Open 800 - Donner Party | Game Over


User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1025 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:51 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 221, DoubtingThomas wrote:sorry if my words were rude. that was not my intent.
In post 381, DoubtingThomas wrote:can you fucking read the posts I write?
In post 385, DoubtingThomas wrote:plusjoyed is giving town reads on his friends like government is giving out food stamps to the poor, wtf?
In post 471, DoubtingThomas wrote:Like sorry if y'all got offended for me saying your meta's day 1 RVS stage meta is shit, but that's my opinion I will stand by.
In post 470, DoubtingThomas wrote:I am putting in a lot more effort to fit in than others
you gotta laugh :lol:
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1026 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:52 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 1024, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn’t mean that in an insulting way
You saw what Noraa did in Haunted Village.
as i recall she won the game
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Gamma Emerald
Gamma Emerald
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Gamma Emerald
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 69109
Joined: August 9, 2016
Pronoun: Any
Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)

Post Post #1027 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:52 pm

Post by Gamma Emerald »

After getting limmed D1 :/
<Embrace The Void>


“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
User avatar
Gamma Emerald
Gamma Emerald
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Gamma Emerald
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 69109
Joined: August 9, 2016
Pronoun: Any
Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)

Post Post #1028 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:52 pm

Post by Gamma Emerald »

Winrate != playskill mate.
<Embrace The Void>


“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1029 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:54 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

tell that to your bosom buddy Tom
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Gamma Emerald
Gamma Emerald
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Gamma Emerald
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 69109
Joined: August 9, 2016
Pronoun: Any
Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)

Post Post #1030 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:57 pm

Post by Gamma Emerald »

Also what’s the point of picking at my “inconsistencies” like you are? Are you scum trying to make you look bad, or just an asshole who doesn’t know how to shut his mouth?
<Embrace The Void>


“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1031 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:00 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

surprise surprise battle mage is laughing at my posts instead of scum reading it we have two scums already folks!
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1032 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:03 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

In post 979, Gamma Emerald wrote:it seems every game I’ve played with you you’ve gotten cocksure, and every time regardless of my alignment it’s alienated me towards you.
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1033 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:03 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

:clap clap clap:
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1034 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:03 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 684, DoubtingThomas wrote: walk away from the game for a moment and come back when your state of mind is better. no need to show anger in the thread.
In post 381, DoubtingThomas wrote:can you fucking read the posts I write?
In post 477, DoubtingThomas wrote:stop shading the fuck out of me for no reason. it's getting on my nerves, okay?
In post 592, DoubtingThomas wrote:don't fucking complain about the game state literally every single time you are in the thread when you were the ignition to begin with. policy lynch this shit
In post 593, DoubtingThomas wrote:so FUCKING annoying for fuck's sake man
In post 589, DoubtingThomas wrote:limp dick johnny
In post 891, DoubtingThomas wrote:fucking boomers
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1035 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:04 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 1031, DoubtingThomas wrote:surprise surprise battle mage is laughing at my posts instead of scum reading it we have two scums already folks!
you have made the game not fun for lots of people, but I'm turning it back around! :lol:
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1036 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:04 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

ok you can stop being useless
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1037 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:05 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

i'm crying with laughter right now at your ISO :D
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1038 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:05 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 1036, DoubtingThomas wrote:ok you can stop being useless
oh please, keep insulting me, more material! :lol:
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1039 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:07 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 1030, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also what’s the point of picking at my “inconsistencies” like you are? Are you scum trying to make you look bad, or just an asshole who doesn’t know how to shut his mouth?
:lol: i hope you're not talking to me? an "asshole who doesn't know how to shut his mouth"? a bit rude! :wink:
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1040 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:08 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

to answer your question, yeah I'll treat all your abusive and mean shit as the joke it is
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1041 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:09 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

In post 712, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 711, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 633, Chaos Triforce wrote:Town!Taylor doesn't give two shits what anyone thinks about anything/anyone. Hmmmmmm.
thats true but i do caere about the game being fun due to limited toxicity. the game is currently not meeting that threshold.
don't worry, I'm here...to...uh....save the day? :lol:
In post 713, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 577, Guillotina wrote:
In post 571, PlusJOYED wrote:I see no reason to continue spending my freetime playing a forum game to be insulted by strangers on the internet who obsess on winning a game with no stakes behind it. I don't feel like I'm the only one who feels this game has become toxic either. I'm replacing out.
This is should get modkilled!
I hope i dont have to explain why.
what the fk is this? :facepalm:
In post 715, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 568, PlusJOYED wrote:this is the most toxic mafia game I've ever played
:lol: what an endorsement! no wonder Marashu was so keen to let me rep in...

I'm enjoying the read so far- will work my way through over the next couple of days.
In post 723, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 721, Guillotina wrote:Except Cat cause it got confused. Insert BlackMage there
what the fuck is with this 'black mage' crap? can we keep my ethnicity out of it, thanks :mad:
In post 725, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 723, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 721, Guillotina wrote:Except Cat cause it got confused. Insert BlackMage there
what the fuck is with this 'black mage' crap? can we keep my ethnicity out of it, thanks :mad:
oh yes, you were the one who tried to get my predecessor modkilled
In post 729, Battle Mage wrote:it's alright, seems there always one clever clogs in every game nowadays who thinks that shit is funny.
In post 825, Battle Mage wrote:i'm the daddy
In post 848, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 846, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 844, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 841, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 805, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 803, Guillotina wrote:
In post 798, Battle Mage wrote:can we all just compromise on a VOTE: pob long
Pob Long will most likely get replaced and killing him will get us no info. So no, any yeet for the sake of yeeting someone is not good for me. Unless of course you can point out the benefit of his yeet.
he hasn't done anything to make me think he's town, and I have a low tolerance for letting quiet scum survive
too long
. Who knows what info we'll get - depends what happens next (i.e. who votes for him, who doesn't, who defends him and why). These open games are pretty swingy, so I think scum might have a lower propensity to bus (eliminate their team-mates) than normal.
it's day 1. lol
it's page 34, i've only just got here and i wanna see some action already :lol:
so ur scum hunting game is to kill anyone who's low activity first? i am guessing that you don't win much
pfft you bitch! my win rate is in my sig :lol:

and no, I'm not necessarily going to kill him, just put some pressure on.
In post 879, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 870, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 848, Battle Mage wrote:and no, I'm not necessarily going to kill him, just put some pressure on.
this is not someone you were voting thinking you are considering 'every one'

it reads more like a scum slot subbed in who wants to stir the pot. and for you to come to the conclusion that i am scummy for apparently no reason is very noted too.
"very noted"? oh wow, nice added emphasis :lol: your emotiveness is one thing which gives you away, as well as the continual appeals to honesty (which is a good indicator for newb-scum).
In post 886, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 876, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 537, superbowl9 wrote:If you really think guillotine and dt leading all our important discussion is not an issue gamma then Ima have to vote you
In post 538, Gamma Emerald wrote:They’re not leading the discussion imo? What makes you say that? And why is that vote worthy/scummy/some combination of the two? And what do you think threatening me accomplishes in getting me to see things your way?
you think directing vig is scummy? then you must really think superbowl is scummy for threatening someone else for not voting another person, right? or you didn't read superb much?
you're comparing apples with oranges here buddy. superbowl suggesting he might vote for somebody is...a fundamental part of the game. Quite different to directing town PRs.

Also if you really want people to engage with you, I can't help but feel you'd be a bit more respectful. Especially to those with a lot more experience than yourself.
In post 888, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 885, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 884, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 881, DoubtingThomas wrote:battle mage is probably the SK lol
:lol: nah I'm just town dude. Although maybe you're pre-occupied with the SK because you're mafia?
clearly not occupied with SK if you read my posts (the first time i ever mentioned sk all game). I have a pretty solid and reasonable scum pool as my thoughts were very transparent. you tend to think 1 post means i've done X all game. if you don't do that, you might have a better game (regardless of alignment)
i'm glad i don't play wherever you normally play, if everyone just talks to each other like shit :lol:
In post 892, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 890, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 825, Battle Mage wrote:i'm the daddy
In post 848, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 846, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 844, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 841, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 805, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 803, Guillotina wrote:
In post 798, Battle Mage wrote:can we all just compromise on a VOTE: pob long
Pob Long will most likely get replaced and killing him will get us no info. So no, any yeet for the sake of yeeting someone is not good for me. Unless of course you can point out the benefit of his yeet.
he hasn't done anything to make me think he's town, and I have a low tolerance for letting quiet scum survive
too long
. Who knows what info we'll get - depends what happens next (i.e. who votes for him, who doesn't, who defends him and why). These open games are pretty swingy, so I think scum might have a lower propensity to bus (eliminate their team-mates) than normal.
it's day 1. lol
it's page 34, i've only just got here and i wanna see some action already :lol:
so ur scum hunting game is to kill anyone who's low activity first? i am guessing that you don't win much
pfft you bitch! my win rate is in my sig :lol:

and no, I'm not necessarily going to kill him, just put some pressure on.
don't demand respect from others when you are calling yourself daddy and me a bitch in the first post you address me. lol. so fucking rude it's kind of insane
the "daddy" thing is a site-wide joke/gimmick. I don't even know where it originated from, but then I have no idea why you'd take it personally.

I called you out as a bitch because you acted like one towards me by saying I was a bad player for no reason.

The bottom line is, be nice to people, and they'll be nice to you. If you act like a shit, people will treat you like one.
In post 893, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 891, DoubtingThomas wrote:fucking boomers are always living in their own world.
treat others like shit
, and when they get a slap back it's the other's fault? mmmmmm yes
lol oh boo hoo, I'll get the violins shall I? You spent most of this game shitting on everyone else (which you apparently call "content"), must be a shock to have someone call you out, eh?
In post 898, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 895, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 893, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 891, DoubtingThomas wrote:fucking boomers are always living in their own world.
treat others like shit
, and when they get a slap back it's the other's fault? mmmmmm yes
lol oh boo hoo, I'll get the violins shall I? You spent most of this game shitting on everyone else (which you apparently call "content"), must be a shock to have someone call you out, eh?
me guessing your win rate is low after joining in, barely reading, not adding any real content besides trying to 'turn the heat on' a low effort slot and when pressured by me just saying 'i was just pressuring them' is a pretty objectively bad start to the game. i didn't call you a shitty player initially, though, i said i am guessing you dont win much? which is my own GUESS as said. it does not warrant for you to call me a bitch, and you've definitely insulted me before i insulted you in response.

nice job trying to turn the tables and trying to make this game a personal thing more than mafia solving. i won't fall for that weak tactic, you scum.
I can only GUESS you rub a lot of people up the wrong way with your shitty attitude. and it's a bit rich saying I haven't done any solving, when I've given actual reasons to think you're scum, whereas you're just idly peddling "BM is scum, because BM is scum"
In post 907, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 903, DoubtingThomas wrote:I said you haven't done any solving at the point of you trying to push pob long for low efforting. that is a true statement because you've only tried any solving on me and that was even after I joined the thread and engaged YOU. not because you were really solving me. and
it's very evident that you haven't read any of my posts
.
eh, if you're gonna continue to be ridiculous, there's no point in me engaging you. it's inconceivable you're town at this point.
In post 917, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 915, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 897, Gamma Emerald wrote:I haven’t seen DT put his ego out into the thread like a bronzed horse turd
WHAT??? Are we reading the same posts??
:lol:
In post 932, Battle Mage wrote::lol:

oh Noraa, I feel your pain. I alt-slipped so much in my last hydra game, my main account posted more than some of the actual players. :lol:
In post 948, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 947, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 946, Battle Mage wrote:there's literally no consensus on anybody though...
I mean we only have about 7 active players anyways, Nora and johnny both TR DT so i don't think we're getting them, I think it's just me and you willing to hop on atp
I think Guillotina could be on board? :lol:

damnit, this game needs some more life
In post 950, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 949, superbowl9 wrote:I thought your pob idea was a good one, but apparently we were vetoed by the big 3 on that too -.-
im getting flashbacks to 'the other hood' :facepalm:
In post 972, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 956, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 854, DoubtingThomas wrote:frankly, when the game has made a consensus elim pool like we did here with guillo-superb-chaos, it's very anti town for a newly subbed in person to try to add additional confusion and instead of elaborating on the consensus choice to try to start everything all over again and derail the thread by pushing low posting slots that people weren't talking about in 33/33 pages of the game thread like you've done. that's almost exclusively what scums do.

even if you were correct on pob long coasting, it gives us more information to elim out of the consensus so there are more associations to go off of. killing pob long after what we've all discussed is about others gives us 0 info even if pob long was indeed a low effort wolf. and there's no guarantee in that either, of course.

we are not yeeting pob long today
The entire boon of replacement players lies in them threshing the existing sands of the game for hidden gems of insight left undiscovered or dismissed. You would have them not seek such treasures?
In post 968, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 879, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 870, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 848, Battle Mage wrote:and no, I'm not necessarily going to kill him, just put some pressure on.
this is not someone you were voting thinking you are considering 'every one'

it reads more like a scum slot subbed in who wants to stir the pot. and for you to come to the conclusion that i am scummy for apparently no reason is very noted too.
"very noted"? oh wow, nice added emphasis :lol: your emotiveness is one thing which gives you away, as well as the continual appeals to honesty (which is a good indicator for newb-scum).
Okay yeah I think I’ve had enough of the inflated confidence from you, on a universal level. Stop being a condescending loony and actually read things with genuine intent to solve, not trying to pick it apart like raw cotton.
Gamma, are you a hydra? I can't believe these 2 posts came from the same guy :lol:

I know you said earlier you didn't wanna say anything to Doubting Thomas as you didn't want to upset him or whatever, but that doesn't mean it's open season to be a jerk to me. Knock it off.
In post 974, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 970, DoubtingThomas wrote:man gamma and i share so many thoughts that i am almost scared i am hard pocketed.. but i wont tinfoil yet at least. if you are town, very good to play w you this game
i'd love to be scum in a game with you as town :lol:
In post 978, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 965, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 872, Battle Mage wrote:On Superbowl, probably lean town, he feels similar to our last game together where we were masons.
He literally feels completely different to that game imo. What is similar to you??
*shrug* do you actually want an explanation, or will you just accuse me of having an inflated ego for disagreeing with you? :roll:
In post 1006, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 1005, Noraa wrote:
In post 946, Battle Mage wrote:
Noraa - you wanna join on Doubting wagon?
Not particularly tho I do see some interesting things there.

-nobear
oops :lol:
In post 1012, Battle Mage wrote:i tried to tell you :lol:

there's something quite endearing about you signing your posts even on your own account :D
In post 1013, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 1010, Chaos Triforce wrote:*sits down and meditates*
*Throws some more plates*
*sits down once more*
*breathe in*
*breathe out*
*screams*
>:(
it's just lucky you didn't decide to be anonymous this game :lol:
In post 1017, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 1001, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 933, superbowl9 wrote:BM I would hop on DT with you but it seems like they are widely townread there so I think wagoning is somewhat futile. Guillo is more likely to pick up steam from my perspective
this is not a townpost
:eek:
In post 1003, catboi wrote:chkflip is town.
:o
In post 1004, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 1002, chkflip wrote:VOTE: Chaos Triforce

They literally have hydra partners.

There's no planet where "tHeRe'S a ViG?" isn't a fake town slip.
except its not a townslip at all because its an open setup and town can see the info as easily as anyone. its just noraa proving she doesnt know how to read setup info
:lol:
In post 1005, Noraa wrote:
In post 946, Battle Mage wrote:
Noraa - you wanna join on Doubting wagon?
Not particularly tho I do see some interesting things there.

-nobear
:cry:
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1042 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:10 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

:D :D :D i am so cool and useful
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1043 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:10 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 1030, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also what’s the point of picking at my “inconsistencies” like you are? Are you scum trying to make you look bad, or just an asshole who doesn’t know how to shut his mouth?
or maybe I'll just be a good boy for Gamma, and shut my asshole mouth :lol:

although i have to say
Spoiler:
pointing out inconsistencies is part of the game
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1044 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:10 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 1042, DoubtingThomas wrote::D :D :D i am so cool and useful
wow, has nobody shown you how to use spoiler tags? :lol:
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1045 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:14 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

im already looking forward to the next time DoubtingThomas says I haven't read a single one of his posts
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1046 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:17 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

In post 700, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 697, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Oh hi bm
hi Johnny

are you scum?

if not, who is scum?

did i claim yet?

if so, what? :shifty:
In post 701, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 699, superbowl9 wrote:BM is it time for us to team up again? Knowing you you'll think I rolled scum this game :lol:
*peeks out from covers* is A50 here too? :lol:
In post 706, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 704, Chaos Triforce wrote:
In post 696, Battle Mage wrote:hi Noraa
BM!!!!!!!!

-excitednornor
<3 I'm excited to see you too, and also at peace with the fact you being here means I don't need to worry about anything after this dayphase. :lol:
In post 712, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 711, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 633, Chaos Triforce wrote:Town!Taylor doesn't give two shits what anyone thinks about anything/anyone. Hmmmmmm.
thats true but i do caere about the game being fun due to limited toxicity. the game is currently not meeting that threshold.
don't worry, I'm here...to...uh....save the day? :lol:
In post 713, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 577, Guillotina wrote:
In post 571, PlusJOYED wrote:I see no reason to continue spending my freetime playing a forum game to be insulted by strangers on the internet who obsess on winning a game with no stakes behind it. I don't feel like I'm the only one who feels this game has become toxic either. I'm replacing out.
This is should get modkilled!
I hope i dont have to explain why.
what the fk is this? :facepalm:
In post 715, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 568, PlusJOYED wrote:this is the most toxic mafia game I've ever played
:lol: what an endorsement! no wonder Marashu was so keen to let me rep in...

I'm enjoying the read so far- will work my way through over the next couple of days.
In post 723, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 721, Guillotina wrote:Except Cat cause it got confused. Insert BlackMage there
what the fuck is with this 'black mage' crap? can we keep my ethnicity out of it, thanks :mad:
In post 725, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 723, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 721, Guillotina wrote:Except Cat cause it got confused. Insert BlackMage there
what the fuck is with this 'black mage' crap? can we keep my ethnicity out of it, thanks :mad:
oh yes, you were the one who tried to get my predecessor modkilled
In post 792, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 789, Guillotina wrote:
In post 787, Tayl0r Swift wrote:hmm thats an interesting interpretation of what i said
Is it? Tell me all about it.
if you're town, you don't do yourself any favours. :facepalm:
In post 804, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 799, Guillotina wrote:
In post 797, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 794, Guillotina wrote:
In post 792, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 789, Guillotina wrote:
In post 787, Tayl0r Swift wrote:hmm thats an interesting interpretation of what i said
Is it? Tell me all about it.
if you're town, you don't do yourself any favours. :facepalm:
Yah? Why is that?
because you're arguing about sod all for the sake of it.
Im sorry, can you elaborate on that?
Arguing about sod
?
lol in my country "sod all" is a nice way of saying "fk all" i.e. nothing

where are you from?
In post 809, Battle Mage wrote:anyway, let's turn up the heat on pob long! :D
In post 811, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 810, Tayl0r Swift wrote: i dont like to pretend that my scumreads are definitely scum.
hey, is that a shot at me? :lol:
In post 815, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 813, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 811, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 810, Tayl0r Swift wrote: i dont like to pretend that my scumreads are definitely scum.
hey, is that a shot at me? :lol:
it wasnt meant that way. you have definitely done that in the past, but new leaf right?
hmm, wasn't
pretending
, just confident... :igmeou:
In post 825, Battle Mage wrote:i'm the daddy
In post 824, Battle Mage wrote:my last open game had already finished by now. :lol:
In post 830, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 828, Guillotina wrote:
In post 823, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 821, Guillotina wrote:
In post 819, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i think the rules state that you have to post once every 48 hours, and if you fail to do so you get prodded. after a prod you have 24 hours to post before getting replaced.
What is getting “prodded” by the way? I keep seeing the term here. Like a warning?
a prod is a private message saying "please post". In reality, and especially in a game like this, Mods are not always meticulous on prodding after that time frame. And pob long HAS posted, he just hasn't said much.

No comment from Taylor on pob long?
I looked into pob long ISO and he has not posted since Nov 13 so... I think he will most likely get substituted and if he comes back and posts again we push him to get more out of him and we make a decision based on that.
a good way to push someone is to vote for them. :lol:

also, i doubt he's getting substituted, it's the weekend
In post 832, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 831, Chaos Triforce wrote:
In post 829, Battle Mage wrote:doubting thomas - sorry I got a bit friendly!
right. I call them "doubting" lmao. tom sounds better. Maybe I ought to do that.

-nornorthedumdum
depends really - are you doubting them? :wink:
In post 844, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 841, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 805, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 803, Guillotina wrote:
In post 798, Battle Mage wrote:can we all just compromise on a VOTE: pob long
Pob Long will most likely get replaced and killing him will get us no info. So no, any yeet for the sake of yeeting someone is not good for me. Unless of course you can point out the benefit of his yeet.
he hasn't done anything to make me think he's town, and I have a low tolerance for letting quiet scum survive
too long
. Who knows what info we'll get - depends what happens next (i.e. who votes for him, who doesn't, who defends him and why). These open games are pretty swingy, so I think scum might have a lower propensity to bus (eliminate their team-mates) than normal.
it's day 1. lol
it's page 34, i've only just got here and i wanna see some action already :lol:
In post 848, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 846, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 844, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 841, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 805, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 803, Guillotina wrote:
In post 798, Battle Mage wrote:can we all just compromise on a VOTE: pob long
Pob Long will most likely get replaced and killing him will get us no info. So no, any yeet for the sake of yeeting someone is not good for me. Unless of course you can point out the benefit of his yeet.
he hasn't done anything to make me think he's town, and I have a low tolerance for letting quiet scum survive
too long
. Who knows what info we'll get - depends what happens next (i.e. who votes for him, who doesn't, who defends him and why). These open games are pretty swingy, so I think scum might have a lower propensity to bus (eliminate their team-mates) than normal.
it's day 1. lol
it's page 34, i've only just got here and i wanna see some action already :lol:
so ur scum hunting game is to kill anyone who's low activity first? i am guessing that you don't win much
pfft you bitch! my win rate is in my sig :lol:

and no, I'm not necessarily going to kill him, just put some pressure on.
In post 852, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 849, DoubtingThomas wrote:you claimed that a 3 person scum team but wants a low poster dead because you want 'something to happen'? in d1? i don't really buy this
that was just my hero solve for the end-game cred. I'm less convinced on Gamma now, but I still think you're pretty scummy.

What's not to buy? Dude, in my last Open game we had literally completed 4 gamedays by this stage. :facepalm:
In post 853, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 850, DoubtingThomas wrote:why don't you want to vote, superb battle mage
thanks for the compliment i guess, i'll let you off the earlier diss :lol:
In post 858, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 854, DoubtingThomas wrote:
frankly
, when the game has made a consensus elim pool like we did here with guillo-superb-chaos, it's very anti town for a newly subbed in person to try to add additional confusion and instead of elaborating on the consensus choice to try to start everything all over again and derail the thread by pushing low posting slots that people weren't talking about in 33/33 pages of the game thread like you've done.
LOL no dude, you're way off here. It's
pro-town
to actually look at everybody, rather than just going with the consensus by default. Additionally, we have like a week until deadline, so there's plenty of time to get more info if you want and yet you're getting precious about a couple of 2/3 person wagons. :roll: It's not "starting everything all over again", it's just adding something new to the conversation. Although from your passionate statement above, it sounds like you're awfully worried about moving away from that existing consensus? :lol:
In post 854, DoubtingThomas wrote: even if you were correct on pob long coasting, it gives us more information to elim out of the consensus so there are more associations to go off of. killing pob long after what we've all discussed is about others gives us 0 info even if pob long was indeed a low effort wolf. and there's no guarantee in that either, of course.
This just reads like a cop-out for not looking at pob long. it's not inherently zero info to look at someone who hasn't been suspected (because info can follow from that), and it's definitely not anti-town.
In post 861, Battle Mage wrote:VOTE: Doubting Thomas

I think I'm happier on this one today. Very informative too! :wink:
In post 879, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 870, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 848, Battle Mage wrote:and no, I'm not necessarily going to kill him, just put some pressure on.
this is not someone you were voting thinking you are considering 'every one'

it reads more like a scum slot subbed in who wants to stir the pot. and for you to come to the conclusion that i am scummy for apparently no reason is very noted too.
"very noted"? oh wow, nice added emphasis :lol: your emotiveness is one thing which gives you away, as well as the continual appeals to honesty (which is a good indicator for newb-scum).
In post 874, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 871, DoubtingThomas wrote:don't forget town vig, that's the slot that was caught literally lying to my face. has 0 town equity. would prob shoot there, if i were a vig
you're trying to direct the vig now? :lol: feeling good about my vote (and for educational purposes, this is the sort of info that can be garnered by looking outside the consensus).
In post 883, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 880, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 879, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 870, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 848, Battle Mage wrote:and no, I'm not necessarily going to kill him, just put some pressure on.
this is not someone you were voting thinking you are considering 'every one'

it reads more like a scum slot subbed in who wants to stir the pot. and for you to come to the conclusion that i am scummy for apparently no reason is very noted too.
"very noted"? oh wow, nice added emphasis :lol: your emotiveness is one thing which gives you away, as well as the continual appeals to honesty (which is a good indicator for newb-scum).
but i am not a newb-scum, so that must make me town haha
we'll see i guess :wink:
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1047 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:18 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

:( I quoted more posts but it says no more than 30 smiley faces
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DoubtingThomas
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2886
Joined: July 13, 2018

Post Post #1048 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:19 pm

Post by DoubtingThomas »

In post 907, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 903, DoubtingThomas wrote:I said you haven't done any solving at the point of you trying to push pob long for low efforting. that is a true statement because you've only tried any solving on me and that was even after I joined the thread and engaged YOU. not because you were really solving me. and
it's very evident that you haven't read any of my posts
.
eh, if you're gonna continue to be ridiculous, there's no point in me engaging you. it's inconceivable you're town at this point.
In post 946, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 942, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 939, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 933, superbowl9 wrote:BM I would hop on DT with you but it seems like they are widely townread there so I think wagoning is somewhat futile. Guillo is more likely to pick up steam from my perspective
you dont think it would be valuable nonetheless? he seems to be crumbling under the pressure of 1 vote already.
I already did this right after we got out of RVS, I thought it made DT look like an obviously good elim target but this town does not agree so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
there's literally no consensus on anybody though...

Noraa - you wanna join on Doubting wagon?
inconsistency? :D
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #1049 (ISO) » Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:23 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

In post 1048, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 907, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 903, DoubtingThomas wrote:I said you haven't done any solving at the point of you trying to push pob long for low efforting. that is a true statement because you've only tried any solving on me and that was even after I joined the thread and engaged YOU. not because you were really solving me. and
it's very evident that you haven't read any of my posts
.
eh, if you're gonna continue to be ridiculous, there's no point in me engaging you. it's inconceivable you're town at this point.
In post 946, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 942, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 939, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 933, superbowl9 wrote:BM I would hop on DT with you but it seems like they are widely townread there so I think wagoning is somewhat futile. Guillo is more likely to pick up steam from my perspective
you dont think it would be valuable nonetheless? he seems to be crumbling under the pressure of 1 vote already.
I already did this right after we got out of RVS, I thought it made DT look like an obviously good elim target but this town does not agree so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
there's literally no consensus on anybody though...

Noraa - you wanna join on Doubting wagon?
inconsistency? :D
:lol: i'm not sure you get much cred for picking 2 random unrelated posts and calling an inconsistency
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%

Return to “Completed Open Games”