[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7391343 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Blitz 6: Normal! [Game Over] - Mafiascum.net
Yakko why are you joining the RVS bw instead of votive thelhix?
I just brought out the refreshments. Do you have a read as to why I am shady?
Going from serious to silly in 1.0 seconds.
Let's just say that your play reads fake.
You asked about the vote from the start and say there are other ways you play but all I see is silliness which doesn't really capture reads from anyone
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Yakko why are you joining the RVS bw instead of votive thelhix?
I just brought out the refreshments. Do you have a read as to why I am shady?
Going from serious to silly in 1.0 seconds.
Let's just say that your play reads fake.
You asked about the vote from the start and say there are other ways you play but all I see is silliness which doesn't really capture reads from anyone
But, did I not give a logical explanation for it? As well, I was also told that plays such as this "sillyness" were common on this site. Essentially leading one to believe they are being uptight. So couldnt you say I am just adjusting to the room?
You know about silliness but not rvs?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #60 (isolation #6) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:24 am
Postby farside22 »
Hello mr. Newb
I'm farside
This is my IC moment.
Considering this isn't a newbie game I'm going to only do this once to be nice.
Random voting stage is normal. (rVS) some do random questions and from time to time you have the RVS bw (which is more and more popular)
The object is really all about trying to figure the game out. Whether by questions, votes or just engaging with players in some manner.
There are a few silly players, I generally ignore them or slap them around till they play the game or get lynched.
That's just how I am.
Ic moment off.
Vote: itelpip
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #81 (isolation #11) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:47 am
Postby farside22 »
In post 72, hi im Yakko wrote:@far are you saying he was no longer in rvs mode when he made said comment about you (far) having two votes so it is highly unlikely that he was still in rvs mode?
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
This doesn't come off as a joke first off.
Second it really reads awkward as far as comment go.
I thought he was serious form what I commented and then the second sounded jokey.
In post 73, Soren wrote:Welcome farside! Nice to be playing with you again ~
I town read farside's entrance to the game, she goes straight down to business.
Hi Soren
<3
Good to see some people I know here.
Did I kick players butt's into gear?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
This doesn't come off as a joke first off.
Second it really reads awkward as far as comment go.
Are you saying that once someone makes a post that isn't a joke they are banned from RVS and can no longer make joke posts?
Also since when is being awkward scummy?
Seriously???
Making a post that gives an impression that you are not sure what to say and are finding things hard to say means that you are being disingenuous.
Now explain how that should read town.
I think being serious and trying to be cute in the way you went about it was trying to defuse a wagon on you.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
This doesn't come off as a joke first off.
Second it really reads awkward as far as comment go.
Where did itlepip say this was a joke? The only reference I can find from itlepip to a joke is:
In post 69, itlepip wrote:
...
i was still in RVS, that was just a comment supposed to be taken lightly. It wasn't meant to be personnel.
Also how would I be able this early in the game to give an explanation of your sheeping, most likely it was just a joking RVS sheep, but if my vote was serious than an RVS vote is bad. You could be scum trying a sheeping strategy early but there isn't much evidence for that. There also could be some scum thing I did early that you guys are reacting to, but I have absolutely no idea what it is.
which I believe was suggesting Yakko's vote was a joke.
I thought he was saying he was joking up to the point of realizing players were being serious.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #175 (isolation #19) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 1:24 am
Postby farside22 »
In post 146, hi im Yakko wrote:It read to me as itlepip has no clue what Nos is talking about.
I agree with this.
Also I don't remember saying I hate anyone but I'm too tired and lazy to check on that.
And Nos argument towards pip bothers me more.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
I'm not sure what to think about pip's self vote, but nos seems to be berating pip for a very minor detail.
Also I looked at ny190 if that is what Titus is referring to and she has a lot of explaining to do.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #191 (isolation #21) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:31 am
Postby farside22 »
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 180, Aquanim wrote:What are the things you find unconvincing about the arguments I've made so far?
Defensiveness despite claiming to be chill is null because self-preservation is null. Is there another basis for your conclusion?
There was the observation that he seems more interested in saying things are scummy than trying to generate more information (the latter being the most important thing for a townie in the early stages of the game IMO).
What about Nosferatu?
Also, why are you voting Titus?
As opposed to Nosferatu she hasn't done anything. I can see Nosferatu's push as newbie town's attempts at getting out of RVS.
So you are an alt and bypassing questions then.
noted
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
Possibly. I have to go for a few hours, so I don't want to make a play like that then be gone. I see the point as for the same reason I originally was wary of Soren, but it would seem it might be a bit heavier this time. I will think over it and come back later. Seem fair?
: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
Possibly. I have to go for a few hours, so I don't want to make a play like that then be gone. I see the point as for the same reason I originally was wary of Soren, but it would seem it might be a bit heavier this time. I will think over it and come back later. Seem fair?
I probably won't be here when you get back, but sure. Do get around to it though, the day's ticking.
Gross. This interaction no me gusta. I think soren might have been right when he said lhix was acting. Lhix just said he has not intention of helping town i.e. wants to be null read. Null reads usually mean staying in the background and playing passively. Weird way of saying he is just gonna do what he said in his op.
The 'play' is a vote. I get not throwing them around like halloween candy, but it hardly seems worth the effort of whether to vote or say no.
@aqua why are you town reading lhix after he said he has no interest in moving the game forward? i.e. Self proclaimed wanting to be null.
Got to say Lhix is a strange cat.
But he isn't the only strange player in this game. I feel some players are putting on acts and others are not. Not sure if it's the new crowd thing being cute or scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Nope. I said nobody vocalized any alignment indicative arguments, which is not contradictory to Soren saying pip's self-vote was scummy being fishy.
In post 216, Soren wrote:What happened to remaining passive neutral or whatever it is you called it.
1. Blatant evidence
2. Discussed how I would vote earlier
3. You asked for my reads and my vote and I relinquished them both with logical assessment to match.
My question. Why so aggressive if all my plays have meaning, and better yet, I've not only maintained my spoken agenda and appealed to the populace wishing me to make a choice past observing. I also addressed that due to the evidence, I would vote prematurely to when I said I would. Any issue?
Remind me wh n this game is over to have a frank discussion about your play style if your town.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 234, Titus wrote:Loha votes me for reasons that aren't clear. The only thing I said was I needed a counter to itep to get things going. That indicates not much is alignment indicative.
Loha sheeps that thought process, but votes me. If he thinks my thought process is scummy, why would he follow it? If he doesn't, then why is he voting me?
All around, that's pretty bad.
This is bs. I'm not sheeping anything.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
Agreed.
Titus: You want to explain yourself better there?
Just an fyi I'm going to do my best not to be an asshat this game, please for the love of all that is holy don't be a hypocrite.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
can't recall a single alignment indicative argument
, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Nope. I said
nobody vocalized any alignment indicative arguments
, which is not contradictory to Soren saying pip's self-vote was scummy being fishy.
You add the qualifier 'vocalized' here. I don't understand how those sentences (bolded) are different. I'm saying that whole sentence seems unnecessary as it looks like you are simply attempting to say farside is wrong and coming up with a justification that makes no sense. From my perspective you simply added the word vocalized and pretended it changed the meaning of sentence? Would you mind explaining it differently. As I don't see what you're talking about.
It's not different.
What are you talking about? Are you for real?
I just found your comment about the arguments vague.
You really have no right to smurf on other players arguments and then OMGUS when players vote you.
And that is the nicest way I can put it.
In other news I'm voting pip because he took the weakest point to bw vote Loha.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #247 (isolation #32) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:22 am
Postby farside22 »
In post 243, Titus wrote:I say there's not much here until I see a counter wagon.
In the post Loha votes me, he says there's nothing alignment indicative.
My post was pretty fucking clear. It's like people cannot understand English. :@
That isn't sheeping sweetie.
In post 244, Titus wrote:Farside moves down several notches unless I am wrong and itepip is scum.
Nope.
You tell me why pip's vote makes sense to you and not a desperate let me jump on this bw approach newb scum tell.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
can't recall a single alignment indicative argument
, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Nope. I said
nobody vocalized any alignment indicative arguments
, which is not contradictory to Soren saying pip's self-vote was scummy being fishy.
You add the qualifier 'vocalized' here. I don't understand how those sentences (bolded) are different. I'm saying that whole sentence seems unnecessary as it looks like you are simply attempting to say farside is wrong and coming up with a justification that makes no sense. From my perspective you simply added the word vocalized and pretended it changed the meaning of sentence? Would you mind explaining it differently. As I don't see what you're talking about.
It's not different.
What are you talking about? Are you for real?
I just found your comment about the arguments vague.
You really have no right to smurf on other players arguments and then OMGUS when players vote you.
And that is the nicest way I can put it.
In other news I'm voting pip because he took the weakest point to bw vote Loha.
I never said that I was voting LoHa for that one post, which is why I said also... But for me that post is the one I want clarified the most.
Post
Post #255 (isolation #36) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:47 am
Postby farside22 »
Titus: I know you are a smart player regardless of alignment so here is where I am confused.
Do you even read what pip is saying at all in this game? Even remotely?
You realize he is just making shit up as he goes along right?
If not you can explain what you see in his post that makes sense from what he said and not what you think he is doing.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Without two wagons, a game is in RVS to me. I read best by relationships.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
[redacted not about me]
VOTE: Titus
[redacted]
Loha was agreeing me about game state, says nothing about me being scummy.
That's pretty damn clear.
This is pretty weak case you are pushing.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Would titus scum create a counter wagon on a potentially easy lynch? Does this suggest pip+titus?
If pip isn't scum, it makes more sense from scum-Titus if there are already other scum on the pip wagon, and Titus was looking for somewhere innocuous to park her vote. As counterwagons go it was a bit half-assed.
This in a nutshell.
I mean not for anything but pip never said anything to give the impression that Titus is taking.
Using experience is one thing, inventing something a player isn't saying and watching that player grab it as a read and lurking after doesn't make your skin crawl, I'm going to call you scum for it
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 308, Titus wrote:
...
I don't work like that. People start as town. Scummy actions (which ipip has none) do that.
Farside backing off Laho pings like a motherfucker, doubly so because she's voting the counter.
I found these posts by itlepip reflective of scum motivaion because they're pointing suspicion at other players but not really pressuring for more information in any way:
Spoiler:
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
You have 2 with yakko sheeping you...
Was that vote in or out of RVS, cause I have no idea.
You sound disgusted? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. Any particular reason you pointed it out but made zero attempts to figure out why I was sheeping? I like my vote more now.
i was still in RVS, that was just a comment supposed to be taken lightly. It wasn't meant to be personnel.
Also how would I be able this early in the game to give an explanation of your sheeping, most likely it was just a joking RVS sheep, but if my vote was serious than an RVS vote is bad. You could be scum trying a sheeping strategy early but there isn't much evidence for that. There also could be some scum thing I did early that you guys are reacting to, but I have absolutely no idea what it is.
Can you explain why you don't find that scummy?
She's not going to do that and act like his action are rational because she says so.
Actually I'm fairly confident now about my Titus read.
No way town Titus would ignore a rational convo.
Vote: Titus
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #344 (isolation #46) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:08 pm
Postby farside22 »
In post 338, Aquanim wrote:Do not turn this game into another Blitz 1, you two.
Listen this isn't the same at all.
Titus arguments are weak.
Look at her day 1 engagement vs this.
Asking questions there. Not asking them here.
Trying to figure motoves there.
Pushing weak reasoning here.
Not the same at all
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #348 (isolation #47) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:11 pm
Postby farside22 »
In post 343, Aquanim wrote:That is directed at both of you. That game is over. Leave it and move on.
She's the one doing it to justify a shotty case.
Oh look at how good I am. Ignore my crappy reason and follow because because of that game.
That's her.
Me I'm showing why she is scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 338, Aquanim wrote:Do not turn this game into another Blitz 1, you two.
Listen this isn't the same at all.
Titus arguments are weak.
Look at her day 1 engagement vs this.
Asking questions there. Not asking them here.
Trying to figure motoves there.
Pushing weak reasoning here.
Not the same at all
If you want to make a meta argument I suppose I'm listening. It is true that Titus' engagement with Blitz 1 early in the game was greater IIRC. Not a scumclaim but it's a valid point.
What I am not interested in is either of you,
whether your assessment is correct or not
, justifying your play there or bitching about that town. This isn't the place for that, it's not relevant to this game, and all it will lead to is ill feeling we don't need.
I'm not doing that.
I'm not sure where that came from but all I'm saying in regards to Titus is that she isn't making a strong case and thinks she's scored scum that confidently is scum bussing or trying to help there scum buddy from being lynched.
I can't remember how Titus feels about bussing as scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #358 (isolation #49) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:25 pm
Postby farside22 »
In post 356, Titus wrote:Farside, really? You go through the hassle to remember my alleged activity level (p.s. I had a bit of work and Saturday game night) but cannot remember I almost never bus as scum?
You are also saying my case is weak and therefore scummy? That's markedly different from how to treat me meta wise.
You're also patently trying vague unknown assoiatives by stating whatever ipip/Laho flip, I'm scum.
That's narrative crafting. Pick a side. You had a scumread on Laho but backed off because my case was weak allegedly.
No, you backed off because the Laho wagon might go through. If you were concerned about my vote, you merely would have unvoted, not vote the major counter wagon.
I don't have to pick a side with Laho today if I'm sure your scum today.
After that your scum biddies will kill me.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #359 (isolation #50) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:27 pm
Postby farside22 »
Also the rest of your points are invalid.
I already explained my vote on pip and on you Titus.
Just because you are spinning a story to enchant others doesn't mean jack to me.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #361 (isolation #51) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:29 pm
Postby farside22 »
In post 360, Titus wrote:Yeah you do. You're trying to provoke me into perceived anti-town behavior and avoiding discussing substance. You're trying to avoid discussing your bus vote on Laho. Loha. Whatever.
Yeah that comment isn't misleading at all there.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #362 (isolation #52) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:33 pm
Postby farside22 »
Come on Titus I'm already voting you and all you've done is allude to an associate without a flip based on weak reason.
If anyone really is buying that I'd love to know why.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Farside did plenty of testing the waters before her vote.
You're missing the point. If Farside wants an itlepip lynch today and does not want a LoHa lynch, why would Farside "test the waters" for a LoHa vote?
She settled on itlepip. It wasn't by design. LoHa is scum. Farside distances a bit, and the rumblings pick up. Farside votes later. That buddies me and provides distance. Not expecting it to take off, Farside votes the counter.
That's another lie.
I can't believe people are buying Titus spinning a story over facts in the game here.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
There IS no wagon at that stage. Why would Farside be trying to work out if she can run a wagon on her buddy, when she could just... not, and sit on her reasonably popular Pip wagon?
What is the actual point of that play? Considering how much pull Farside has in this thread there seems to me that there would be considerable risk of the wagon taking off. I simply don't buy it as a bus. Too little reward for far too much risk.
Notice Titus side steps the question when all she had done is use an association and her whole push on loha is over one fucking post.
In post 402, Titus wrote:Again, why so focused on Farside when Loha must be flipped first for any of it to have a point?
Second, if Farside had as much "pull" as you state, why doesn't she say Loha is town? She doesn't. She calls my case weak, but never says he's town when inviting him. She doesn't say he's town when she's paranoid over him.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Post
Post #419 (isolation #56) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 12:45 am
Postby farside22 »
For those that don't know I phone post a lot so I'm going page by page comments while I do that.
Anyways.
I'm going to speak freely now.
Titus is pushing a case on loha over one point and is not engaging or asking question to the player she is supposedly scum reading.
What I don't get is why others are following it.
so those voting loha should explain what makes Titus points valid.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Still down with an itlepip lynch at this stage. He still hasn't done much useful, I still don't see towny motivation behind those early posts, and I won't be very sorry if it turns out the martyring, self-voting player is a mislynch. I'd be much sorrier if we went for Lhix or Titus and they flipped town.
VOTE: itlepip
I want LoHa to talk some more.
You are aware that Mala and Kop together have 8 total posts here? Going for a policy lynch of me doesn't make any sense.
Pip: who are your scum reads?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 418, itlepip wrote:...
You are aware that Mala and Kop together have 8 total posts here? Going for a policy lynch of me doesn't make any sense.
I'm aware.
I dislike Mala's playstyle of lazing about day 1 but sadly it's not alignment-indicative, and typically her usefulness picks up later.
As for Kop, I simply have more reason to think you're mafia than I do him. Kop would be a straight policy lynch. Yours isn't.
I'm feeling ignored this game.
I'm not crazy
And I'm not scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.