A mason breadcrumb to fall back on with your scumbudddy, Bob? I see right through you.
Scumlean.
A mason breadcrumb to fall back on with your scumbudddy, Bob? I see right through you.
Already redirecting suspicion towards skitter?
Justifying lurking? You said it yourself in a previous game, you find it harder to hyperpost naturally as scum.
Nice try. Until you link me to another game where you've posted this exact thing, you're scum giving an excuse for lurking.In post 10, Wake1 wrote:Hey all.
My general play-style Day 1 is to lurk in the background. Take a breath. Breathe out.
I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.
I'll be observing in the background. Please don't assume that I'm not present when you're posting.
It's scummy as fuck. Why reason it as a RVS? So that you look better when he flips town?In post 14, BrightEyedFish wrote:RVS for now. Even though the idea of pre-determined lurking is yucky.In post 13, Garmr wrote:So do you find it scummy or is this a reason to rvs???In post 12, BrightEyedFish wrote:EBWOP
My vote is on wake because this was going to be my excuse if I have trouble getting engaged on D1.
I like to use VCA for my reads and VCA is useless until we get a flip so my D1s are also always yucky...
Nice game advancing. No RVS or anything game-related in sight.
Taking notes of others' VLAs ? Feigning non-apathy and enthusiasm.
Policy for what? This game is all about passion.In post 38, Wake1 wrote:In post 33, Hectic wrote:In too deep so you can’t back out, huh?
I'm sorry if my behaviour is too “try hardy" for you.
Nah,fuck that, why should I be apologising for your shitty behaviour? I play this game to win. That means pointing out shit I find scummy, and not giving ANYONE a free pass.
You’re playing this game to win too, but from the MAFIA's side. You lurk around with your non-game progressing behaviour, and thesecondyou see something easy to push, you’re in there like a fucking Nazi going to Argentina.
Intent to hammer if Rob ever hits L-1.
I'd prefer you dial it down so we don't have to policy you.
I normally write off most "scumslips", but this one is kinda interesting, and I wouldn't mind hearing Rob elaborate on his use of that word there.In post 77, skitter30 wrote:In post 45, Robbnva wrote:
Try Harding and calming non ai things scummy are like things I’ve legit see scum do.
lowkey feels like a perspective slip.
Go on.In post 75, Robbnva wrote:I wonder if anyone is seeing what I’m seeing.
Rob?In post 78, Hectic wrote:Bowl of Cereal - Skitter:I normally write off most "scumslips", but this one is kinda interesting, and I wouldn't mind hearing Rob elaborate on his use of that word there.In post 77, skitter30 wrote:In post 45, Robbnva wrote:
Try Harding and calming non ai things scummy are like things I’ve legit see scum do.
lowkey feels like a perspective slip.
His first post in this game is comparatively too defensive for my liking:Wake88 wrote:I hate Day 1 shenanigans. I need something to actually work with.
Observing for now.
He'sIn post 10, Wake1 wrote:Hey all.
My general play-style Day 1 is to lurk in the background. Take a breath. Breathe out.
I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.
I'll be observing in the background. Please don't assume that I'm not present when you're posting.
If you're scum, you use 'legit' there if you forget you're speaking from a townie's perspective, and speak from scum's perspective where you're trying to convince people that even though you're scum, this thing you're pointing out isIn post 86, Robbnva wrote:I don’t understand what the issue of using the word legit is. It’s not a slip and I don’t see how anyone could think it was.In post 84, Hectic wrote:Rob?In post 78, Hectic wrote:Bowl of Cereal - Skitter:I normally write off most "scumslips", but this one is kinda interesting, and I wouldn't mind hearing Rob elaborate on his use of that word there.In post 77, skitter30 wrote:In post 45, Robbnva wrote:
Try Harding and calming non ai things scummy are like things I’ve legit see scum do.
lowkey feels like a perspective slip.
Just so you know, I don't think it's a slip, and I don't really believe in semantic scumslips anyway.In post 91, Robbnva wrote:Well people have accused people of things that are nai. You being one of them. Me saying what I said and using legit (besides the fact that legit is part of my vocabulary) means that the stuff I find scummy are things I’ve actually seen scum do. Instead of using a long work like actually, I say legit. If y’all want to call it a slip go ahead but it isn’t. Your line of thinking doesn’t even make sense on a logical or even common sense level so I’m not going to worry about it.In post 88, Hectic wrote:If you're scum, you use 'legit' there if you forget you're speaking from a townie's perspective, and speak from scum's perspective where you're trying to convince people that even though you're scum, this thing you're pointing out is legit scummy.
Take it easy, man. I'll eagerly await your return when you're ready.In post 104, Garmr wrote:I took a sezuire so I'm not up for posting will tomorrow.
Why?In post 124, Robbnva wrote:Yes I am.In post 121, Hectic wrote:You still happy with your vote on me, Robb?
How is this fencesitting?
Still busy so haven't caught up, but wanted to outline what I found scummy here:In post 150, BrightEyedFish wrote:The game got off to a blazing start, making me dizzy and paranoid.In post 105, Robbnva wrote:So bef, do you have any other thoughts on the game? Reads on anyone else?
Here is a shotgun reads list, and before anyone asks, these are all gut reads based on ISO reading:
bob3141 - null, 1 RVS post
Tchill13 - Town lean, his "i've changed" post seems genuine. However, alone it's not AI and could be a ploy.
Garmr - I don't get why he scum reads me but if this game is anything like my other games, I'll probably say something "scummy af" get a wagon on me (usually led by scum)
Robbnva - Null - The amount of posts makes me want to put Robb in the scum pile but I don't like committing too early.
Wake88 - My RVS vote is there now, but I feel fine leaving it there even out of RVS for now
skitter30 - I always think skitter is town and I'm pretty sure I've never played with scum!skitter. Just going on odds RN. Town.
Hectic - Hectic's post fit his name well. Scum lean just for the abrasiveness.
Rabid Schnauzer - I want to put Rabid in the scum pile but as I'm writing this I am getting the feeling that I am just scum reading the most active players.
In post 254, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:You're projecting. Maybe you prefer to sort through gentle questioning, rather than pressure. I in general prefer pressure. And, my read on you has adjusted because of it.In post 251, Robbnva wrote: I can only go off what i see and your entire iso has been skewed towards me being scum. So you are either conf. biased or are scum. if you were sorting me, there would be more questions trying to understand my thought process.
How did your read adjust from pressuring Robb?In post 257, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:OK. Sorry to hear your mind is closed this early, but really we need to end this now anyway as I suspect it's TvT and providing cover for scum.In post 255, Robbnva wrote:at this point you need to not worry about convincing me you are town.
Why?In post 283, Tchill13 wrote:i do concede my point on rabid is silly because i do ultimately tr him, its just a pet peeve of mine.
of the 4 of us id choose hectic to be scum.
w/ garmr (for little to no reason except a guess)
Emotional?In post 173, Tchill13 wrote:I think you're both highly emotional players that tend to let that dilute your games.In post 128, Hectic wrote:Rabid is making some good points on both Robb and Tchill.
@Tchill: I'd like to hear someconcrete reads from you on the HecticVRobb thing, and now this RabidVRobb thing.
Robb ik is aware of this as scum. He is capable of manipulating it.
Hectic I pretty much focused on manipulating to win a scum game due to his emotion. I've never seen him play scum.
I'm not jumping at the chance to take stances on you two.
His read progression on you throughout that interaction isn't very clear. I was surprised to hear him say he thought the interaction was TvT, which is why I've questioned him on when he landed on you being town.In post 296, Robbnva wrote:@hectic. What do you make of rabid saying he was trying to sort me when his iso clearly shows he had already decided my alignment before he actually pressured me? How can this or any of his behavior tbh, be town?
In post 113, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:You're scum.In post 74, Robbnva wrote:What are your thoughts about what’s actually happened?
You try to misrep me as only coming in on the replace out issue. Fact is I had already changed my RVS vote to a serious vote on you due to your reaction to Hectic's posts, which clearly seemed to be joking or RT to me.
In post 144, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Scummy AF.In post 142, Robbnva wrote:hectic - what do you make of schnauzer's playstyle shift after getting called out? ignore the points he made because tbh the points he made could be made as either alignment, does the playstyle shift itself concern you?
Like what changed between the first two and last post?In post 257, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:OK. Sorry to hear your mind is closed this early, but really we need to end this now anyway as I suspect it's TvT and providing cover for scum.In post 255, Robbnva wrote:at this point you need to not worry about convincing me you are town.
Wake wrote:I hate Day 1 shenanigans. I need something to actually work with.
Observing for now.
Wake wrote:It's been awhile.
If Scum could hurry up and get nervous that'd be great. I pick up on nervousness extremely quickly.
Gonna read through the last 2 pages. Don't ask me how I play, or tell me how to play. I play as I play. I play at my own pace. That said, do routinely ask me questions and engage or I will destroy you if you're Scum.
In post 10, Wake1 wrote:Hey all.
My general play-style Day 1 is to lurk in the background. Take a breath. Breathe out.
I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.
I'll be observing in the background. Please don't assume that I'm not present when you're posting.
In post 300, Robbnva wrote:His logic actually hasn’t been sound. If anything tchill made a better arugument. Rabid wanting to “sort” skitter and then just sheep him is a terrible idea if town but that’s what he said he wanted to do. His fence sitting comments about tchill weren’t actually fence sitting imo. Not when he has knowledge of our play style.
All his reasons for pushing me were bad. His reasons for tchill look bad. I doubt anyone can find one solid argument he’s made.
You're biased because most of the game consists of him attacking you. I don't understand how the point on Tchill fencesitting is invalid if he knows our playstyles. He can still determine our alignments from the contents of our argument. He commented on it without taking a stance/side, or even suggesting if it was SvS, TvT, or TvS.In post 301, Robbnva wrote:but you’re in my lynch list and he was chainsaw defending you so I don’t expect you to actually evaluate him honestly. He’s either pocketed you are you’re scum with him.
This isn't what I normally do though. Tchill's been in two games with me. One I was similar to how I was at the start of this game, see this post for example: viewtopic.php?p=11221494&user_select%5B ... #p11221494In post 304, Robbnva wrote:there was no need to take a stance though. Early game and two hot heads are doing what they normally do (according to him. I can’t speak on your play). Smart play is don’t encourage it. Don’t stoke the fire. Look elsewhere.
People hate tvt fights. Rabid stoked the fire. He took a side without even attempting to sort. Then later when it seems that I may not be lynched. His read has changed. He still hasn’t tried to sort me.
Remember when I said rabid is sort of playing my scum game? my scum game is to push surface level scummy behavior and make people think it’s not. He’s pushing surface level scummy behavior and he tries to stoke the fire in me vs you. He’s done no actual sorting.
My post on your reads list was serious, how does that affect your read on me knowing this?In post 339, BrightEyedFish wrote:So the posts doubled after myshotgun reads list©RCEnigma
Which is ashoot from the hip,not much thought,gut-basedlists. And let me add it was after.7 pages
As far as my Hectic read is concerned, I really can't tell if he is justJKor beingseriousand that's why I don't trust that slot.
I feel like I've heard Tchill make the "I'm too good to be scum here" argument before, but I can't remember if he was scum or town. Will have to check later.In post 334, Tchill13 wrote:that im too good as scum to be scum here.In post 331, skitter30 wrote:You're playing awfully and scummily so what am i supposed to think?In post 327, Tchill13 wrote:youre accusing me of poor scum play now.
but ppl cant make a read like that, except me when it comes to other players playing town poorly.
its exceptionally aggravating with you, whos seen my approach to a scum game.
I've tried to get people pressuring Wake several times now.In post 373, Tchill13 wrote:I just like to be right about ppl acting like they care about players like wake.In post 369, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:And yet you mention him.
i'll call out hypocrisy every time.