watching you close now because I can't fathom why you said it
I dunn liek hasta[/quote]
Also on that note why not vote hasta if you don't like him sounds like that's a scum read to me but when asked on who your town and scum reads are you just give a empty bs reason on who you think is town. That was a chance to show why you don't like hasta.
Everything you have posted is empty and with out reasoning and hating against everything like a hipster at starbucks,A emo in a cemetery or a angry mum after controversial video game.
Even with all this hating nothing you have said so far has any depth to it so far and is all shallow.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 100, JohnnyFarrar wrote:@Garmr if you're gonna try to make me look scummy the least you could do is vote me. Couple things you seem to be confused about: One, my like and dislike of people has nothing to do with their alignment. I like Ari a lot (I know him well outside of Mafia) but he's maybe one of the most suspicious people right now. Two: My townread comment was not a complaint, in fact I said it would make the game interesting further down the line. Also I'm not in the habit of explaining my townreads unless people ask because I don't want to give scum a reason tokillmy townreads, got a problem with that?
ThreeMultiple attempts at smearing peoples imagaes who are commonly read as town.
I don't even know what this means
Also you seem to be trying to insulting me with your hipster bullshit. Why? If you have a personal problem with me you can send it through pm, if not let's keep the name calling to a minimum, I got out of high school a long time ago, I've no reason to listen to childish namecalling.
@insanity you gave that reason in post 74, which is by my count on page 3, not page 1. Is Ari the only weird thing you've seen since then or is he just the weirdest? Is weird scummy?
If Dwee's not willing to meta read then I'm just assuming Skull's a newbie and he's being friendly with Dwee because he's a friendly face. If y'all wanna dispute that then tell me why I'm wrong.
I have a vote already on someone else I think is scum. People can can have multiple scum reads.
Also I thought you meant disliking as not thinking hasta was town otherwise what was the point in saying that. Also this ari scum read come out of no where and you don't even vote him. The words you say and your actions don't match up making everything seem hollow.
Smearing ones image means saying something that makes them less trustworthy with out laying down a scum read on them or really even having a reason 2. Scum tend to do this when they feel threatened by people generally town reading a certain player.
Also the allusion to hipster is the fact you are against everything that seems to be the common consensuses saying it's bad ect. It was meant to be a light hearted joke about what your play resembles so far (I made other jokes like it like a emo in a cemetery.) and not a insult on your personality. Humor seems to be lost on the people of this site through.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 110, Dwlee99 wrote:Garmr, In all honesty I think your vote is trash. Put it on hasta or ricastle.
I think my votes better than yours and has more substance and I trust my opinion over yours.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 114, Aristophanes wrote:In post 103, Dwlee99 wrote:I think that is a misrep. Skull just knows me.
You two are literally saying the same thing. This is dumb.In post 100, JohnnyFarrar wrote:
I'm just assuming Skull's a newbie and he's being friendly with Dwee because he's a friendly face.
Watching people not understand Johnny is always amusing
This isn't out of the ordinary though and he is, I guess, a slight mafia Hipster.
Johnny, you asked if I thought Rica's post was serious a d though I don't buy that they would hammer then, as it is undead for either alignment, I thing hinting at his ability to has some indication of alignment and it gives me bad feels.
Garmr, who is generally townread right now and how is Johnny smearing their respective images?
Because it's page, what 5?
I don't think generally accepted townreads are a thing yet.
This is not a isolated case he went after dwlee as well in the post I linked. His going after shit because his playing like newbie scum and feels threatened by my presence and anyone who gets town read by a majority even through those tend to go away after the game gets in more play. It doesn't matter how many pages there are for him to feel threatened.
Also people are ignoring that all his posts are pretty much empty.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 119, Dwlee99 wrote:I am not convinced on skull rn, and therefore I find your vote trash, garmr. Whatever.
Pff dwlee when i'm right you know this will blow back in your face.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 121, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Confidence vs arrogance I like it
Gar baby watchu think about insanity?
Getting out the way I like them because they are also australian bias lol.
I didn't like that she didn't sheep me with skull master through or the fact way she doesn't really like the town block to much but that can be elevated by the fact one of her scum reads is in it. I can see it from her point of view and can see how she got to that and no real scum agenda stands out so she's not really on my lynch list at the moment.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 126, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 125, Garmr wrote:@Dwlee other than going your vote is shit can you be more constructive with what you say by explaining reasoning. I don't want to wad through piles of content less post to get to posts that have a little bit of depth.
I already said skull hasn't posted anything alignment indicative yet.
I think his concern with his image is alignment indicative.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
dwlee can I ask you why do you even bother trying to get in the way of my posts with empty things like I can't see it ect?
You said so yourself you view Skull as not doing anything alignment indicative. I would think the town thing to do is let skull answer for himself instead of passively defending him constantly... Aren't you interested in trying to find out skull alignment it's like you don't even care?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 134, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 131, Nosferatu wrote:^this is what he was talking about @Johnny
I mean he quotes two posts and says "he seems concerned about his image," I'm saying I don't see that concern.
Well i do maybe I should bold it for you again.
In post 55, Skullmaster4 wrote:Oh.
UNVOTE: Dwlee99
Misread aristophanes said. I was on a phone, so I couldn't highlight the black text. I just assumed it was unimportant lol.
sigh
In post 52, Dwlee99 wrote:Skull you know I am town so why instead of sheeping me are you voting me?
I legitimately thought there was some sort of thing where you can't unvote, so you have to have a vote on someone at all times.
Shows concern over how his action was perceived.
In post 27, Skullmaster4 wrote:Did.. Did we almost just hammer right at the start of D1?
Thanks for giving me a heart attack.
That could of just been REALLY bad.
Is unvoting possible in Mafiascum, or do you have to keep a vote on somebody at all times?
Fake concern over a potential hammer. If he was really concerned he would of shifted his vote.
In post 51, Skullmaster4 wrote:In post 28, Aristophanes wrote:Nopers.
Once you vote, you can't revote for the cycle. It is now locked in for all of D1.
Just use the unvote tag. UNVOTE: <--- no space, obviously
^ Highlight that to read it, Skull.
Good to know, thanks. I have no confident leads at the moment, so I'm just going to keep my vote on dwlee for the time being.
(Sorry dwlee.)
Apologizes to dwell for leaving his vote on him even when he showed concern about dwlee being hammered even if he thought He couldn't unvote he could of shifted it to a wagon that wouldn't pick up. A weird interaction.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Was referring to the fact that i am right and after this game I will rub in the salt but what ever.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 158, Dwlee99 wrote:He thinks that the way garmr was talking in absolutes is a slip.
I think it's more the part saying you will regret it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 167, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I'll react to it when I know exactly what he meant
You've already reacted.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 170, Dwlee99 wrote:People keep placing shit votes, that is an example of one, garmr.
Who in your opinion is a good vote.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 173, Dwlee99 wrote:Ricastle and Hasta. And to not be a shit vote it just needs to have good reasons that I cant just walk up and say no to.
I can go up and say no to everything even if it still has a good reason.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
dwlee I'm going to be blunt with you the only reason I'm hesitant to scum reading you at the moment is these facts
1.your play is extremely supbar (I have seen you can do better as scum then again sometimes your scum game is supbar but not really to this level.)
2.The fact you went out to to make a town block/taking more risks I only have seen you play safely as scum. Even then this pretty close to your scum game.
3.Taking stances early on instead of leaving yourself open to quickly change your vote.
These are the facts that don't go in your favor
1.Saying you are trash downplaying yourself like last game
2.Trying to invalidate peoples votes with out explaining why and what makes them town other than you disagree.
3.Lack any scum hunting in thread you haven't posted any good reasoning down or thought process behind it.
4.Getting in the way of other people like another certain someone in this game holding up the game is anti town.
You have done all those things as scum but I'm not sure how many of those are just your experience level since I only seen you as scum.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Not really sure about that but what I do know is johnny is scum. Look at his posts and how empty they really are.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 206, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 205, Lowell wrote:Eh, ric is fine, I guess. But insanity is better. Notice how she disappeared.
My townbloc is johnny, aristo, dwlee, and me. Anyone disagree?
Not sold on johnny townand I don't really have a read on you. Aristo is probably town, though.
This is what I can agree with most scrubs seem to think being activey is a sign of being town but it's content and behavior that are most important.
Lets talk more on what you think of johnny and his posts.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I don't like you're 3 recent posts dwlee they don't match up.
In post 206, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 205, Lowell wrote:Eh, ric is fine, I guess. But insanity is better. Notice how she disappeared.
My townbloc is johnny, aristo, dwlee, and me. Anyone disagree?
Not sold on johnny townand I don't really have a read on you. Aristo is probably town, though.
This indicate doubt that johnny is town but when I asked you about it you said this.
In post 208, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 154, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Is it a slip you see?
In post 160, JohnnyFarrar wrote:CLARIFY DOC YOU FUCK
In post 162, JohnnyFarrar wrote:But what if it's not stupid?
I don't see this coming from scum but I'm not 100% sure.
In post 209, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 137, JohnnyFarrar wrote:The only concern I see is him trying to be friendly with Dwee. His reactions read more genuine than fake imo and if you think he's a newer player, as I do, you can note that newbie scum aren't as free with their thought process as he seems to be. I'll wait for him to actually post more before getting aggressive about this, but consider me strongly opposed to this wagon for now
P-edit: holy shit, yeah. Get your votes off him.
This feels town.
This is hypocritical to you saying not sold on Johnny town. I would expect some things you find scummy and some things you find town . But all you are doing here is trying to sell johnny as town. It does not compute.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 213, Dwlee99 wrote:Did you ever think I went into his iso to try and find things to read him on and discovered he is actually pretty townie? Hmmmm?
There was a 5 mins response time between my post and your answer meaning you just had a quick scan through picked random things and said they were townie. Hell it could of been even shorter than 5 mins. I would think a townie would put effort into someone they are null reading and actually try to sort them out. This is just throwing out things for the sake of it.
VOTE: Dwlee-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 218, Dwlee99 wrote:you can't read me for shit.
Can't say to much now but a ongoing game where we are both dead says otherwise. Now no more about this subject.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 227, JohnnyFarrar wrote:No fake hammers? This game just got boring
Make it fun then. Maybe right up a big post and explain why certain people are scum instead of not committing.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 231, DrCirno wrote:In post 176, Aristophanes wrote:Can I say what I see?
I like that you're looking, Cirno, but I'm not convinced.
Insanity I may vote though.
Welp.
I love how people are just keep going "I think I see what Cirno is seeing" and yet no words about "I think she's seeing (insert speculation here)".
(Except Garmr. But it doesn't count since it was his post.)
I did like JF trying to unearth the unvagueness.
With that said, this little fun thing did what it could, so there's no more use for this anymore.
UNVOTE:
(Oh and just in case, no I didn't believe that myself either lol)
In post 179, Ricastle wrote:Yeah, Dwlee's been irritating me pretty badly thus far. I didn't make the leap that it was because he was scum, which was indicative of apathy on my part more than anything.
VOTE: Dwlee99
huh
It's pretty easy to see what you are seeing but it's wrong.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 233, DrCirno wrote:In post 188, Garmr wrote:dwlee I'm going to be blunt with you the only reason I'm hesitant to scum reading you at the moment is these facts
1.your play is extremely supbar (I have seen you can do better as scum then again sometimes your scum game is supbar but not really to this level.)
2.The fact you went out to to make a town block/taking more risks I only have seen you play safely as scum. Even then this pretty close to your scum game.
3.Taking stances early on instead of leaving yourself open to quickly change your vote.
These are the facts that don't go in your favor
1.Saying you are trash downplaying yourself like last game
2.Trying to invalidate peoples votes with out explaining why and what makes them town other than you disagree.
3.Lack any scum hunting in thread you haven't posted any good reasoning down or thought process behind it.
4.Getting in the way of other people like another certain someone in this game holding up the game is anti town.
You have done all those things as scum but I'm not sure how many of those are just your experience level since I only seen you as scum.
Link to his scumgame?
Why on Insanity?
In post 198, Garmr wrote:
Not really sure about that but what I do know is johnny is scum. Look at his posts and how empty they really are.
I disagree!
Also, I do agree that whoever has a number avi's questions felt empty.
My vote might go there.
Maybe it's because it's night but I can't understand what ricastle is saying is his last post.
The one this is similar to is the one I can't but here is the one where he actually played well the first time I meet him.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=63461-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 248, JohnnyFarrar wrote:The difference is when I vote it makes sense to people. I don'thaveto explain. (There are certain people who would have me go through the motions anyway but ew) Your vote however is garbage.
Or another way to put it is you are opportunistic.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
This environment is awful for scum hunting. There's little to no one making cases thus making it harder to get the ball rolling and if a case is made rejects just go no your wrong with out saying why which is making it even more toxic for town since no ones willing to push them for it. The post that are made are small. People just switch votes with out explaining themselves and I'm we have plenty of lurkers.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 288, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 21, Ricastle wrote:I could hammer right now!
eww
In post 54, Ricastle wrote:
That's not what I was implying at all. I was merely joking around on P1.In post 44, Aristophanes wrote:DrCirno wrote:Since when calling for hammer page 1 garnered town points?
^ This is not a call for a hammer.In post 21, Ricastle wrote:I could hammer right now!
This is going "Icouldhammer. Look at me not hammering.
I can haz town points?"
Which is yuck.
Turns out that the punchline is your insinuation that hammering there would be optimal scumplay.
Ari didn't insuate that
In post 93, Ricastle wrote:I didn't have anything to contribute at the time, no. And the situation now isn't too dissimilar. My reads are simply that I definitively disagree with all of the reads so far presented, except maybe Garmr's. On that note VOTE: Skullmaster4
Awful vote and very vague discussion of reads
In post 102, Ricastle wrote:Why aren't you voting Ari, then?
In post 179, Ricastle wrote:Yeah, Dwlee's been irritating me pretty badly thus far. I didn't make the leap that it was because he was scum, which was indicative of apathy on my part more than anything.
VOTE: Dwlee99
oppurtunism
In post 247, Ricastle wrote:There is no specific post that ticked me off about Dwlee. His entire demeanour is annoying as hell, but in a deflective and paranoid way. Just look at this page. What is this desperation for? Why is lynching me regardless of whether I talk or not so urgent with so much time left in the day?
Also, just to point out, Johnny has wagon-hopped much more than I have and with literally no reason each time. So if that's why anyone is voting me/planning to then I'd like you to at least consider that.
The second part is "I know I haven't mentioned johnny at all this game but you know I think he is actually scummy so yea bye"
boom I made a case. You happy now, garmr? Will you actually vote scum now?
Would be better in detail why a scum ria would do those actions but i get the gist of your case. I hesitant to sorting out ria at the moment. Not because of ria actions (I do agree on some of your points or at least how I interrupted it.) not because of the people voting ria. But because of the people defending the it's a joke. It's a incredibly odd thing to say nether the list and it wasn't clear if it was or not. It does come off as it wasn't through if your reading it. The thing seems off and I'm guessing scum are preparing for a bus/mislynch at this very point making it a vital stage day 1. I'm trying to work it out and trying to connect the dots on what could be possible happening and which scenario is more likely. I would like more people to place there words and thoughts down more through.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
UNVOTE: dwlee
Don't know if I was right or wrong about dwlee but here's my thoughts on current events.
I see the case on Ria and I do agree with it to some extent i'm apathetic towards him. I don't care if he lives or dies today.
What does peak my interest through is the people reacting to ria. Especially the joke bit which to me wasn't clear as a joke.
Another event is people trying to build town blocks forcefully no that's not what you do you let them build naturally when you mutually town read each other you don't try to force them. Other than that town blocks are ok but it seems everyone and there uncle is trying to form or get in one.
Also what is up with these forced johnny town reads that pop up every once in a while. He post superficial shit you should be null or scum reading him at most depending on your outlook on things.
I am hopping this game picks up day 2 because day 1 was a horrible start.-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 414, insanity018 wrote:In post 373, Lowell wrote:@insanity- you're never going to win this "insanity v. lowell" battle you're trying to set up. doesn't matter how my text-walls you build. no one's going to buy it. might as well quit while you're behind.
^ This is also an attempt to dissuade me from scumreading him, without addressing any of the reasoning for the scumread.
In post 393, Garmr wrote:I only feel confident that two people are town this game no matter what and that's Insanity and Nosferatu.
I'm glad because you and Nosferatu are my stronger townreads as well.
In post 404, Garmr wrote:Why are you taking dwlee rolepm thing so seriously ari it seems so fake and artificial to even show concern over something so small.
Completely agree with this. I don't believe anyone was going to think that Dwlee's role PM was a good argument. Aristophanes is just adding more 'worthless filler' by arguing about it. Also for someone who is so concerned about Dwlee posting 'worthless filler', Aristophanes posts quite a lot of fluffy filler himself
His acting all buddy buddy with johnny as well if you read through all his posts and pretty much been supporting and seems like trying to defuse things anytime johny seems under fire.
In post 114, Aristophanes wrote:In post 103, Dwlee99 wrote:I think that is a misrep. Skull just knows me.
You two are literally saying the same thing. This is dumb.In post 100, JohnnyFarrar wrote:
I'm just assuming Skull's a newbie and he's being friendly with Dwee because he's a friendly face.
Watching people not understand Johnny is always amusing
This isn't out of the ordinary though and he is, I guess, a slight mafia Hipster.
Johnny, you asked if I thought Rica's post was serious a d though I don't buy that they would hammer then, as it is undead for either alignment, I thing hinting at his ability to has some indication of alignment and it gives me bad feels.
Garmr, who is generally townread right now and how is Johnny smearing their respective images?
Because it's page, what 5?
I don't think generally accepted townreads are a thing yet.
In post 412, Aristophanes wrote:
I can indeed attest to this fact.In post 411, JohnnyFarrar wrote:So I've worked 36 of the past 48 hours so you'll forgive me for being curt but can we talk about this fucking post for a second?
In post 362, Ricastle wrote:Scum consists mostly of the players not currently posting.
VOTE: JohnnyFarrar
Seems to me like he's realised he can no longer fluff his way through the game and has gone quiet.
First, work prevented me from posting. Eat it. Ari can tell you I am IN NO WAY scared of fluff posting my way intogetting lynchedthe end of the game.
Second, and way more importantly, your gameplan is seriously to townread all active players? Because how could you possibly think that? List all active players and why they're town.
I'll read everything else after a good night's sleep. Peace.
It's part of what makes playing with Johnny frustratingly fun!
He does raise a good point on your use of activity to garner reads though.
God it doesn't even end with supporting he seems to be buttering him as well.
In post 79, Aristophanes wrote:Johnny!
Wonderful to play with you again!
RHOUGHTS ON Dwlee's responses to the wagon?
I did stop for a second and think these two might be masons but this post disproves it.
In post 100, JohnnyFarrar wrote:@Garmr if you're gonna try to make me look scummy the least you could do is vote me. Couple things you seem to be confused about: One, my like and dislike of people has nothing to do with their alignment.I like Ari a lot (I know him well outside of Mafia) but he's maybe one of the most suspicious people right now.Two: My townread comment was not a complaint, in fact I said it would make the game interesting further down the line. Also I'm not in the habit of explaining my townreads unless people ask because I don't want to give scum a reason tokillmy townreads, got a problem with that?
Because of his behavior around johnny is most likely buddying I want ari dead.
VOTE: Aristophanes-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 417, Aristophanes wrote:I've played with Johnny many,many times are we are good friends.
I always act a little less serious and joke around a bit more when he's in the game.
Dwlee, I meant my comment as a one-off statement. I went into it because you pursued it. I dislike that argument from anyone at any time, I merely explained the reason this time.
Garmr, believe it or not, that was my being friendly, not me buddying.
Being friendly is one thing defending him constantly and mixing those two doesn't look good to-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 436, insanity018 wrote:Hi ffery!
In post 422, Garmr wrote:The others were a example of buddying
Kay. I accept that it possibly comes from Johnny and Aristo knowing each other IRL.
Johnny's post makes me lean town. I don't think Garmr is insinuating you are scum though. From my understanding, he just thinks that some people have a very fishy basis for townreading you and in the case of Aristophanes, Garmr thinks that he is buddying you.
Preferred lynch: Lowell
Would also support lynching: SRMP, Aristophanes
Ricastle's posts are not great but I am not really seeing his actions as scum motivated. He currently feels like a lazy townie.
My read on johnny was on the scum side before but it's kind been drifting in and out of null. When I was isoing and focusing on ari it hit me that his behavior looked a lot like that and ari became the most suspicious.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 427, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Also Dwee look at Gar from a non-Johnny-who-is-mad-at-him standpoint, does his attitude toward me look weird? I fear the anger may be coloring my perception
Why would you feel anger towards me. Your skins pretty thin then and you may want to get that check because I haven't said anything insulting.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 423, JohnnyFarrar wrote:
In post 387, Garmr wrote:Also what is up with these forced johnny town reads that pop up every once in a while. He post superficial shit you should be null or scum reading him at most depending on your outlook on things.
Have any of you ever read the guide to the perfect scum game? Because this is almost a direct example of one of the strategies. Constantly attack a town player without actually committing to vote him or put him in any real danger of being lynched, everyone lets you be because you look like you have stances. Put your money where your mouth is Gar.
In post 390, Nosferatu wrote:In post 373, Lowell wrote:@insanity- you're never going to win this "insanity v. lowell" battle you're trying to set up. doesn't matter how my text-walls you build. no one's going to buy it. might as well quit while you're behind.
this right here doesn't sit right with me.
UNVOTE: Ricastle
Nossy why you unvote?
Boom Ari wagon out of nowhere. Let's take a look shall we?
In post 415, Garmr wrote:Because of his behavior around johnny is most likely buddying I want ari dead.
What in the fuck does this even mean? Why do you still insist on voting anyone but me while continuing to insinuate I'm scum?
As someone who's lynched Ari day 1 many times, this is one of the worst votes I've seen on him. You're voting him for the way he talks. He talks like this all the time.
IN SUMMATION this game took a turn for the stupid since I've been gone.
first I'm not attacking the townie scum strategy as you pull it because 1 I'm not scum and two you don't have the support to get a lynch through on you today. Also I'm kinda waffling at the moment.
also don't like how you pretty much chop most off my post up and just focus on the vote to go wtf dude. If your town that's shit if your scum continue doing what your doing you'll slip up doing that.
Also buddying,misrepresenting and fluff(normally it's fluff all game with no content at all.) is dependent on the player and if you think they don't happen out of newbie games then you need more experience.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 443, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 440, Garmr wrote:first I'm not attacking the townie scum strategy as you pull it because 1 I'm not scum and two you don't have the support to get a lynch through on you today. Also I'm kinda waffling at the moment.
Props for admitting to waffling
also don't like how you pretty much chop most off my post up and just focus on the vote to go wtf dude. If your town that's shit if your scum continue doing what your doing you'll slip up doing that.
1. Big quotes are ugly to look at
2. The only thing I cared about was the vote. If you like I can come up with something sarcastic to say to every point you make from now on, though.
Also buddying,misrepresenting and fluff(normally it's fluff all game with no content at all.) is dependent on the player and if you think they don't happen out of newbie games then you need more experience.
I'm saying those things are onlyused in building a read on playersin newbie games because experienced players tend to find more intelligent reasons to read someone.
P-edit: ugh what about any of that is scummy? That looks like you're a) saying people who disagree with you are scum, b) saying naked votes are scummy and c) being bad is scummy. All of which I disagree with.
lets start with the pedit
The difference between that is that and the former is the former is scum behaviors while the latter is just behaviors of town. The opposite is usually true with being bad it's normally a town thing scum are normally in the middle or really good with there fake reads. It's rare to see scum attack everyone. With the former you can mistake town as doing these things that's why you have to look for them doing it consistently and other scummy behaviors mixed in. No one thing makes someone one scum just everything all together.
Tbh it doesn't matter what's in the scum read only if it's scummy behavior. Also look at the players in the game a lot of them are newer with a lot of inactive with out heaps of content being posted you are not going to find much out of the basics. After a couple of flips through things will change
1. Was to show the point you ignored the point of the reasoning (his passive defense of you and buddying nature seems scum motivated.)
2.If the only thing you cared about and not the vote you will miss the details.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 446, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I can't tell if I'm just too tired to understand that or if it's genuinely hard to read, but either way I'll look at it tomorrow
It's simple
Buddying, misrepping, fluff, Fluffing in particular If used in the context say to dodge posting content say like "this guy was fluffing all the time and has not content" Or "she has a habit of fluffing as scum to find time to think on who to vote."so it will never stop being used.
That looks like you're a) saying people who disagree with you are scum, b) saying naked votes are scummy and c) being bad is scummy.
These three different scenarios are different to the three presented above. I could even argue that being bad actually is more a townie thing. These are reading town as scum for doing town/null things. Unless your talking about the ria/srmp then I will put it simply
SRMP
It was not obvious that the hammer thing was just a joke as others have misunderstood/caught on depending if ria is scum. Thus shrmp saying it was obvious and arguing comes off to trying to push people off ria this show especially 292 when he tries to debunk all of dwlee post. when you combine it with this post.
In post 318, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:In post 312, insanity018 wrote:I don't like the way he is awkwardly defending Ricastle
why are you assuming im defending him? Why dont you assume that i think the case shown is bad but I still think ricastle is scum?
He want to cling on to the scum read even through he is actually defending ricastle. That's seems really weird to do. I don't think there is any town incentive to do this.
A scum incentive is to keep the lynch open if he want to go down this route latter. If his scum and ria scum it could be an attempt to stop a partner from being lynched. If ria is town he may be keeping his options open if he can't push through a lynch on another townie and if the lynch doesn't go through he could be aiming to nab some better lynching positioning so he can set up a mislynch tomorrow by saying he was right about that and pushing a lynch on someone who was pushing ria for that reasoning.
I can't think of town scenarios were someone would defend someone with out letting them answer for themselves just to say they might lynch them latter.
Also my ari case is simple.
His passive defense of you while being all friendly is him trying to get in your good books.
Look at his voting habits they are just rica and insanity and he is always on the one which is picking up steam when he jumps off onto insanity at post 177 the rica wagon is dying yet the insanity wagon is growing. He stay on the wagon till it deflates and jump on rica again. Then this is not shown in the vote counts but ria had johnny,dwlee,nof and the votes on insanity were declining so he jumped back on rica.
What does that add up to well when you consider what I post next then it will make sense
Ari is scum in a comfortable postion his got two wagons that seem to always garner support support. His reads are not dynamic. Seriously look on them in his 36 posts then ask what has he done to change/update them. Nothing
Reasoning
His reasons for thinking insanity/rica as scum.
Have not updated since initial release
his town read on johnny
still remains and it's because of johnny's confidence. Yet he knows johnny inrl and has played many games with him. I think he can come up with a better reason to town read him.
His town read on dwlee
after initial reason was given he continues to push the town read.
Lowell
I guess lowell is a town read he hasn't really laid down a commitment but his praised lowell a couple of times.
Everything is static.
Has he attempted to look around at other possibilities for scum no he hasn't
So the conclusion from that is ari is scum at ease keeping his reads static while minimizing his thoughts on people trying not to make much of a impact. His reads list shows no signs of development after he hit his comfort zone. This shows his happy with the scenarios that are playing out as well and doesn't want to change them.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 434, fferyllt wrote:Vote Count 1.8
Dwlee99 [2]:Ricastle, Some Random Mafia Player
hasta_la_pasta [1]:Number_0ne
insanity018 [1]:Lowell
JohnnyFarrar [2]:Ricastle, Skullmaster4
Lowell [2]:hasta_la_pasta, insanity018
Ricastle [2]:Aristophanes, JohnnyFarrar
Aristophanes [2]:Garmr, Dwlee99
Not Voting [2]: DrCirno, Nosferatu
7 Votes are required to obtain a lynch. 7 votes are also required to obtain a no-lynch prior to deadline.
Day 1 will end in (expired on 2016-02-20 12:00:00)
Greetings from your backup mod!
I think you made a mistake with riacastle vote. His on there twice. I have noticed the vote count forgets to move votes over.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread