Large Normal 224 | Endgame
-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
I was first.
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
That's a privilege the mod gets.In post 13, Reundo wrote:Not first to post, though!-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Bad vote.In post 35, splitfarvle wrote:I think it’s strange to appear to be getting out of rvs but not voting, and giving up so easily on it.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
i cant tell if this is a jokeIn post 45, Zote the Mighty wrote:
Fool! Must you wait until others cast their vote on someone you find scummy before you cast your vote on them yourself?In post 39, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Actually no, Layla's excuse can easily be made by scum. So since Gamma so kindly started the wagon, i'll put some more "oomph" behind it.In post 33, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I guess it’s NAI then.
VOTE: Layla
Precept Sixteen: Don't Hesitate. Once youve made a decision, carry it out and dont look back. You'll achieve much more this way.
VOTE: Norwegian-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
In post 75, Luca Blight wrote:So first you called the votes on Norwegian bad, and now you’re calling the ones on Layla bad because they should be on NorwegianboyEE instead?
Thought processes can change?
Explain, please.Does it need to be?
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Ok boomerIn post 88, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I scumread Chemist already.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Goodposting I seeIn post 110, Layla wrote:I don't actually find tea scummy. I have him as null, but true null, not leaning towards any alignment.
1. People showed concern about 74. It's a bit overzealous and overall bad yes. Does it draw aggro? Yes. But is it scummy? Remember that bad != scummy.
2. His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?
Now why do I say such thing when I pretty much don't have any read on tea? Because I think the direction of arguments thrown against him is wrong and that kind of arguments only bring wasted pages in the game.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Calling a vote bad isn't a TR; and this isn't semantics.In post 114, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
If all it took was 2 minor posts from me between him vaguely implying to TR me for him to change his read and get needlessly aggressive then it wasn't a particularly strong TR in the first place.In post 110, Layla wrote:His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?
I think the line of reasoning people took to vote you was bad and the line of reasoning people took to vote you 20 posts later was substantially better.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
I mean, that's kind of the point...In post 126, NorwegianboyEE wrote:He only has 8 posts total on his profile. I have no idea what his meta is.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Because you don't need to vote immediately to contribute to the gameIn post 143, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
I'm glad you made this post. Because the 3 before it made me want you to eat rope in the next 24 hours.In post 139, Tea wrote:
Calling a vote bad isn't a TR; and this isn't semantics.In post 114, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
If all it took was 2 minor posts from me between him vaguely implying to TR me for him to change his read and get needlessly aggressive then it wasn't a particularly strong TR in the first place.In post 110, Layla wrote:His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?
I think the line of reasoning people took to vote you was bad and the line of reasoning people took to vote you 20 posts later was substantially better.
Why did you think splitfarvle's original vote on Norwegian was bad? I liked that post. And what was wrong with Zote pointing out that Norwegian shaded the slot waited for someone else to vote it then hopped on?-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
I dunno, am I?In post 196, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Are you NoNK?-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
i think w/ added context & elaboration + new developments from norwegianIn post 251, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
@tea - what do you make of this explanation? Is the vote still based on poor reasoning?In post 245, splitfarvle wrote:
It seems odd to me that there would be a serious push in the middle of rvs without a serious vote. It looks like scum trying to spread suspicion without committing to the read. It could be a soft bus but it’s probably dumb to speculate about that without any flips.In post 171, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
But that's not what you did. You shaded Layla at 30, you didnt ask a question, you shot. Maybe with a water gun but you fired the shot before asking the clarifying question.In post 167, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Ok i’ll shoot first and ask questions later from now on.In post 155, Zote the Mighty wrote: It's wasn't just the lack of a vote from Nor fool, it was him waiting until someone else voted for a player he found scummy before hopping on the wagon.
AMERICAN STYLE!
She responded to your shade as though it were a question and you originally said it was NAI based on her explanation.
Then post 30, Gamma says your 30 reasoning seems valid, so all of a sudden, you do a 180 on your NAI reasoning say scum could make that excuse and vote Layla. This is already after splitfarvle voted you for not voting when you had provided some reasoning on something.
VOTE: Norskie
@Splitfarvle, can you explain your 35 a bit, I think I'm interpreting it correctly but I want to make sure.
yes this is a good vote now-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
This is a strange post but I disagree with the reason you think it's strange, Billy.In post 246, Zote the Mighty wrote:UNVOTE:
The speed at which the Tea wagon built up and the little resistance it had is definitely something worth noting. It makes me think that scum either found an opportunity to hop on an early wagon, or found an early opportunity to distance from their partner. I'm gonna take a look at all the people who voted for Tea.-
-
Tea Goon
-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Because nobody has done anything warranting a vote?In post 266, Reundo wrote:
All of your TRs are players who've either defended you or aren't critical of you (except for maybe Billy for a bit), and all your SRs are players who were/are voting you or were critical of you, which reads pretty safe / risk-averse to me. Luca especially is a bit jarring, because while I don't have a strong TR on him I don't see anything of his that's especially scummy either. Similarly, I haven't seen anything especially towny from Chemist either, so some elaboration on those reads would be nice because I can't really see where you're coming from rn.In post 262, Tea wrote:town
{Chemist Billy}
{Layla GE}
---
{Luca Reundo}
{Vork Norwegian}
scum
there's a pretty big difference between the tiers separated by the line btw.
Also, why are you still not voting anyone?-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
I also wonder why I'm scumreading people with bad progressions on me... maybe its because they have bad progressions on me.In post 266, Reundo wrote:
All of your TRs are players who've either defended you or aren't critical of you (except for maybe Billy for a bit), and all your SRs are players who were/are voting you or were critical of you, which reads pretty safe / risk-averse to me. Luca especially is a bit jarring, because while I don't have a strong TR on him I don't see anything of his that's especially scummy either. Similarly, I haven't seen anything especially towny from Chemist either, so some elaboration on those reads would be nice because I can't really see where you're coming from rn.In post 262, Tea wrote:town
{Chemist Billy}
{Layla GE}
---
{Luca Reundo}
{Vork Norwegian}
scum
there's a pretty big difference between the tiers separated by the line btw.
Also, why are you still not voting anyone?-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
In post 67, Luca Blight wrote:The whole'crafting an RVS vote before getting a role PM' thing seems weird to me, though. I could see this being a lie, because I can't imagine why anyone would make an RVS post before the game has even opened.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: LaylaIn post 75, Luca Blight wrote:So first you called the votes on Norwegian bad, and now you’re calling the ones on Layla bad because they should be on NorwegianboyEE instead?
Explain, please.In post 87, Luca Blight wrote:What have I done that’s the same as NorwegianboyEE?In post 93, Luca Blight wrote:Not sure I follow you.
Also, do you dislike/disagree with the vote itself, or is it purely the fact I haven’t received as much heat as NorwegianboyEE that pings you?
Dude... his entire ISO is empty or easy questions.In post 99, Luca Blight wrote:What about the NorwegianboyEE and Tea wagons, Chemist. Anything ping you there?-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
...separated by the line...In post 285, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
You claim there’s a pretty big difference between the tiers, but your top TR is just a "gut read" on someone that’s posted like 2-3 posts by the time you made this...In post 262, Tea wrote:town
{Chemist Billy}
{Layla GE}
---
{Luca Reundo}
{Vork Norwegian}
scum
there's a pretty big difference between the tiers separated by the line btw.
ok-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
In post 293, Luca Blight wrote:
I agree with this but knowing Aaron it kind of is not as abnormalIn post 246, Zote the Mighty wrote:UNVOTE:
The speed at which the Tea wagon built up and the little resistance it had is definitely something worth noting. It makes me think that scum either found an opportunity to hop on an early wagon, or found an early opportunity to distance from their partner. I'm gonna take a look at all the people who voted for Tea.
I don’t like this; it feels very showy.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Very ironic... considering I didIn post 289, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
Man, I dont know if this is a playstyle thing with you or what, but it's annoying. He provided a possible explanation of your reads, which wasnt completely unfair given that you haven't provided much thought on it in the thread. You respond by saying that it was surface level. It's on you to explain your actions. Reundo is giving you an opportunity and you respond by calling his interpretation of your reads list surface level. It's not on us to be able to explain your reads. So why dont you explain why its not simply what Reundo accused you of?In post 267, Tea wrote:That's very surface level.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Because those slots havent made much an impression on me?In post 283, Reundo wrote:I don't see how him asking questions about your posts == a bad progression? Luca's ISO is a bit worse than I remembered but it's fairly ordinary in this game at least. "Empty or easy" questions describes a lot of ISOs here, and throwing him in your scum reads but not say splitfarvle/davesaz/dunn seems a bit random.
Also, I hope you ignoring like half the posts directed at you doesn't become a habit because it's starting to get annoying. What is your aversion towards voting people, exactly? I don't see a good reason to keep it holstered at this stage, or how it'll affect your "interactions with your scumreads" or whatever.
And it's his effort to present himself otherwise; a lot of other ISOs are plainly idontgiveafuck.
And when those posts all ask the same question about not voting that I answered... and like the answer boils down to playstyle differences, yeah I think it's starting to get annoying you ask the same question over and over when an answer is either pointless or already given.-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
I agree with this.In post 378, PMysterious wrote:
Okay, so now that Nomination Mafia actually ended, I can finally establish the point I wanted to make earlier. In Nomination Mafia, NorwegianboyEE made similar aggressive statements as he did in the quote I posted recently. It turns out that he was Mafia that game, and because of that, I'm not comfortable about Norwegian's aggressive play in the quote I mentioned. I thought I'd have to wait until Day 2 or 3 to bring it up because of the "no ongoing games rule" put in place, but lucky me, the game ended before the day expired.In post 228, Gamma Emerald wrote:
That’s what he was avoiding :thonk:In post 210, davesaz wrote:
You shouldn't refer to ongoing games.In post 194, Tea wrote:I've been waiting for Nomination Mafia to end
I'm pretty sure PMysterious is town and I think it's fairly likely Norwegian is playing similarly to how he played there.
Anyway, back to looking through this game and figuring out what to do next.-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
This fails to account for weighted probabilities.In post 410, Almost50 wrote:Tea seesawing Nor could be: (a) Genuine, (b) Scum coming to the rescue of their buddy who had been forced to vote them after having failed to make a distancing maneuver, or (c) Scum WKing someone they know ill flip town.
(a) Tea is Town, Nor is unknown.
(b) Both are scum.
(c) Tea us Scum, Nor is Town.
66% Scum!Tea, 50% Scum!Nor-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
In post 23, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Vorkuta is good at hyperposting as scum.
VOTE: Vorkuta
Take my "random" vote.In post 29, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Show me that good content boii.In post 24, Vorkuta wrote:I'm good at pretending to generate "good" content.
This game.. I actually have to generate GOOD content.
Cus i'm not trusting you after that whole "pocketing" stunt ya pulled earlier.
Like I feel like as scum he makes an obligatory "lol im so funny" post and then gets too serious too quickIn post 30, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Layla's RVS vote has too much justification behind it. Only scum cares about justifying and "explaining" their RVS vote.In post 14, Layla wrote:VOTE: davesaz because his username doesn't start with a capital letter. splitfarve doesn't either but I only have one vote.
Take open 767 as a comparison
In post 16, NorwegianboyEE wrote:9/11 confirmed lol.
[Mod edit: NorwegianBoy has been banned from the game. Not appropriate]In post 30, NorwegianboyEE wrote:By people actually talking hopefully.
Anyway there's not much to comment on atm so i suppose i'll need to create some content myself.
I don't really know anyone here other than Mutantdevle whom i've played mafia games with on another site. I hope he's actually town so we can play on the same side for once, i've had to make him my enemy for so many mafia games in the past. Mutant, plz be town.
Why would Titus and Dongo vote to lynch the cute cat Joey? Just why? :c
Meanwhile in open 765 he doesn't do anything closeIn post 64, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Mutant’s logic in voting for Pisskop is indeed stretching it. But that doesn’t make him scummy like Joey suggests. I think Mutant is just trying to create content for us so we can make a proper judgement about who’s acting scummy. The game is in too early of a stage for that vote to actually be serious.
UNVOTE:
In post 7, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Hello everyone, i don't know anyone here. But i'll do my best.In post 32, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just so everyone is in the clear, i've read the setup and while i really don't understand a single thing about the "points mechanic" i did gather from the setup that we are informed about who the mafia roles are already.
So Baezu has already told us in the second post which mafia roles are in the game:This means (If i'm understanding this right) that the mafia has looked at the townie power roles and decided they want the 2 specific roles. (Putting aside the generic goon which is called "ghoul" in this setup)
- Zombie
Will always resurrect the next day if lynched. Can only be permanently killed by other means.
- Witch
Basically the mafia rolecop.
(Please explain to me if i misunderstood something.)
Like I know this seems based off of meta but the takeaway is that he's trying to artificially establish a presence in a scum-motivated way without really getting called out/noticed for itIn post 41, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Almost 14 days left before deadline. How much of that time are we using before the lynch i wonder? Seems a bit hasty to start voting already so early, but if it puts pressure on players i’m all for it.
VOTE: benhalkum
And meta is just because he might go "Oh I'm not the kind of guy to do this stuff!" which I really don't want to deal with, so here it is-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
In post 69, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
What careful play lol.In post 62, davesaz wrote:Tea's 57 is casting shade on what look to me to be a couple of good leads.
Tea would be a good vote but I think the careful play by Norwegian is scummier.
VOTE: NorwegianIn post 70, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
This is a good point^In post 67, Luca Blight wrote:The whole'crafting an RVS vote before getting a role PM' thing seems weird to me, though. I could see this being a lie, because I can't imagine why anyone would make an RVS post before the game has even opened.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: LaylaIn post 77, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Nice narrative you're trying to build there.In post 74, Tea wrote:Like... I'm pretty sure Norwegian is breathing a sigh of relief after seeing yall vote Layla.
Perhaps i should do the same?
Tea is most definitely breathing a sigh of relief here at the possibility of turning the vote away from his scumpartner and shading a town slot instead.In post 98, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The difficult thing about this setup is that i'm most definitely going to forget at least a couple of people here, especially the inactive ones. So if they're scum they can just coast along undetected because there are so many distractions.In post 126, NorwegianboyEE wrote:He only has 8 posts total on his profile. I have no idea what his meta is.
And holy shitIn post 175, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Actually re-reading the game. This post is BIG yikes! Holy shit.In post 144, Flavor Leaf wrote:i have a weird gut feeling we hit scum in Tea for completely wrong reasons and now we’re in a holding pattern because scum’s awkward.
I don’t actually have a Tea read myself
Like yes there's "all over the place" solving as town (RC comes as a pretty big example) but this is like "oh I'll be able to setup/turn to anyone I need to" and it feels like he's keeping his options open instead of trying to keep his mind open.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
One of them is for appearances, one of them is genuine.In post 493, Reundo wrote:Also don't really get the distinction between "keeping his options open" and "keeping his mind open"?-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
It's not a fucking meta caseIn post 497, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Your meta case is trash Tea.
I don’t know what else to say.
Like if you’re going to not look at my behaviour objectively and just case me on meta and claim i’m scum for it then you’re really not taking your read on me seriously.-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Ok, the content is better, but I still don't like the way you're saying itIn post 500, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Looking at people like Davesaz and Splitfarvle. They have been going a bit under the radar, and i don't see anything town indicative from them. This gamestate seems like it really benefits scum and i think they should be put more upfront.
Who are your townreads @Davesaz and @Splitfarvle?
Also if i remember correctly Billy Pilgrim claimed he liked my play better in this game, yet he's voting for me. What is that about?
It feels... off-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
The benefits of voting you outweigh the harmsIn post 510, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Luca initially scumreads Tea and TR's me. Then when the narrative is appearing to be switching [Tea loses votes and posts a case] he immediately goes back on his principles and votes me. It sure looks like a scummy and opportunistic wagon hop to me.
In particular you seem not to be playing in good faith... so there's really no point not voting you.
Also, voting you is more likely to make that change than not voting you, and you're also really likely to be scum. So-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
bouncing around w/ a purpose vs trying to look like you're bouncing aroundIn post 523, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why is aimlessness on D1 scummy?
And another question for you, why is not being aimless on D1 town indicative?-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
Hot take tbhIn post 552, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Btw Nor is townIn post 513, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It was for the MEMES!
I think that burst of posting was rather earnest-
-
Tea Goon
-
-
Tea Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 209
- Joined: September 8, 2019
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-