[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 9625667 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1826 Basketball Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #222 (isolation #4) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 2:39 am
Postby UC Voyager »
lol. looks like zemaj screwed thhings up for himself. he is from the same site i am from, and it is a lot different there. he actually followed standard procedure as we would there for the most part.
right off the bat im having scum reads on peaches and Plotinus
CheekyTeeky is very straight foward. making good points so far
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #236 (isolation #7) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:09 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 232, Spartan117 wrote:I believe it is actually yeah, shame that Voyager couldn't have included that in his naked vote.
I had reasons but I am at school..... : p .....
I still am, so I only have 5-10 min time frames to make posts.....I will get back and state my reasons during lunch....which is in two periods. So lets not give him another vote until then. I'm just as much as against naked votes than you are.....
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #246 (isolation #11) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:00 am
Postby UC Voyager »
i voted on peaches for the exact same reason you just got a little mad at me.
i am a huge fan of naked votes (which kind of makes me a hypocrite because i did[though it was due to time issues] i dont like to do it myself)
im going to check and make sure i didn't misread earlier post before trying to make a post referring to it.(another thing) (not naked vote)
In post 129, Assemblerotws wrote:see my twice-expressed scumread on zemaj, though I botched it the first time
This is valid. Could you elaborate on the Zemaj read and tell us your thoughts on others at this point? Here's where I am atm - top is town:
Spartan (conf.)
Clemency
Zemaj
Plot
Deimos
Peaches
XnadrojX
Assemblerotws
Two players that scum lean on you are also the two slots you scum lean on. I also remember seeing you regurgitating other people's reads, plus it looks like you're struggling to come up with original thoughts about the game which is why I put your slot where I did. It looks like I could be wrong about the assemble/deimos team.
VOTE: Peaches
this is a good point. he seams to scum lean on people who scum lean on him. Trying to remove the people putting pressure on them. using scum lean so he can use it as an excuse to why he voted. if Peaches flipps town, i would not be all like, ah crap, i knew he was town". i would man up and say i was wrong....i feel if he were to get his way, and the person flipped town, he would say that he knew that i they were just a lean!!!!
other than the last page, he seemed to not be around for like over 5 pages or so.....lurking!!!or IRL issues? i would like to know?
he hasn't seemed to post since we started a push on him either. i find this very weird as well. like "oh crap, they are figuring it out" "lets hide and hope that they turn they're focus to someone else??????"
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #258 (isolation #15) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:43 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 255, CheekyTeeky wrote:Would it make sense for assemble/peaches to be scum and on each other's wagon? I'm thinking not. Clemency you need to place a vote, sitting on the sidelines makes me suspicious of you.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #263 (isolation #17) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:11 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
oh....and spartan.....you said this is a SE spot. this is not actually. this a noob spot. Zemaj was a noob. Rc was SE......he got the spot because the replacment request was up long enough that he could take it, but thenhe was busy or something, so Mr.Mod had it as a noobie spot piority
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #275 (isolation #21) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:05 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 274, Spartan117 wrote:You believe that there are at least 1 if not 2 scum on assembles wagon, so does this mean you town read him or at least think he might be some lynch bait?
i really dont think he is scum. i really dont, but if peaches can give me a solid reason to vote for him, i
might
actually do so
what im implying is that "im missing a reason to vote for assemble, but if some one (peaches preferably_ could give me a decent reason to, i might"
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #277 (isolation #22) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:39 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 276, Spartan117 wrote:That sounds like an utterly terrible reason to vote, are you trying to be scummy? If you are town, and Assemble is town, scum can just come along give you a reason to vote for assemble and you will.... that's not townie in the slightest..
shit, i didn't think about that. this is my 5th game, so im still learning. this is my 500th counting ToS and other sites, but on ToS it was literally 1 min day, 30 sec niight
short 15 min games of mafia
so im still figuring it out.......
ya
VOTE: Peaches because where is he. he just disappeared
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #280 (isolation #23) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:42 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 279, Spartan117 wrote:ToS is how I came about this too from a friend who I played that with told me about this, It doesnt really compare tbh. But Idk how having played 5 games you are still a newbie, when this game finishes this will be my second completed game, apart from that I have played in one other game that I ended up subbing out of.
You need to make sure you announce the L- when voting especially when it gets down to L-2 and L-1, I don't really accept your excuse as acceptable as to why you would think that way, I'm gonna be watching your slot carefully as we progress as I have found a few things that you have been doing very fishy.
That is what I expect from any good player. Everyone who is town including you and me should be watching every one.....(:
, you've talked more about your scumread on Peaches than you did about your scumread on me. Can you point to some of my posts that you don't like? Peaches explained her vote in 215, do you disagree with her reasoning? In 248, it sounds like you are doubting your scumread on Peaches in your first paragraph because you talk about what if peaches flips town but then you go on to talk about why you think she's scummy. Am I misunderstanding your post? What were you trying to say about Peaches there? Wait I think I get it, are you saying that it's scummy of her to scumlean people because it gives her an out if the person she is scumleaning flips town, and using yourself as an example for how you would feel if you were wrong about a scumread? Is that it or am I still getting it wrong? You seem to be townreading assemble. Can you point to some posts of his that look town? If someone you are townreading is at L-1, you should be worried that we are going to mislynch and try to get town back onto the right track. If we're going wrong here, show us the light. Who should we look at instead? Make a case for why we should lynch the person you want to lynch. Do you have scumreads outside of me and Peaches?
I have less of a scum read on you know. i posted that because well. im not exactly sure why i did that. i know when i made the post saying i thought you were scum, i was really kind of in a rush to make a post, then get to school before being late...
i will look back on the post where i talk about my scum read on peaches real quick
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #290 (isolation #26) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:43 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 246, UC Voyager wrote:i voted on peaches for the exact same reason you just got a little mad at me.
i am a huge fan of naked votes (which kind of makes me a hypocrite because i did[though it was due to time issues] i dont like to do it myself)
im going to check and make sure i didn't misread earlier post before trying to make a post referring to it.(another thing) (not naked vote)
so i just realised i made a mistake here. i meant to say i am not the biggest fan....not say i am the biggest fan
In post 129, Assemblerotws wrote:see my twice-expressed scumread on zemaj, though I botched it the first time
This is valid. Could you elaborate on the Zemaj read and tell us your thoughts on others at this point? Here's where I am atm - top is town:
Spartan (conf.)
Clemency
Zemaj
Plot
Deimos
Peaches
XnadrojX
Assemblerotws
Two players that scum lean on you are also the two slots you scum lean on. I also remember seeing you regurgitating other people's reads, plus it looks like you're struggling to come up with original thoughts about the game which is why I put your slot where I did. It looks like I could be wrong about the assemble/deimos team.
VOTE: Peaches
this is a good point. he seams to scum lean on people who scum lean on him. Trying to remove the people putting pressure on them. using scum lean so he can use it as an excuse to why he voted. if Peaches flipps town, i would not be all like, ah crap, i knew he was town". i would man up and say i was wrong....i feel if he were to get his way, and the person flipped town, he would say that he knew that i they were just a lean!!!!
other than the last page, he seemed to not be around for like over 5 pages or so.....lurking!!!or IRL issues? i would like to know?
he hasn't seemed to post since we started a push on him either. i find this very weird as well. like "oh crap, they are figuring it out" "lets hide and hope that they turn they're focus to someone else??????"
so with this. what i was trying to say is that at that point i thought he was targeting cheekyteeky. even though it was just a scum lean. so i was like. is he putting her on scum lean so he can try to use that as an excuse if she flips town...i mean.....why would one try to push a scum lean???? i later realized he was actually voting for assemble.
at this point i feel either assemble or peaches is scum. not sure if both
That makes sense Voyager. I did misunderstand that post. I think my main problem with you at the moment is you don't really seem to care which of the major wagons gets lynched. But if you are town then you should care, because the odds that we have everything all figured out on page 12 are pretty slim most of the time. We need all hands on deck here to solve the game. When you have time, after school and after you finish your homework, I'd like you to do some reading of different players in ISO1. Read through some people's2 posts and talk to us about what you like and don't like.
short for isolation. It's the link at the top left of each person's post, next to the post number. Or at the bottom of the screen there is a drop down menu and a [+] where you can select up to 3 different players to look at in isolation together.
assemble and peaches are a good start because they're the major wagons, but I encourage you to branch out from there.
Yes. I care.
What I care most about is if we get the right one. I think that one of the two wagons are on a scum. The other is town. I want to see evidence that they are not scum....i think peaches is scum, but if he gives me a good reason that he isn't scum or that assemble is, I might side with him
UC Voyager wrote:
Yes. I care.
What I care most about is if we get the right one. I think that one of the two wagons are on a scum. The other is town. I want to see evidence that they are not scum....i think peaches is scum, but if he gives me a good reason that he isn't scum or that assemble is, I might side with him
ok. I mean, you're probably right that one of them is because I can't really feel assemble's beating heart at all.
i mean...who says i never break the rules and post during class?????though i generally am very limited during class....dont rely on me breaking the rules though to be available....
In post 288, Plotinus wrote:The rest of you are contributing enough already. I feel like I have a good understanding of where Deimos is coming from and what his reads are and why he's pushing the things he's pushing. I like and support the assemble push. The reason your last post broke the forum is that tags have to be closed in a mirror image of how they are opened:
Oh gosh I saw that my signature seemed strangely large on my phone but I thought it was just a mobile glitch. Nope, my post is literally breaking the forum.
Thanks for the advice, it seems fairly straightforward but it gets confusing when you have 3-4+ tags open at the same time.
In post 307, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok announcing intent to hammer assemble in the next 12 hours.
why????
what reasons
i really dont think he is scum, but whatever.
I don't think so either but Plot is right about how he has no pulse now and also about us running around as headless chickens if we leave it too long. If he's town he really hasn't even tried to help himself this game. I said 12 hours to give him a chance to defend himself.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #318 (isolation #37) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 4:46 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
I will be v/la for the next few days
so my parents are divorced right. so im with my dad on school days, and im at my moms on the weekend. simple. well i got a school and home lap top. i guess i grabbed myy school lap top charger to take to my moms in stead of my moms, so my battery is toast! i will try to post mobile if i can, but this is a btw....
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #319 (isolation #38) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:33 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
due to a lack of defense on his case, i agree to hammer assemble
VOTE: assemble
this isn't because i wont be active. this is because he just wont post and try to defend his case. he is just trying to lay back and hope no one finishes him. we know he has been online, but yet he doesn't post when all this pressure is on him?????we have given him to many warnings...
we have waited, and waited and waited and waited.......he seems to be online.....so why does he not post...possibly trying to avoid lynch by dragging out claim....we have given him a chance, and he refused it. if he flips town, then crap, but so far, i havn't seen a reason to vote for him. WHy? because he hasn't made a post, so that is that
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #325 (isolation #42) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:39 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 323, CheekyTeeky wrote:Thats the point of announcing intent to hammer BEFORE hammering. Now we lose you too and if you're town you've just crippled us with 4 town losses....
you do?????i have never had to do that TBH......i mean. im not lying, i havn't, but for reals. we keep nagging on him, but he wont post....
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #330 (isolation #45) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:46 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
but for real. how many times have we asked for him to freaking post!!!!!he still doesn't.......as plot pointed out earlier, he has been online, but refused to post!!!
In post 111, Deimos27 wrote:Recent posts from Xnadj feel pretty town, Assemble is where I want my vote.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Assemble
L-1
Since the IC hasn't yet explained this:
Do not hammer before stating an intent to do so and asking for a claim.
Ignoring the above is equivalent to a scumclaim.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #335 (isolation #48) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:54 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 334, CheekyTeeky wrote:No matter how convinced you are, you need to remember that this is a team game. If we have accidentally lynched a PR then it cripples town. Also town is inclined to lynch you next day phase if you quickhammer because it only benefits scum.
if your so convinced i am tomarrows lynch, then why do you imply im town...if im a (idiot) town, then you guys should know not to lynch me
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #338 (isolation #49) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:04 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 336, CheekyTeeky wrote:Not to mention that you ignored the request of confirmed town to hold off until we have enough evidence to get the buddy too. (If assemble is scum).
Pedit because it is policy to lynch the quickhammer. The responsibility lies with you to understand this. Not with us to let VI's live because they don't know any better.
ok. sure i didn't do what another person wanted me to, but as i have said. we keep waiting for assemble to post, but as i assume, he is just lurking!!!
i understand where you are coming from though. i should have at least given him some more time first. i was just so annoyed with the fact he couldn't even make a single post!!!not even to say. give me a little. im busy......
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #345 (isolation #51) » Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:09 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
not a bad thing. ( :
better than losing another townie if i do say so myself. on the flip side, we re out of PRs.....
we are all the equivalent of a VT.
i will post more tomorrow
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #351 (isolation #52) » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:55 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In my defense. I was thinking he wasn't scum due to the fact he wouldn't post. Then realised he was literally lurking. He was online. Not posting though. I wasn't aware that people had to call "hammers". I really was starting to think he was scum. He had so much pressure on him and did not post. If I'm correct, lurking is a common scum move.
Right now I want to hear from the most silent / inactive people
Peaches, Clemency, whatnot.
I really think CheekyTeeky is town. Her defense of a town member was townie. And she tried to explain to me that what I did was scummy. That I shouldn't do it.
In my defense. I was thinking he wasn't scum due to the fact he wouldn't post
. Then realised he was literally lurking. He was online. Not posting though. I wasn't aware that people had to call "hammers". I really was starting to think he was scum. He had so much pressure on him and did not post. If I'm correct, lurking is a common scum move.
Right now I want to hear from the most silent / inactive people
Peaches, Clemency, whatnot.
I really think CheekyTeeky is town. Her defense of a town member was townie. And she tried to explain to me that what I did was scummy. That I shouldn't do it.
I will post more at lunch when I get the chance
Uh, sorry. You were townreading a lack of activity? How in hell?
Like I said, there was no reason for you to be townreading him. This reasoning is terrible for the certainty you displayed. That was not a legitimate townread. Only scum knows the alignments of others.
Then because Plotinus demonstrated that he was online at one point, you decided he was lurking and chose to hammer him without letting him claim.
It's not just a matter of stating intent. You said you have a history in ToS, I know asking for a claim is standard practice there also. With days left on the deadline how do you not do so this time?
Spartan had a bunch of other great points, care to address them?
It is only fair to adress. In ToS, you ask for someone's role if you are investigator, cop, etc. And if they claim one of the roles you came back with, you know they are telling the truth.
Role Call is the term for when everyone claims a role. But it is very late game. The reason it doesn't happen early is jester will try to get himself lynched.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #358 (isolation #54) » Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:07 am
Postby UC Voyager »
ok
i have a town read on Spartan....because well.....
I have a town read on cheekyTeeky. she seems pretty pro-town. sh explained to me why i was a little scummy, and that i shouldn't do that. and seemed to be hesitant on voting. seemed pretty townie
i have a town read on Plot. she keeps making very good points, and is drawing people out of their holes, so scum cant lurk.
i have a feeling Peaches is scum, but i am thinking that for the same reason i hammered assemble. because he isn't posting, so im not sure if he is scummy or not.
i have a scum lean with clemency. i found it funny he jumped on my wagon and used "everyone else said everything" as a reason. as if he doesn't know why, but knows he can use other people coming up with reasons, but again. He might have been thinking the same thing that spartan117 was thinking.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #362 (isolation #57) » Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:52 am
Postby UC Voyager »
townie-scummy
1-Spartan117-most townie
2-CheekyTeeky
3-Plotinus
4-Deimos27
5- Clemency (just a little. [he doesn't seem super scummy. it is just that everyone else seems townie] )
6-XadrojX (im not to sure. he hasnt posted. like. at all)