In post 5, Christopher wrote:Hi. Who’re the goons?
Obvious townslip by Christopher, GL fell for it.
GGEZ
VOTE: GreenLiquid
In post 5, Christopher wrote:Hi. Who’re the goons?
Obvious townslip by Christopher, GL fell for it.
I understand the sequence, but I feel like a town would make that more clear in a post. It wasn't 'hardposted' yet, so you could easily redraw that post to express your actual feelings.In post 60, BuJaber wrote:It's not a contradiction. It was just the chronoligical order of my thoughts.
The prediction comes first. Then I narrow it down to Raska/GL but just because I don't think love would do that if scum doesn't mean my scumpool becomes smaller. Just means I'd want love lynched last out of those 3.
These are literally the only mentions Lovebird has about me.In post 71, Lovebird wrote:Vote iconeum pls.
While I agree that activity is NAI, I Feel Rask has made enough other posts to not scumread him.In post 76, ZZZX wrote:I just feel people trying to talk about people not posting enough or not giving enough content at the 2nd (or 3rd?) day is really... fakeLets keep it at thatVOTE: Raskolnikov
i'm not sure what you mean here. You are quoting my opening post, where I made a joke about 'knowing the goons'?In post 98, Major Minor wrote:Can you elaborate on this? I don't know why knowing the setup is a town slip.In post 15, Iconeum wrote:In post 5, Christopher wrote:Hi. Who’re the goons?Obvious townslip by Christopher, GL fell for it.
GGEZ
VOTE: GreenLiquid
Rask seems town for the way he's engaging with the game. The poking & prodding to dig out even the tiniest morsel of content from someone screams town this early. The way he also threw his vote around onto Not_Mafia just felt really town in my gut? I hate gut reads, it's hard to explain, but it was the lack of pretense that pinged me as town. There's no show to put on, nobody to impress with his vote switch, it's just what it is.
Iconeum's push on BuJaber seems weak and phony. It basically comes down to "you didn't stop and rewrite your post to avoid possibly being read as scum for the contradiction" -- which, IMO, is a reason to point to Bu being TOWN, not mafia. Town doesn't have to go through that extra layer of thought because they aren't trying to hide who they are -- Mafia do. Would love to hear a response to this. The rest of Iconeum's stuff feels null at worst.
I dislike Lovebird's empty push on Iconeum, though. No reasons or anything? Feels opportunistic.
ZZZX's push on Rask is out of left field. He's voting Rask for pointing out the number of lurkers... while completely ignoring all the rest of Rask's content? And there's a LOT there to be ignoring.
VOTE: Iconeum
Do you disagree with how we are disecting your reads? Do you disagree that you are inconsistent and/or illogical in your conclusions?In post 149, BuJaber wrote:One day I'm going to make a wiki section for my page where I link everytime someone made fun of my logic and I was right 100%.
People seem to forget that if they read something as townie and someone else reads the same thing as scummy somehow their opinion is more correct and it's bullshit. People don't always play the same way every game.
I think I'm fucking right and if you want to lynch me for that do so but I'm gonna rub it in your face when we lose and you decided to let your ego rule the game.
I'm sick of people on MS belittling my thought process.
In post 66, Christopher wrote:In post 64, Iconeum wrote:Do you, or do you not, scumread Rask. Explain plz.BuJaber's opening is pretty standard. That, in and of itself, is NAI. Like he mentioned in #63, based on my recent experience it would be foolish to assume AI based on that.In post 65, BuJaber wrote:Why is it so difficult to understand? Please help me. I run into this situation a lot. Is it my wording that is unclear? My english is bad? What is it?
I don't scumread rask. I don't townread rask.
Because of the whole process I explained above I forced myself to choose between rask and GL for whom to vote. I compared the 2 and decided rask is more likely to be the scum. Fact that it is the same person I voted for in RVS because his openings pinged me played a part in helping me decide.
In post 100, Christopher wrote:tr Greenliquid.
leantown on BuJaber, Iconeum, and Lovebird.
Major's afk, and i'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
tbh, I'm null on ZZZX and Rask.
leanscum on no content Not_Mafia.
Care to explain how you come to a Bujaber 'light townread' conclusion after stating and re-stating that everything he's done so far is NAI?In post 152, Christopher wrote:Ya, I'm fine with this wagon. I stand by my reads.
Honestly, BuJaber's opening so far is NAI. FMPOV, it's just his town and scum opening.
In post 161, BuJaber wrote:Shit I missed that chris had a townlean on me.
Okay
1 scum in {NM, chris, Major, Icon}
1 scum in {GL, Rask, Lovebird}.
In post 169, BuJaber wrote:I get that people might disagree with it as a strategy but it's natural for me.
I am not locking myself to these people as only possible scum.
For example for the GL, Rask, love pool I strongly believe I am right for thinking that discussion was intentionally encouraged by scum. So until they flip or I can confidently townread all three that pool will remain as it is.
Like, I'm really trying to understand here because it's important. But if you are town, then with the exception of 1 player, you are putting every single other player in the brackets and saying 'i'm not locking myself to these people as only possible scum'. Who else are you going to include here, then?In post 173, BuJaber wrote:Icon you're not getting it. I don't know any other way to explain it.
Considering it was my first post in the game, chances are that it was, in fact, an RVS joke.In post 212, CheekyTeeky wrote:In post 15, Iconeum wrote:In post 5, Christopher wrote:Hi. Who’re the goons?Obvious townslip by Christopher, GL fell for it.
GGEZ
VOTE: GreenLiquid
Obvious town slip in what universe? This better be an RVS joke.
I have trouble understanding this, I'll try to get it straight.In post 318, Raskolnikov wrote:Actually icon I forgot about this, don't think you answeredIn post 106, Raskolnikov wrote:Out of curiosity, you didn't notice this when you made 43 right?In post 59, Iconeum wrote:I agree that putting Lovebird in a scumpool, but in the same post mentioning that is has no reason to act like that if scum, is just weird.
Still like how he tries to steer conversation away, because that was leading us nowhere.
You still have failed to provide anything even remotely close to a scumread on me.In post 400, Lovebird wrote:Another reason I rather lynch ico is that I'm pretty sure it's bujaber as the partner if ico's scum.
In post 71, Lovebird wrote:Vote iconeum pls.
It's not until his 147, after repeatedly being called out to provide substance to his case, that he calls my 59 'lazy'. And that post wasn't even made until after his accusation. Another odd thing is calling me and Buj a scumteam in 400, after I've spend most of my posts attacking Buj and voting him. Again, not bothering to prove the relation.In post 102, Lovebird wrote:Really empty initial posts, didn't like the push on buj.In post 94, Iconeum wrote:These are literally the only mentions Lovebird has about me.In post 71, Lovebird wrote:Vote iconeum pls.
Care to explain at least the scumread on me?
367 is a town post.In post 462, Raskolnikov wrote:Can you be more specific with this btw? I don't know how you make this judgment they're kinda mixed for me.In post 451, Iconeum wrote:Christopher has a few decent last posts.
I never check meta. Maybe I should, but I'm not a big fan of it.In post 464, Raskolnikov wrote:@Ico are you seeing love here as significantly different from in one-shot?
I'm adding rask to the list of willing to lynch todayIn post 552, Iconeum wrote:I'm not voting outside of Buj, love today.
If the group values Buj over love, then I'm willing to hammer.
I added rask just a few posts ago to my lynchpool.In post 557, BuJaber wrote:What doesn't make sense love?
I had love, GL, Rask in one pool. Rask is now a confident townread so the pool shrunk to love and GL.
You and icon is just a theory I'm playing with don't see the need to think about it or talk about it more right now until one of you actually flips scum first.
Okay guys since everyoneis flip flopping around we just gotta lynch someone and move on.
If I get to L-1 I'll hammer. We need to find a wagon everybody agrees on.
People they want lynched (correct me if wrong)
Ico: buj/ love
Buj: love / GL
Cheeky: rask / buj / love
Rask: buj / nm / love / icon
Zzzx: need an update
Chris: need an update
NM: love?
GL: need an update
Love: not clear.. rask? Buj?
Seems like love is the most repeated name followed by me. Let's just lynch one of us.
Why did you put yourself in the lynch bracket if this is your reaction?In post 564, BuJaber wrote:So to summarize my conclusions:
Scum based on meta: love, NM. Also somewhat scummy by play.
Scum based on irrelevant discussion in the early game: love OR GL. (Unlikely both together and rask is now a TR so out of this pool).
Scum because of how fucked the game state is: cheeky OR Icon (i'd be very very very suprised if they were both scum.. weird team). Also MM slot was terrible before replace. Maybe cheeky is very good at scum replacing thus my gut townlean.
ZZZX, Chris - true null. They could literally be anything and regardless of alignment this level of apathy is bad for town. They are at least partially responsible for this game state even if town lurking unintentionally. I'd rather lynch someone from above for day 1 though because this would be a total coin flip and would give us no info to go on if we lynch one and they flip town.
I don't care about your opinions anymore. If none of the players here can understand my perspective in 22 pages then nothing will change. My death is more convincing.
And yes the conclusion is from my POV love is ovjectively and subjectively the best lynch.
I don't want to get lynched but I also don't care. What we need is town consensus and if town consensus is for me to get lynched then that is the role I play in this game.
Show me where you disagree with what I said.
Why quicklynch? Don't wanna discuss my lynch?In post 568, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok who wants to quicklynch Ico?
As a reaction tester, how do you feel Buj reacted to our votes? Town reaction? Scum? Nai?In post 575, CheekyTeeky wrote:Did you read WHY I thought NM was town on entering. I even used logic to illustrate - which is the post I didn't like Rask's reaction to.In post 572, BuJaber wrote:Like you guys are harping on rask and I for being invonsistent. (Don't know about rask but I have been very consistent actually if you read my posts). But cheeky has some subtle inconsistencies that are just weird. Like I keep townreading cheeky but then she posts stuff like 558 and 568 and it makes me doubt her again and remind myself that MM pinged me.
Pedit - read what again. That was how you entered the game. You were like why are we voting NM.. NM is town. Is that not what happened?
Bu, I'm a reaction tester/intent reader. Nothing I do makes sense until I'm confident or compromise on a lynch. I actually find my intent this game to be very towny
No argument there. Anyone is welcome to do whatever to meIn post 602, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm happy that we have more content than what we did if the NM lynch went through.
I'm just going to reiterate that people need to check Ico's behaviour around the two wagons - NM and Love tomorrow.
Ok, I did overlook the part where you talk about Rask townread.In post 643, BuJaber wrote:I am townreading him. I gave you the reasons.
I'm starting to think both scum are active and messing with us.
@mod - please replace both zz and chris
In post 387, Lovebird wrote:Okay, I see what you mean. Goes to not mafia as an easy push. Says he wants more content, but voting not mafia doesn't really accomplish that.
In post 470, Lovebird wrote:I voted NM after coming back from getting prodded because nobody cared about lynching my scumread and the game wasn't moving, needed a lynch.
You focusing just on my vote ignoring the others is just omgus for what I'm saying about you.
These are the only mentions you have in your ISO in regards to NM. All I see here are naked votes, and 'I vote there to get the game moving'.In post 625, Lovebird wrote:Doubting other reads. Fine with this.