this is some good stuff... sorry i havent gotten an avatar yetIn post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:dont get offended by th
Newbie 1979 | Good Jams | (Game Over)
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
I agree with most of this post aside from luca being inno.In post 41, insomnia wrote:ctually read it fairly towni-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Yes i got a few reactions that gave me some inklings about who might be town. Did not serve up any info on who might be mafia.In post 149, dawoodle wrote:Ima, #107, do you feel like you got any informative reactions from it?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Im assuming it was a read derived from djstr's post on the end of page 1.In post 160, dawoodle wrote:Bumping this because it is a fair question considering that Luca had posted twice at this point.
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
i think its pretty clear where that assumption could come from. If its a good read or not isnt what we are talking about.In post 162, dawoodle wrote:What about that post indicates that they're not partners though?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
yes i would like you to go into more detail about Luca leaning scum and why dsjstr is suspect.In post 181, dawoodle wrote:
I think at least one of Blatant and Billy are scum. Dsjstr is suspect, and Luca is null but leaning scum. I can go into my reasoning if anyone is interested.In post 175, insomnia wrote:So who are the scum for you, dawoodle?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Good pointIn post 190, dsjstr wrote:
It was to get other people to be active, getting someone closer to a lynch allows for the game to progress and for knowledge and information to be shared.In post 184, dawoodle wrote:The interaction around Billy's vote for Blatant was strange. The evolution of explanation for Billy's vote was suspect. On the other hand, since the first day, most of Blatant's posts have either been defensive or just general process. I have not seen what I would consider scum hunting from him and the aggressive push against Billy's vote is one piece of that.
For dsjstr, he put a vote on me to "get some activity" (#77) and in the day since, his only activity has been confirming that it was an L-2 vote (#79) and justifying his lack of posts by saying it was comparable to Ima's number of posts (#122). If he actually wanted some activity, I would expect him to post.
For luca, his lack of activity concerns me. As Billy pointed out, he was supposedly catching up in "a few hours" a day ago, and has been silent ever since. If he starts posting and interacting, I will reevaluate based on his behavior.
Most of these reads are made under the assumption that I am a villager. As a townie, the wolves should be happy that suspicion is on me and would avoid scumhunting for the easy mislynch. Regardless of whether I am town or not though, villagers should still be looking for the second scum which seems to be lacking.
It is D1 still. I dont think i need to know both mafia on day 1 half way through. I absolutely did not BW you. There are two other people in this town with 3 votes on them. I asked you to say stuff earlier, however, all you said was i havent post much more than you. Thats a filler defense imo especially since you have already used it twice in day 1.In post 191, dsjstr wrote:
How would lynching me help town D2? Do you think I am associated with someone? Can you provide some more context to your vote when you wanted to hear more from me then proceeded to not prob me and then immediately jump on the BW to vote for me.In post 189, IMASPY wrote:Actually yea i have committed to it now. VOTE: dsjstr I think if we have to get rid of someone today it should be dsjstr or Luca.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY
-
-
IMASPY
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
In post 188, IMASPY wrote:i havent commited to anything yet because im still waiting for some interaction from luca and dsjstr that isnt filler.
What made you commit to something that 20 minutes ago you weren't willing to commit to?[/quote]In post 189, IMASPY wrote:Actually yea i have committed to it now. VOTE: dsjstr I think if we have to get rid of someone today it should be dsjstr or Luca.
I think what really sent me over was on page 4 when he put dawoodle at L-2 and disguised this by diminishing the post count of everyone by comparing it to the mod. Which made absolutely no sense to me since the mod made 12 post on page 1 before the thread became unlocked.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
how about you come up with real reasons why anyone else is scum... how about you start by telling me why dawoodle is scum? You are voting for him and i have already asked you this question with no answer coming from you. So far you have give 2 easy reactionary reads with no follow up probing of those people you gave those reads on.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
You are fundamentally wrong if you think i am calling you scum just for voting dawoodle. This is now the third time im gonna ask youWHY YOUthink dawoodle is scum. I havent seen any real reasons that i agree with. Can you maybe quote a reason you think i would be convinced by or maybe even just type up a couple loose reasonswhy youthink he is mafia.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Actually the reason i revoted is the same reason im still grilling him. I simply asked him to give a reason why he is voting for dawoodle still after pointing out that his L-2 vote on page 4 was scummy. He has dodged it 2 times so far and i have justed asked him a 3rd time. Its unfair for you to dismiss the possibility that i would have not revoted him if he answered my question.In post 258, Poyzin wrote:
Who are you to be the judge, jury, and executioner? I’m sorry that I don’t have all of the relevant quotes, but you asked dsjstr to defend himself, and then after he does, you decide it isn’t sufficient so you revote. Why would you unvote if you only planned on putting your vote back into dsjstr? I know that you could easily say “I wouldn’t have put my vote back I liked his defense” but that clearly isn’t the case based on this quote. Your vote isn’t worth more than any of the other players, and I’m sure that you didn’t need to unvote to make your point. You really just wanted to leverage your voting power, which as I stated doesn’t account for much.In post 227, IMASPY wrote:So dsjstr i will give you one more chance to defend yourself. Why are you still voting for dawoodle after you voted him to get information out of him? What has dawoodle done or said to convince you he is mafia?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
In post 262, dsjstr wrote:In post 83 insomnia even said he thinks daw should be pushed.
Blatant Scum voted for dawoodle before 2 of these post even happened. RVSIn post 265, dsjstr wrote:Everyone voting for dawoodle is using the same posts I was the last to join the wagon, and my thoughts on him are the same. Try finding better evidence if you are going to tunnel on me.
You voted for dawoodle before the magic post #83.
You have went from voting for dawoodle for more activity to voting for dawoodle because enchantress convinced you he was the most scummy in the 3 post before you voted.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
If you are telling me to stop asking you to have some responsibility as town by trying to find mafia then id rather vote you out. Either you are a town that will not contribute or you are mafia trying to avoid making enemies of too many town.In post 257, dsjstr wrote:
So stop asking.In post 215, dsjstr wrote:I will admit I am struggling to get reads right now so I would not be productive for the town.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
In post 268, dsjstr wrote:I can get reads if you give me time. But I did what you asked why are you selective with what you are saying. Only taking the parts that help your vision. I gave you my reasoning about why daw is scum how can you say I am not trying to help?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Well if town look for scum, not town wouldnt that put dawoodle more on the town side considering he gave 3 scum reads opposed to 2 town reads.In post 274, insomnia wrote:He’s actually gonna get locked if dawoodle flips scum so I don’t want to focus that
I think your attention should be on the two wagons. Dawoodle has done nothing but ask me questions, his town read, and didn’t sort any of the other people.
Town look for scum, not town.
If he says otherwise, refer back to his wall where he gave the equivalent of 3 scum reads in proportion to 2 town reads.
Also dawoodle has not only asked you questions. He ask me questions and he addressed billy in an individual post not connected to you at all.
He has reacted alot to you, but i forgive that since you tunneled so hard in the first 100 post.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Im not clearing dawoodle as town. Infact i gave a list of my sus list and stated i see him as more sus than you. However, i havent see anything from him that has made me think he is scum totally.In post 282, insomnia wrote:And, by the way, me making a read before the 100 post mark doesn't change it's accuracy in any way. You don't need tons of information to find scum. Actually, it was demonstrated that you get more confused when presented with tons of information, rather than with a low amount of information. It helps you keep a clear head.
Scum lynches do exist on day one, town lynches are more likely on day one. But scum lynches also do exist.
Ima and literally everyone that's not voting dawoodle, what reasons do you actually have for defending dawoodle here? Anything deep / nuanced? If you call it a tunnel, prove me wrong and try to work with me. If the only reason you have for not voting him is "insomnia's read was made too early, no way it's scum" then lol you. Not even considering this option as a scum is faulty. Please let me know your concerns about my read, I think it's quite good.
Also, the inconsistency in dawoodle's reactions is also glaring. Remember when I first called him out on his first wall? Read his reaction there and his reaction in this wall and see the difference. He's calming himself down and is trying not to flail. It's just not town consistency.
Again, if your reason for not voting dawoodle is because it was a post-whatever-under-100-read then you're not having an actual town read, you're just doubting my capabilities. If you're doubting them, then read him for yourself and debate with me. Why is he town???
He asked me a question on post #87 and after i answered that he gave me a follow up question in post #149. I am in no way saying that makes him town but you are giving him less credit for his post than i am.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
In post 267, IMASPY wrote:
If you are telling me to stop asking you to have some responsibility as town by trying to find mafia then id rather vote you out. Either you are a town that will not contribute or you are mafia trying to avoid making enemies of too many town.In post 257, dsjstr wrote:
So stop asking.In post 215, dsjstr wrote:I will admit I am struggling to get reads right now so I would not be productive for the town.
If you ask me dsjstr has done far far less inIn post 284, insomnia wrote:
Ok, I misspoke there. What I meant was that, town look for scum, as in they probe their scum reads, as opposed to looking to validate their town read on someone. You don't come back to your most confident town read. You have nothing to sort there. Dawoodle would just keep coming back at me with questions for no reasons, what's he looking to achieve, he already has a scum read on me?In post 276, IMASPY wrote:Well if town look for scum, not town wouldnt that put dawoodle more on the town side considering he gave 3 scum reads opposed to 2 town reads.
This point is in connection with the "asking questions" point thing I made in the massive wall. He's not even ACTUALLY looking for scum which is even worse. Hope you understood what I meant now.actually]/b] looking for scum. I do know what you mean by that last sentence because i just made that case against dsjstr.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
I posted a response to it 12 post later.In post 259, IMASPY wrote:You are fundamentally wrong if you think i am calling you scum just for voting dawoodle. This is now the third time im gonna ask youWHY YOUthink dawoodle is scum. I havent seen any real reasons that i agree with. Can you maybe quote a reason you think i would be convinced by or maybe even just type up a couple loose reasonswhy youthink he is mafia.
Dsjstr response to this post was quoting 4 post from you. And used those 4 post to justify his and scums vote on dawoodle. Two post were done after Blatent Scum voted for activity. One post was done after dsjstr voted dawoodle for activity.
However 100 post later dsjstr uses these 4 post to claim those are the reasons for believing dawoodle is mafia.
If that is the case why didnt dsjstr use one of those post as a reason for voting dawoodle at the time?
Probably because i pushed him for reasons and since you are the only one 100% convinced dawoodle is mafia you are the only person he can quote with scum reads on dawoodle.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Man its pretty dangerous claiming proof of someones inner thoughts with something so flimsy.In post 290, insomnia wrote:That’s not the answer I was looking for, but here’s why I town read it.
What scum, knowing that he’s voting a town, would ever use that excuse in order to call someone else out?
It proves two things, one, he actually believes that dawoodle is scum, even if it’s based on my reasoning
And two, he doesn’t have TMI on dawoodle.
Its weird to me now that you are trying to clear dsjstr to me as town after your whole town reads scum, not town post.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
\In post 258, Poyzin wrote:
Who are you to be the judge, jury, and executioner? I’m sorry that I don’t have all of the relevant quotes, but you asked dsjstr to defend himself, and then after he does, you decide it isn’t sufficient so you revote. Why would you unvote if you only planned on putting your vote back into dsjstr? I know that you could easily say “I wouldn’t have put my vote back I liked his defense” but that clearly isn’t the case based on this quote. Your vote isn’t worth more than any of the other players, and I’m sure that you didn’t need to unvote to make your point. You really just wanted to leverage your voting power, which as I stated doesn’t account for much.In post 227, IMASPY wrote:So dsjstr i will give you one more chance to defend yourself. Why are you still voting for dawoodle after you voted him to get information out of him? What has dawoodle done or said to convince you he is mafia?
I am all three in this game.... that is exactly what this game is... all townies are all three of those things. I have already replied to this post, but I was looking through poyzins post and i forgot to make this point the first time.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
weird how you ignore my very first sentence in this post when you were setting up your quotesIn post 285, IMASPY wrote:
Im not clearing dawoodle as town. Infact i gave a list of my sus list and stated i see him as more sus than you. However, i havent see anything from him that has made me think he is scum totally.In post 282, insomnia wrote:And, by the way, me making a read before the 100 post mark doesn't change it's accuracy in any way. You don't need tons of information to find scum. Actually, it was demonstrated that you get more confused when presented with tons of information, rather than with a low amount of information. It helps you keep a clear head.
Scum lynches do exist on day one, town lynches are more likely on day one. But scum lynches also do exist.
Ima and literally everyone that's not voting dawoodle, what reasons do you actually have for defending dawoodle here? Anything deep / nuanced? If you call it a tunnel, prove me wrong and try to work with me. If the only reason you have for not voting him is "insomnia's read was made too early, no way it's scum" then lol you. Not even considering this option as a scum is faulty. Please let me know your concerns about my read, I think it's quite good.
Also, the inconsistency in dawoodle's reactions is also glaring. Remember when I first called him out on his first wall? Read his reaction there and his reaction in this wall and see the difference. He's calming himself down and is trying not to flail. It's just not town consistency.
Again, if your reason for not voting dawoodle is because it was a post-whatever-under-100-read then you're not having an actual town read, you're just doubting my capabilities. If you're doubting them, then read him for yourself and debate with me. Why is he town???
He asked me a question on post #87 and after i answered that he gave me a follow up question in post #149. I am in no way saying that makes him town but you are giving him less credit for his post than i am.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Sure, I read Billy Pilgrim as a town late to the party trying to figure everything out.In post 309, dawoodle wrote:
Could you explain your reasoning for this list? The most obvious one is why Billy is at the top while several people, myself included, have pointed out some of his scummy posts. Is your reasoning for the ones near the bottom similar to mine or do you have further insights you would like to add?In post 187, IMASPY wrote:Im starting to see my post are not nearly as long as others so far. Id like to give me sus list from least(top) to most(bot).
Billy Pilgrim
Iconeum
insomnia
dawoodle
Poyzin
Blatant Scum
Luca Blight
dsjstr
Iconeum insomnia and dawoodle were all basically at the same sus level for me at the time. You happened to be at the bottom because of insomnias post about you.
Poyzin has gone lower on my list since this post, however, at the time nor he, luca, or blatant scum had posted enough townie content for me to even consider them as town.
dsjstr has been my scum read from the moment i voted him. I did not believe totally at the time i posted the list that he was mafia but now i do. This does not mean im closed off from talking to dsjstr as i have demonstrated since that post.
Luca has gained the most townie rep from me since that post but we was second from the bottom so it wasnt hard for him to move up in my rankings.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
As you can see i did make notice of his first post. I thought it was scummy to rely on meta data from previous games. However, not scummy as he was mafia, scummy as in poor sportsmanship.In post 108, IMASPY wrote:To Billy Pilgrim about his opening post #81. I thought meta gaming like pulling from previous games was frowned upon in this set up?
Once i was told meta gaming is accepted in this forum i applied some meta gaming to this game myself.
My meta game read is someone is only gonna need a replacement if they are town. I have not brought this up nor will i be voting totally based on this. But from my perspective people only need a replacement because they are town and was hoping to be mafia. Luca came into this game with knowledge he was gonna be afk for most of the time, but instead of getting a replacement he just let people know about the afk. Partly why luca was so low on my list from the start because i figured going afk is an easy way for mafia to avoid being probed.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Yes the dynamic between dsjstr and poyzin has part to do with it. Along with the lack of townie content provided by both of them. It took me voting on dsjstr to get some serious post out of him, and all of sudden poyzin comes out of smoke to defend dsjstr. Along with FoS on me early for a post that i made about hammering when no one was even L-2 nor had i put a vote in.In post 313, dawoodle wrote:Am I correct in assuming that Poyzin dropped because he defended dsjstr or was there something else that bothered you?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
The reason i would not use this meta data is because this is my first game in any type of mafia on a forum. I simply do not have enough experience to draw conclusions based on this type of meta data.In post 314, IMASPY wrote:
As you can see i did make notice of his first post. I thought it was scummy to rely on meta data from previous games. However, not scummy as he was mafia, scummy as in poor sportsmanship.In post 108, IMASPY wrote:To Billy Pilgrim about his opening post #81. I thought meta gaming like pulling from previous games was frowned upon in this set up?
Once i was told meta gaming is accepted in this forum i applied some meta gaming to this game myself.
My meta game read is someone is only gonna need a replacement if they are town. I have not brought this up nor will i be voting totally based on this. But from my perspective people only need a replacement because they are town and was hoping to be mafia. Luca came into this game with knowledge he was gonna be afk for most of the time, but instead of getting a replacement he just let people know about the afk. Partly why luca was so low on my list from the start because i figured going afk is an easy way for mafia to avoid being probed.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Yes i dont have a reason for unvoting at that moment. You were on him from RVS and i was forced to believe your vote was not true. I was voting dsjstr in order to have him be more active since my previous attempt was responded with filler. When luca seen the scumread that i seen and voted for dsjstr. I did not want him to be on L-2 because I wasnt convinced either of you were mafia at the time. So that mean two mafia could have came around and double voted dsjstr if i was wrong about him. I was truely attempting to give dsjstr another chance to become more active and do something i seen as townie. From what i see to me he is mafia or a bad townie. I have no better read than that. Im not gonna kill someone else that i do not see as guilty.In post 318, Poyzin wrote:I am thoroughly re-reading the messages from #258. If I don't get to somebody's reply between the time that this reply is posted and the time that I'm done replying to past messages, then please don't worry; I'm not ignoring you, I just would like to read the last couple pages in chronological order.
This was not my point. While I truly don't believe that you intended to keep your vote off of dsjstr after your unvote, there is no evidence to say so. After all, every cause has an effect, and I cannot see into your head to determine what options were considered and what was not. It is just my opinion that you had no intention of sparing dsjstr, as it would be impossible for me to know the truth beyond speculation.In post 260, IMASPY wrote:
Actually the reason i revoted is the same reason im still grilling him. I simply asked him to give a reason why he is voting for dawoodle still after pointing out that his L-2 vote on page 4 was scummy. He has dodged it 2 times so far and i have justed asked him a 3rd time. Its unfair for you to dismiss the possibility that i would have not revoted him if he answered my question.In post 258, Poyzin wrote:
Who are you to be the judge, jury, and executioner? I’m sorry that I don’t have all of the relevant quotes, but you asked dsjstr to defend himself, and then after he does, you decide it isn’t sufficient so you revote. Why would you unvote if you only planned on putting your vote back into dsjstr? I know that you could easily say “I wouldn’t have put my vote back I liked his defense” but that clearly isn’t the case based on this quote. Your vote isn’t worth more than any of the other players, and I’m sure that you didn’t need to unvote to make your point. You really just wanted to leverage your voting power, which as I stated doesn’t account for much.In post 227, IMASPY wrote:So dsjstr i will give you one more chance to defend yourself. Why are you still voting for dawoodle after you voted him to get information out of him? What has dawoodle done or said to convince you he is mafia?
However, the evidence that I DO have is this: you DID unvote before you placed your revote. I cannot find a comprehensible reason for doing so, other than to assert your voting power over dsjstr, which isn't worth more than anybody else's. Do you have an explanation for this action?-
-
IMASPY
-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
In post 324, IMASPY wrote:
Yes i dont have a reason for unvoting at that moment. You were on him from RVS and i was forced to believe your vote was not true. I was voting dsjstr in order to have him be more active since my previous attempt was responded with filler. When luca seen the scumread that i seen and voted for dsjstr. I did not want him to be on L-2 because I wasnt convinced either of you were mafia at the time. So that mean two mafia could have came around and double voted dsjstr if i was wrong about him. I was truely attempting to give dsjstr another chance to become more active and do something i seen as townie. From what i see to me he is mafia or a bad townie. I have no better read than that. Im not gonna kill someone else that i do not see as guilty.In post 318, Poyzin wrote:I am thoroughly re-reading the messages from #258. If I don't get to somebody's reply between the time that this reply is posted and the time that I'm done replying to past messages, then please don't worry; I'm not ignoring you, I just would like to read the last couple pages in chronological order.
This was not my point. While I truly don't believe that you intended to keep your vote off of dsjstr after your unvote, there is no evidence to say so. After all, every cause has an effect, and I cannot see into your head to determine what options were considered and what was not. It is just my opinion that you had no intention of sparing dsjstr, as it would be impossible for me to know the truth beyond speculation.In post 260, IMASPY wrote:
Actually the reason i revoted is the same reason im still grilling him. I simply asked him to give a reason why he is voting for dawoodle still after pointing out that his L-2 vote on page 4 was scummy. He has dodged it 2 times so far and i have justed asked him a 3rd time. Its unfair for you to dismiss the possibility that i would have not revoted him if he answered my question.In post 258, Poyzin wrote:
Who are you to be the judge, jury, and executioner? I’m sorry that I don’t have all of the relevant quotes, but you asked dsjstr to defend himself, and then after he does, you decide it isn’t sufficient so you revote. Why would you unvote if you only planned on putting your vote back into dsjstr? I know that you could easily say “I wouldn’t have put my vote back I liked his defense” but that clearly isn’t the case based on this quote. Your vote isn’t worth more than any of the other players, and I’m sure that you didn’t need to unvote to make your point. You really just wanted to leverage your voting power, which as I stated doesn’t account for much.In post 227, IMASPY wrote:So dsjstr i will give you one more chance to defend yourself. Why are you still voting for dawoodle after you voted him to get information out of him? What has dawoodle done or said to convince you he is mafia?
However, the evidence that I DO have is this: you DID unvote before you placed your revote. I cannot find a comprehensible reason for doing so, other than to assert your voting power over dsjstr, which isn't worth more than anybody else's. Do you have an explanation for this action?In post 325, IMASPY wrote:yes i do*-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
I think he did a prod on the last vote count.In post 320, Poyzin wrote:
Dsjstr ALSO said in post #229 that "[he] still believe that Luca is town even though [he] just said [he doesn't] trust SE's". Very strange to say the least, given that Blatant Scum is the only other SE.In post 292, insomnia wrote:The only thing I didn’t like about djstr is that he said he doesn’t trust SE’s but he’s following the lead of an SE right now, as well as his reasoning. But he did mention he town reads me, despite knowing I’m an SE.
Speaking of which, can we seriously get a prod on Blatant scum? It's been over two days and I'm itching for more information on that end.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
What you left out of this quote.In post 322, Poyzin wrote:
Actually, it WOULD be hard for Luca to gain the most townie points. Luca was your second highest scumread at the time you originally posted that list, so it would seem that you had some conviction to put him there. This is clear when you talk about your confidence in your dsjstr scumread, which has been unwavering to put it in different words. You even say that it is easy for players near the bottom to move up, yet that doesn't seem to be the case for dsjstr, who you are committed to lynching. To finish the thought, it would be easiest for null reads to shift around, as you wouldn't have much conviction about their placement.In post 311, IMASPY wrote:Luca has gained the most townie rep from me since that post but we was second from the bottom so it wasnt hard for him to move up in my rankings.
Once again, I'm just postulating, but I'm pretty sure Luca moved up only because you agreed on dsjstr "definitely" being scum. While I agree that this is a good possibility, as I do heavily sus dsjstr, I am even more suspicious of you because of your use of underhanded tactics to push the scum!Dsjstr envelope that I have previously described. I have high confidence that at least one of the two of you are scum. If you are scum, I'd say dsjstr is cleared. (And vice versa for that matter, because I can't picture any scenario where the two of you are mafioso based on both of your demonstrated convictions throughout the last few pages).
VOTE: IMASPY
Don't say that I'm defending dsjstr; I'm not. I'm just trying to find flaws in the argument for dsjstr. There is a large difference, as the former implies that he's a townread for me; he's not.
"Poyzin has gone lower on my list since this post, however, at the time nor he, luca, or blatant scum had posted enough townie content for me to even consider them as town."
you luca and BS were in three way tie for 2nd to last as i said in that very same post you just clipped from. When three people are tied and two of those 3 people have the least post i would say the person that posted the most out of the three has the best chance to gain townie points. Along with the best chance to let off a scum read. just so happens i read luca as a town.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
This post and the post he asked enchantress about lylo were the two post that made me feel he was town. His first post didnt give me much information because he was using meta data for most of them.In post 103, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
Oh god this is scary. Please dont hammer already. We've got no information yet. Noting this post because I wanna check who was L-1 at the moment.In post 70, IMASPY wrote:these jams got me thinking im ready to hammer now... am i right guys? I think we probably have all scum but 1 targeted right now..i am not quite sure how many scum is in this damn town.-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Yea I really dont like 1 of his 2 post.
Are you factoring in any of Billy's post that you can link me?
I still think dsjstr is mafia. He has gotten alittle more crafty with his post since I pushed him, however, he hasnt convinced me he is town at all. I seen that you were considering voting him. Any townie post he made that you could link me?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
Wow dude j just got done saying you haven't convinced me and you go and post the most townie post I have seen from you this gameIn post 422, dsjstr wrote:Actually I guess you don't have to do everyone, I don't see why Icon is so high on your list. Also, was I that low on your list when you defended me?-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
So yea i do agree i could have misinterpreted billy as town with the #103 post. I was thinking hey a town would want to take note as who was L-1 when i posted that, however, could be that he seen that as the situation and attempted to counter play with that. And #182 does look a bit scummy.
The only thing keeping me from voting flippy rn is im still on this dsjstr kick. I happen to think he is partnered with poyzin tho....-
-
IMASPY Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 619
- Joined: January 4, 2020
-
-
-
-