Micro 618 {Over}
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Alright! Now that the other hydra has posted I'm gonna clutter up the thread! Sorry to everyone who thought I wouldn't be spamming and wallposting this game <3In post 53, Chip Butty wrote:
You're voting me for "potentially carnivorous"? Have you looked at your scumbuddy MURDERCAT'S avatar?In post 32, ReallySick wrote:VOTE: Chip Butty
for potentially carnivorous and to be honest, I have a hunch that BulletNLynchproof is town.
~ Realeo
Chip, does this mean you are scumreading Murder? If so, why? If not, why did you make this comment?-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
In post 53, Chip Butty wrote:
You're voting me for "potentially carnivorous"? Have you looked at your scumbuddy MURDERCAT'S avatar?In post 32, ReallySick wrote:VOTE: Chip Butty
for potentially carnivorous and to be honest, I have a hunch that BulletNLynchproof is town.
~ Realeo
Also, did you mean to tie your vote on me to your hunch about BNLP? And is your hunch based on his superior math skills? As far as I know, that's NAI.
@Sick head: It's the weekend, dawg. Chill. Discussion will pick up once people are in a position to steal from their employers by playing at woork.
This is not really a reason to scumread him imo, but with that said! I am scumreading him for other reasons.In post 57, BNL wrote:
I want to scumread this for not being game related... but I can say the same for Charloux and karnos. And we have two non-posters -.-In post 52, BTD6_maker wrote:I can also support the motion for Mafiascum PTs.
VOTE: BTD-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
In post 20, Chip Butty wrote:I just want to clarify, and I know SOMEONE will jump on me for this, but it is a genuine question about the mechanics:
If werevolves have no factional NK, and only kill Town through lynching and vengekill resulting from lynching, can't Town actually peacefully co-exist with werewolves indefinitely, as long as we never lynch? I mean, with no NK, they pose no threat to Town unless we lynch.In post 22, Charloux wrote:He was dumb to begin with... But if BNL didn't start the voting we could've coexisted...
These are townleans for me. As far as Charl's posting, the joking didn't sound forced and was pretty much exactly what I expected from him.In post 24, Charloux wrote:"If no majority exists, the player with the highest vote total is lynched. In a tie, it's whoever held the highest vote total prior to the tie"
If nobody votes, there is never a majority, so Ranger either has to kill all of us or nobody
VOTE: BNL for being a warmonger
Chip follows the pre-emptive frustration that someone will jump on him for a mechanics question. In and of itself it's not alignment indicative, but I liked the tone for town.
Nahdia hydra so far has been pretty much on my line of thinking which means I like them for town as well.
Also, wouldn't not voting in order to co-exist be playing against win con?-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
The spam from BTD at the beginning of page 2 rubbed me the wrong way for a number of reasons. I liked Chip's response to it, but I'm voting for the RVS vote itself pinging me as scummy moreso than the rest of the spam.
I liked Realeo's entrance, but disliked Sick deliberately being overly reachy with the vote reasoning on Chip. Also disliked the whole hunch on BNL being town thing, but I am assuming that is linked to some kind of thought process that the person wagon'ed in RVS is usually town? If that's the case, I disagree, but it's not a scummy thing to say. Sick I've noticed looks scummy to me in general when I spectate games so /shrug. We'll see how that goes. I didn't much like 47 since it's defending the other head but ehh. I can't see motivation there either way other than just story time.
I liked BNL's 48 for town.
Oh and Chip? The reason I replaced out of Trees now that I can talk about it is because of Open 640. I saw your RVS banter with Kappy and realized I was going to tunnel tf out of you because I somehow got that in my mind that you were his scumbuddy despite previously stating that you would have had to have reverse the whole bus station over him. Talk about reading into things too much...-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
My experience for this is based on newbscum. They tend to try to joke and come off incredibly forced. It's not the joking itself, but how natural it feels to me.In post 86, ReallySick wrote:IMO scum usually seem more confortable and laid back... so the joking could go either way as a scum or town lean, just depends on the person... meta-ing him now...
Also worth noting. Chip plays with a persona that tends to look scummy to me. The fact that he's a townlean could mean something. Or it could mean nothing.
What do you think about Murder trying to direct conversation towards BTD in 72?-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Self-meta. I'll check this, but I don't like the RVS vote because it doesn't give anything away. It's a vote you could easily make on the same person across multiple games and that's why it pings me.In post 104, BTD6_maker wrote: How was my vote scummy? It is consistent with my RVS vote from other games, where I vote someone for having a name suggesting a role that they don't have.
The fact that then there was this weird "true ninja" line of thought that honestly has nothing to do with anything, and then a post where you didn't even weigh in on the game state after things had happened didn't do anything to elevate you from that initial scumread.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
I'm not sure I follow this. Is the comparison only due to the speed of the wagon? Wagon speed doesn't mean much alignment-wise. Flash wagons happen on both town and scum, and they can happen with all town on the wagon, so what we're looking for here is the motivation of people for jumping on/off the wagon (I don't think we can get much from people staying off the wagon due to the speed it formed though, which is a bit of a shame).In post 124, BNL wrote:
Yes, the wagon seems a lot quicker than usual, and I feel that BTD6 is town with scum on his wagon, solely due to the speed of the wagon. Kinda reminds me of this.In post 121, Chip Butty wrote: I have to say, that wagon looks a bit quick, guys...
Dislike Murder's vote there. Found karnos' to be ok if a little overboard in trying to make BTD feel pressure from being at L1, since he is gonna feel pressure from it without waving it around that he's in danger of being hammered.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
This. I don't like the fact that he's being told, basically, "don't worry my wolfy mate you aren't at risk of being lynched". He still hasn't done any visible scumhunting and I would like to see that.In post 186, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote: I honestly dislike the resistance to the BTD wagon. There's nothing I see redeemable about his slot and I don't mind putting him at L-1 this early.
101 didn't feel like a townslip but I'm not sure it even feels like it's trying to come across as one? I read that as NAI. I suppose you're thinking that it's an attempted townslip?
Not sure what to think of 119. It just looks worded strangely. I'll go back and do motivations in a bit since I'm kinda out of it right now.
I thought that might be the case. Slightly wary but your thoughts are mirroring my own (one of the reasons I was scared to post earlier before everyone got content out) almost to a T with small exceptions so I guess I can't keep up the paranoia of your strong scumgame forever.oh and since I think someone (Jae?) asked; Ariadne is the Nahdia head!
Anyway, agreeing with Murder/BTD as most scummy right now.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Alright, I'm still townreading Nahdia. Her thoughts mirror my own too much to be anything but the same role as me, I think. Unless I'm horribly off on how to play, which could very well be the case, but I'm treating her as mod confirmed town for the moment. There are conditions where I will look at her slot again but I don't feel like outing them beyond that yes, there is a possibility, but no, I'm not looking at her as wolf now in any light.In post 270, MURDERCAT wrote:What a twist! I kind of thought you might be doing that but then you stuck with it lol. I don't believe it either, I think we can just lynch him.
That said, I am townreading karnos due to recent events, and dislike the way MURDERCAT interacted with the wagon, and pretty much everything surrounding it. The aggression towards Sick isn't something I expected from town murdercat, for one, and the weird behaviour since has only solidified that feeling. This is where I'm looking for the next wolf.
VOTE: MURDERCAT
I don't want D&A or BTD lynched anymore. I don't believe BTD's claim, if I'm honest, but I'd rather lynch the other scum today just in case.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Does anyone? lol.
If we lynch another scum today then we get 2 scum for the price of one.
If he does somehow happen to be the seer then we also get a result if he isn't vengekilled.
It's up to wolves whether they wanna vengekill him or not in that situation. He's basically the guaranteed lynch tomorrow if he doesn't hit a wolf tonight, so that's a free mislynch for them on a town power role, but if he hits a wolf tonight and we lynch a wolf today then it's game over.
Depends how ballsy our remaining wolf is in that situation, and whether they have an alpha or roleblocker. It's likely that they do if we do indeed have a seer. So I want to lynch that today if possible.
So, Murder, to answer your question. Don't believe the claim, and I think you're looking scummy so you're the next best option for me. I'm hoping to nail both scum D1 but I don't expect to, if I'm being honest. Feel free to make cases if you think I missed something either undeniably townie from you or undeniably scummy from others (preferably the latter since I can better read you off that I think).-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Ok so no one is following my defense of nahdia being too close to my own thought processes to not be town so I'll add this. Nahdia has a strong scum game. She tends to play people as scum. She's not doing that here, because she's not scum. You think she suicides like this as anything but town? Because I don't think so.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
In post 89, JaeReed wrote:The spam from BTD at the beginning of page 2 rubbed me the wrong way for a number of reasons. I liked Chip's response to it, but I'm voting for the RVS vote itself pinging me as scummy moreso than the rest of the spam.
I liked Realeo's entrance, but disliked Sick deliberately being overly reachy with the vote reasoning on Chip. Also disliked the whole hunch on BNL being town thing, but I am assuming that is linked to some kind of thought process that the person wagon'ed in RVS is usually town? If that's the case, I disagree, but it's not a scummy thing to say. Sick I've noticed looks scummy to me in general when I spectate games so /shrug. We'll see how that goes. I didn't much like 47 since it's defending the other head but ehh. I can't see motivation there either way other than just story time.
I liked BNL's 48 for town.
Oh and Chip? The reason I replaced out of Trees now that I can talk about it is because of Open 640. I saw your RVS banter with Kappy and realized I was going to tunnel tf out of you because I somehow got that in my mind that you were his scumbuddy despite previously stating that you would have had to have reverse the whole bus station over him. Talk about reading into things too much...In post 102, JaeReed wrote:Can we wagon BTD please? I'm not comfortable with a townread of mine running up time as the highest wagon while BTD is looking scummy and laying low content-wise. If BNL's town then that's exactly what the wolves want to happen here.In post 108, JaeReed wrote:
Self-meta. I'll check this, but I don't like the RVS vote because it doesn't give anything away. It's a vote you could easily make on the same person across multiple games and that's why it pings me.In post 104, BTD6_maker wrote: How was my vote scummy? It is consistent with my RVS vote from other games, where I vote someone for having a name suggesting a role that they don't have.
The fact that then there was this weird "true ninja" line of thought that honestly has nothing to do with anything, and then a post where you didn't even weigh in on the game state after things had happened didn't do anything to elevate you from that initial scumread.
@Real I think I did explain in thread. If you want me to quote-wall for convenience I can but not tonight. I have a RL condition that is messing with me atm. Sorry. If you ISO me and search BTD there should be enough there to know my thoughts on him. If you ask for clarification about something specific there I'll try to still keep responding to the best of my ability tonight.In post 192, JaeReed wrote:
This. I don't like the fact that he's being told, basically, "don't worry my wolfy mate you aren't at risk of being lynched". He still hasn't done any visible scumhunting and I would like to see that.In post 186, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote: I honestly dislike the resistance to the BTD wagon. There's nothing I see redeemable about his slot and I don't mind putting him at L-1 this early.
101 didn't feel like a townslip but I'm not sure it even feels like it's trying to come across as one? I read that as NAI. I suppose you're thinking that it's an attempted townslip?
Not sure what to think of 119. It just looks worded strangely. I'll go back and do motivations in a bit since I'm kinda out of it right now.
I thought that might be the case. Slightly wary but your thoughts are mirroring my own (one of the reasons I was scared to post earlier before everyone got content out) almost to a T with small exceptions so I guess I can't keep up the paranoia of your strong scumgame forever.oh and since I think someone (Jae?) asked; Ariadne is the Nahdia head!
Anyway, agreeing with Murder/BTD as most scummy right now.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Except I don't think you're a Seer. I think you fake-claimed.In post 389, BTD6_maker wrote:The difference in this case is that lynching the Seer is worse than lynching a VT. Thus, if you think I am a Seer, you would be best going for your next strongest, as usually the worst-case scenario is that they are a VT.
My argument was addressed to Karnos, who was choosing between Murdercat (weak scum) and D&A (strong scum). Neither of them are claimed PRs so in my argument it was implicit that neither target was a PR.
Anyway, I'm sure D&A is town and the discomfort over me potentially buddying makes that even more so. It's pretty much exactly how KTS reacted when I declared him pretty much an Innocent Child to me in the newbie game Trees. This is an incredibly strong read for me and this should not be where Karnos is lynching today. I believe Karnos is willing to compromise with me on that.
If you're somehow town and have doubts then check them tonight. Not where I'd be checking, but eh. Not a lynch I will allow to happen without fighting furiously against it.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Not really, but I am unsure on you and my strongest townread got put 1 vote off the top wagon. All it would have taken was you switching from Murder to D&A. I'm not letting my strongest townread get lynched without a fight. This way I think(?) that makes Murder the longer standing wagon from the two of them.In post 398, BNL wrote:Jae, you still fine L-1ing 3 days from deadline? I'd prefer that only two days away IMO.
For the record, I'm not certain on Murder atm, but at this point it's whether I'd rather him or D&A. Which means that, if we assume BTD's claim is true, the likely scum are in those I've been town or nullreading. So BNL, Charl, Karnos, Chip. Karnos I really think is town. Charl isn't acting like his scumgame here either. Problem with that is I'm left with someone I have a propensity for townreading as either alignment (BNL) and someone I have a propensity for scumreading as town (Chip).
I don't know. If we assume BTD and Murder are both town then my reads are thoroughly fucked. The one thing I am sure of is D&A as town, and therefore, I want them alive as someone I trust to be coming from a town mindset.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
I see no contradiction here. He voted BTD because I asked for it and decided it would be good for reactions. That's a part of what wagons are. I was scumreading BTD but he didn't need to in order to join the wagon.In post 403, BNL wrote:Rereading karnos ISO. Would want to point out this contradiction while I continue reading:In post 132, karnos wrote:You realize this is a micro game right? L-1 in a micro game is about the same as L-2 in a larger game. There are only 2 scum. I put BTD at L-1 because I'd LOVE to see a scum quick-hammer him, it would rip the game wide open and give town a free lynch tomorrow. I trust my fellow town to not hammer needlessly. I also saw some value in seeing exactly how BTD reacted to the sudden wagon.
But now all that is for naught.In post 162, karnos wrote:Not strongly, I was voting him to provide a service:
In post 102, JaeReed wrote:Can we wagon BTD please? I'm not comfortable with a townread of mine running up time as the highest wagon while BTD is looking scummy and laying low content-wise. If BNL's town then that's exactly what the wolves want to happen here.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
I desperately need your thoughts on the gamestate when you can. Specifically your thoughts on BNL as a potential partner for BTD.
I think you might actually be town here but am less certain than I am on D&A which is the only reason I need your wagon to be higher. Your best bet for survival here is voting BNL because that's where I would rather be right now.
For the record, Karnos, I don't think Murdercat could be BTD's partner based off an ISO. He was too amiable to the lynch there and continued to scumread BTD after the claim like the rest of us.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
In post 357, BTD6_maker wrote:Moderate Town: Charloux
Null-weak Town: Chip, ReallySick, JaeReed
Weak scum: BNL, Murdercat
Moderate-strong scum: Karnos, D&A
Ok so why D&A or BNL instead of D&A or Karnos? What changed for you?In post 419, BTD6_maker wrote:Murdercat is my fourth strongest scumread. I am OK with a lynch on him but I would rather push and vote for a lynch on one of my three stronger scumreads (D&A, Karnos, and BNL). Of these, D&A and BNL would be preferable lynches to Murdercat.
What I don't like about lynching Murdercat is that most people are actually pushing for the wrong reasons. If Murdercar is a strong scumread, by all means vote. If not, vote for a strong scumread.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Yup! My QuickTopic with him!In post 421, BNL wrote: First, karnos says that he voted BTD for reactions (from potential hammerers and BTD himself), then he says it was because he wanted to follow you. Are you seeing something that I am not?-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Yeah I don't think Murder is scum anymore. So day 2 I'll be voting with D&A for BNL most likely and trying to make that case when there's more time to do so.In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8021603#p8021603]post 447[/url], ReallySick wrote:
You're not crediting me enough. The first post was debunking argument, then the second two are original argument (by my standard. No one had talked about the 2 types of player right. Everyone was "why the hell you let loose the pressure.")In post 425, BNL wrote:So reading again. I don't like how Realeo is townreading Murdercat by discrediting scumpoints rather than making a towncase. This is because this could be scum defending their buddy.
I have question for everyone. A number of people went "Yash! We got 2 werewolf for the price of 1!" (referring to BTD and MURDERCAT)
What happen if MURDERCAT flips town? Are you going to just whack BTD or what?
PS: We have 1 day left. Start voting even though you're not sure.
~Realeo-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Yeah still backreading since I just woke but speculating whether scum have rolecop.In post 482, BNL wrote: I forgot about that investigatives were broken with the QTs, and it has nothing to do with the Nightless part. (Jae you remember when you were a follower in the fallout shelter?)-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
But did his scumbuddy? They have daychat.In post 490, ReallySick wrote:About BTD, the question we have to answer is:
1) Did BTD figured out that the hammer is fake?
2) If no, did he troll as a maf?
~Realeo
I am convinced that neither me, MURDERCAT, ChipButty realized it--but BTD? I am more inclined to not either.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Actually, I think I believe the claim on reread. My original thought was that a scumbuddy coached him to claim seer knowing that it wasn't a hammer, but I didn't check the timestamps. Plus there's the cop/seer thing that he wouldn't have messed up if he was told to claim seer.
He's scummy as f but I do tend to read him as a scummy when spectating games regardless of his alignment. The claim looks genuine now that I've had time to cool off the "nah he's too scummy for it to be true" mindset.
For the record, when I read his claim I considered softing to push the lynch through as well since I didn't believe it. So if D&A happen to be scum then nahdia has the same scum mindset as my town one. Hence why I think they're town.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Yeah that was unfortunate. I should have paid more attention to the thread before the flip. Would have been nice to clarify some things with BNL before it, if only to get that little bit extra of information from him.
Still townreading Charl and D&A, for the record.
I'll go over more of this game over the weekend hopefully. Need to re-evaluate things with the flip.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
What do you propose we do if the response is "No result"?
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
See it's stuff like this that makes me think you could be scum. I remember having a really strong town read on you comparable to my read on Charl though so I need to do that review.In post 581, karnos wrote: But I still think D&A is the scum, and JaeReed is the scum partner. Just some strong tells that I would never expect to see from a town player.
I'm thinking there is a decent chance Murder is town. BTD could flip either way but there's no way he's actually a PR I think. Other than that, need to do my reread and throw things into the thread.
For anyone wondering about my paranoia here, in my room with Karnos last night it sounded like gloating scum. The very first thing was a comment on BNL flipping what he said he'd flip, basically.
So I'm going to be looking at BNL's last thoughts regarding his wagon, the way it came about as a counter to Murder and where the resistances for it were, whether they seem natural or unnatural. I'm going to be looking at Murder coming about as a counter to BTD, BTD's claim, who believed him and who did not. Who stopped pushing him and who kept doing it. Whether it reads as natural or unnatural. Highly encourage others to do the same, since I don't really know enough about wagon analysis.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
I told him not to vote D&A. My read on her is equivalent to Innocent Child to me. I'd imagine that's what the blackmailed not to part was about, because I told him I want my strongest town read alive.In post 585, Chip Butty wrote:In post 515, Charloux wrote:I know i don't have the right to say this based on my activity but,why on earth are you guessing the game setup 12 hours before the deadline?!
If you can't decide who to lynch, then just go to random.org or something. The only ones who have a clue of the setup are PR's(If any) and scum. So i can only see scum gaining from mere speculations.
We have no claimed Seer, so lynching town delibaretly is a bad idea if you ask me.
VOTE: Karnos
Since i didn't even analyze the game properly i just decided to vote for someone i don't mind not seeing tomorrow. My first choice would be D&A, butsince SOMEONE blackmailed me not to(You know who you are!) i will just go with this.
Explain the bits in red, please.In post 517, Charloux wrote:What misrepresentation? I never linked that statement to you!
Basically you are scumlean at worst ,but i have reasons not to vote for anybody else.
The top bit is him saying deliberately lynching town is a bad idea. I agree. He misunderstood that we were looking for the 2nd scum rather than deliberately avoiding scum to avoid the venge on BTD if he was indeed the seer. (He's not the seer, though)
He has reasons not to vote for anybody else = townreads or claims. It all seems pretty straightforward to me aside from the blackmail comment. Which is directly correlated to our chat in our room.
In other news:
VOTE: ReallySick
If there's scum on BNL's wagon it has to be either him or Murder. Since I'm thinking Murder's more likely town than not from the innocent way he reacted to his own wagon (the fact that he thought the lynch was to avoid the vengekills and so purposely on town) this is where I'm voting for now.
Last time I sheeped BNL good things happened. He repeatedly said he thinks the scum on his wagon is RS, and his gut reads are pretty good. I am also willing to vote Karnos, who was his first scumread for the reasons he stated that I also saw as suspicious. The avoidance of the BNL wagon was very deliberate imo and BNL hadn't done much to appear as town.
I am pretty sure this is game solved, if I'm being honest. At least one of Karnos/RS are scum, if not both. If my reread gives me an undeniably strong townread/scumread then that vote can change, of course.
Thoughts from Chip, Charl, Nahdia, Murder?-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Yes, and considering I was thinking of doing theIn post 616, karnos wrote:
Gloating town and gloating scum sound pretty similar, the difference is town doesn't care about his gloating being revealed.In post 584, JaeReed wrote: For anyone wondering about my paranoia here, in my room with Karnos last night it sounded like gloating scum. The very first thing was a comment on BNL flipping what he said he'd flip, basically.
Your buddy, who you are calling an innocent child, LIED to try to get BTD lynched. That is how positive she was that BTD was scum. Yet a little bit latter she was happy to jump wagons to BNL, and lynch him, with basically no case at all.
That is pure scum motivation. I was pretty sure you were her partner, as it's the only think that made sense of your silly "innocent child" claim, but maybe just maybe you had the wool pulled completely over your eyes. Either way, D&A is scum. With murdercat, as it may be.exact same thingat the time I was reading BTD's claim because I didn't buy it for a second, she's town for it. BNL did not look town. His lynch was mostly my fault in the end because I went with her read on him after I wasn't so sure on Murder anymore. If I'd set up a topic with him beforehand things might have been different, but I didn't. There was a case on BNL. Just because you didn't see it didn't mean there was no reason we were lynching him.
D&A is not scum, because I did not get a scum aligned role PM. Simple as that. There's a reason I waited for everyone to post before I did on D1. D&A's thought process lines up almost completely with my own. Which means she is the same alignment as I am. Guaranteed.
And yes, we pretty much unanimously agreed as town to not lynch BTD yesterday so of course she's going to move on to her next scumread.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
All of her posts convinced me. She's not scum.In post 619, karnos wrote:
Why? Can you share the exact read? What post of D&A's convinced you, not that she is merely town, but that she is absolutely confirmed town with no possibility of you being wrong?In post 586, JaeReed wrote: I told him not to vote D&A. My read on her is equivalent to Innocent Child to me. I'd imagine that's what the blackmailed not to part was about, because I told him I want my strongest town read alive.
And, really, the weird thing to me is that you claimed this in a topic as early as 7pm EST on June 15th. But then on June 16th at 6:40 pm, you told me you don't share a whisper topic with D&A. Whoa, huge red flag. You honestly expect me to believe that up until that point, you were perfectly happy to share your theories and bounce ideas off me, instead of someone you said was essentially mod-confirmed town to you?
That made no sense to me whatsoever.
Didn't need a topic to know she's town. The early topic with you was because I was having trouble sorting you. Questioning you and bouncing ideas around helps to get more info to sort you with. Early topic with Charl was for trying to game solve with a townread (which I requested in RVS before D&A even posted).-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Your reaction to your wagon yesterday and to the guilty read as town to me.In post 606, MURDERCAT wrote:What the fuck JR, he just claimed a guilty and you think he is VT?-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Not necessarily.In post 613, Charloux wrote: Also, i find this situation with BTD and Murder kinda sad. If he is guilty then we got scum, if he is town then BTD is scum, no?
"Well this is shocking" does not read as a genuine reaction to me. Also as far as the latter bit, I was pretty sure we hadn't agreed on any such thing considering we didn't know whether to believe the claim. So you're reaching. In a big way.In post 614, karnos wrote:Well this is shocking, I was pretty sure about my suspected scum team, apparently I made a mistake. Of course BTD could be scum lying, but in retrospect there is this:
WTF was this?
Murdercat, are you going to pretend you had no idea about the no-vote strategy? Start of the day, immediately places a vote, so we can't attempt a non-vote no-lynch day to let the "seer" work a little?
Dumb town, or scum just coming out as scum in the most obvious way? I don't know.
We lynch murdercat, if he comes back town we lynch BTD tomorrow. I'm not going to vote immediately, I want to see some discussion regarding the above.
The very last paragraph? That's not happening.
Also not happening. This is also the wrong conclusion to reach from that response.In post 620, karnos wrote:
Scum, or town that likes to lynch fellow town. Either way you need to by lynched after murdercat.
You're the one currently being bad if you're town, and you need to stop with the tunneling based off weak reasonings if you're town. You literally said to me that BNL couldn't be BTD's partner because scum wouldn't associate so openly, and then not long after start saying I'm scum with D&A when I've drawn such strong associates there that it could never be the case.In post 622, karnos wrote:
If you are town motivated, then you are just bad.In post 621, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote:The fact that you still can't see the town motivation in my play is seriously confounding. It's like your a little child, covering their ears and closing their eyes and screaming "LALALALALALA" when the blatant fact that I'm town is presented to you.
After we lynch your partner murdercat, you are next.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Is that the argument pointed out earlier in the thread? I addressed that. My topic with Charloux was because I wanted a topic with a townread. My townread of Charl started as early as his confirmation. Plus I was purposely withholding saying anything in thread until everyone had posted at least once and I had my initial reads. I needed /someone/ to talk toIn post 632, ReallySick wrote: And I want to address one extra reasoning that has something to do with the drama we had today: D&A fosing me over the whisper.
As hinted above, I exchange a lot with Karnos. Karnos pointed out a good argument about JaeReed being scum. This has something to do with JaeReed whispering D&A (I will give more detail later on) which is why I must ask D&A about JaeReed. But this is where it raised my alarm. He gave me argument about JaeReed being scum--but he is advocating a D&A lynch (I will explain more detail later on. I really need sleep)
~Realeo
I got a topic with Karnos because I can't read him. Figured that might make it easier to read him + he was complaining about people not talking in the main thread so I assumed he didn't have a topic with anyone. In Fractals I was pretty lost without a topic but once I got one with BNL it helped a LOT so I thought that may be the issue Karnos was having.
Out of the early RS/Chip deal, Chip comes out looking a lot better than RS. I can see Sick's point that Chip isn't playing to his town meta though, and it's continuing to bug me even now. That said, he came up with the breaking strategy where we no lynch and let the seer work, which, regardless of whether we're believing BTD's claim and result, is a strategy that could only have town motivation, I think.
The BNL lynch was absolute garbage in hindsight. His early stuff was just flat town and I got too paranoid over him believing the claim and ended up dropping my initial townread because of it. That was entirely my fault for not getting a topic with him early on like I tossed up doing due to paranoia of his scumgame and him potentially manipulating me.
I think I'm townreading Karnos again though. On review I actually think a lot of his stuff is just town. The issue I'm having is that I am literally townreading everyone. Which is less than ideal, obviously.
Murder looked really innocently town regarding his wagon yesterday, in a way that I'm thinking he probably is actually just town. I just don't know where to look from here. Maybe now that my romantic interest is asleep I can actually reread the game.
UNVOTE:
P-Edit: Ranger your nerdiness showed It's ok though I still think you're cool <3
Pfft, I've only watched the film...fifteen, sixteen times or so. It's not like that's anything unusual.Last edited by Ranger on Sun Jun 26, 2016 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
That's the argument from earlier I was talking about. Saw no need to whisper someone who had the same thoughts as I did that early on. I did end up getting a room with them later in the day.In post 641, ReallySick wrote:
No, it's a different argument.Is that the argument pointed out earlier in the thread? I addressed that.
So this is basically Karnos' argument:
Premise 1 : JaeReed townread D&A
Premise 2 : We expect town to whisper their townread
Premise 3 : According to JaeReed + Karnos whisper, JaeReed didn't whisper D&A
Conclusion: Therefore JaeReed is scum.
He claimed to have 5 topics.Figured that might make it easier to read him + he was complaining about people not talking in the main thread so I assumed he didn't have a topic with anyone.
Thing is, a strong townread on someone based off "I know my alignment and they are saying almost the exact same thing as I would be" hardly amounts to me & that person scum team. At most it amounts to me being scum buddying town. The associates Karnos is drawing from are lazy as and go against what he said earlier.
I feel like Karnos is more along the lines of town thought.
As for the topics thing, that was my own assumption. I never asked him how many topics he had.
P-Edit: Chip is town I think. Does Sick need a case?-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
As far as my read on Chip... It's coming. As far as BTD, yeah I'm thinking the claim was fake and therefore the guilty is fake. Plus I was townreading Murder due to the way he reacted to his wagon D1. Just wasn't a scummy way to react to your own wagon.In post 650, Charloux wrote:
Sad, as in nobody even cares for BTD. Nobody is voting for Murder and nobody is scumreading BTD because they think he is faking it. Just flat out ignored.In post 623, Chip Butty wrote:
Why sad? It's good for Town to finger scum, no?In post 613, Charloux wrote: Also, i find this situation with BTD and Murder kinda sad. If he is guilty then we got scum, if he is town then BTD is scum, no?
@Jae: For a drunkard you sure like wallposts Jae. And it's part 1?! And since you drink every day a bit of warning: Alcohol kills nerve cells. I don't know if you have these people there, but there are a couple of local legends here that act like they are drunk even when they aren't. The thing they all have in common is that they used to drink too much. And i wonder what will be the the turning point of your read on Chip, so far it's null-scum?
And I have studied the effects of alcohol on the brain. It's part of the intro to psychology. At least I don't inject adrenaline on a dare and potentially stress my heart for a stupid as fuck reason. You have no right to take the moral high ground with me, dude.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
This. BTD can be scum or town.In post 662, ReallySick wrote:So? He is claiming a guilty on you has equal power with claiming a innocent on you or even claiming roleblocked. A VT claimed Cop is a VT gambit--it doesn't matter the report. This maybe counter-intuitive but it is the truth.
He can be scum, VT gambiting scum on your, or real cop checking you.
Trust me that 100% understand you--if you're town--I have been on the giving end and the receiving end.
~Realeo
I do not believe BTD's claim and I do not believe his claim of having a result.
This means he could be seer with a no result, seer with a guilty, VT guessing at a result he's confident on (think what pisskop has been known to do) to try to get that lynched to save his own bacon, or I don't really fucken know. Charl knows more about fakeclaiming than I do considering he was the one that fakeclaimed JK and ended up moving the lynch line along to the doctor in Trees so that both our goddamn PRs got outted. Yes, I'm still pissed about that.
Anyway, there are situations in which neither BTD nor Murder are scum. I'm townreading Murder but am still unsure on BTD. The fact that Murder is acting like a goddamn Jester doesn't help me sort shit. Everything has been complicated needlessly because I have to sort if the seer claim is scum or dumb town.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Because he looked scummy as fuck on D1 and people didn't believe his claim even then. He was told to have a guilty basically by D&A and he conveniently comes back D2 with a guilty... On someone who reacted so innocently town to his wagon D1 (the whole "oh so we're lynching town to avoid the vengekill" assumption on your behalf) that there's no way it could be scum.In post 665, MURDERCAT wrote:As for BTD, I don't see why people are even thinking about the possibility that they could be a gambitting VT. Like where is this coming from? He claimed cop and has a guilty on me.
If I hadn't experienced town fake claiming before I wouldn't even be questioning this and would be trying to drive home a BTD lynch right now. This is fucking with my head and I feel like I'm being manipulated seven ways to Sunday and I don't know who by or whether it's for scum or town reasonings.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
I doubt it. Purely because I know what it's like to be a PR in this kind of setup. I was Follower with Get A Room mechanics in my first exposure to this mechanic.In post 668, ReallySick wrote:Time to spill the bean.
I'm the seer. Me and BTD have been roleswapping.
~Realeo
I outted to my rooms and townreads only (along with an accidental outing to Postie which in turn her reaction was so town that she became my top townread). I did not ever under any circumstances out in the main thread.
But alright. You're claiming seer. Are you saying that you have a guilty on Murder? If you do, we should be looking for a partner. Murder is acting like a jester though in that he wants to be lynched. If he's scum I don't think it's wise to allow him his 2 vengekills before we sus out his partner.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
If you were seer with any result it would be more believable than BTD's claim.In post 671, ReallySick wrote:
Let us do the math.If you do, we should be looking for a partner. Murder is acting like a jester though in that he wants to be lynched. If he's scum I don't think it's wise to allow him his 2 vengekills before we sus out his partner
If I have Murdercat guilty and I tell that I have guilty report: there'll be people who question my report and insist on me not being cop
If I have Murdercat innocent and I tell that I have innocent report: there'll be people who question my report and insist on me not being cop
It's a lose-lose. I am100% goingto out it later, but it's the best of interest for us to be not biased. The reason that I'm telling that I am the cop is Murdercat is tunneling on BTD and that's like not productive like hell.
It is possible that I erred and BTD is scum--but at least ditch away the gambit reasoning.
~Realeo
The thing is if you have a result on Murder and you were relying on BTD you needed to make sure he followed through on securing the lynch through QTs.
Hell, here. http://pnewman.net/shelter/viewtopic.ph ... &start=825
That's the game I was Follower in with Get A Room mechanic shortly after the site went down a while back. (Also, that's where to go if the site goes down again!) That's how a newb!PR acts from my own experience. BTD would not have claimed in the main thread. He would have claimed in various quicktopics with people he townread that were on his wagon.
As far as you? I have no idea. I'm willing to believe a guilty from you, though. The thing is, I still think Murder is not the lynch for today. Instead of trying to prove his own innocence he's begging to go into a 1v1 (before it seemed to me like he was just begging to be lynched but he seems to claim that's not the case). If you truly have a guilty on Murder then you'll want to find his scumbuddy so that when you get venged it won't matter because we already have the guilty.
So, do you have a result on Murdercat or not? Is that result a guilty or innocent? If it's a guilty then I'll just admit I'm shit at reading anyone and vote wherever the majority wants me to. Because I'm townreading Murder right now in a way that I can't see him flipping scum.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
I'm not forgetting.In post 678, MURDERCAT wrote:Is everyone forgetting how scummy BTD looked before his claim?? Are you forgetting that I know he has a fake guilty on me??
However, I want you to look at RS most recent posting, then look at his ISO around the BTD wagon and your wagon. Tell me if that lines up ineven the slightest.
I think I've actually found scum, tbh. I just don't know for sure now that we have two fucking seer claims. One with a guilty and one with an apparentlysuper sekritresult.
Both Realeo and Sick had opinions regarding BTD's seer claim that I don't think could possibly make them Seer.
Gambiting in this manner if you're a VT is anti-town as fuck, guys. Like holy shit. You're muddling shit up more than is necessary. This is not beneficial to town in the slightest.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
BTD would have had topics by the time his wagon was run up. Everyone did. He wouldn't have needed to make a new topic, imo.In post 680, karnos wrote:
Not reading the other game right now, I try to avoid meta-gaming based on other games unless I was personally part of the game.In post 677, JaeReed wrote: That's how a newb!PR acts from my own experience. BTD would not have claimed in the main thread. He would have claimed in various quicktopics with people he townread that were on his wagon.
That said, your claim doesn't make any sense to me. If BTD is a legit seer, he was also legit convinced he was hammered. There is no point in being coy about your role when you are already dead, so he wouldn't out himself in quicktopics, he would just post in the thread, as he did.
Besides that, there is some lag with quicktopics, if you are sitting at L-1 in thread and you don't want to get hammered you might not be willing to wait some time for ranger to log on and see the request for a topic. I think your argument is nonsense.
To be clear: I am not 100% convinced BTD is seer, but the problems I have with his claim are completely different from the nonsense argument you posted above.
I do not think he thought the hammer was legit. You made a huge deal about the whole if you're town don't hammer. There was a lot of discussion because of that. Then you expect him to believe that you hammered after all that? Sure, people forget. But the person put at L1 doesn't forget who put him there, I don't think (never been there so I can't know for sure, just running off basic theory here). Plus there are quicktopics and daychat for scum. The whole thing could have been an elaborate gambit.-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Not a change of heart. It's still anti-town. Town do anti-town shit all the time. I'm not saying she'sIn post 682, karnos wrote:
Jae, yesterday, re: D&A's seer claim gambit:In post 679, JaeReed wrote: Gambiting in this manner if you're a VT is anti-town as fuck, guys. Like holy shit. You're muddling shit up more than is necessary. This is not beneficial to town in the slightest.In post 627, JaeReed wrote: Yes, and considering I was thinking of doing theexact same thingat the time I was reading BTD's claim because I didn't buy it for a second, she's town for it.
Why the change of heart?smartfor pulling that stunt. I am saying I thought of doing the exact same thing because I didn't believe the claim and was even more sure with the claim that we found scum. An investigative is extremely broken with this setup. BNL pointed it out, and if you checked the game I linked you'd know why. Anyone half competent wouldn't have been as obv!PR in the main thread as I was D2, where I essentially said "Hey come to the room I have something super sekrit to tell you and it's obviously not because I'm a PR with a guilty (but totes is and you need to come to the room for me to say it)".-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
See bold and underlined. Myself and D&A thought it was legit. It matters less to us who put BTD at L1 than it matters to BTD who put him at L1.In post 685, karnos wrote:
But you thought D&A legit thought it was a real hammer? I thought you both had the same thinking, and that is why you town read D&A so hard. If they think different from your thinking, maybe you don't share an alignment after all...In post 683, JaeReed wrote: I do not think he thought the hammer was legit. You made a huge deal about the whole if you're town don't hammer. There was a lot of discussion because of that. Then you expect him to believe that you hammered after all that?, I don't think (never been there so I can't know for sure, just running off basic theory here). Plus there are quicktopics and daychat for scum. The whole thing could have been an elaborate gambit.Sure, people forget. But the person put at L1 doesn't forget who put him there-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
I gotta come up with some catchy title? Q.Q I'm no good at titles! MY ONE TRUE WEAKNESS!In post 689, mhsmith0 wrote:@all: please do not use naked spoiler tags.
Code: Select all
[spoiler=blah blah blah]text[/spoiler]
Spoiler: blah blah blah-
-
JaeReed Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: April 3, 2016
Was also told that you knew.In post 700, MURDERCAT wrote:I assume that JR and RS also knew this?