sons i am disappoint
Hi VOTE: Aaron Fucking Frost
sons i am disappoint
There's 3 scum thoIn post 23, Menalque wrote:Calling it now the scum team is literally datisi, SS
I didn't point it out as a "Townslip" becuase I genuinely don't believe it to be so. (1) I'm p sure (which he later confirmed) that even town!Mena would know how many scum there are, and (2) I thought it was obviously a joke of "call whoever called my puns bad the scumteam [despite knowing it's not the correct number]", "that's not the correct number"In post 106, GuiltyLion wrote:I thought it was presented in a joking manner (and Salamence has since said it was RVS/joke) but personally I viewed it as something that's worth a non-RVS vote and I was kinda hoping Salamence felt the same. I think if you genuinely forgot when posting that there were 3 scum then that's a townslip and Datisi pointing it out yet without any thought to your alignment feels like something scum might do.
Is this supposed to be me?In post 126, Amrun wrote:I think this is a good reason Mena is town but not a good reason thatIn post 122, GuiltyLion wrote:And I think you misunderstand, even if you knew already there were 3 scum you may not have been explicitly thinking about that when joking that the scumteam is 2 people. Which would still be a townslip bc I don't think scum would forget that so easilywhatsitis scum.
And what does that have to do with anything?In post 148, alimdia wrote:I just said Mena is null for the whole argument. Part of me could townread him for not trying to use it to get himself more towncred,but then Datisi is in the game so....
why do you see it as an obvious townslip and not as a joke?In post 153, Iconeum wrote:this is the main item that makes me doubt hereIn post 118, GuiltyLion wrote:do you see/agree with what I'm saying about how her comment is kinda awkward in that she's making a joke about something that might be a townslip yet not addressing that it might be a townslip
It was a pretty Obvious townslip and dats ignored that part
Again, what do these two have to do with each other? Why couldn't it have been both? And what exactly do you mean by me ~*knowing*~ stuff?In post 151, Iconeum wrote:I feel like it was a townslip from menal, but datisi is known forknowingstuff.
love you too AFFIn post 133, AaronFrost wrote:Or she acts obvtown so that she can deepwolf but ends up being scum in the end.In post 115, Menalque wrote:Datisi is always scum tho, apart from when she’s obvtown
*cue flashbacks to Newbie 1949*
Err, what else was I supposed to do? Or are you referring to me being absent from the thread in general?In post 144, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess I would then clarify that it's jokingly correcting Mena but then not doing anything else that I find scummy, not the act of correcting itself
Can you answer me these two then please? And the "dats ignored that part" makes me feel like you're trying to throw shade.In post 155, Datisi wrote:why do you see it as an obvious townslip and not as a joke?In post 153, Iconeum wrote:this is the main item that makes me doubt hereIn post 118, GuiltyLion wrote:do you see/agree with what I'm saying about how her comment is kinda awkward in that she's making a joke about something that might be a townslip yet not addressing that it might be a townslip
It was a pretty Obvious townslip and dats ignored that part
Again, what do these two have to do with each other? Why couldn't it have been both? And what exactly do you mean by me ~*knowing*~ stuff?In post 151, Iconeum wrote:I feel like it was a townslip from menal, but datisi is known forknowingstuff.
What do you mean by uninformed? In what way? And I know this was said wrt alimdia, but I then assume your original vote wasn't serious?In post 183, Salamence20 wrote:Assuming that anyone didn't know there were 3 scum in this game seems... uninformed? idk.
I still don't think it was a Townslip. And am I then NAI for that interaction or not?In post 164, Iconeum wrote:Why not a joke? I don't know. I didn't read it as a joke. I think if ur scum, and fully aware of 3p scumteam, you don't post it like that. It felt too fluent.
Hm. I guess it's agree to disagree since I think that (1) town!Mena would definitely know how many scum there are and (2) scum!Mena's got enough of a brain to fake a ~townslip~ like that.In post 257, GuiltyLion wrote:I think it's fundamentally just that I disagree with you that Menalque is likely to be thinking "3 is the correct number but I'm going to joke that it's only 2 people are scum". I thought it was town-indicative if not a straight townslip and I felt some kinda recognition that it was +town-indicative was missing from how you replied to him.In post 156, Datisi wrote:Err, what else was I supposed to do? Or are you referring to me being absent from the thread in general?In post 144, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess I would then clarify that it's jokingly correcting Mena but then not doing anything else that I find scummy, not the act of correcting itself
What's your read on Menalque now?
Why does 149 bug you though?In post 294, Salamence20 wrote:I think its a good place to put my vote for now. His 149 bugs me and he hasn't done anything to make me think hes town yet.
That's not what I was thinking about when I got that number.In post 294, Salamence20 wrote:If Icon is usually (60%) scum, then he is scum in this game is gamblers fallacy.
Have you played with Icon before?In post 255, DrDolittle wrote:i dont really get scum vibes from ico this game.
so wait am I NAI for it or not then?In post 344, Iconeum wrote:In post 242, Datisi wrote:I still don't think it was a Townslip. And am I then NAI for that interaction or not?In post 164, Iconeum wrote:Why not a joke? I don't know. I didn't read it as a joke.I think if ur scum, and fully aware of 3p scumteam, you don't post it like that. It felt too fluent.Your reaction is NAI.Him joking about the scumteam is probably NAI. I saw something. I called it out. Make of it what you will.
Some of you are acting like I hard-townread him for that slip, which isn't true.
Eh, any reason why you didn't say so about the reaction test in 339 right away?In post 369, Amrun wrote:1) It depends on the question and the context. In this particular case, I was trying to reaction test alim but it didn’t work because I’m dumb. I kept my vote there because the vote was still the thing that pinged me the most up to that point.In post 345, Menalque wrote:I mean (1) the fact you went “eh still a weird vote” feels like you were looking for an excuse to vote him and idk why that’s natural? Also I disagree that not answering a direct question is scummy when the simplest explanation is that the person just missed it?In post 339, Amrun wrote:@Menal: That case is far too boring to spend my time on tbh but I’ll touch on a few salient points.
Not answering a direct question is usually scummy, or at least belligerent, but it does depend on what the question was. In this case, it was me being a derp and missing the answer. The vote was still weird, though.
---
---
---
Oh, I missed that, my bad.In post 383, Salamence20 wrote:I've already answered this.In post 317, Datisi wrote:Why does 149 bug you though?In post 294, Salamence20 wrote:I think its a good place to put my vote for now. His 149 bugs me and he hasn't done anything to make me think hes town yet.Looking at your 149 again. I think it looks like took my 35 seriously, I don't understand how Menal "Townslipped."
Also I'm not sure what you are going on about in reference to Pretentious 41.
yeah he's a dragonIn post 434, Salamence20 wrote:Btw i just learned icon is not a guy. Neat.
which kinda reads weird, like groundwork for justifying a vote there later?You seem to be an odd duck that matches to your own drummer, soI’m not sure yet that any of this is NAI.However, it is still bad.
I think I do? But if the whole reaction test was botched anyway because you missed their answer, why not out ~that part of the reaction test~ in 339, but rather after further being called out?In post 465, Amrun wrote:Do you fundamentally understand joe reaction tests are intended to work? Basically everything I post is some sort of reaction test. That’s how the game is played.In post 457, Datisi wrote:Eh, any reason why you didn't say so about the reaction test in 339 right away?In post 369, Amrun wrote:1) It depends on the question and the context. In this particular case, I was trying to reaction test alim but it didn’t work because I’m dumb. I kept my vote there because the vote was still the thing that pinged me the most up to that point.In post 345, Menalque wrote:I mean (1) the fact you went “eh still a weird vote” feels like you were looking for an excuse to vote him and idk why that’s natural? Also I disagree that not answering a direct question is scummy when the simplest explanation is that the person just missed it?In post 339, Amrun wrote:@Menal: That case is far too boring to spend my time on tbh but I’ll touch on a few salient points.
Not answering a direct question is usually scummy, or at least belligerent, but it does depend on what the question was. In this case, it was me being a derp and missing the answer. The vote was still weird, though.
---
---
---
If you mean "going hard against someone then backpedaling once the push isn't working as well as hoped", Newbie 1949 - Korina pushing for Mena's lynch at first because BS reasons then slowly backing down and letting another lynch through.In post 466, Amrun wrote:Can you actually provide any examples of scum acting like this?
In post 465, Amrun wrote:Do you fundamentally understand joe reaction tests are intended to work? Basically everything I post is some sort of reaction test. That’s how the game is played.
In post 466, Amrun wrote:Can you actually provide any examples of scum acting like this?
These parts gave me the overdefensive/aggressive vibe fwiwi.In post 468, Amrun wrote:I’m also not threatened in any capacity and have no reason to change my reads or behavior for any reason.
I felt a need to include myself in the list, I don't know. I am me though.In post 474, AaronFrost wrote:WhaaaaaaatIn post 460, Datisi wrote:I'm meDo you think that aggressive behavior is more likely to come from scum? I honestly don't see Amrun's posting as super aggressive and have actually been liking her posting a little more on this page.In post 469, Datisi wrote:And I feel like your tone is being unnecessarily aggressive with me? I don't think I'm pushing you/threatening you that hard, I wasn't asking you to /change/ your behaviour, I wasn't saying you need to explain ALL your thought processes?
It struck me was weird because I didn't exactly see much reason for you to see me as Town, and therefore kinda confidently assume I'm Town and misunderstanding your playstyle, rather than scum trying to BS push your lynch through.In post 470, Amrun wrote:I don’t think you understand my playstyle, which is ok.
I'm having a hard time getting into this game for some reasonIn post 560, Menalque wrote:Datisi why are you not posting more
lolIn post 571, Salamence20 wrote:I mean to say Datisi and creature would look worse than the others on a townflip since they actually look to be decent players
Nope, I've done it in just one gameIn post 595, Salamence20 wrote:Hey Datisi, do you always do notetaking in your own pt?
Yeah, those were the behaviors that made me comfortable enough to be on the wagon/that I could see as scum-indicativeIn post 684, Something_Smart wrote:Like when I pressed her about it she finally gave 462 which for the most part just described behaviors and didn't say why they were likely to come from scum.
this makes me scum because?In post 878, Pretentious wrote:they were the first on Amawesome, they immediately went to creature.
tbh I think I'd rather flip Creature than DDL todayIn post 919, Menalque wrote:I love it when u read my mindIn post 912, Datisi wrote:lemme guess, vote DDL?
Was there any point to posting this? Do you agree with it?In post 978, Iconeum wrote:But I know ur worried about the fact that Datisi isIn post 892, Menalque wrote:Like I have a high confidence in getting to a correct read on datisi (ftr I’ve read here right every game we’ve had together since our first) and I don’t see scum her yet
Like maybe a little from the hesitance to be in thread but she’s still a tonal TL so I’m not willing to go there todaynot quitein her town meta as she usually is when town
You still dislike their posting? If so, why not try to get people back?In post 989, Iconeum wrote:Amrun, now THAT was a good wagon
"yo mena, dats isn't quite in her
Okay?In post 998, Iconeum wrote:i'm completely caught up, i've not skipped a single pageIn post 996, Datisi wrote:Deadline is sorta soon-ish though, are all of Creature/GL/DDL a hard null to you?
and yet I have no real reason to vote on either wagon other then 'deadline soon'
yeah what about it?
Which votes btw?In post 1000, Iconeum wrote:and about Amrun: it wasn't his posting, it was his voting that stood out to me btw
Yeah, in most cases I do. But it's tiring, and sometimes I do want to take a back seat for a bit.In post 1004, Iconeum wrote:I mean you have a very, ehm, forthcoming? way of playing town. It really stands out. And I'm not seeing that here, yet. That's exactly what I was trying to see how Menal feels about it (him having a ton of experience with you as well).
I admitted that the "I'm not hard in my Town meta part" was accurate. I still think the shade itself was garbage thank you very much.In post 1018, Iconeum wrote:She even admitted as much as it being accurate. How is it bad?In post 1016, Amrun wrote:Iconeum’s weird half-shade on Datisi is bad