i don't think obscure was newIn post 8424, Ausuka wrote:it's possible a new player goes for the townread on two partners but is it likely
"villagery" and "real-timing" aren't phrases that i often hear new players use
i don't think obscure was newIn post 8424, Ausuka wrote:it's possible a new player goes for the townread on two partners but is it likely
how did i not notice obscure called relly Irrelevant11 that's hilariousIn post 1975, obscure wrote:@Irrelevant11 thank you! i haven't played forum mafia before, i've played it with my group of friends irl and i've played a few quick games on discord with a group of people, but i'm new to this setting and to how long the phases are/mechanics. yeah there's been quite a few confusing things, but i found the Wiki which is very helpful =p (i'm a teacher irl so i know that.. instructions are provided places even though most people don't go look for them and i don't want to be That Newbie)In post 1885, Irrelephant11 wrote:Welcome @obscure very nice to have you join us! You really jumped into the deep end. Have you played much forum mafia before? We use a lot of buzzwords
huh I mean maybe? it seems like such a weird thing to fake but i guess not impossible???In post 8425, Datisi wrote:i don't think obscure was newIn post 8424, Ausuka wrote:it's possible a new player goes for the townread on two partners but is it likely
"villagery" and "real-timing" aren't phrases that i often hear new players use
In post 2588, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm really interested in what people think about what i think about obscure.
Because i was not happy when i came to the conclusions i did. So sanity checks appreciated.
In post 2596, Thestatusquo wrote:I disagree with you about this but i don't actually think it's relevant to your alignment so I'm not really interested in discussing it further.In post 2591, fireisredsir wrote:don't rly care what you think about the usefulness of self meta, i like sharing my thoughts. you are welcome to ignore them if you wantIn post 2547, Thestatusquo wrote:Post 1414 self meta is either useless or cheating. Either you are lying and you try to do these things equally because you are aware of them, OR you are actually aware of the differences in your play and intentionally not fixing them and bringing them to the attention of others in your town games is borderline trust telling. So I guess my question to you is: Which is it? Are you so bad that there is a massive difference in your town games and your scum games in how you fundamentally approach day one and you’re mentioning that here to say you’re town in this game, or are you a capable town and scum player who we can safely disregard your self meta description of yourself?
calling it borderline trust telling is ridiculous. nowhere did i say that my town and scum games are wildly divergent and that one should be instantly recognizable. i was just trying to explain my motivations/mindset in this specific game bc it was relevant to the post i was responding to
my goal as scum is not to precisely imitate my townplay. it's to get townread and to kill town. those are accomplished in very different ways so your point here is irrelevant
In post 2597, Gamma Emerald wrote:It’s not bad I thinkIn post 2588, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm really interested in what people think about what i think about obscure.
Because i was not happy when i came to the conclusions i did. So sanity checks appreciated.
I wasn’t really scanning for excessive noob card usage but from your scan it seems that was going on and I’ve def seen scum use it to great effect
i think this interaction looks town for shea? at least the way gamma responded seems to fit better with t!shea to meIn post 2599, obscure wrote:Who did status replace?
no there were only ever 3 votes i thinkIn post 8412, DeasVail wrote:Did frog get hammered?
hectic played that game straight, he wasn't trolling or gamethrowingIn post 8433, Ausuka wrote:ok i had a thought that is probably stupid but like
when you guys say you've seen people fake being new, what was the context for why they did that and how they used that idea? because like, the hectic thing sounds like he was trolling, and i don't think that's what happened with obscure.
i mean, okay, sorry if what i said was rudeIn post 8435, Datisi wrote:hectic played that game straight, he wasn't trolling or gamethrowingIn post 8433, Ausuka wrote:ok i had a thought that is probably stupid but like
when you guys say you've seen people fake being new, what was the context for why they did that and how they used that idea? because like, the hectic thing sounds like he was trolling, and i don't think that's what happened with obscure.
later on, he told me he hammered bc he had a strong scumread on the player and didn't wanna let him get away because of a pr claim
but he pretended to be new, so
i think in general it looks more like obscure was trying to save hem by pushing deas, even when ignoring the alt shenanigansIn post 8438, Ausuka wrote:this might be dumb but my thought was like... if he was pretending to be new, it might explain his behaviour around deas, if deas is scum? because if people believe obscure is new, they would be reluctant to believe he would tunnel a partner like that?
this is maybe more active. Like, maybe he didn't have a TON of experience but he'd I'd be very surprised if he'd actually not played online mafia before and he frequently brought up his newness and used it as deflection a ton as a way to do things like talk about the number of scum in the game several times.In post 8437, fireisredsir wrote:also idk maybe im gullible (i am) but i don't think obscure was faking to that extent. he def did play up his newness a bit to hide behind tho
i was more surprised by him saying he was an english teacher tbh i didn't get those vibes at all
as for his read on me i don't think there was a lot of intent on walking it back? he townread me p hard like right after that and continued to so do i think
oh, i guess i missed this originally >.>In post 8437, fireisredsir wrote:also idk maybe im gullible (i am) but i don't think obscure was faking to that extent. he def did play up his newness a bit to hide behind tho
i was more surprised by him saying he was an english teacher tbh i didn't get those vibes at all
as for his read on me i don't think there was a lot of intent on walking it back? he townread me p hard like right after that and continued to so do i think
i think there are posts where obscure has very awkward reads on hem while he continues to push deasIn post 8441, Ausuka wrote:and iirc it was quite sudden, scamper built that wagon quickly. i'm skeptical of wagonomics around that, and certainly i don't think obscure was playing around it.
what context in this game applies to you but not me outside of possibly alignment?In post 8382, Frogsterking wrote:This is probably mid tier because it's a really weird tinfoil that jumped off from something I said in a very wrong direction, divorced from all context in the game.In post 8360, Thestatusquo wrote:The other thing that I find striking is there seems to me to be a marked difference in how frogster has approached today compared to other days in tone and substance. Previous days there were a lot of loud proclamations about who was scum and a lot of antagonism towards scum reads as well as sort of a brash confidence which seems to be completely gone today. He is definitely coasting. Unlike the other players who seem to have hesitation based off of being genuinely unsure of who could be scum out of the options frogster just doesn't seem to be thinking about it all that much.
I am kind of taken with that post that dannflor called town from frogster because something I try to do a lot is listen to people when they talk about things that they think about wrt others alignment because frequently they take those observations with their self as a baseline. Frogster said he thought I might be town because I haven't "burned out." But it seems like he himself has burned out a bit here.