Queen of Hearts [Game Over]
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Because I've seen people complain at others for not doing so.In post 18, Harkonnen97 wrote:If you've never been this role before, why do you think that you're supposed to claim Day 1?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I assumed it's the thing you do. People complain all the time regardless.In post 20, Harkonnen97 wrote:So the only reason you did it is because you don't want people to complain at you?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I was actually stating a factIn post 22, Harkonnen97 wrote:You first said that you didn't want people to complain at you.
I never said I didn't want people to complain at me.
Words are hard, eh?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Ah, okay.In post 25, Seraphim wrote:No that was the right play, I just don't believe you.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Policy lynches are garbage.In post 36, zMuffinMan wrote:would anyone be up for policy lynching cupcake?
So... No.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Is this why you are trying to be Obnoxious and blunt so people town read you?In post 63, Harkonnen97 wrote:Obnoxious and blunt posting style usually gets you townread.
Sugar-coating, polite and diplomatic posting style usually gets you scumread.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Give it time, I can just tell his fingers are itching.
I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I believe you could plant the seed to try for town points, yes.In post 70, Harkonnen97 wrote:Are you implying that I will try to be obnoxious on purpose in the future, so I can get townread?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
But you only planted the seed. Then denied that you were playing like that when called out.In post 72, Harkonnen97 wrote:Ah. Well, that's a pretty good strategy, especially considering I revealed myself that I think it would make me look town. (yes yes, wifom wifom)
But now seem to be accepting that you are playing like that?
I'm confused here, which one is it?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I don't do jokes.In post 75, Harkonnen97 wrote:#72 was a joke. I sarcastically said that it would be a pretty good strategy for scum!harkonnen to try to be obnoxious on purpose, to get townread, after he himself saying that doing that should get him townread. Hence the (wifom wifom) comment at the end.
Lets face it, I'm not wrong, am I?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Then why the fuck are you flip flopping around with these bad naked votes?
I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I can see this being true. Doesn't mean it's AI though.In post 153, SirCakez wrote:Probably that I struggle to explain reads sometimes, or that my thoughts are jumbled and end up looking fakeI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
The NAI part wasn't directed at you.In post 159, SirCakez wrote:Never said it was
More directed at anyone wanting to use it as a reason.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Then I retract my comment.In post 161, grapes wrote:chill out that was my first vote damnI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Town post. (Sarcasm for the slower players).In post 171, curiouskarmadog wrote:from this point on in the game in Day 1...lets all stop putting town labels on people.
I think it's a case that scum fear decent town blocks.In post 198, curiouskarmadog wrote:in regards to my previous vote on grapes. Scum tend to try to make friends early day 1. it is human nature to "feel good" about someone who says you are town, even if you dont know you are doing it. I disagree with grapes (and cakez later) that X and X are town. there was very little reason to think that other than "this is how town players are supposed to play in a particular situation". to start (seriously) saying people are obv town this early in the game FOR NO REASON is bullshit. all it does it puts a mark on someone's back. if you are scum, it earns you friends.
They want everyone to be suspected at all times. I agree that buddying happens, not as much as town calling someone town, but it does. The fact you don't want anyone to be town read/called on day 1 at all is scummy as fuck.
162 is so damn awful, and you are actually using a start date to say how someone should or shouldn't react to a post.
I'm not sure what your interact was overly with Froot, or what the actual point was. Looked to me trying to appear making an effort, when in reality, it was a waste of time.
UNVOTE: Ank
VOTE: curiouskarmadog
"what I was trying to figure out here, is if you really care." - I mean, yeah, okay!I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Again, using join dates to determine posts - Scummy as shit, you also won't intimidate me to back down with such comments either, kiddoIn post 223, curiouskarmadog wrote:you know I have to immediately look at your join date when you post this right?
lol
yeah, that is what I thought.
someone who has experience in this game like UT, would not have voted THAT post (Froot) over other actual scummy things in this games. The post was newbie-ish at best. it looked like low hanging fruit.
for the record, did you think that UT's vote of Froot's post was a good one, given the content of the post?
Now, you are asking all of the wrong questions here. What you are asking is if the way the vote was is good rather than where the vote was. The vote itself is town, I mean, someone with that kind of experience doesn't give so little content in the vote while scum, right? Right?! This is what you are clearly basing it on. Personally, without using stupid reasons to read someone as scum (Yeah, sadly your reasoning fell under this ), their vote is NAI. They backed up the comment with posting a quote, so it wasn't a naked vote. Basically the response just looks like what I see from Froots. This vote can be town looking at it as scummy, could be scum that see an easy opportunity (this is why it's NAI, just so you know )
Regard who the vote is on, and to what post... This is what you should focus on.
Voting Froot looks to be justified here. Her comments are unusual. If someone appears to be scum hunting, they should be town read, and then follows up with questioning that are obviously trying to be seen as scum hunting (after the original comment, of course) but make no sense if she were looking for scum.
Asking someone what's scummy about their general play isn't scum hunting, it's asking a question, to ask a question. There's no question to advance the game, instead, dwelling on the negatives.
That said, just finishing a game with Froots, I think that she just words things differently.
It does interest me that the only part of my post to you that you brought up was the part about your awful post on UT.
The whole point of your interaction with Froots was ignored, the "OMGAWD Don't town read" comment was ignored
I want you to go over this one with me again, as this is the most bullshit I've seen in a while.In post 198, curiouskarmadog wrote:what I was trying to figure out here, is if you really care.
I'd like you to provide proof to this comment.In post 224, curiouskarmadog wrote:But if someone just comes out of no where and starts providing town lists...blah. 7 times out of 10 scum.
Your stats, seem just that little bit off.
I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So it's only week phases. Did not notice that.In post 230, FakeGod wrote:Countdown to deadline: 4 days, 2 hours, 19 minutes
Well, anyone who votes with me and votes off scum I'll put you in a town block for tomorrowI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Apparently so.In post 236, Seraphim wrote:How have we not lynched this yet? Is no one else seeing this? Is it really just me?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Is this because Marquis was a no go?
Talk to me about the vote. Why Cakez to help you kill Bulge?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Well actually no, he shared the same amount of votes as Marquis.In post 243, grapes wrote:Bulge has more votes.
Now, I'm sure you didn't want to jump on a leading wagon otherwise Froot on 4 would have been perfect for you. You also have Muffin, Sera and UT on 2.
So tell me, what appeal has the vote on Bulge have that these 4 names don't?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So you honestly believe that there is slim to zero chance in 9 of the people with votes on them (excluding Marquis, of course) of flipping scum?In post 245, grapes wrote:What if I told you that of the votes out there, bulge is the only one I think has a shot at flipping scum?
Explain this a bit further to me.
What makes Bulge scummier than anyone else, other than "He had a vote on him"?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I still don't see it. I see a pointless conversation that didn't provide.In post 246, curiouskarmadog wrote:what part do you not understand? read the interaction. she asked me a question...I was trying to figure out if she really wanted to know. so I asked her if she actually read what transpired. Not sure, exactly what you are missing...or if you are actually missing anything, but just trying to throw shit against the wall to see if it sticks.
what part EXACTLY do you not "get"?
also how big are you into metas? I have complained about town lists numerous times as town (and maybe once as scum). I have also judged people numerous time (I think solely as town) by their join date...if you have a certain level of experience there are certain things protown players dont/shouldnt attack.
if I provide these games...would you read them? (hint: answer should be yes, if you are going to continue pushing the argument).
I dont think Froot is scum, I think UT was looking for something to easily jump on without having to scum hunt.
Meta? Well I don't care for self meta. I mean, you can link me games, but I'm sure if you're scum it will be selective games. I can say "I do X in games" and then link 3 games where I've done that, out of all my games. However, if people with meta on you agree with this, sure I'll accept it. Although no one has come to your aid as of yet?
But this you are contradicting yourself... You are saying that with UT's join date, he should know exactly what to do and how to vote people while giving the impression on town, but then saying that he is scum to trying to jump on an easy wagon.
Just explain that to me again. Either knows how to vote and look town or not. This is where your join date opinion is wrong, and if actually town, need better ways to look for scum.
So Froots is a null for you, even though UT is scum pushing for an easy lynch, correct?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
@Grapes - Now Bulge is back to 1 vote, does this make you want to change your opinion again?
I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I'm happy to look myself (tomorrow as it's 1am) but I'd still like people to confirm the meta on you if it's such a reliable reasoning.In post 255, curiouskarmadog wrote:that would be great, right. I provide games, then you check and find OTHER games I didnt provide? BOOM, I must be scum. For the past 2 years, I have only played one game at a time, so I really cant hide shit. soooo you want me to pull some? or you can just do it...not hard.
in regards to UT, there is NO contradiction. I dont see TOWN UT voting that post....thus why I think he is scum...it is about motivations.
Froots is probably town..if he flips scum, I know I will be eating a bunch of shit, but I think given his posting and UT's vote...Froot is probably town and I am leaning UT is scum...UNLESS this was an early bus, but too early to really tell.
With UT, can you confirm if you've played several times with him as both align? I don't recall ever playing wither either you or UT on this site. I still think your read on people and how they do things having effect from join date is garbage. I've seen many experienced players on here make terrible plays as town.
With Froots, I'm not sure I see her as town yet, as I haven't seen enough, but as I said, she has a unique way of putting things which can easily be seen as scummy.
I'm not feeling the UT vote. I could go for Grapes though - He's trying to sweet talk me as he knows I like that. Share you advanced opinion here if you wouldn't mind.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
The part of you doing it, or the part that I like it?In post 261, grapes wrote:That's not true.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Actually, have you ever been scum for me?In post 262, Vedith wrote:The part of you doing it, or the part that I like it?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Didn't see this, my bad.In post 256, grapes wrote:I didn't like his entrance into the game.
He was really focused on harkslot for something that I didn't find all that alignment indicative and he seemed overly convicted considering how early it is. Then karmadog calls him out on the vote and now it's because his post was "robotic" kinda think scum are more likely to tack on buzzwords.
But that can be said for many people in this game. It's what happens in most games, the RVS stops because people pick up on scum tells (or push the fake ones).
I don't understand the buzzwords comment. Offsite we have a player who consider scum if they say "kill" instead of "Vote". I don't see it at all, as it's more of a personality trait rather than an alignment trait. Why would scum use robotic rather than town?
I don't see his entrance bad. He voted (naked, yes) and then responded in a joking way to a vote on him.
How about someone for example Muffin, asking for a PL? Who still hasn't placed a vote. I don't understand why Bulge is so special here?
That said, I'm really going to bed, more on this tomorrow.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I just want to confirm. I'm not saying that your play is terrible, I was more making a point about that being the reasoning.In post 270, Untrod Tripod wrote:I voted someone who I think is scum. Sue me.
I wanted to use it as an example. And give you an opportunity to go with a case on him. You didn't tae it so there's that.In post 268, grapes wrote:And I'm not really sure what's comparable here? Like you yourself said what makes muffin special it's that he's not posted any content besides pushing a pl and I'm not even sure if it's serious.
I've played with Muffin a total of once. I had him as scum from day 1 and got it right. I think it was more from inexperience with him though as people believed that he plays that kind of way all the time.
I saw this more of a dig at him. Anyone can give content so yeah, what kind of content did Hark want?In post 267, grapes wrote:"What's content even mean"
I don't really know if there's a correct answer to that. Much less an alignment indicative one.
Okay, I like where you're thinking, as it's the small slip ups that give scum away more than the big ones imo.In post 269, curiouskarmadog wrote:in regards to UT, i dont think i have every played with him. I have also seen experienced players make terrible plays as town (see my worry about DGB and the word "defensive"). but is day 1, and I am looking for anything...ANYTHING..that gives clues.
However, the way you spoke about UT I had the impression that you had experience here.
I'm not sure how to think about this.
I mean the recent discussion with him and me. Views can change, and I think I made a valid point to his votes and reasons.In post 269, curiouskarmadog wrote:now are you really asking me my opinion on grapes?
The only issue I have with Grapes is that I normally scum read him every game, and since I don't recall him ever flipping scum, I'm wrong a lot of the time (given as scum I've pushed him before).
I actually want to know if my comment has reason to see him as scum or if I'm stuck in a scum reading spiral with him.
Okay, I obviously sounded a lot more sarcastic here then I was aiming for (which was for little or none).In post 269, curiouskarmadog wrote:"advanced opinion". lol, guess you think I am being over confident? hardly, when you check out my play (at least the last 3) I start freaking out towards the end (when not scum) second guessing myself. if I have learned anything is to always go with my gut. speaking of which I think Cakez has played with me the most recently. My gut thought his hydra was scum last game and he wasnt (of course our last game, there were not real scum and town) DGB and I go way back, but I took a 2-3 year break, so I dont know how well she really knows me now.
I will be checking your games out once I have a chance, as it's going to be profitable in pushing forward.
Concerning DGB, if she's scum, at least we can find buddies out when she flips. I'm not worried about focusing there on day 1 as she's a good player as town.
As a Miller, you don't survive to Lylo. What good is there for him pushing me day 1 as scum?In post 277, iraonavp wrote:Okay, you are just spamming baseless nonsense now...
Seraphim's read on Vedith is pretending to be confident and I think he is scum-aligned.
I could understand if there was a wagon building on a scum buddy of his, but there was nothing at this point worth of interest.
I don't think he's worth the focus right now, and probably just lazy town rather than opportunist scum.
Didn't you have Hark as town too? Has this changed?In post 275, Marquis wrote:so far I have grapes town anyway tho and cakez townlean. everything else equalized out to meh. weak game atm
@UT - 251 - Did you see this post? I'm interested in your view on this situation, as you seem to be one of the prime topics so far.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I like you better when you were voting me.In post 328, Seraphim wrote:Vote: DGB
Just seems now that you gave up on me and moved where an easy vote can be cast.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
UNVOTE: curiouskarmadog
So I checked your games, including a scum game. Now, you weren't really challenged as much in the scum game (Mini 1758) apart from RC basic comments like I did to you.
The only thing I noticed was the in depth posting. As scum, your attitude doesn't seem to alter as when town, not for me anyway. I do think you try to come across as overly confident regardless. But you amount you respond with, the referring comments stand out a lot more as town.
I'll give you that one.
You said that you start to flip flop in games as town. I don't see that, what did you mean by that?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Chin up DGB, find some scum.In post 367, DrippingGoofball wrote:Sorry I just finished a game that totally demotivated meI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
We aren't lynching you, today at least.In post 370, DrippingGoofball wrote:Last time I did it got ME lynched
Talk to me about 232
I could be guilt!Biased but I don't see anything wrong with Froots.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Talk about self centred...In post 393, Seraphim wrote:Hey muffin you should call me stupid some more. You still haven't laid down a really good quote for my sig.
VOTE: Bulge
Let's go, let's go!I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
There's a difference on trying to look scummy and acutally looking scummy.In post 423, curiouskarmadog wrote:Say what? I do all the time you saying you don't?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
My title is Alice if that helps? But my name isn't.In post 456, zMuffinMan wrote:there's also a very simple way to verify this is the case: a mass alice claim
but i dunno whether people want to do this (though it should be rather obvious already that i'm not one)I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Sit down, lets not have another episode of last time.In post 459, Froot Loop wrote:Sorry I wasn't very active at the end of yesterday. I was on holiday and thought I'd be able to post more.
I'm suspicious of Seraph's claim. I don't know why he would include the vig aspect of his role if he's a town player. I would claim neighbourizer and leave it at that. As scum, he'd know that a vig is more helpful to town and definitely wouldn't get lynched. I also agree with what Muffinz was saying about Seraph pretending to play badly but then calling out people who voted for him for that play.
I'd also like some confirmation of the neighbourizing, at least.
@UT - I responded to your 206 in 217. Do you think I haven't been contributing all game? Or before that post? I also disagree that I wasn't contributing - I've explained why I asked the questions. About your comment about seeming awkward - have you read any of my previous games? I'm asking because people regularly comment about my tone seeming detached but it's not AI.
About Peregrine, I was talking about 282, 283 and 284. I read it as PV stating CKD's role and then voting for Cakez for doing that. But I misunderstood. I also didn't connect then that PV replaced Hark, who I thought was town. So I'm town-reading that slot at the moment.
I've got some problems with Vedith's play:
- speculating about Hark between 69 and 73. I don't know why it's necessary to speculate like this so early in the game, especially about potentially scum-indicative play.
- Didn't read before reacting to grapes' vote. I don't understand how that reaction can be legitimate when it's contradicted by the play. This makes me think it's made up and jumping on a chance to criticize another player.
- I got the feeling that Vedith lost the train of his conversation with CKD. Again, this makes me think that he wasn't truly engaged with the conversation with I think is AI.
All of this activity is shade-throwing without foundation which I think is scummy.
Vote: VedithI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I can't ever explain my play.In post 463, Froot Loop wrote:Can you explain your play a bit? I can't ignore it just because of last game.
I rely on others to do that for me.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Having more than 2 would be over kill. It's now to decide if they are both town.In post 675, Froot Loop wrote:Pedit: The Bulge was also a bodyguard. I'm not sure how many is reasonable to have in the game.
@Vedith
I think Muffin's town because of the interaction with ira, I'm also town-reading CKD and was Hark.
About thenewearth - a different site I played on had double voters as normally town-aligned but I don't see that in the wiki here. Is it a common scum role?
Seraph - waiting for the confirmation of the neighbourizer. I'm worried about his claim, like I said before, and other aspects of his play.
I think UT's play is quite town but I'm also worried that he hasn't said anything about looking at my other games. I guess that's playstyle, but I'm not very comfortable with it.
About you - I don't know why you would have thought grapes was flip-flopping when he definitely hadn't. If you're town, I don't know where that thought/suspicion would come from. As scum, you could've seen the naked vote and jumped on it, without properly looking at grapes' play.
I don't really have any feelings about anyone else. I want to have a look at DGB because some people have been talking about her.
I don't really like the Ira votes. He's a different style of player imo. The fact he couldn't understand Muffin's reasoning on him and has the mind set that he's more or less confirmed town highly suggests town to me.
Muffin I'll agree is town, putting way too much effort into framing someone as scum.
TNE I haven't had many games with yet, seems a lot less aggressive than I remember though, but that could purely be down to many things like player list, setup etc.
Sera wouldn't be scum while attacking me after my claim, only thing that would be more doubtful was that he switched off me easier than expected.
UT seems to be looking for an easier lynch with the Ira situation, trying to throw mud in the water for me. Saw an opportunity and grabbed it.
I'm not worried about your thoughts on me, I'm trying to get a better idea of your play here, it seems to be quieter than before, but again, many things can be the cause of that.
DGB I am going to say will most likely be unreadable to me this game, lately in games she just hasn't had any motivation it seems to play to her potential. Hopefully things pick up because I like playing with DGB town.
Do you have an opinion on Katsuki? Or Wingback?
What if I told you I think Katsuki is scum trying to coast by on the game?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I don't need to offer an explanation. If you feel what I did was scummy then voice your opinion over it.In post 685, Froot Loop wrote:@Vedith - you might not be worried about my thoughts about your play but I'm talking about something specific which worries me and you haven't offered an explanation.
I mean, I've kind of already answered this.In post 685, Froot Loop wrote:Sooo, what do you think?
Plausable, just not probably.In post 685, Froot Loop wrote:That's easily fabricated. Especially since ira's responses don't have a coherent theme as far as I can see. He's saying "that doesn't make sense" and "I'm town" a lot. Basically, if it seemed like ira thought they were having a different conversation, and contributed to that conversation, I'd think it's less likely to be fake. ira doesn't look like he's having any conversation.
So you think that ira did forget that a bookie was a role, despite the game two months ago? This is the post I have a problem with:
I'm not going to say if Ira actually forgot his role or not as only he knows, all I'm going to say is that I myself forget many roles I've been in. There's roles I've been that I've probably forgotten what they do. Ira plays in several games a time so it's not out of the question, but again, I can't say.
One thing that crossed my mind is if he faked it as town to get conversation going and it back fired.
There's also the point from Muffin where he tried to claim lack of knowledge in the game he posted, but I'm not sure if he was town or scum in that game I haven't looked yet.
I can see that, I just think it was too easy of a fumble considering it's Ira.In post 685, Froot Loop wrote:I think ira got caught out when Muffin starting asking about it and this is how he justified the question, but this post is contradicted by the other game.
I'm not really thinking that much about Seraph. I'm worried, but if we get the info about the neighbourhood then it'll be more settled. I'm more open to UT but I've read some of his play as town.
His post contradicting again could have reason depending what he was there.
If he was scum, of course his opinion contradicts if he's in a town mindset now, if he was town there then sure, I could see him in a lot less of a town set mind now.
In post 685, Froot Loop wrote:Could be. Neither of them have done very much so it's possible. There's a lot of players in the game I'd put in that category. Why do you think Katsuki's scum over some of the others?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
@UT - This does not look like a soft claim to a BG.In post 445, DrippingGoofball wrote:I am certain there is more than one in this game.
I checked her other posts and see nothing else you can have thought as it.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Phone posting so can't quote but what do you think about DGB thinking Ira is town?In post 703, Untrod Tripod wrote:
...well I don't really know what to say to that.In post 688, Vedith wrote:
@UT - This does not look like a soft claim to a BG.In post 445, DrippingGoofball wrote:I am certain there is more than one in this game.
I checked her other posts and see nothing else you can have thought as it.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I said it isn't a soft claim BG, I didn't say it isn't a soft claim.In post 705, Untrod Tripod wrote:I think she's wrong
that doesn't really address the issue, which is your assertion "I'm certain another (role) is in this game" doesn't at least look like a softclaim. which is ludicrous.
You get to call my comments ludicrous when you actually read them correctly.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So you think she's wrong, but the fact you dis like Ira suggests you think she is town BG (right?)... Don't you think DGB would doubt Ira here with that kind of information given if she was a BG and Ira is?In post 705, Untrod Tripod wrote:I think she's wrongI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I don't see it.In post 708, Untrod Tripod wrote:and I find it being a BG softclaim waaaaaaaaaaaay more likely than any of those three.
As I said, I think DGB would have been a lot more concerned over it instead of calling Ira town.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Players style of play.In post 713, Froot Loop wrote:Why do you think DGB would be questioning ira when you think it's ok that ira isn't questioning ckd?I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 716, Untrod Tripod wrote:what exactly are you seeing, then
That's what I see with this kind of question.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Unless you are suspecting DGB as scum here, suggesting what I think she was saying isn't beneficial. Do you disagree here?In post 718, Untrod Tripod wrote:what the fuck
"I think DGB is softclaiming this"
"I don't"
"What do you think then?"
"*Irrelevant bullshit*"
"What do you think DGB is claiming"
"omg ur fishing"I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I mean, look at this wagon.In post 676, FakeGod wrote:iraonavp [4] - zMuffinMan, Katsuki, Untrod Tripod, Froot Loop
Muffin and Froot are the only valid people to be on this wagon out of you 4.
You and Katsuki are just throwing shit without actually discussing it.
That's right, I don't see your argument as you actually trying to work him out as scum or prove him as scum, you are just pressing worthless pressure on him to be doing something.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So my choices are, Ira, Froot, DGB and you?In post 760, zMuffinMan wrote:if you're not voting someone, vote
if you're voting someone and nobody is voting with you, do something about it
Yeeahh, no.
VOTE: KatsukiI claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I'm voting where I think is scum, sadly town aren't doing a good job with their votes, and I'm not voting the 4 up for offer.In post 772, Untrod Tripod wrote:deadline is in two days and you want to start a new wagon on a player who has barely posted?
I can understand why you are satisfied with voting anywhere though.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Of course you can, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.In post 778, Froot Loop wrote:You can talk about what scenario you think is more likely, or the same.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
As I said, there's roles that I would have forgotten, so I don't see how others can't.
My comment was that if Ira was scum in the game linked then of course his opinion would change if he is town here. However, if he was town in that game, then sure, I could see it change as a scum mind set here.I claim scum \o/-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
-
-
Vedith Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey