I am currently
However, I may (or may not) switch out my role from the Mystery Box, so I'll update you all if I decide to do that
VOTE: Flames682
L-1
Because for townies with abilities - investigative, protective, roleblock, whatever - that ability is better spent on a person it will actually affect. Any ability spent targeting someone ascetic is a complete waste. It's pro-town to claim and therefore I claim in my first post, and it would be distracting or misleading if I bring it up later towards day end. Nothing would be gained from hiding that I'm currently ascetic.In post 38, NJAC wrote:Why exactly do you think it's a good idea to reveal that info this early?In post 34, GuiltyLion wrote:I am currently ascetic
Partly RVS, partly Meta. Do you think I should vote someone different?In post 35, GuiltyLion wrote:NJAC why are you voting someone who hasn't posted yet
If there's scum on the wagon and Flames is scum, I'd say only for RyanK would this argument be plausible, and even then I'd still look into NJAC or Not_Mafia first.In post 69, Maruchan wrote:I disagree.In post 67, GuiltyLion wrote:On first impression I doubt scum!gigabyte would openly encourage the Flames wagon along in 40, unless he has a history with Flames and Flames is usually mislynchable, but yeh page 2 reads
also if Flames flips scum then I'd say the wagon is very likely all-town
One of the first few voters could have RVS lol!voted for their scumpartner hoping to use it later for vote count analysis or whatever, and been dragged along for the ride without realizing it.
In post 38, NJAC wrote:Why exactly do you think it's a good idea to reveal that info this early?In post 34, GuiltyLion wrote:I am currently ascetic
Partly RVS, partly Meta. Do you think I should vote someone different?In post 35, GuiltyLion wrote:NJAC why are you voting someone who hasn't posted yet
These questions. "Why exactly" is just an altogether scummy phrase in general IMO.In post 42, NJAC wrote:Why exactly is that a terrible idea in this setup?In post 40, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:Scum claiming ascetic is usually a terrible idea whether they are really ascetic or not
Is 5 times not a lot? I haven't actually counted but I feel even just two or three games is enough experience to understand someone's playstyle. Further, I have read several other games he has played.In post 149, RyanK wrote:You have only played with Non_Mafia at the most 5 times. Why did you claim you play with Not_Mafia a lot.In post 100, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm not saying he's definitely scum, he could just be cagey, but he's definitely giving the most scummy pings so far relative to the other posts, especially given a town!Flames
I've played with Not_Mafia a lot. I have experience with him myself. The idea that he'd react in a significant way to a lone RVS vote is a joke.
Look, I can't explain exactly how my gut works, but the way you ask questions reads to me like you're trying to pressure solely for the sake of pressure, making people explain vague things they said rather than actually trying to discern their alignment. It may be playstyle-clash so I will give you some towncred if you are willing to wagon and lynch scum!RyanK with me.In post 151, NJAC wrote:Elaborate how my questions feel "leading". WRT Flames: House voted him based on Flames' RVS vote, I think Flames' response to it was good. I saw nothing scummy from Flames. The way some players were jumping on that wagon seemed opportunistic (e.g.: Ryank's). It was page 2 and I didn't want to put someone at L-1 that early, even more considering that N_M is playing this game.
I was tempted to vote Ryank, but as I said, I wanted to hear more from Expedience. Meanwhile I thought my vote would be fine on N_M.
In post 162, NJAC wrote:Why did you decide to investigate him?In post 157, GuiltyLion wrote:So I was also a neapolitan in addition to being ascetic, which is why I didn't trade the role.
I investigated RyanK and the action failed. I cannot be roleblocked, so I believe he is also ascetic, and he did not claim it.
VOTE: RyanK
I don't investigate scumreads, I presume that they will be lynched without me needing night actions. In regular setups, it's also very awkward if you get a town result on a scumread as a cop to do a complete about-face on them the next day without giving away that you're investigative. So generally I investigate null reads, and in this game I picked RyanK as he had one post, was on a mislynch wagon, and I figured if I got a VT result then I could play it slow and see who tried to push him and whyIn post 163, House wrote:NJAC presented a good question, made me revisit Guilty's ISO where i found this.In post 100, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm not saying he's definitely scum, he could just be cagey, but he's definitely giving the most scummy pings so far relative to the other posts, especially given a town!Flames
I've played with Not_Mafia a lot. I have experience with him myself. The idea that he'd react in a significant way to a lone RVS vote is a joke.
Guilty, why didn't you investigate NJAC if you were suspicious of him?
I also buy itIn post 197, Expedience wrote:Me too.In post 179, House wrote:I can buy that.In post 178, RyanK wrote:I'm not sure if I was ascetic. Here's the situation. I was hated before I changed my role in the night. After I changed my role, I was ascetic.
Wow this is a bad post. House is trying to soft a power role but not actually claim it, to deflect votes off of him without having to commit to a claim ahead of time. The attempt at AtE is pretty visibly fake as well. You get ropeIn post 240, House wrote:House isn't claiming at L-1 with intent, either.
If you people want to derp lynch me, you can learn about my role from the mod because I'm dead anyway so I refuse to reward town after being so stupid.
I'm having second thoughts on scum!NJAC at the moment, and I would quite like for him to powerlynch House with us today. If he avoids the House wagon after his distancing vote then I'd say NJAC-House team would be my pick, mostly because I'm townreading everyone else (especially RyanK and Expedience)In post 272, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:GuiltyLion, if you are the kind of player who cares this early in the gamestate, who's NJAC's partner? Because right now with my reads his partner (Not_Mafia) makes zero sense, but that tends to happen when you use PoE to find partners.
This is a scum vote, here's why:In post 308, House wrote: This bugs me.
You seem to have zero interest in a player's alignment after you decide they are lynch-worthy, but there is also value in stopping mislynches because it narrows the PoE pool while also preventing a possible mislynch which allows you to build a team of confirmed town to take to end game or until you do get your guilty because scum don't kill likely mislynch candidates.
Undermining a lynch wagon on an inno without outing results is doable, and that feels like a scummy copout. Hell, even if you out the results, you can simply change out the role!
On top of that, ascetic is a really poor modifier for town because it prevents any sort of protective role from targeting you and leaves you open to the night kill, yet you are clinging onto it as a prize.
VOTE: GuiltyLion
I don't believe this "result" at all, it's pretty obvious you're flailing now. You opened the day with this post:In post 315, House wrote:I can tell you right now that NJAC is a VT, which is why I've been eyeballing you for a while.
Why would you say that if you got a VT-result on NJAC?In post 144, House wrote:For all intents and purposes, my vote is on NJAC.
I'm not going to get into any more mud-slinging with you. I hope the rest of the town can see for themselves the scumminess and monologic in this post (and the many, many of the others you have made).In post 321, House wrote:You were pushing NJAC for loopy shit, so I wanted to give you a tasty wagon to see if you'd latch on and continue your assault.
There was no way he was getting lynched, though.
Okay I know I just said I wouldn't respond, but I can't resist pointing this out - there's literally no rage in my posts. Further, I gave many legitimate reasons as to why you are obvious scum that have nothing to do with OMGUS. Just to recap:In post 327, House wrote:Lol, typical scum maneuvering... Rage OMGUS once getting called out and pretend to ignore me.
How on Earth is 1) a towntell? 1 is in no way a towntell, it's incredibly scummy. Especially given that House left no discernible crumb or result-soft in his day opening, in fact,In post 336, Expedience wrote:I don't think I can get a read on House, but I've read this over and 3) is the only point that I'm worried by.In post 328, GuiltyLion wrote:Okay I know I just said I wouldn't respond, but I can't resist pointing this out - there's literally no rage in my posts. Further, I gave many legitimate reasons as to why you are obvious scum that have nothing to do with OMGUS. Just to recap:In post 327, House wrote:Lol, typical scum maneuvering... Rage OMGUS once getting called out and pretend to ignore me.
1. When you started getting votes, you softed a valuable PR and also threw up AtE
2. You justified your vote on me with several misreps, particularly "you are clinging to ascetic" when that's bluntly not true. I traded my role already
3. You claiming to have a VT-result on NJAC is not reflected in your ISO from earlier today. It has scum motivation in both trying to save your ass and also creating WIFOM about NJAC's (the other primary scumspect) alignment.
1) is a towntell, 2) seems tenuous and I think House would do that as town
Otherwise, more sure you are town now. Not sure how to read NJAC.
Assuming that House is scum then this line makes Expedience conf-town, he's talking to Expedience as if he already knows Expedience is townIn post 359, House wrote:You wanna mislynch me because I'm not a proper little stereotypical townie? Whatever. But Expedience, you should know damned well there's nothing typical about my town game so you just have yourself to blame.
can you just read House's + my postsIn post 393, Not_Mafia wrote:What is the case on House, Neapolitan is often confused with vanilla cop, I modded a normal centerwd around it and everyone got it confused
In post 402, Expedience wrote: But your explanation in 356 isn't consistent with that.
In 356: "I thought neapolitan was a vanilla cop because I didn't realize goons counted as vanilla"
In 209: "neapolitan is vanilla cop because neapolitan checks if someone is vanilla and goons are also vanilla"
here's yet another reason why House is scum (and Expedience consequently conftown) - he's calling Expedience a "liar" in this post, but he also constantly speaks to Expedience as if Expedience is town, he's repeatedly referred to how strongly he's townreading Expedience. If House truly believed Expedience is town then House would not assume Expedience is lying in any of his posts. Townies don't immediately discredit and accuse their townreads of misleading behavior.In post 403, House wrote:356. Liar.In post 356, House wrote:Check my games. I've never been Neapolitan OR a role cop. I thought "Vanilla" meant "Vanilla Town".In post 354, Expedience wrote:He's given two contradictory explanations for his behavior. Even if he was telling the truth about "lel i voted my clear for reactions", he can't simultaneously have gotten a "vanilla" (instead of "VT") result on NJAC.
Then i realized that goons were vanilla mafia.
For Jesus' sake, my confusion isn't that hard to follow.
I think it's either NJAC or Gigabyte, I'm currently leaning gigabyte and would lynch him today because I do find his hard-defense of House to be pretty suspect and forced. I feel in his defense of House he is set against the conclusion of my (and your) arguments about scum!House first, and then justifying his conclusion after it's made.In post 427, Expedience wrote:Guilty, you didn't seem concerned with or even acknowledged my unvote. Who do you think is scum with House?
I've mostly focused on the objective aspects of House's claim and explanations given for his behavior because I find it impossible to tell whether or not his confidence levels are genuine. The "liar" thing is something that I don't find alignment indicative because of this. He discredits people like that all the time as either alignment I think. I can understand your desire to lynch House and it looks mostly town to me.
I dropped my push on you and looked elsewhere today - how was my twilight action trying to set up a mislynch if I stopped following through on it? I was giving reads and trying to create content because we had such a quick lynch, and actually managed to sort Maruchan correctly out of it.In post 434, NJAC wrote:I ISOed Guilty and I'm definitely not a fan of his posts.
His early push on me D1 seems forced. He tried to set up a mislynch on me during twilight. He never adressed my defense on his accusations. He doesn't seem interested in determining my alignment but in throwing shade on me.
To respond to your earlier point, here what you call vote-manipulating is me trying to sort your alignment. I liked it when you voted House and I hated it when you unvoted. What do you think about my case/points about House? I'd like you to address those.In post 434, NJAC wrote:He has tried to manipulate my vote:In post 161, GuiltyLion wrote:I will give you some towncred if you are willing to wagon and lynch scum!RyanK with me.In post 314, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm having second thoughts on scum!NJAC at the moment, and I would quite like for him to powerlynch House with us today. If he avoids the House wagon after his distancing vote then I'd say NJAC-House team would be my pick
You could be! Because I'm town, so you're currently pushing a mislynch, and you're also ignoring a case I feel is on pretty obvious scum. If you have a nullread on House, why aren't you talking to him?In post 434, NJAC wrote:@Guilty, same question I asked to Expedience: am I scum for not having the same reads you have?
My push on RyanK was a reaction test to follow up from my night action. I feel RyanK has since been town and I dropped it pretty immediately. Calling that a "mislynch attempt" is weak.In post 434, NJAC wrote:Pushes on Ryank and House seem also mislynch attempts.
This is a stupid question and I'm not sure why you're insisting on following up on it, but at the time I felt Flames was overexplaining his vote by saying he turned off auto-correct and engaging in an argument about why he could have copy/pasted. It just didn't seem like something town should (or would) concern themselves with. 23 is also a WIFOMy post about getting lynched and I always see scum!motivation in that.In post 430, NJAC wrote:@GuiltyLion: You ignored some questions I made to you. Please answer:
In post 164, NJAC wrote:Better question:What about Flames' response to House was good? And again, you're saying your vote was "fine" but that's not an argument that it would help game-solve.what about Flames' response was scummy in your eyes?I saw a natural response to explain an RVS vote, and to deal with House's pressure.
What do you want me to elaborate? I still find your posting obnoxiously leading, and your reads bad. You ignore commenting on things I think should be central topics of discussion, and you push on stuff that I find rather useless in determining alignment. Not hard scumtells, but definitely not towntells either.In post 223, NJAC wrote:Please elaborate.In post 208, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm finding House's D2 play to be vaguely scummy, and NJAC scummier still
VOTE: NJAC
One other point with respect to this - if House is town, then who's scum? It's not me, we would both agree it's not you, I strongly doubt RyanK with how he responded to my initial vote/push today, which leaves {GB, NJAC, N_M}. I believe if scumteam was 2 of those 3 then at least one of them would be capitalizing on an easy House mislynch, but instead I feel like I have to put in tons of effort to get this obvscum lynched. All three of them are ignoring the case/wagon on House (again - ignoring the neapolitan claim completely, he's still scummy as fuck -In post 427, Expedience wrote:Guilty, you didn't seem concerned with or even acknowledged my unvote. Who do you think is scum with House?
I've mostly focused on the objective aspects of House's claim and explanations given for his behavior because I find it impossible to tell whether or not his confidence levels are genuine. The "liar" thing is something that I don't find alignment indicative because of this. He discredits people like that all the time as either alignment I think. I can understand your desire to lynch House and it looks mostly town to me.
and again, if House is really a town neapolitan, he made this post without ever having crumbed his result on NJAC. He's implying he is important, yet simultaneously refusing to give useful information to town.In post 240, House wrote:House isn't claiming at L-1 with intent, either.
If you people want to derp lynch me, you can learn about my role from the mod because I'm dead anyway so I refuse to reward town after being so stupid.
Sorry yes, I agree if you are town it's not stupid per se, I just think it's silly because Flames already flipped town and so any explanation I give for scumreading him is going to be biased by that fact, and unfortunately the day happened so quickly that I didn't express my reasons prior to the lynch. When I respond, you're working with stale/manipulatable info regardless of my alignment - like, I'm town in this instance, but if I were scum it'd be easy to make up some crap as a response as to why I was scumreading Flames after-the-fact.In post 442, NJAC wrote:It's not a stupid question. You helped to mislynch the guy. I'm assuming there was at least one scum on that wagon.In post 439, GuiltyLion wrote:This is a stupid question and I'm not sure why you're insisting on following up on it, but at the time I felt Flames was overexplaining his vote by saying he turned off auto-correct and engaging in an argument about why he could have copy/pasted. It just didn't seem like something town should (or would) concern themselves with. 23 is also a WIFOMy post about getting lynched and I always see scum!motivation in that.
I have more questions, btw:
1) Who are your town reads and why?
2) You criticized my vote on N_M. How are you planning to determine his alignment?
I was mostly joking/being cheeky, but the point was that if Flames was scum, then I would be hypothetically townslipping by assuming that he was telling the truth about being town. Which is why scum don't usually pretend to be town in twilight, it just creates more chances for townies to obvtown themselves and their partners - if they choose to post in twilight - have to conceal that they know the flipped person is still lying.In post 373, RyanK wrote:What do you mean?In post 85, GuiltyLion wrote:...
@Maruchan - I doubt lynched scum would have claimed they were town. I mean this could just be WIFOM twilight trolling, but I think it'd be really disadvantageous for scum!Flames to twilight post as if he were town, because if he flips scum thenI've indisputably townslipped
Hearing that he was banned for abusive behavior does make me think the aggressive arguing with me may be more a playstyle tell than an alignment tell, but I still have fundamental problems with his original push on me and the fact that he didn't crumb any NJAC result until wagoned.In post 444, NJAC wrote:I admit you have some valid points against House, but I also think it could be a problem with his play style.
I believe to be a scumslip. I'm not moving my vote today.In post 168, House wrote:Why does getting "Vanilla/Not Vanilla" results as well as being untargetable for anything except kills make it a desirable role?
You're a sitting duck for the night kill, and your results don't serve any realistic purpose in a role madness game.
I could just see myself as town in your shoes making that post. Like, I don't agree with you re: NJAC/House being the only House scumteam, but if you are convinced of that then everything that follows makes sense re:flipping House and also accepting your own (presumed mis-)lynch if House flips scum. It makes you far less likely to be a House scumbuddy in my mind.
I'm guessing House did figure out that NJAC was a VT somehow, and thought that "clearing" NJAC would give him enough towncred to survive today. I also don't think NJAC was very likely to be lynched at the time of House's 315 - I had already moved my vote to House and I don't think most other people were expressing a firm desire to lynch NJAC. He had zero votes at the time.In post 484, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:and can you talk to me about why scum!House derails town!NJAC's mislynch?
This catchup, again, looks transparently scummy to me. Like I know I'm already sold on scum!House but here are my problems with it:In post 487, Vaxkiller wrote:It took some time to catch up. I'm just going to post some thoughts here as I read through.
Why in the world did the scum kill the derp voter, seemed like a valuable asset for them. I was planning on voting him until I read he was NK'd.
I played my first game with RyanK (I think it was his 1st or 2nd) and he is playing pretty similar. (lots of votes, and randomness)
Can anyone read not-mafia? He has posted so little. All one sentences. Here is his only contribution longer than that: 393
People always tell me posting frequency is not alignment indicative, but I always look into players who post infrequently and too much. Not mafia and my slot comes to mind.
First I asked myself, Vaxkiller, are you scum? I replied, "of course not, you are a good person"! Now to look into Not-mafia more.
There is literally nothing there. (On a side note, is posting "ego" some sort of meme on this site?)
House already claimed Neapolitan, what makes you think I would claim differently.
Ryan, voting a no lynch is a terrible idea. We only get 2 more miss-lynches before we lose and voting no-lynch would count as such.
Since the only person lurking cant really be analysed at all, I also like to look at the middle of wagons (I would have been all over that accidental hammer (to me there are no accidents), but he actually turned out town.)
So gigabyte,Ryan, and guilty are in what I like to call the scum sweet spot (middle of the wagon). Ryan I believe is town, but I'm going to go through gigabytes and guilty's iso's now.
is this a "too scummy to be scum" argument? Does it look like good town play?In post 500, NJAC wrote:Well, I said before that House has to be town, because him claiming VT on me doesn't look like good scum play.
Is "the way you ask questions reads to me like you're trying to pressure solely for the sake of pressure, making people explain vague things they said rather than actually trying to discern their alignment." not sufficient explanation? You're just jumping on the phrase "gut" without actually interacting with what I said.In post 528, Vaxkiller wrote:I hate gut reads. If you can't explain it, it's not really there. I always say scum are full of guts.In post 161, GuiltyLion wrote:Look, I can't explain exactly how my gut works, but the way you ask questions reads to me like you're trying to pressure solely for the sake of pressure, making people explain vague things they said rather than actually trying to discern their alignment.
I already explained why it was scummy when House was trying to pin me for some kind of scum!motivation in who I chose to investigate, you're doing the same thing here. Are you accusing me of lying about why I chose to investigate RyanK? If so, why did scum!me choose to lie about RyanK in the way that I did, and why did scum!me make up these reasons to justify my investigation? And how would scum!me have known for certain that he was ascetic?In post 528, Vaxkiller wrote:If you're town you really shouldn't be so worried about how things look.In post 206, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't investigate scumreads, I presume that they will be lynched without me needing night actions. In regular setups, it's also very awkward if you get a town result on a scumread as a cop to do a complete about-face on them the next day without giving away that you're investigative. So generally I investigate null reads, and in this game I picked RyanK as he had one post, was on a mislynch wagon, and I figured if I got a VT result then I could play it slow and see who tried to push him and why
Vax is projecting in this post. What Vaxkiller doesn't acknowledge is that I made my 503 well before the GB counterwagon kicked off, and have maintained that his slot is scum LONG before I pointed out what was scummy about his catchup. Also he then afterwards says this referring to GB:In post 528, Vaxkiller wrote: How else should a catch up post look? I'm entering the game as a new player with a new and different view on the game. I feel like this scum setup post for tomorrow, so he has something to refer to right off the bat (about Vaxkiller)
which would completely invalidate his point about me "setting him up" for tomorrow - you can't say that GB is scum but I was simultaneously crafting a plan to push you the next day, yet we were not scum together. That's not coherent reasoning, you just had to dress up your hammer as if you actually believed GB was scum.In post 528, Vaxkiller wrote: I think he listed guilty as a scum read in preparation to vote for him, but then changed his mind because he could just steal some flimsy reasoning for voting me instead (really just someone elses reasoning he has been conveniently ignoring all this time, he even admits to it) The guiltylion town to scum to town isn't even explained. I think this makes guilty town when giga flips scum, I can't see a giga-guilty scum team.