In post 564, FA_Q2 wrote:
I see your case on farside and branz - I must have missed beli.
Why do you think beli is scum?
Yeah so basically I've had him as a tentative townlean so far, but then the other day at work I was thinking about this, and a little light bulb went off. The sequence of posts that is
149,
155, and then
443, where he flipsflops on his own logic. "No easy wagons, there needs justification" earlier today on a BRantz wagon, when getting the ball rolling really mattered, and then when push comes to shove "oh yeah let's go for a policy lynch I'm fine with that". That is shit. And then when I prompt him about it starting around
525 his answers p much confirmed my suspicions.
529 reminds me of Beli in a game I played with him where he and I were scumbuddies; throw out some vague, mostly irrelevant nonsense about meta/some game related anecdote/whatever you want to call it and pass it off as a contribution.
So TL;DR
1. Early game, wagon pops up on BRantz. He ignores it and pushes against it, with the logic of "nah, this wagon is 'easy' and has no justification so it's bad"
2. Wagon on BRantz again, he gets put to L-1, with an alternative wagon of Sera being at L-3 by the time he joins it. A pure policy lynch, with zero reasoning, and somehow it's more justified than a lynch on BRantz who has an actual scumcase being pushed by several people? Nah, this is scum-Beli seeing an alternative wagon to his partner picking up steam.
3. Scum-Beli trips and drops his townmask in the mud in 525. While scrambling for it he mutters some irrelevant nothings about another game.
Clear logical contradiction, pieces fit, he looks like the Beli I played with as scum. *Waves to Scum-Beli* ^_^
I believe I've already pointed out where Farside screwed up, where she had a clear logical error regarding BRantz, where the logical conclusion to her line of questioning would have been to vote him, buuut then she instead voted for VM. "Bus a buddy, vote a townie".
BRantz hammer please.