Mini 1749: Classic Rock Mafia: Game Over!
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 17, MattP wrote:In post 15, Garmr wrote:mattp has a slight scummy response going to serious vote him.
What was that?
The fact he asked why over something rvs that didn't need much explaining. I don't know how to put this into words but was there any reason to ask why for something rvs like. Just seems a bit you know.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 24, MattP wrote:In post 21, Garmr wrote:In post 17, MattP wrote:In post 15, Garmr wrote:mattp has a slight scummy response going to serious vote him.
What was that?
The fact he asked why over something rvs that didn't need much explaining. I don't know how to put this into words but was there any reason to ask why for something rvs like. Just seems a bit you know.
It's pretty innocuous to try to move RVS along by prodding RVS votes?
What's the point of it when it's obviously a rvs. It like saying I like red that's why i will vote this person who likes gold then someone ask why would you do that.
What response were you expecting from the rvs?
Also why trying to push that it isn't bad to do instead of it isn't scummy that's a strange angle to come from?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 30, MattP wrote:In post 28, Garmr wrote:What's the point of it when it's obviously a rvs. It like saying I like red that's why i will vote this person who likes gold then someone ask why would you do that.
What response were you expecting from the rvs?
Also why trying to push that it isn't bad to do instead of it isn't scummy that's a strange angle to come from?
I don't think it's common sense that it's RVS for a player to quote a player's rxn to a vote and then wagon that player? People rationalize things as small as an emoticon reaction for a vote. Even if it's a low-stakes beginning-of-day-1 vote with weak reasoning people still justify reads with weak reasoning early on to move RVS along and it's not foul play to engage that sort of vote to continue a dialogue
Well it's first page, I said lets wagon him and there was no case on aero thus it's obvious to see it's a rvs wagon. Also I think Dwlee would of said something if his vote was serious. It's more the fact you were trying to push yourself as harmless instead of trying to dismiss my position as weak.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 44, iraonavp wrote:In post 28, Garmr wrote:In post 24, MattP wrote:In post 21, Garmr wrote:In post 17, MattP wrote:In post 15, Garmr wrote:mattp has a slight scummy response going to serious vote him.
What was that?
The fact he asked why over something rvs that didn't need much explaining. I don't know how to put this into words but was there any reason to ask why for something rvs like. Just seems a bit you know.
It's pretty innocuous to try to move RVS along by prodding RVS votes?
What's the point of it when it's obviously a rvs. It like saying I like red that's why i will vote this person who likes gold then someone ask why would you do that.
What response were you expecting from the rvs?
To be fair, your description on his response as "slight scummy" makes it appear like you are no longer participating in RVS.
Also why trying to push that it isn't bad to do instead of it isn't scummy that's a strange angle to come from?
Very much this. It's as if MattP feels like he is playing his scum-aligned role adequately, yet is attacked on an inadequate basis.
I was talking about the wagon aero being rvs and my responce to matt p is not rvs. I think your confused with some aspects.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 57, iraonavp wrote:In post 49, MattP wrote:Forgive me, I'm on ambien that I swallowed a few minutes before this wagon started
I don't know how I should feel about this, considering that he has mentioned his usage of Ambien in previous games and it probably affects his judgement and behavior. It may not necessarily account for what he has posted here, though. I would definitely like to retain the pressure on his wagon and hear more from MattP once he becomes unaffected by his medication.
It may be because of his medication he didn't think it through and responded what was on top of is mind. I am starting to think he could show his scum game more when his drugged up.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 65, Taly wrote:In post 58, Garmr wrote:In post 57, iraonavp wrote:In post 49, MattP wrote:Forgive me, I'm on ambien that I swallowed a few minutes before this wagon started
I don't know how I should feel about this, considering that he has mentioned his usage of Ambien in previous games and it probably affects his judgement and behavior. It may not necessarily account for what he has posted here, though. I would definitely like to retain the pressure on his wagon and hear more from MattP once he becomes unaffected by his medication.
It may be because of his medication he didn't think it through and responded what was on top of is mind. I am starting to think he could show his scum game more when his drugged up.
Are you using meta to decipher Matt's play? Could you direct to the post to where he's likely scum in your eyes - as previously stated, I'm not seeing it.
The "scum-like meta when drugged up" thing doesn't seem to hold a lot of weight.
In post 62, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
Ironically for being one of the less active players. Just see it as a random vote.Explain this Radja vote AI.
Alright, I'll take that at face value.
No reaction to my claim?
Frozen Angel wrote:In post 61, Taly wrote:I want to say Matt is town for being so quickly pushed L-2 by the 2nd page, just for saying "Why" to a wagon.... His reasoning doesn't mark me as scummy, unless I'm missing something?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=64070
Blocky was town who got lol-hammered day 1?
And that's relevant, how? Is that an alt?
>I've yet to see RVS wagons hit scum, despite how uncredible this reason is.
>How can scum be so quickly pushed to L-2? You'd think someone would have a stance opposing it but I don't see much of any resistance here.
>"Why?" Isn't a good basis for a scumread. I can see if they had meta congruent to this and someone would like to keep someone at L-2 there... But it doesn't really make sense. Questions in RVSshouldbe asked, and that's how I'm seeing this wagon formed over.
How about instead of focusing on the medication thing and putting your own words into it (it's nothing to do with meta.) Seriously I don't like the way you tried to twist things.
The original reasoning on him was weak coming out of rvs and he could of easily argued a point to it being null but instead like that instead he played it off as him being harmless and it doesn't hurt anyone. IThat's scummy as.
The fact you ignored this being brought up and went straight to defending him means you either didn't bother reading the game or your purposely opting to do that and judging by your posts it leans to the latter which disturbs me.
Also your points
1. I have seen scum been run up in rvs I have been that scum that was run up in rvs and still lived and won. Just because you lack experience with it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. This is a fools way of thinking
2. Asking why over a rvs is ok the votes on him for it wouldn't of been that strong and would of quickly shifted when some else popped up but he panicked and tried to present himself as harmless. This is what people are voting him over and his weird behavior. Using medication as a excuse is awful as well and he shouldn't play if his drugged up.
I really don't like your attitude around this wagon instead of going for what people are voting him for you go for the drug thing.
Also your defending the wagon while you haven't listed one person as scum or thought of one person as scummy.
You can be scum I don't see any town effort put into your posts your just looking for the white knight.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
dwelee let me bitch slap you for being dumb there we go.
I don't think matt is town. But taly is treating matt like they are town with no reasoning and defending them by distorting facts this is white knighting the wagon.
In forum parlance, it means rushing to the aid of another poster for whatever reason. An accusation typically reserved for when a poster is being hammered by another poster(s) and the accused leaps in to defend them, usually without thinking things through as to why the person is being attacked
I also never said I thought matt was a downie. Also scum defend there buddies to ;/-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 85, Dwlee99 wrote:Whiteknighting is generally when scum defends a townie for town cred. I guess I misunderstood you.
It's fine just i have dealt with to many situations like this in the past were people focus on my wording instead of what I'm actually trying to say. Sorry I got agitated.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Really can't be stuffed answering walls in the future of the same thing taly so lets get this down.
In post 115, Taly wrote:
In post 79, Garmr wrote:The original reasoning on him was weak coming out of rvs and he could of easily argued a point to it being null but instead like that instead he played it off as him being harmless and it doesn't hurt anyone. IThat's scummy as.
You could have just said this instead of making wild assumptions of me questioning the wagon.
I have been saying this for ages you obviously don't fucking read taly if you don't read the game what do you actually plan to bring into the game taly.
In post 115, Taly wrote:
In post 58, Garmr wrote:In post 57, iraonavp wrote:In post 49, MattP wrote:Forgive me, I'm on ambien that I swallowed a few minutes before this wagon started
I don't know how I should feel about this, considering that he has mentioned his usage of Ambien in previous games and it probably affects his judgement and behavior. It may not necessarily account for what he has posted here, though. I would definitely like to retain the pressure on his wagon and hear more from MattP once he becomes unaffected by his medication.
It may be because of his medication he didn't think it through and responded what was on top of is mind. I am starting to think he could show his scum game more when his drugged up.
You said'his scum game.' What are you referring to? Were you not going off a playstyle you had over him previously?
I never mention anything of meta it just a fucking guess, because I have a scum read on him it reflects in my guess get me.
In post 115, Taly wrote:
In post 79, Garmr wrote:The fact you ignored this being brought up and went straight to defending him means you either didn't bother reading the game or your purposely opting to do that and judging by your posts it leans to the latter which disturbs me.
Defending? I stated why I believed Matt was likely town and how I didn't entirely understand the wagon, if you saw my points and recognized that I did pose questions on the thinking of the wagon then why are you taking this in such a completely different direction?
Opting to do what? If I sheeped the thinking and vote on the wagon that'd push him straight to L-1. Scum and town could hammer, what would come from a flip like that in 3-5 pages when not everybody has even posted yet, specifically outside of RVS?
You know what would sort out half this problem if you learn to fucking read. Also you don't need to place your vote down on him. Your lack of reading and defending him just because his l-2 makes you scummy. If you are somehow town then your just a shit player for not reading in my eyes you're not a big loss if you die.
In post 79, Garmr wrote:Also your points
1. I have seen scum been run up in rvs I have been that scum that was run up in rvs and still lived and won. Just because you lack experience with it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. This is a fools way of thinking
Want to link me some games on this?
How about no since your annoying me.
In post 79, Garmr wrote:2. Asking why over a rvs is ok the votes on him for it wouldn't of been that strong and would of quickly shifted when some else popped up but he panicked and tried to present himself as harmless. This is what people are voting him over and his weird behavior. Using medication as a excuse is awful as well and he shouldn't play if his drugged up.
Not exactly sure if he's being harmless if he's asking questions and putting his stance on things.
Didn't like the medication excuse, but does that mean he's scum?
Are you fucking serious
In post 24, MattP wrote:In post 21, Garmr wrote:In post 17, MattP wrote:In post 15, Garmr wrote:mattp has a slight scummy response going to serious vote him.
What was that?
The fact he asked why over something rvs that didn't need much explaining. I don't know how to put this into words but was there any reason to ask why for something rvs like. Just seems a bit you know.
It's pretty innocuousto try to move RVS along by prodding RVS votes?
In post 26, MattP wrote:Like, the worst-case scenario is that it doesn't get an appreciable rise out of the person you ask the question to and RVS continues
Or this happens (':
His trying to downplay himself as harmless here instead of of justifying his action as town and what he hopped to get out of dwelee.
In post 83, Garmr wrote:dwelee let me bitch slap you for being dumb there we go.
I don't think matt is town. But taly is treating matt like they are town with no reasoning and defending them by distorting facts this is white knighting the wagon.
You're continuing the idea that I'm WKing someone and saying I'm distorting the facts yet you've never asked anything to clarify and instead assumed that I'm "defending" someone I think is likely town.
You defended him with out actually going into the reasoning why people think his scum and assumed why he was getting voted. Your white knighting that's a fact. If you are town and white knighting then you are the village idiot.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
How could it be helpful what did you expect as a answer?
It still doesn't change the fact your pushing that the question to harmless. Your just doing it in a different way. Post 136 indicates that. It wasn't your question that took us out of rvs btw it was me who did it. Who decided to push you for it. So doing that to try and justify the logic is extremely bad especially because your plan was obviously not "make myself look bad to move out of rvs".-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 240, Dwlee99 wrote:I am liking Aero and Dier for town atm. Taly is leaning town, too.
Personally I don't like that matt p dropped a soft claim to doctor earlier considering there probably isn't a doctor in this game.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 242, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 241, Garmr wrote:In post 240, Dwlee99 wrote:I am liking Aero and Dier for town atm. Taly is leaning town, too.
Personally I don't like that matt p dropped a soft claim to doctor earlier considering there probably isn't a doctor in this game.
Wasn't he referring to his avatar?
It felt like he was laying down a fake claim for latter.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 248, MattP wrote:Your opinion of me is so stale - I've explained my rationale to you. You've ignored my explanations until I forced you to engage me (why is it so difficult to get you to engage me? Shouldn't you want to engage me? Don't you want me dead?) and then I provided further explanations that clearly explain the things you have reservations with (I'm not an idiot, I can see clearly that my explanations make sense, other people are fine with my explanations and have unvoted me). You're forcing puzzle pieces to fit into your story line of why I'm scummy to you (seriously, you think I'm "crumbing" and that "doc doesn't fit into the setup"?)
You're either tunnel-visioning or you're forcing the read, I'm the only person you've called out all game (other than to say, "Radja is scummy but mattp is scummier so I feel uncomfortable moving" with no explanation for why Radja is scummy)
HAHAHA wow and this was from the genius who down played him self but now he has no pressure he gets confidence fucking obvious mafia not moving my vote now.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 255, MattP wrote:In post 138, MattP wrote:In post 137, Garmr wrote:How could it be helpful what did you expect as a answer?
It still doesn't change the fact your pushing that the question to harmless. Your just doing it in a different way. Post 136 indicates that. It wasn't your question that took us out of rvs btw it was me who did it. Who decided to push you for it. So doing that to try and justify the logic is extremely bad especially because your plan was obviously not "make myself look bad to move out of rvs".
You're not even directly responding to what I'm saying. I never said I brought us out of RVS, I said that asking someone a question about a possible non-RVScouldbring the game out of RVS. I've brought games out of RVS, by engaging people, it's not earth-shattering logic.
His vote could have been based on him not liking Aero's reaction, and there could have been shitty or reasonable logic behind it, or it could have been a meaningless entirely RVS vote. I was simple asking to engage a player and gauge a response/reaction from that player. My point was that there could be utility to that - at worse it could do nothing. The point was, "what's the harm to engaging people in RVS?" not "look how harmless I'm being!"
I don't care if you brought us out of RVS, congratulations. I'm not at all concerned
In post 139, MattP wrote:And for the record, yeah, it did nothing. His response of "why not" made it clear it was a random vote and I didn't continue the conversation. If he said, "because he responded in an awkward way" or something to that effect then I would have continued that discussion.
In post 141, MattP wrote:And if you think people don't over-rationalize votes like that in early-game, or try to rationalize votes like that in early-game, you're wrong, it happens all the time.
In post 143, MattP wrote:Especially newbs. If someone like Reckoner or kanye made that vote I wouldn't have asked why. The player that made the vote joined the forum in 2015, my threshold for assuming the worst of newbs in lower than that for experienced players.
pedit: if you're on firefox, that's what's wrong. Idk why.
Garmr, this didn't deserve a response?
No-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Frozen angel and anyone else looking at matt as scum
-Mattp is scum and I'm glad how you picked up on matts role drop wifom and got a similar thought process than mine. All the things he quoted in 255. His trying to say he was trying to bring us out of rvs with his question.
-But lets look at the fact scum want to look like they are doing something and that's what does matt achieve with that nothing. Through the point is weaker what he is ignoring is initial response. He focus's on the the why question which I admitted and said time again was a weaker part of my case as I thought his initial response was scummy and he hasn't brought a satisfactory answer to the table to answer that.
-He tried changing what he said and even with the changed explanation it still lead to the same result of him worrying about he is perceived instead of trying to add value to hunting scum.
-It's also possible that mattp is on the scum team and intentionally did that drop to try and find out if there is any dr now I think about it. There is plenty of scum motive to do that and no town motive.
Also look at how fast the wagon assembled then disassembled there was likely scum on the wagon and I think it was a early bus and saw the opportunity to jump off. It's not the first time someones been caught in rvs. Also running up someone early fast is a great way to diffuse the wagon as someone is always guaranteed to rush to defend against it.
there are a couple of other things I find scummy but I want to see if other players picked up on it
@matt p
actually changed my mind about not responding to that. In post 143 you say that if it was a more experienced player you wouldn't bother asking but earlier you were trying to make the case it doesn't hurt and can only help us get out of rvs. If it never hurts to ask why be selective about who you ask it kinda contradicts your reasoning a little.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 274, Taly wrote:In post 224, MattP wrote:In post 221, Mathilda wrote:
I'm surprised to see a naked vote on page 9 when the thread has clearly progressed from RVS.
I guess you've never played mafia
Cool first contribution to the thread btw
This response does not look harmless. ._.
In post 226, MattP wrote:In post 222, Taly wrote:Wait, what is this vote for? Specifically why now - when Dier hasn't responded to the current votes - and not before?
Why wouldn't I add pressure to a wagon prior to diers response?
1)Stating this kind of reason partially defeats the purpose of pressuring a wagon.
2)If it is for pressure, and dier has responded - do you believe he's scum?
3)I'm not a mind reader.
In post 235, Dierfire wrote:Actually I don't think that this needs many words.
UNVOTE: AlwaysInnocent
VOTE: Albert B. Rampage
The vote on Mathilda is fine, but if the point was to get a better read on Mathilda, then why remove it before Mathilda returns?
In post 239, Dierfire wrote:Ha ha, that's why I can't use tabs any more.
Anyway, fine, let's not argue about that.
Let's instead discuss your point that I am not contributing original thoughts.
I thought that my vote on AlwaysInnocent was fairly novel, and I don't recall anyone else pointing out the discrepancies with Frozen's timestamps as I did in 91 and 129. I also think that my most recent vote on ABR is relatively new and I would like to know what you think of my reasoning.
I don't really see your reasoning on ABR? You didn't really say it...
In post 240, Dwlee99 wrote:I am liking Aero and Dier for town atm. Taly is leaning town, too.
Cool that you have townreads... Any scum?
In post 256, Radja wrote:In post 222, Taly wrote:
Can you explain your Garmr townread?
Also, you said that my miller claim would be dealt with. Why not now, and when is later?
Garmr was the one who originally pushed MattP for his question in RVS. He posted what I was thinking before I got the chance to make a post about it myself. That's usually something that gives me an immediate townread on someone. The pushing of MattP was also the end of RVS, which moved the game forward.
About the miller claim, what I mean is that it's not unlikely it will sort itself out. Whether you are lying or not, there are PR's in this game, and it is possible for one of them to out you if you are lying. So you get to live through day 1, at least. I'll deal with your claim if it becomes a problem(which would be right before LYLO, most likely)
OK, I'm not going dive into this setup spec shit partially because I don't know the full set-up (Don't play many closed games). But unless there's a role-cop, then most any investigate role we could have would be incriminating me and that defeats the very purpose of my claim of not wasting and fucking with the town.....
In terms of me not making it to lylo, all I can say is that I am a miller, and I don't expect this will keep me alive in this game - however, I'm not going to stand around and let people wrongfully accuse me of what simply isn't true.
I'm understanding your read formation right now, my scumread on you is slowly dying.
Moving Matt on less likely town now.
Why would you prompt someone to answer something and then drop it when they refuse?
I'm starting to see this 'downplaying' that Garmr talks about...
>>>
Not sold on Dwlee or Dier town but I can see it.
Lowell, Aero, and FA are town in my eyes. Specifically because 269 looks very much like a town thought process. I can also understand the FA suspicion because in my last game nobody ever suspected her despite her being town. So pressure would be nice, even if I agree with her.
Lowell, what are your thoughts on Garmr?
Hey your just now starting to see why matt is scum god your slow. If matt isn't lynched today and his scum it will be all your fault. I changed my mind you can be town.
I have a feeling at least one scum was on the wagon and one off. They probably waiting for a sucker like you to diffuse it. (You can see my frustration with you right.)
Your missing huge chunks as well look at his personality change as the game progresses it goes from weak and timid and complaint when there is a wagon him to over confident and a asshole. This is him a scum him knowing that the majority of the players won't vote him now after it was pushed to l-2 and was diffused by you.
fuck you can tell his shit at scum look at this
In post 230, MattP wrote:In post 228, MattP wrote:In post 227, Mathilda wrote:In post 152, MattP wrote:Well you can trust me, I'm a doctor
OK you have to know that everyone's going to notice this comment. It's too obvious for a soft claim or bread crumb and if you're townie then why would you say such a thing? Especially if you were a doctor. This is suspicious.
My title is "Dr. Feelgood" and my avatar is a doctor. If you're setting up a bullshit vote on me spare me with the weird justifications
Also if you really thought this why would you even bring attention to it? You just brought attention to what you believed was a soft claim
In post 247, MattP wrote:Continue with your tunnelvisiony rolefishing and setup spec, it's so fascinating
And for the record, I wasn't crumbing anything.
See what his doing here his fucking trying to bait people into reacting then trying to incriminate them with what he said instead of . As scum he can also be trying to bait out roles.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
VC stuff take notice
Will also note that matt p and radja have a interesting relationship.
Most people have noticed radja awkward transition off the matt wagon he got a lot of votes for it
What people haven't noticed is the variety of transitions off the radja wagon. Mattp was originally second on the wagon before it took off. In post he votes radja for taking his vote off him and doesn't really push radja hard giving him some squirming room over his next few posts. Now 194 the wagon is at l-2
Now this is pretty funny because around this time Always innocent unvotes on the thought me and radja are masons then the next post he says never mind yet he never revotes radja or mentions him again.
It's actually around this time the radja wagon is dieing we have opposition to wagon now in the forms of lowell,dwlee not actively but in the fact they are questioning the wagon of radja that matt takes his vote off.
taly has no trouble pushing this wagon to l-2 being a bit of hypocrite in some aspects not that's a scum thing just showing my annoyance at him.
P-edit now this interesting AI switch of reads on radja.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 296, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
That was a silly misunderstanding on my part. It didn't deserve much attention, because it was simply my own stupidity.Now this is pretty funny because around this time Always innocent unvotes on the thought me and radja are masons then the next post he says never mind yet he never revotes radja or mentions him again.
Thank God (or rather, Nature) for the ability to revise my beliefs!P-edit now this interesting AI switch of reads on radja.
Without pressuring Radja, we would not have modest evidence in favor of him being town. It is only natural to move on at that point. There's nothing wrong with that.
So you think Radja is scum and he is being saved, or what?It's actually around this time the radja wagon is dieing we have opposition to wagon now in the forms of lowell,dwlee not actively but in the fact they are questioning the wagon of radja that matt takes his vote off.
Not sure on radja tbh There's just a lot of activity between him and mattp wagons was originally thinking radja might be scum but that's got weaker and weaker. Think I picked up on something through and want to see how that plays out.
Still think that there is at least one scum hopping between the two through.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 378, Aeronaut wrote:Ok, going a little at a time, because there's too many pages and too little of an attention span.
In post 246, MattP wrote:In post 243, Garmr wrote:In post 242, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 241, Garmr wrote:In post 240, Dwlee99 wrote:I am liking Aero and Dier for town atm. Taly is leaning town, too.
Personally I don't like that matt p dropped a soft claim to doctor earlier considering there probably isn't a doctor in this game.
Wasn't he referring to his avatar?
It felt like he was laying down a fake claim for latter.
I officially think you're bad at mafia
Congrats!
Garmr is actually pretty good at this game, he just gets to where he's going in a different way than most.
In post 262, Garmr wrote:@Frozen angel and anyone else looking at matt as scum
-Mattp is scum and I'm glad how you picked up on matts role drop wifom and got a similar thought process than mine.All the things he quoted in 255.His trying to say he was trying to bring us out of rvs with his question.
Whataboutthe things he quoted in 255 are bad? Like, you didn't respond to them, which is whatever, but you can't point to them and say they're scummy if you yourself wouldn't comment on them. Explain what's bad about them.
In post 280, iraonavp wrote:In general, I think it is best not to mention real or imagined softclaims in the thread.
Unless you think they're bullshit, then it's fine. In my opinion, anyway.
In post 283, Garmr wrote:
Hey your just now starting to see why matt is scum god your slow. If matt isn't lynched today and his scum it will be all your fault. I changed my mind you can be town.
Ok Garmr, tell me succinctly; why I should be voting mattP, and like a few of your main points on him right now.
To be honest, reading the fight between you and Matt is migrant-inducing, so I need something easier to swallow in order for me to follow along, here.
Ok
with 255 I felt that I answered a majority before or they aren't even relevant to my case. Posting stuff that isn't relevant and side stepping is dodging and is scummy. The problem was with what he was doing sure his saying that it wouldn't effect the game negatively but the point was instead of justifying a reason to ask why he went and played it down as a action that can't hurt instead of one with actual town motive. That in itself is scummy. His original passive response is the problem and how long it actually took for him to actually think up a answer which shows that he made that up and it wasn't his original intention.
quick summary doesn't cover my whole case presented so far but some of it.
-his initial reaction to being questioned and downplay himself it was like he was caught and didn't know how to react.
-His passiveness which turned into aggressiveness once the pressure was off. This means other peoples views influence his behavior which is generally a scummy thing to do. Other behavior show that he is influenced by other people instead of trying to catch scum.
-New one he never has contributed anything to any wagon he is on. He says something like oh you took the easiest path or pretty much no reason at other than saying "I don't like deir."
-The trust me I'm a dr looked deliberate. Seemed like an attempt to bait a reaction out.
-claims that i'm rolefishing ect Has made implied suggestions that my actions are scummy yet town reads me in various bits. Like his trying to push me off him with hidden threats.
-My gut plus a couple other things I am watching him for.
-Brought up by someone else but something I agree on. The fact once I said no I wouldn't answer them he calmly accepted it instead of asking why.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 385, Dwlee99 wrote:Taly it is iioa because they are just stating stuff that happened.
Most of my stuff is Analysis that's why my case on mattp took off at the start. I will admit that a lot of the VC stuff in post is more information than Analysis that does have a slight bias towards my thinking when I posted it. But that's because I want people's options on it.
Also your using IIOA extremely wrong.
players who speculate about the setup more than they ask for other players' reasoning and/or accuse other players of being scum are probably group scum".
This is the situation the original creator wanted to use it in.
link here-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 389, Dwlee99 wrote:I take IIOA literally.
You posted information and not analysis and even admitted dont tell me I am wrong?
You don't even explain a motive or even tried to rule out town motives. The creator meant it to narrow people out who do this constantly you probably just learned the term and still using it in the way it wasn't meant to be used.
In fact You are actually doing it yourself just posting a obvious observation by saying That post is IIOA and not following up with anything. Is just stating information it self.
What i'm trying to say is that it is a information post meant to spark conversation about the wagon which no one has really brought up and so I don't forgot about it latter on when more information is available.
What I'm finding curious is even through you are town reading me you keep jumping in trying to prove I am scum
Trying to say I slipped when I didn't
Saying I haven't accomplished much (that's because people aren't listing because they are stupid and mattp is scum I can't control how bad others reads are.)
Then trying to push a information post as scummy with no reasoning.
It makes me thing you are scum.
Also you have contributed very little to this game with 44 posts most of them are junk.
VOTE: Dwlee-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 303, Dwlee99 wrote:I've liked some of garmr's earlier postsbut that post didn't feel like he accomplished much.
I don't approve of the dier vote.
Implied you thought I was townish at one point by saying you liked. If you didn't think I was town at all what's the point of mentioning it unless you just want to look like you had a opinion on me.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 397, Dwlee99 wrote:You are using present tense for me tkwn reading you which obviously isnt the case. And oneliners are my playstyle.
What so you admit that you have provided pretty much contentless posts ok then.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 444, Mathilda wrote:
Honestly I don't really know. I'm sort of hanging back and trying to see if anything rings my scumdar but not much is. But I can give you my feels at the present moment.
MattP and Garmr are interesting to me though. I am not familiar with MattP but he seems rather cocky, which can be read as being defensive. Garmr is burrowing into him like an African parasite but is that because Garmr is town and is also suspicious of him or is it because he's a scum buddy distancing himself from MattP? I have played with Garmr before and I don't remember him like this. He was scum in Mini 1741 but the whole game was a mess with one scum outing all his buddies and the game should have been scrapped rather than played out. So it's no wonder that Garmr was less active in that game. Overall though I am getting a town vibe from Garmr.
So the only one I'm happy voting for at the moment is MattP. In fact, I think I'll do that right now.
VOTE: MattP
I'm happy with a mattp lynch as well or dwlee
VOTE: mattp-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 521, MattP wrote:In post 518, Garmr wrote:matt p shows survivorlistic traits I think his probably the sk with that claim don't care through mafia should deal with him. I refuse to accept him as town.
UNVOTE: mattp
It makes me feel so good to know I could vig you
Not that I will
But man it feels so sweet
You can if you want to I don't really care to much because you'll just end up chocking on those words as much as Pamela Anderson chokes on coc coc cocktails-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 524, MattP wrote:Hey Garmr, mb you should vote someone
I think dwlee was the scummiest slot but I know ds pretty well so I going to watch him carefully. Tbh I haven't looked at dier and his wagon at all since I been focused on what jumped out to me as scummy.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 537, Firebringer wrote:In post 536, Garmr wrote:I think dwlee was the scummiest slot but I know ds pretty well so I going to watch him carefully. Tbh I haven't looked at dier and his wagon at all since I been focused on what jumped out to me as scummy.
Can you explain why you are scum reading my slot?
1. First off dwlee has contributed little to the game yet very active and engaging with people. What I'm saying is he is talking and not hunting in a majority of his posts.
2. He is extremely jumpy with me. It looks like he was trying to find a reason to vote/make me look bad me like saying the white knighting thing,the iioa incident ect.
3 When he was talking about iioa. I explained why he was using it wrong and How it was supposed to be used when a majority of posts are that way. His response didn't want to let it go and said he was using it on a individualistic bases. I then asked him why he thought that instance was scummy and what would the scummy objective behind it. He never stated a reason and flat out ignored it.
4. I pointed out a post were he implied I was town earlier game when he mentioned where did I ever say I was town. he said but that's in the past. Despite it being exactly when he accused me of iioa.
5 Tried to push not having a impact as scummy thing instead of town not agreeing with me. Acting like I have control over others.
6 Trying to push a scummy veil over me despite not ever saying he scummed read me and not admitting to it when I was pushing for his read on me. (you think he would say that when I said I thought you were town reading me)
7 Actually downplaying his skills a noob scums mistake
@mattp
Look you are either a sk or a vig and I am starting to feel like mykonian. I don't want to be like mykonian being focused on one player the whole game (me) and pretty much fucking the whole game up because they can't stop focusing that one player (his reason was the language I used TBH To be honest).-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 541, MattP wrote:Garmr, I would have been willing this whole time to have productive discussion with you. Since you agree I'm not scum, it's logical to look at associative of how people responded to your push on me
I think determine radja alignment would help a lot with this. If he is town then 1 or 2 scum may of shifted from your wagon onto his.
Abr feels like town to me from my experiences with him.
Mahilda feels like scum
comparing this game to mini day 3 she plays a lot different. The way she handles her votes in that game were more care free and less cautious. The information she produced was also better quality and her opions were pushed more by her. Even through a lot of people scum read her she handled the pressure well.
=26392]here is the game
VOTE: mathilda
I'm not to sure on taly at the moment. The miller claim is pro town. But something about her makes my stomach churn.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 635, iraonavp wrote:In post 634, Garmr wrote:Don't like ironp suggestion about leaving Mathilda to shoot we should lynch her today and if she flips scum look closer into iron.
If I am scum with Mathilda, why on earth am I suggesting to have her shot?
Tons of reasons 1 is distance. Another is scum may have a way around a vig shot but not a lynch.
I can think of more but the real question is why would a townie be worried about the difference between a shoot and a lynch rather a townie would compromise and ask that his scum read be shot of ask at all
Also why ask for à town read to be shot
I'm up for lynching iron first
Scum is probably in màhilda or deir-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 639, Albert B. Rampage wrote:FA is still slipping scum. You call her out and promise to re read her and then you do nothing.
I was deciding if it was or not decided it wasn't-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 672, AlwaysInnocent wrote:So, this leads us back to Dierfire, Mathilda and Dwlee/Firebringer.
What about ironp what do u think of him.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I think your slots scum dazzle me-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
We have 3 days this isn't the time to be pulling this shit.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 834, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Read List D1 V2
Frozen Angel
Lowell
Radja
Mathilda
Dwlee99
Dierfire
Albert B. Rampage
Garmr
Aeronaut
MattP
Taly
iraonavp
AlwaysInnocent
I pretty much agree with all your reds and orange and yellows I would put them all in scum. But some of the people you are town reading I would put in null.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 837, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Garmr, which people are null, according to you?
lowell
aero
radja would be null
you would also be a null-town on my list so I guess light green.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Well I'm interested in how the flip will be. Noticing how after Mathilda was lynched that people are withdrawing the town reads on me to a leeser cough frozen. Which I find interesting. Could be knowledge of what mathilda will flip and they are prepping for the next day.
@frozen I am happy talking about the dwelee fire slot.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 965, Frozen Angel wrote:Well I said I like to intract with you more. You were hellish active before matt claim but just suddenly deactivated afterward.
In post 962, Garmr wrote:@frozen I am happy talking about the dwelee fire slot.
well His reaction after my Vote is what I think He actually slipped there, It was like he got shocked - hanged how he could confess to such a thing .
whats your give on them?
i don't really think that's a slip but I read fire bringer as scum anyway. Since his got here he hasn't really made a case or taken a strong stance on anyone. I would expect a town firebringer to at least skitz over someone and push a lynch.
I love you fire but you rolled scum sorry.-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 1006, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 1004, AlwaysInnocent wrote:A. Not true. I do try to explain my reads. Sometimes I present my list before my reasons, but that is just a new (town) tactic I am trying out in several games.
B. Um. If necessary, I try to bring "something new to the table", but in this case it seems you agree with me. So what's the problem?
C. This is basically a repetition of A. What do you mean by "not fluid", though?
Everything here was talked about more indepth in my first post which you so easily brushed off and never challenged any part of it.
@Fire, burden of proof that he's guilty lies on you, not me to prove his innocence. Show ME what makes him guilty here.
Don't like this attitude.
People should be able to support there thought process. If your calling fire bad for saying someone is scum yet you can't prove why they are innocent and dodge it in this way that implies you have knowledge of who is scum and who isn't.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread