Open 579: Pick Your (Chocolate) Power -- Game Over
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 30, Mathdino wrote:I wouldn't put it past clever scum to double up and have the 3rd scum pick a separate number. It might be something I'd do out of audacity. Agree on everything else though.
I want to note however that there are definitely picks that scum would find very lucrative. Among them:
1-shot Vig
Roleblocker (just block everyone at the top of the draft)
Jailkeeper
Vengeful/Night3Vig
Since JK and RB are paired up with Tracker and Doc, not much alignment indicative in that. However, 1-shot Vig/1-shot PGO, along with Vengeful/Night3Vig are HIGHLY useful scum roles.
What this means is if you were near the top and you went for either of the above slots and you DIDN'T get them, there is likely scum above you. Be sure to factor this in.
I think you and I think of things differently. I had thought of taking vig to keep it out of scum hands. But on the other side if scum didn't get the first pick and I had first pick I'd think of choosing pGo because scum may kill me and I could kill them back.
Vengeful I imagine IAM when he was scum and targeted the most useful role for the town to die.
In post 41, Mathdino wrote:PGO is a terrible role because you can't predict for sure when you'll get targeted, so let's get that off the table. 1-shot vig has a much higher chance of hitting town than not.
I'd actually be totally cool with lynching a claimed vengeful if we all vote on who they shoot if they end up being town. Vengeful and vig by themselves are much more likely to hit town than not and if anything are a detriment to town.
When it comes to vig, if the vig agreed to shoot someone the crowd decides on, sure I'd be fine with keeping them alive.
Basically my point is, something like Cop is 10x more useful to town than any killing roles are, and I have a problem with any uncontrolled vigs because if they're scum it's a free pass to kill off a townie they happened to be 'scumreading'.
Out of curiosity with the research done did you or hayate look to see if the vig when town did shoot?
This is where I personally love to wifom scum with the role out there.
See the player picked vig or pGo may or may not be scum. You might say the player waits to shot for a night. Hypothetically he really picked pGo and may or may not activate the ability tonight.
What I have done proposing the above is, if the player is town, give the player an extra day to maybe live because the scum now have to decide is it worth shooting that player and although i don't practice it myself, more info can be had after more then one game day.
You have people that are dead and flipped (should be more then 1).
If the player is scum I forced him from holding back the shot for more analysis. PGo in scum hands is unpredictable though.
Droog: do you think an rvs wagon gives more information? If so what?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 46, Mathdino wrote:We do think of things differently, but that's good because I think you're on to something but I can't for the life of me understand it.
Can you rephrase your proposal for the vig please? Suppose someone claims 1-shot vig. What are you suggesting?
Also, no, I didn't look into that but I might when I have more time. Hayate's research is a bit more in depth than mine of course (probably does have more time) so I'll see if he wants to.
I was saying the player who picked vig hold off to shot till night 2.
Town or scum with the ability who hold off helps town either way.
Don't forget the 1 shot could pick pGo too.
In post 47, Amy Farrah Fowler wrote:In post 44, Mathdino wrote:Amy, what are your reads? What's your read on me? If scum, why didn't you vote me?
It's page two, I'm not going to look for any serious reads when there are none. If I thought you were scum then I would've voted for you.
So what about town reads outside Dino?
Hayate: I'm referring to if the 1 shot vig held back the shot or not.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 51, Alchemist21 wrote:Honestly I don't think Flubber is scum because of his post about being mad. Even if he was exaggerating his anger, I don't think that's really telling.
I'm sure Mathdino is town here, and I feel like Droog's town. I played with these guys before and their play feels very much the same here. I can't say the same for wgeurts until he posts more, but I don't take his RVS vote as scummy. The game is only 3 pages in, we're sure to get some people still coming in RVS voting.
Why would exaggerated anger read town?
How many games you played with droog? What was his alignment?
In post 54, Venrob wrote:No, I'm saying that if the town decides to lynch me even though I am town, I'd rather it not be at LYLO.
Reads? Not really. I don't get reads this early into Day 1. If you wish to confirm that, you can check out my other games- that's what I pretty much always say regardless of alignment.
And if I seem defensive, please note my 1 town win and 6 town losses.
Do you have foot and mouth disease where you say the worst things that read scummy?
Have you played scum here? If so where you lynched easy as well?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
droog wrote:RVS tells me who likes wagons
Who's comfortable with sheeting
Which is more useful than not
Sheeping is null. I've seen it from town and scum. Zor's game you just played should tell you that.
Why do you think it's useful?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 60, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 57, farside22 wrote:In post 51, Alchemist21 wrote:Honestly I don't think Flubber is scum because of his post about being mad. Even if he was exaggerating his anger, I don't think that's really telling.
I'm sure Mathdino is town here, and I feel like Droog's town. I played with these guys before and their play feels very much the same here. I can't say the same for wgeurts until he posts more, but I don't take his RVS vote as scummy. The game is only 3 pages in, we're sure to get some people still coming in RVS voting.
Why would exaggerated anger read town?
How many games you played with droog? What was his alignment?
In post 54, Venrob wrote:No, I'm saying that if the town decides to lynch me even though I am town, I'd rather it not be at LYLO.
Reads? Not really. I don't get reads this early into Day 1. If you wish to confirm that, you can check out my other games- that's what I pretty much always say regardless of alignment.
And if I seem defensive, please note my 1 town win and 6 town losses.
Do you have foot and mouth disease where you say the worst things that read scummy?
Have you played scum here? If so where you lynched easy as well?
I'm not saying it reads town, I'm saying it doesn't read scum. I've played one previous game (o574) with Droog where he was town. He hard pushed an early wagon on randomidget in that game. Dino and wgeurts were also in that game.
If it doesn't read scum or town then null. My question still has merit if you think it's null why would or have you seen town exaggerate feelings?
In post 63, Mathdino wrote:Tbh I'd probably be tunneling Venrob by now for every word he says if I didn't believe him on his meta, haha.
droog is town. Like, incredibly town.
Alchemist, want an explanation for the vote. Is it because wgeurts usually hates RVS? I don't see that as a tell either way.
I want you to explain the town read. I only know droog from replacing me in another game.
Going with my gut currently
vote: AlchemistSarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 66, Mathdino wrote:On droog: 37 and 61 show what look like fairly genuine town perspectives, and 61 is just a good post in general, using RVS to the fullest.
On Alchemist and Flubber: Hmm. While I agree that Alchemist's defence of Flubber may beincorrect, I'm finding it difficult to call it scummy. Consider: Saying it's null "Even if he exaggerated his anger" doesn't really have much scum motivation if Flubber's town, and if they're both scum I find it difficult to believe Alchemist would be a scumbuddy apologist.
If anything, what's worse about Alch's ISO is the naked vote on wgeurts, but I'm waiting on an explanation for that one.
Edit: Okay, so what was the point of that statement I quoted?
If you're scum then this is a nice way early on to start lining up mislynches for later on in the game.
I find it odd he is stepping in for flubbernugget. It pings me as insincere.
but so far out of everything said thus far it is my first ping.
What do you think about my suggestion of shooting night 2?
In post 65, Amy Farrah Fowler wrote:In post 50, Mathdino wrote:See the issue I'm having with Amy is the underhandedness of the statement "If you're scum then this is a nice way early on to start lining up mislynches for later on in the game" without even scumreading me. It's like "Okay, that action is potentially beneficial for scum". Well that's great. So are most actions. She's throwing out reasons to be suspicious of the theory debate without any conviction.
Also, while farside provides examples and from what I understood, good reasoning on why some assumptions I made were wrong, Amy's reads more like "Well I dunno, PGOcouldbe useful, right?" which seems a bit off.
I'm not throwing out reasons to be suspicious. While I dislike theory debates, they're pretty null to me. And I can throw out statements without said statement automatically being attached to a read going one way or the other. It doesn't signify a lack of conviction. I'm not going to make a non-RVS vote for someone for one post.
In post 67, Amy Farrah Fowler wrote:
Did I miss someone asking for your scum history or are you just throwing this out here?
Because if this is out of the blue then saying 'I'm always scumread' is sure a great way to get people off your back for a while.
I officially feel invisible.
I asked Venrob after his comment about how he plays as scum.
Amy: I asked about any town reads or if anything a feeling you have about anyone thus far other then dino.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Ooooo aneninen gave me another reason I hadn't thought about. If scum have the JK or RB and the vig is town letting the vig decide to shoot and saving the shot or saying vig you decide to shot between X and Y is another thing.
That's if the vig is town and the player picked vig.
Damn my lets wifom scum meter is now in overdrive thinking of multiple viable'sSarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 85, Mathdino wrote:You just got me thinking about what if we voted on who the vig should shoot and have them remain silent, but then I realised that if the scum have JK, and they probably do given history, they could easily just jail the player we want vig to shoot. :/
Scratch the entire vig discussion then. However, I still think all this applies to vengeful. If someone claims vengeful, we should immediately start voting on who they should shoot IMO. And... scream at them if they don't shoot town's choice?
hmmmm
con: town could be the vengeful and the agreed upon player is town. That means 2 town dead Bu day 1
Pro: Scum could be the target or the vengeful.
I'd want to feel really, really sure of my reads to take a risk. I have seen both town and scum vengeful. I don't want to give too much away if vengeful was picked on what happened. But I have a thought if you want to humor me for a moment.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 86, davesaz wrote:In post 83, Aneninen wrote:
And don't forget our kitty! He's sleeping next to the keyboard which is good, because he's sleeping not NO the keyboard. And everyone knows if I didn't post anything about him that would be scummy.
Not disparaging the kitty in any way, but this feels trust-telly to me. Don't remember if you've mentioned him in my other games you've been in.
What?
How is that a trust tell if he didn't mention it in another game?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 88, Alchemist21 wrote:@Mathdino: The wgeurts vote was just an attempt in getting him to post more so I might be able to get a read on him. I don't mind keeping it there until he comes back though. P.S. I had no idea wgeurts hates RVS. He openly participates in it.
@Farside: There's no scum motivation for flubber faking his emotion. Some people just exagerate things when they talk because that's who they are. There are plentynof people who say, "I was so fucking pissed," when really they were only moderately annoyed. Being mad over losing out on the draft is null, and exaggerating any emotion about it has no scum motivation because it won't get him anywhere.
TL;DR I think his post shows his personality, not scumminess.
Your talking to a player that speaks highly emotional and understands it more then most.
Fake reads and emotion = fake
Not hey I don't mean it but it's there. Also last time I dealt with Flubbernugget I don't recall emotion at all from him. Being pissed about not getting an someone picking your number and ending up low is natural. Being fake pissed is weird and unnecessary.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 91, Mathdino wrote:@davesaz: Also, as trust tells are banned, you might wanna read up to make sure and contact the mod and not us.
@farside: It's an extra lynch if we lynch town. Lynches are good, especially since leashing the vengeful essentially gives us a redo if they flip town. 2 town COULD be dead but we face that danger with any lynch.
And if the venge is scum then it's just a waste of time.
If we L-1 someone and they claim vengeful, we agree to lynch that person no matter what because leaving them alive puts them in the scum's hands and we don't want to get into a NK WIFOM discussion of why they're alive the next day. At that point, we start voting on who they should vengekill. If you're a town vengeful, you need to know that giving town discussion on kills is absolutely best for town.Here's my idea:
@Alchemist: Pressure vote is meh, wgeurts could just not be online. Don't like it.
I'm thinking crazy for a moment.
I'm hypothetically a vengeful townie. I would target Alchemist if I was lynchedSarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 94, Mathdino wrote:Then hypothetically I'd argue with you the entire day about why you should go with the majority vote.
That said, as of the wgeurts vote explanation, current scumreads are Amy, Alch, and Flubber (though I'm iffy on the latter 2 both being scum), so I wouldn't cry over it.
Edit: Alchemist, please give your top scumread or any reads if existent. The fact is that you changed your RVS vote to someone as pressure when there was no indication that hewouldn'tcome back, all the while RVS votes are pretty much for reactions in the first place.
I'm stubborn. You can argue with me but unless you can convince me I'm wrong and by your list you don't disagree I'll be keeping my vote there for now.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Someone asked me the point of my hypothetical vengeful. I was testing a theory I have but it may be unuseful because I'm low in the pecking order.
Someone high up the scale do a I'm a hypothetical Vengeful and would target (insert player name).
I'm just testing a theory here.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 137, Mathdino wrote:I'd like farside and Hayate to be town but I'm unsure on them.
It's a statement of wishful thinking based on player affinity, not confirmational bias.
I love you too.
No worries from me.
I was hoping someone would take my offer. Hopefully it can be revisited later.
Flubber: no way is amy a thor alt. I've played with both SG and thor...amy only with ongoing game. Both SG and thor are cunning and thoughtful when communicating. All I can say about amy is she is not an alt.
Alchemist: why are you asking others about post droog's post?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 160, wgeurts wrote:My main point is anen managed to slip onto a wagon and claimed some soft-meta on her with an ongoing game. That meta was wrong and I really don't want this to happen. Anyway, I don't have a lot to go off and yes my scum find is slightly non-serious. We need to however get discussion going as it's stalled around page 6. The scum will of cause lurk in this as it benefits them. So yeah, my vote is basicaly summed up as "Anen seems oportunistic". It's day 1 and we need discussion, get it going.
I didn't see anen using any meta when he put a case on amy.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 176, droog wrote:i have thoughts about this but im too exhausted rn
people asked me some questions and
there were some good points raised re: why scum would ask setup theory
that i honestly hadnt considered
when i come back if i miss something please point me toward it
I'm not sure where you stand on players this game or why.
In post 178, davesaz wrote:Spoiler: Venrob
So we have:
Games go to shit when you're in them
Everyone reads you scum
You have a terrible record
Don't have time right now
We're gonna need to see a lot more than a bunch of AtE, or this is going to become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
This is a good catch. I feel like he maybe using the aTe and may just lurk it out.
Someone to keep an eye on.
Ane: have you played with amy? If not I'm going to say one thing only. Not all newbs are the same.
Ask her if she played elsewhere.
I'm going to ask you, do you think that just because someone just started at ms they are a noob?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
@alchemist:
I asked you a question about this
In post 130, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 100, droog wrote:In post 98, Aneninen wrote:Conclusion. Amy is most probably scum. She speculates about "what would be useful for the scum?" things all the time, especially during that Vigilante/Vengeful/Idunnowhat part of the chat. Other reasons are shown in my catch-up.
scum have daytalk
Someone help me understand what the relevence of Daytalk is here. Ane knew what your point was but I don't see it and what that has to do with what you quoted.
Why did you ask others and not droog about this?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 188, Aneninen wrote:No, I haven't played with her.
As I've said before, I find her scummy regardless of her experience. Thats'why I haven't asked her about other forums. But okay,
@Amy, have you ever played Mafia on another site or IRL?
Was the reason you found her scummy only because of the lack of hard claim?
Sorry if you said something earlier.
It's almost 6am and my brain is mush.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
I'm making notes here as I reread and catch up.
I'm not sure why alchemist felt the need to make a comment about flugger's comments as null.
Amy: I asked ven about his history, what is your read on him?
Dino: why is the reaction weird
Alchemist [ url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p6402026]dont get this[/url] people don't react just because of a vote.
Dave's post 117 is something to keep in mind to see if the pattern repeats.
Droog: why are you voting here for amy especially as Dino is voting for her as well? You think dino maybe scum for reason's I disagree with and he voted his scum buddy?
Wgerts: what happened between this post:
In post 133, wgeurts wrote:Ok droog and mathdino are town,
I'd like alchemist to do be so as well however I'm unsure on him. Also, alchemist screw you for making any negative comments on you look like WIFOM .
Anyway, I'll make a proper reads list and explanation in a sec.
And this post:
In post 139, wgeurts wrote:I need to reread and take a really good look.
Why the reread so early?
In post 144, Amy Farrah Fowler wrote:In post 80, farside22 wrote:
Amy: I asked about any town reads or if anything a feeling you have about anyone thus far other then dino.
My top townreads are you and droog.
Why?
I really hate this vote, looks hella opportunitic
In post 149, droog wrote:That's flybber's personality wgertus
I am not confident enough in this wagon.
If it hits l-1 I will Unvote. O
Scum!
Vote: droog
Town reads:
Dino
Anen
Scum:
Alchemist
Droog
Flubber
Stoped at the end of page 6.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 151, wgeurts wrote:Anenin,
He's sheeped dino and it seems like the general oppinion at that point was against amy. He could of voted in his first catch-up however he waited so that he could see how it would go. When he saw Dino go for it he joined, as scum this is a great position to set yourself up early game.[Removed ongoing games reference ~insanity]
@An,
Why didn't you vote straight away, why didn't you also factor in her being a noob?
Anen made a case after his sheep vote and I didn't see meta.
Wgerts: did you ever explain why you were fine with droog's sheeping vote vote scum reading anen for it?
Noting romi in the background and seeing this post reads as a weak reason and question knit picking to keep an eye on
i noted this too she is more interested in answering questions asked to her then scum hunting. I know when I'm busy I do that too, then go back and read but I'd keep an eye on amy.
Stopped top of page 11.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 251, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: guts
Sheeping dino. I town read him and I suck at mafia right now.
Why did you switch your vote? Do you think amy is scummy still?
In post 252, TheAdrienC wrote:I haven't caught up yet, but Nugget hopping from one wagon to another is something that makes me uncomfortable.
Why?
In post 257, wgeurts wrote:In post 233, Alchemist21 wrote:
I assumed wgeurts would read back and find the answer to this, but since he hasn't replied I'll repeat it.
124 - Droog openly sheeps Anem's case on Amy.
133 - Wgeurts calls Droog Town.
151 - Wgeurts votes Ane for sheeping Mathdino's case on Amy.
Now my question to wgeurts: Why do you think it's scummy for Ane to sheep Mathdino but not for Droog to sheep Ane? Also, it doesn't look at all like Ane sheeped Mathdino's case in the first place, so I don't know how you even came to that conclusion.
Anenenin had convieniently done it in his catch-up, it was either dripping with conf-bias or it was a fully intentional scum way to join the wagon. Both aren't good, droog however I was already town reading. My vote on Anen wasn't because he sheeped, it was more how he did it and a lot of gut.
What? Your reasons make no sense.
In post 261, wgeurts wrote:Hahaha thanks dino for 249. He unvotes amy saying contradicting or conflicting oppinions don't make her scum then goes on to vote me for seemingly just that as that's the only case I can see.
VOTE: Siveure
I'm starting to think you are a vi.
In post 263, davesaz wrote:My vote is there because you don't seem to be scum hunting, and only for that reason.
I could list 3 other people that have posted this game that are not scum hunting. Why gert over others?
In post 264, davesaz wrote:BTW, I had rejected voting wgeurts way back at 168 but screwed up the explanation.
There is town meta of him showing concern about lynching PRs. But I later thought his slow play was uncharacteristic of him as town. Cautious yes, but not slow.
I think Mathdino's jump off the wagon could be scum not wanting to remain first on the wagon if wgeurts flips town. The early vote could even be a catchphrase bus, with the wagon building as the reason to jump off and then be surprised if wgeurts flips scum. This gives me reason to watch Mathdino more closely, though not enough to tip the scales given how much pro-town activity he has had.
What is the point of this?
You post a damn/damn post for Dino but believe he is town.
Why did you post him as scummy either way?
In post 272, Alchemist21 wrote:I was starting to feel a similar train of thought with both the wgeurts and Amy wagons last night. I don't think it's because the wagins were too easy, but because the wagons developed at around the same time and there were no counterwagons coming up.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Flubbernugget
This guy has been unproductive for town, and the, "I suck at mafia right now," excuse doesn't cut it for me.
Also, to anyone thinking Mathdino could have been bussing wgeurts, check the draft order. They took the same number, so there's no way they're scumbuddies.
Also, hi Ank! Welcome to the game.
Agreed!
*Moves alchemist from scum to null*
In post 273, droog wrote:ive looked through flubber's games
he is just as "useless" in other town games
the one game he posted substance in, he was scum
Did he join any wagon? Did you check all his scum games?
Also he was town in a game I played. Most of the time he lurked like a fiend but towards the end tried to figure things out. He did not jump from wagon to wagon and that game a player played his town meta and was scum that game. One of the reasons I no longer take stock in meta.
In post 274, Mathdino wrote:In post 253, Flubbernugget wrote:I like when ppl doubtcast without trying to peg my alignment.
Too scummy to be scum, Alchemist. This is the kind of guy I'd want a meta and playstyle argument on before considering voting him again. Also the blatant sheeping. Scum tend to do it much more subtly.
Of course if he's usually way better than this we'll lynch his ass, but I just don't know right now.
Personally, I'm gonna go with Siveure and see where that takes me.
VOTE: Siveure
You're right, anyway, with the fact that the wgeurts wagon practically absorbed the Amy one. The lack of competition is bad.
Edit: Good. Well, not good, but I guess he's town.
I disagree.
ITS null at best. I'm seen scum and town sheep. He should still be pushed to explain his vote change.
Too scummy to scum is a fucking phalasy! If it talks like scum and acts like scum, guess what it's more likely scum.
The next person to defend Flubber without pushing him for a response will get a rash of crap from me.
Amy: why is anen scum?
Posting from phone and moving to computer.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Why did you switch?
In post 297, Ankamius wrote:Amy wagon at this point is bad. The way she handles the pressure is town.
Siveure trying to discredit Mathdino leaving the wagon is slimy as hell. Nothing about his ISO really gives me any good iggly wigglies either.
Something about Venrob's reads sounds town. Probably because of the Amy townread. The feeling I get from his play is that he wouldn't just close off that avenue so easily as scum.
Romitelli does a good job at trying to appear like he's doing something while not doing anything.
Those are the main things that stood out to me.
What did amy do that read town, quote example.
Same question about Siv. What did he do that gives you that read.
I agree with you about Romi.
In post 313, Ankamius wrote:That's okay, because I posted the meat of why I think he's scum on the last page.
Why did you wait to vote for Siv?
In post 320, Alchemist21 wrote:Here's something else to consider. Siv is 4th in the draft order. If he's scum, I think there's a good chance he got his submitted role choice, and he would also likely be the highest scum in the draft order.
If he's town, this wagon would be an easy mislynch.
If he's scum and his draft pick returned Vanilla, then this might be a wagon where the scumteam will bus.
However, if he holds a key role for the scumteam, and we push the wagon harder, I think we'll see some ratalliation from the scum hoping to keep an important role for them in the game.
WIFOM time. He's at l-2, why is he scum exactly if the above holds true?
In post 334, Alchemist21 wrote:Even without resistance, I want to see others' opinions of Siv and why they are or aren't on the wagon. I'll continue my approach based on how Siv and others respond to the wagon.
You think he is scum and he's at l-2. You stated the wagon is an easy mislynch if it was going by quickly. Is this wagon any different then Amy's or gerts?
Why?
In post 338, Amy Farrah Fowler wrote:In post 298, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:
Amy, anen, NOBODY except you two find either of you scummy. If you really want the other guy lynched, you'll need to engage everyone else, and not just be arguing with the "scum".
Alrighty, sure.
Let's start with his initial serious vote, which was on me.
He's talking about my speculation of what would be beneficial to scum. The logic behind this is somewhat skewed. Surely part of figuring out the scum is figuring out their thought processes, and I was doing so. And there goes reason #1.
He's also supporting the notion of me saying a role isn't scummy as evidence. There is no connection to one being scum due to that, and that's trying way too hard to provide more evidence of which there is none.
She's trying to make a case out of nothing here.
I'mtrying to make a case out of nothing?
He also does something that I've notice a fair bit of from scum trying to fabricate evidence. He decided to inflate my mention of Venrob's unprompted mention of his game history as this huge case.
Well, of course it'll sound scummier if you inflate it to be a bigger deal then it was and then shoot that strawman down.
His responses as to why people find me scummy are a bunch of drivel, nuff said.
Finally he chose to unvote me, probably because he saw the depth of his case on me and realised that he wouldn't get anywhere.
I am calling you a hypocrite and officially putting you on ignore.
Reread what you wrote and tell me how you did not just do the same thing you accused anen of?
grrrr
In post 341, Mathdino wrote:In post 329, Venrob wrote:Well, Siv is another person I am willing to vote, so since this looks like it's happening...
VOTE: SivL-2
This seems fishy. It reads like he's trying to be consistent with himself from earlier (saying he'd watch Flubber and Siv), not trying to scumhunt.
Nah he said he thought they were both scummy. I just don't get why he voted flubber first based on the wagons.
Ven: Why did you vote flubber first over Siv?
In post 361, Venrob wrote:I was planning on checking siv's ISO in Open 472, and didn't want a lynch while i was gone. Figured better safe than sorry.
My results from ISO'ing him show that he is a hell of a lot more active post-wise in this game than 472, though actual content in posts isn't much better. He was scum jailkeeper that game, (which was this same setup), and lasted to the day before lylo. Of course his scumbuddy Ser Arthur Dayne had everyone thinking of him as the towniest person, so town lost anyway that game.
His play is similar between these 2 games, and he was scum in that one. VOTE: Siv
My current thoughts on the gamestate? Siv is either scum or really bad town, hopefully scum because it is looking like he is gonna be lynched. If we can get a scum down day 1, that is a huge advantage for us. I have more townreads than scumreads, but that is completely normal D1 for me.
How was it the same?
In post 362, Ankamius wrote:This is town-Alchemist.
In post 375, Mathdino wrote:In post 5, insanity018 wrote:Alchemist21 - 4
davesaz - 6
Hayate YagamiAnkamius - 8
Siveure DtTrikyp - 13
Venrob - 15
Aneninen - 1
Romitelli - 1
Amy Farrah Fowler - 3
farside22 - 3
Mathdino - 5
wgeurts - 5
Flubbernugget - 2
gangsta_duck41AdrienC - 2
droog - 2
Groups that don't have more than one scum:
Alchemist, Siveure, davesaz: Finding it unlikely Siv would've let Alch go for 4. Alch's behaviour is mostly scummy if Siveure flips town. Setup spec tells me it's unlikely there's more than one scum here simply because Siveure didn't get his pick, along with a few other things.
Aneninen, Romitelli:High chance for Anen to be scum if Siv's town. It'd certainly fit the whole "scum chooses one high, one low, and one middle" draft pattern. Until we get a flip, no comment on this pair.
Amy, farside:Amy more likely than farside, but I'm less confident in my Amy read than I was due to aforementioned wagon patterns.
Mathdino, wgeurts:wgeurts is prob town by this point.
Flubbernugget, Adrien, droog: Hmm. Originally I'd have gone with Flubber but people's input makes me less sure. Also voting patterns make me think Flubber and Siveure aren't a thing. So I'd go with Adrien.
Ankamius: Not enough to tell. Every one of Hayate's posts were null IMO.
Very much appreciate the low number of groups to go through. This, people, is why you don't pick 9001 or 42. NKs in the top section will make it easier. As of now, here are my 2 callings of the more-likely-to-be-scum-of-the-groups:
If Siv's scum: Siveure, Romitelli, Amy, wgeurts, Adrien, Ankamius
If Siv's town: Alchemist, Aneninen, Amy, wgeurts, Flubbernugget, Ankamius
Anyone got any input, I'm welcome to it.
I'm leaning alchemist, flubber and anka as scum team. See below for reasons.
In post 396, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:In post 385, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Also if by some miracle the doc is town, the best move for scum is probably to nightkill below me in the draft.
Regardless of what scum would do, town doc has to protect low, I mean. They're either shooting the doc or low.
And this quote is actually stupidly scummy.
I wish I wasn't getting lynched so I could actually explain that at a good time dangit.
Anen, nobody asked the question. The point of answering them was purely to crumb.
Oh no. I'm going into setup breaking mode. Frak.
Hmm. I'm legitimately questioning whether anen is actually this dumb. And I'm a little sick of sheeping by now.
VOTE: aneninen
Like the post, hate the vote. Why Anen?
Okay I have had an issue with Flubber and the first person to say 2 scummy to be scum can kiss my ass.
Vote: Flubber
Flubber has jumped on 2 wagons for 0 reasoning and suddenly he is on v/la after that. I don't like the timing of the situation at all.
He doesn't explain his votes and just lets others use his meta while saying nothing at all.
This is what allows scum to float by people. He needs to explain his vote and his reason's for his change and allowing him to skate why is shitty. Admittedly I had a bit of paranoia about flubber not jumping on Siv, but he was called out on his votes by a few others so that could account for the lack of switch too.
Alchemist; Originally I moved up and with his recent post about Siv he is a scum read. I had this moment of thinking he and flubber where scum together. I liked the vote on flubber but he moves it easy over to siv without much pressure. He's also has the post I quoted above about Siv and seeing how people go on the wagon. Siv is no better or worse a wagon then Gerts.
Anka: Don't like his entry in the game and his lack of reason's for his vote on Siv.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 413, Venrob wrote:farside22 wrote:Ven: Why did you vote flubber first over Siv?Spoiler: quote
I was told to vote my top scum read, and if there are ties use random.org. Since it was a 2-way tie i simply flipped a coin- and it landed tails, so I voted flubber. Then siv moved up on my scumreads list and I switched my vote to him. My flubber vote was in my next post after the quoted post.
Your a strange person.
How is siv meta as scum similar? Did you search his town games?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 417, droog wrote:In post 406, farside22 wrote:Did he join any wagon? Did you check all his scum games?
Also he was town in a game I played. Most of the time he lurked like a fiend but towards the end tried to figure things out. He did not jump from wagon to wagon and that game a player played his town meta and was scum that game. One of the reasons I no longer take stock in meta.
if you dont take stock in meta, why are you asking?
i did not look at all of flubber's scum games
the vast majority were town games
anyways, is...there something scummy about the wagon switching?
i could imagine scum motive
but i dont see anyone making a case that flubber's behavior is motivated by scum motive
He never said anything.
It's easy switch to make and he never expanded on anything add.
How many times do you see players that do that flip town vs scum?
I have seen it from scum. Lurk, post little content. It makes it easy to stay under when players fight.
Do I need to bring up Zor's game and how poorly kurbio's play was?
I will push it and damn the meta, but if your going by meta I'm going to ask how much you searched to reach your conclusion?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 425, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Math, what's so different about my wagon as opposed to wgeurts's and amy's that you switch off them easily and don't off me?
Farside, your read on me is?
Scumreading flubber and claiming his V/LA is suspicious is insanity. He's not going V/LA in the one game he's scum in and staying active on the rest of the site.
Wait. Actually put some thought into the alchemist case and lol. That is actually scummy by siv's narrow definition of scummy.
VOTE: alchemist
Anyway I'm gonna lurk for a couple days until the wagon disappears. See you all on day 2!
I thought your sheeping post was null and I got dave's point, but I don't see you as scum most because how you played after the wagon formed on you.
I think out of all the wagons that have formed Amy's play has been very under the radar and it disappeared without much said by her.
I have a gut feeling about amy that makes me not chase the rabbit currently.
If Flubber continues and alchemist flips scum I want him to be pushed.
Vote: alchemist
In post 426, Mathdino wrote:wgeurts's and Amy's developed too fast. Yours didn't, and the people had better reasons for voting you other than sheeping.
UNVOTE:
I'll decide who to vote after I come back but I'm beginning to think I was only hanging onto Siv since he already claimed and I wanted an info lynch.
Let's not do that.
I think they all formed at the same speed. I'm not sure why you pause at lynching alchemist if you think he is scum and you think scum might be within the top 4Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 428, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 414, farside22 wrote:Flubber: why did you vote amy and siv?
Siv is scum.
I need a better grasp of Amy's intentions.
Why is siv scum?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 431, Flubbernugget wrote:He wasn't trying to excuse his play in the last pyp.
Why is that scummy?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 435, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Amy, the point of calling you a hypocrite is that everything you called him scummy for you did yourself. Which I kindof agree with.
This^
My comment probably came across bitchy. Hypocrisy is just one of ny peeve's.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 438, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 432, farside22 wrote:In post 431, Flubbernugget wrote:He wasn't trying to excuse his play in the last pyp.
Why is that scummy?
Not playing to town meta, not taking responsibility for his actions, playing defensively, etc, etc.
Are you asking this out of disagreement or asking out of thinking I'm a moron?
I'm missing what your putting down.
How does not excusing his play in pyp make him scummy this game?
Gerts: my reads are here also see 408 add on.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 297, Ankamius wrote:Amy wagon at this point is bad. The way she handles the pressure is town.
Siveure trying to discredit Mathdino leaving the wagon is slimy as hell. Nothing about his ISO really gives me any good iggly wigglies either.
Something about Venrob's reads sounds town. Probably because of the Amy townread. The feeling I get from his play is that he wouldn't just close off that avenue so easily as scum.
Romitelli does a good job at trying to appear like he's doing something while not doing anything.
Those are the main things that stood out to me.
I wanted the quote you mention siv discredit. I'm pretty sure he wasn't the only one to mention Dino leaving the wagon.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Anka:
He responded with his issue here
In post 199, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:In post 157, Mathdino wrote:I did a quick search, Amy's not experienced,let's take that off the table.
About math's distancy stuff, this.
Oh.
Let's take this off the table.
Why is it scummy? It's the only thing you pointed too and voted on.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 469, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 446, farside22 wrote:In post 438, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 432, farside22 wrote:In post 431, Flubbernugget wrote:He wasn't trying to excuse his play in the last pyp.
Why is that scummy?
Not playing to town meta, not taking responsibility for his actions, playing defensively, etc, etc.
Are you asking this out of disagreement or asking out of thinking I'm a moron?
I'm missing what your putting down.
How does not excusing his play in pyp make him scummy this game?
Why does he have a self-preservation mentality he didn't have as town?
I don't know.
What I know is what siv sai here
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 0#p6414560
I don't dive into meta for too often because people can be misinterpreted. I recall vezo and I agruing about meta and how I play and how he played. We thought because of our meta of each other, the other was scum and we were both town.
I have to remind myself when I play with someone I know, they change playstyles for whatever reason. I want to scum read them for there differences, but I step back occasionally and say what kind of case are they making? How are they coming across in there views?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Droog: what I don't get with what your pointing out. What is Dino's scum motivation for unvoting once the wagon gained speed.
Also he was typically 1st or 2nd voting that player where others followed him.
Why does any of that make him scum vs others that followSarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 670, TheAdrienC wrote:So that's five on Anen and four on Siv, right? Because I think we're close to deadline and we need to decide on a lynch soon.
Do you have a scum read on either one?
In post 666, Mathdino wrote:Ugh, last thing I was planning to do was huge ISO of Alchemist and Anen but I fell asleep before doing that. Twice. Procrastination.
More comfortable lynching Alchemist. Anen's whole softclaim thing is actually giving him slight townpoints.
Aneninen, can you
A. semi-prove you are town tomorrow and/or
B. have your plan done by tomorrow?
I've not sure why alchemist wagon didn't hapoen. I saw at least 2 other player voice suspicion but didn't vot alchemist.
In post 671, Alchemist21 wrote:You have that backwards. Four on Ane and 5 on Siv.
Nice of you to just sit back and watch there.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 744, Alchemist21 wrote:VOTE: AdrienC
His sudden naked vote on me was scummy.
@Formerfish, do you still think Venrob is scum?
Lots of players naked vote.
Why did you finds his vote scummy?
Also thoughts on Dino.Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 751, Alchemist21 wrote:Not really. My line of thinking was that if Siv actually turned out to be town, he could be easily mislynched without the scum needing to be on the wagon, so I'm focusing on players that weren't on the Siv wagon.
Hmmmm
*note to self to check siv wagon*Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 753, Formerfish wrote:So your theory is that scum stayed off the wagon, one that was a deadline compromise that they would literally have no cause to have to explain their vote? Interesting. Probably wrong, but interesting that you would put that forth.
Also, give reasons for why you think Math is town.
I think it's crazy.
Why would scum stay off an easy lynch and one that would deadline.
Droog: you think scum stayed off the wagon too or is it just Adrienne coming in and asking about the lynch?Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Sure lets go over a few things.
The vote on siv which came after stating a reason.
In post 297, Ankamius wrote:Amy wagon at this point is bad. The way she handles the pressure is town.
Siveure trying to discredit Mathdino leaving the wagon is slimy as hell. Nothing about his ISO really gives me any good iggly wigglies either.
Something about Venrob's reads sounds town. Probably because of the Amy townread. The feeling I get from his play is that he wouldn't just close off that avenue so easily as scum.
Romitelli does a good job at trying to appear like he's doing something while not doing anything.
Those are the main things that stood out to me.
The reason is vague.
In post 362, Ankamius wrote:This is town-Alchemist.
In post 447, Ankamius wrote:In post 407, farside22 wrote:In post 297, Ankamius wrote:Amy wagon at this point is bad. The way she handles the pressure is town.
Siveure trying to discredit Mathdino leaving the wagon is slimy as hell. Nothing about his ISO really gives me any good iggly wigglies either.
Something about Venrob's reads sounds town. Probably because of the Amy townread. The feeling I get from his play is that he wouldn't just close off that avenue so easily as scum.
Romitelli does a good job at trying to appear like he's doing something while not doing anything.
Those are the main things that stood out to me.
What did amy do that read town, quote example.
Same question about Siv. What did he do that gives you that read.
When I asked about the delay I get more vague reasoning.
She's trying to get reads from the pressure she's getting instead of spending all her effort trying to dismantle the wagon. Other than a few posts at the start, it's been very little of that until the wagon dismantled. The posts after came less often (null tell), but had the same type of feel to them.
I don't understand your second question at all. I explained my scumread on him and the second point is basically just saying that nothing he posted gave me a particularly town feel to his play. Unless you want me to go into the first point more, this question isn't answerable.
In post 407, farside22 wrote:
In post 313, Ankamius wrote:That's okay, because I posted the meat of why I think he's scum on the last page.
Why did you wait to vote for Siv?
I was kinda hoping to get interactions before committing to anything since I hadn't fully parsed where everyone is in my head at that point; the reads list was just general areas for everyone. After getting asked one question, I started being completely ignored and Siveure DtTrikyp made some pretty icky posts at that point so I just said fuck it and voted.
And more vague.
Lots of buzz words and no substanceSarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 777, droog wrote:In post 775, Ankamius wrote:In post 769, droog wrote:In post 761, Ankamius wrote:Not liking droog's AdrienC vote.
do you think adrien asking if the lynch was through
without voting on it
was not scummy?
That's not what I was getting at. You posted all this stuff about other people, then quoted one post by Adrien with a response that is less impressive, but decided that was the scummiest thing out of everything you posted. I don't understand how it's groundbreaking enough to be stronger than everything else you posted by itself.
so instead of saying 'please explain
you posted all this stuff about other people
then quoted one post by adrien'
you left the vague 'i dont like this'
which could be interpreted many ways
So you want to explain why you said all that stuff about others but voted for adrien?
*places money that droog will continue to ask questions while never answering what's asked*Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
In post 747, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 745, Formerfish wrote:Yes. Why wouldn't I? Did you are anything that would make me change my mind?
No. I'm just thinking that unless Venrob is scum then the Siv wagon was all town. I'll be keeping my eye on him.
P-edit: Usually you can find a reason for a vote in another post. Ade gave absolutely no reason when he voted me.
Also I'm still sure Dino is town.
I just remembered that Flubber naked voted amy.
Did you vote for him?
Looks
You thought it was random even though he clearly went to amy and then gerts
ExplainSarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
@droog
Both quotes show alchemist and anka asking you about your vote on Adrien vs your comments.
Neither time do you explain the reason but ask questions to both players about the read on adrien
In post 780, droog wrote:In post 778, Alchemist21 wrote:Droog, I don't understand how you went from voting Dino to voting Ade in just a few posts.
I would still gladly vote Dino
But does adrien in say end not look scummy??