Let's 1v1.
RVS is over now.
Everyone pick a side.
In post 20, absinthe wrote:@No Brainer, let's hear why you chose to 1v1 him.
Rasko wrote:Why?
Hm.BBT wrote:Actually.
This is scum.
Struck me as more likely to be a newtown than newscum reaction.Anti wrote:i was serious about the reads being kinda' bad though.
how do you justify town on rasko?
q.q I guess so.No Brainer wrote:I think cheetos has a grip tho.
Be showier about it. What towncred does he get for borderline naked voting someone? Is he producing lots of content by doing that? Getting to coast by?BBT wrote:How do you differentiate between the two? Like, what would you expect scum to do that was different?
In post 37, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Voting No Brainer.
In post 53, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:In post 50, absinthe wrote:In post 48, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Anti's one of my best friends and he also happens to be obvious when scum. He's not scum here.
That's nice. My reads of those two are based on what's in this thread.
But your read of me ISN'T based on what's in the thread, you specifically said that.
In post 22, absinthe wrote:I looked at page one of some of your earlier games.
That's just as much meta as his reason to trust Anti.
Also in reference to your post 49. You complained that he didn't include the reason, why you voted me is his reason for thinking your scum, but you didn't really give a reason. Based on what you say, you have some sort of unexplained meta read.
In post 57, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Anti, I was hoping you'd have seen what I saw - the unnecessary appeasement to No Brainer for no apparent reason. If she's town, everyone on the list should be a question mark. She questions NB, who responds by withholding information in exchange for a vote, the she gladly gives...
The biggest thing for me really was the statement "I will vote one of you if I think you are scum." I see this kind of forced cautionary statement a lot from newbie scum who are trying to show that they are "thinking" about the game and "aren't sure".
In post 98, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm not concernd with who is voting who.
My reasons for voting TheMan are pretty clear. If you have a problem with them, you should say so.
In post 100, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I have nothing to say to her than what I have already said.
I believe absinthe is town and I dislike ETL's push on her. Nothing else to say on the matter as of now.
I think 'ignoring' is a little extreme as well. Has she addressed something directly to me that I have not responded to?
In post 107, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Mollie, have you ever, even once, read me correctly? Serious question.
BBT wrote:I believe absinthe is town and I dislike ETL's push on her.
If you like the second point, what is so scummy about ETL's push on absinthe that you were actively trying to discredit anti calling her town?BBT wrote:OK, but if she was looking for information...why wouldn't she vote? She is following up on the question so I'm not sure how it's appeasing.
Second point I kind of agree with though.
In post 114, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:When I say I don't understand it what I mean to say is I don't like it. Should be more specific with my wording I guess.
I fully understand why ETL was pushing absinthe, but I don't like it.I also don't like this defence of Anti/ETL that you got going on.
In post 124, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What if player x and player z are scum?
What if their reads are wrong?
In post 129, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Except for in our last game I nailed scum and you derailed me. Remember that? So for you to insult my town game seems a little silly after that.
PEdit - What is your problem with it?
In post 132, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:In post 124, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What if player x and player z are scum?
What if their reads are wrong?
i think this actually happened once or twice with all three of us lol... it didn't work out if i recall. lover's game and i htink the other was a large theme or mini theme
In post 137, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Can't remember which game it was. You apologized to me post-game though, you must remember doing that?
Do you really think that if I was scum here I would just be dodging explaining because I have no reason and don't want to be caught for it?the man who sold the world wrote:until No Brainer's plan (which he seems to be actively ignoring questions about) is explained I prefer my vote on him.
You'd better not buddy me.lalala wrote:(cheet seems more townierer than mollie :s)
:/the man who sold the world wrote:I make that it's bullshit, they apparently got reads off of it but with no explanation, and actively ignoring people it's just scummy. The only real town explanation I can think of for just dropping it is if it was a gambit that failed, but even then they should at least own up to the fact it didn't go anywhere rather then just pretending it didn't happen.
In post 28, No Brainer wrote:In post 20, absinthe wrote:@No Brainer, let's hear why you chose to 1v1 him.
Rasko wrote:Why?
If this is true then sorry q.qthe man wrote:I feel like a fucking idiot.
In post 202, Antihero wrote:...and thinking on it more, i really don't like it...
why are you sticking your neck out for this guy?
In post 206, absinthe wrote:Why aren't you asking me questions or something then?