In post 2103, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 2097, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 2096, Thestatusquo wrote:yeah, I looked at them and I already know what your narrative is going to be because its the same one you used to attack me earlier.
It hasn't gotten any better.
Explain 751, 842, 845, 863, 1627, and 1787.
Here are the posts you want me to "explain" and I will also quote the post where I literally did explain them and apparently you're just ignoring that fact.
751: Do you think llamarble was being surface level here? I think picking down through to what might happen if eddie is town and hammers is far deeper analysis than scum players usually fake. Do you disagree? If so, why? Provide me examples of that kind of analysis being faked by scum. Because I haven't seen it and I've been playing 10+ years.
Heres 842:
In post 842, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 841, Thestatusquo wrote:@Ran I would happily kill either LQ or Tchill. Right now there is a wagon on one of them and not on the other. I have pretty high confidence in my scum reads on both of them, so I don't see why it makes sense for me to switch over to LQ at this time unless the wagon moved over there for some reason independent of me.
What is your strong SR on me based on? I expect some pretty strong evidence considering this is D1.
In post 843, Thestatusquo wrote:We had like a 5 page back and forth about what my scum read on your was based on. I explained it to you multiple times. We argued about it for pages.
There's literal no way you don't remember why I'm scum reading you. This is more well poisoning.
Oh look I responded, telling you to read the entire game. Because honestly I still don't understand how you could not understand how I was scum reading you. Here are some of the posts that I was trying to direct you to look back on that apparently you're too fucking lazy to do so.
In post 439, Thestatusquo wrote:I consider what people say about their play, but I don't let people tell me why they're doing the things they do because people lie. You know damn well I know you're quick and I believe I've told you that I've read your wiki, but I also recall you have something of a poor memory, so I forgive you for not remembering that.
The problem with your actions is that the things you're doing also have significant scum motivations. Regardless of if you think you're doing them for other reasons, I'm not in your head, and I can't just trust you.
And I also am starting to be pretty sure you're scum because you're poking and drawing almost no reasonable conclusions. You start long discussions with me about nonsense about how reck is using different tools to find reads, and then disengage as soon as I try to explain. That's the biggest problem here. You're poking, but you don't seem to care about the responses to your pokes. At least not from the people you're poking. You seem to be singularly interested in the responses of other players, which makes me think you're more interested in finding where you can find an easy lynch, and not concerned about finding the correct lynch. This squares quite nicely with your vote on marquis also, which you have not fully explained after naked voting. It's nice to be on the highest vote getter who happens to not be posting much.
Actually, literally all the votes on marquis right now are atrocious.
Yeah, If you are going to accuse someone of something, you really shouldn't be doing it yourself. I am talking about you accusing me of just dropping things. You have done this a lot this game in my interactions with you. If you have a viable response to why you have done this, than so do I. And it's looking more and more like Marquis is Scum, so I'd like to know what you defense of him is based on here.
In post 2103, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 445, Thestatusquo wrote:1) I didn't say you're going for the easiest lynch. I said you were going for an easy lynch, which I think "the second easiest lynch" would qualify as.
2) I don't agree with people just because they town read me. That's playing town 101. Please give me more credit than that, I've only been playing this game for 10+ years.
3) you seem to think that this read is coming out of nowhere out of one thing. That's not the case, and it doesn't come from lycan. Lycan's post just made me circle around to something thats been bugging me about your play for basically this whole game, which is what I laid out in my last post. You're poking everywhere, but you don't care about the persons response to the poking. You keep trying to figure out how the rest of the town is responding to the poking. That's the basis of me thinking that your motivation is not to find scum but to find where you can rally town support.
4) I am voting another scum read. I'm allowed to have multiple. Would happily switch to your wagon. I have been pretty transparent about how I feel about people. The reason I asked the question is that you haven't been. I have no way of knowing who you find scummy other than your vote, because you keep poking at cracks and moving on when a wagon doesn't form.
1) Semantics. If you really think you "caught" me for that then your experience does you no justice which leads me to
2) Appeal to authority
3) You talk about my flipping like it's a sure thing. Why?
4) Yeah, who you are Scum reading are Town, so you haven't impressed me with your reads, honestly.
In post 2103, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 595, Thestatusquo wrote:Like that vibe becomes even stronger with the conclusion.
It's another reason I think you're likely to be scum.
You keep trying to subtly discredit scum reads on you. And I just mean like, argue and dispute arguments, because theres obviously town motivation to do that. What I mean is you keep trying to weasel around people scum reading you. One example of it is trying to cast all the people scum reading you as not understanding how you play, and saying they were doing so because they didn't like you playing mechanically, when in fact doing so was not the reason I had stated I was scum reading you, nor do I think its a fair characterization of the reason others were.
Similarly, in this post you seem to be suggesting that llama has not done the work, and subtly implying that his reads on you aren't to be trusted. At no point has llama said or even implied he hasn't read your iso, so you throwing it out there like that reads to me as an attempt to discredit his arguments instead of trying to interact with them.
It's disingenuous. You're not making good faith arguments.
I laid out in GREAT FUCKING DETAIL why I thought you were scum. I did it multiple times. The fact that you couldn't fucking remember is not a fucking scum tell for me.
With regards to me fighting the Scum reads on me: You fucking have meta on me of doing this very thing as Town. Why are you just sweeping that under the rug? Like that was a huge part of the game where havo and others were saying (I think Chill, your teammate was saying the same) that I was only accusing Havo of being Scum because they suspected me first. Like it seems you have drawn zero conclusions about that in the way I approach getting SR.
Llama gave zero details about most everything they have said. Why should I just take it on good faith that Llama has done that work? It seems you are acting in a way that you know Llama is Town already and not questioning that at all. Why?
In post 2103, Thestatusquo wrote:845
In post 845, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 843, Thestatusquo wrote:We had like a 5 page back and forth about what my scum read on your was based on. I explained it to you multiple times. We argued about it for pages.
There's literal no way you don't remember why I'm scum reading you
. This is more well poisoning.
You admitted yourself you know I have a bad memory. What the hell, man?
Oh my fucking god look I responded literally TWO POSTS AFTER.
In post 847, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 845, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 843, Thestatusquo wrote:We had like a 5 page back and forth about what my scum read on your was based on. I explained it to you multiple times. We argued about it for pages.
There's literal no way you don't remember why I'm scum reading you
. This is more well poisoning.
You admitted yourself you know I have a bad memory. What the hell, man?
This isn't some passing remark, this is the fundamental and huge part of this game. I simply do not understand how you could possibly have a position on me and how I've played this game without some understanding of why I am scum reading you. Nor do I believe that bad memory means "don't remember a huge thing that happened like 3 days ago"
So basically, you are saying you don't think I have as bad of a memory as I actually do. How would that make me Scum? It would assume I couldn't/wouldn't have the ability to defend myself. I think it should be clear that I am not short of arguments, so where does this come from?
In post 2103, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 863, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 855, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm not relitigating the argument. I'm just saying the claim you're making in 850, that llamarble was interpreting my words without context and that I had done nothing to explain them and that I had never confirmed he was correct is DEMONSTRABLY false.
You've basically just said that your hard defence of Llama is completely baseless because otherwise you would see that my interpretation of what you said is correct and Llama's is incorrect. Reason for this is the point I bring up (which is a valid one) is that under what condition do I always vote for you in that situation. This is a situation that has not been answered and so it is NEW. We haven't talked about this yet and if we have, I don't remember getting an answer. So what I am seeing here is although MY interpretation of what you said is true and Llama's is false, you still SR me and TR Llama. How do you account for this disparity?
I didn't respond to this because its bullshit. your entire premise is false. Llamarble was correct and you were wrong. Full stop. Furthermore, clearly you should know I would have this opinion because again we already had a full page long argument about this. You are wrong. The fact that you literally have no idea what colloquial language is is again not a reason I am scum.
So you didn't respond to it because it's bullshit? That's a fucking weak argument mate. If it was bull shit it should be easy as cake to disprove what I said, but you give nothing there. Under what justification do you feel you don't have to answer to this accusation against you? You still never answered even at this stage of the game.
In post 2103, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 1627, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 1626, Thestatusquo wrote:Are you honestly accusing me of having the dastardly scum plan of hoping that people don't realize that 3 does not equal exactly 7?!?!
Is that legitimately what you think is happening right now?
Did I say that is what is happening now?
So I'm scum because I didn't feel like having a fight with you about whether someone saying "in the middle" to mean "not at the very beginning" is valid? Thats fucking bizarre dude. I think you are mistaking me being frustrated with the fact that you don't make ANY fucking sense for a scum tell.
Frankly I hate talking to you because I never understand what you're saying and it seems like at times you're purposefully misunderstanding the things I'm saying. What is the point of pointing out that 3 does not literally equal 7 if you're not trying to suggest I'm misreping? What is the actual fucking point you're making because honestly I'm still not fucking sure, so I have no idea what you even would want me to engage with you on here.
Well, it's not really a Scum tell that you said 3 days is midway through the day, but it is a Scum tell that you just completely drop the point when I say something that you can't explain from me as being a Town perspective. Like, even if you were to say something like "that's stupid" it would give me something from you that you acknowledged my point in the first place. Instead you don't say anything which means you either feel like I don't deserve a response or you know there is an undercurrent of Scum motivation for missrepping how much time is left in the day. Like I can come up with something like "shea said 3 days was midway through the day because he is trying to put it in people's heads to not utilize the full day to get as much out of Day Phase as possible." If I can come up with an explanation why it could be Scummy to say something, I would expect an answer for why you said what you said in the first place. So why DID you say it was midway through the day when it had only been 3 days?
In post 2103, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 1787, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 1785, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 1782, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 1778, Thestatusquo wrote:
a lot of the problem is that its not like you really reevaluate, its like you shift from full town reading them to voting them with no warning and no indication that you were ever even remotely thinking of them as someone you might before.
Latest example being davsto.
Yeah, I do the opposite as well and change from Scum to Town reads this is just a part of my play, deal.
do you try to emulate this as scum?
I thought you didn't agree with self-meta. Why are you asking this question?
To answer, I think I have don't it in the past, but more often than not I try and have my reads "make sense" to Town members so it doesn't look like I am laking progression on people. It depends on the game. As Town, I just care more about constantly looking at things from different angles, so that is why my reads change like this. Ultimately, I would say switching reads like this is a tool I utilize, but it's not one I am constantly thinking about. Also, my perspective in doing this as Scum has more of an agenda, which is that I am usually in danger of getting lynched so I try and make it as hard to tie myself to my teammates as possible. And yes, I am actually pretty damn good at doing this considering I rarely see end game as Scum, but I still have a decent record as Scum. Really tho, much of my game as Scum is about confusing Town if I die. That is why I pull things like cross distancing with my teammates. I also try and make believable pushes on my teammates and it usually doesn't get them Lynched because I am actually horrible at pushing lynches because no one ever believes the reads I have. That's why it confuses Town so bad when I push my buddies - because they don't know what I was doing because my pushes make sense coming from me (at least on my teammates).
Literally already answered this. I was trying to catch you in a lie. I didn't. You weren't lying.
This is an incorrect answer. What you should have done is reference back to where you said you don't mind people giving self meta if asked, but that you don't like it when people use it as a defense. Why not include this in your answer? There is literally no reason not to unless you know what you are doing has ill intent.