[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10694389 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1915: Africa [Game Over!] - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #30 (isolation #3) » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:31 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 28, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Hey guys, I'm new, never played mafia online or in irl at all, but my friends said I should try this so here I am. I'm a bit confused by my role to be honest though, since I'm a Vanilla Townie (it's ok to say that, right?), does that mean I don't get to do anything? Sorry if it's a dumbb question, I've never played before like I said, so I want to find out what I can. Great to get started with you guys, sure this'll be heaps of fun!
Is it just me or does the entirety just reek scum, including the player name? VOTE: NotMySpamAccount
Post
Post #56 (isolation #4) » Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:16 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 36, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Regarding the name, it's a joke from another forum with some of my friends, no relation to this
The name gives contrast to your claimed newbieness. Imo from your first post it's very plausible you are an alt of someone and deciding to play the newbie card for "easy town cred".
In post 49, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Elements: random inexplicable starting vote, voting me for similarly inexplicable (though not quite as bad, I can see why scum (scum is another name for mafia I think) would open like that) reasoning.
The first vote, and to some extent the second, is part of something called RVS (i think, not sure what it stands for, IC help?) where you make random votes (RV) to get the game rolling so we can form reads on people and find scum. Otherwise the game is very slow to start and there is nothing to talk about which helps scum
Post
Post #57 (isolation #5) » Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:36 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 54, cbynumber wrote:Also, while I don't like NotMySpamAccount's opening post, both it and his response to the accusations read as town to me. Also, he's voting for scum, so that's good.
Post
Post #58 (isolation #6) » Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:44 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 34, NotMySpamAccount wrote:WHAT THE HECK I LITERALLY SAID I'M FOR THE TOWN AND NOW YOU ALL WANT ME DEAD WHAT THE HECK SERIOUSLY I POST ONE LITTLE "SLIP" AND NOW Y'ALL ARE GONNA KILL ME
To clear up a misconception you may have. Just because I've voted you doesn't mean I want you dead. Votes are the only tool we have during the day to help us root out scum so using them to apply pressure or even to just spark a reaction is very common. If I wanted you dead this early I would be doing exactly what ruined the first game of forum mafia I played.
Being very liberal with their role as VT helps mafia significantly more than town so as town there's zero incentive to do this. I explained the name bit earlier. I also have a bit of a habit to mistake bad play for scum play in IRL mafia, so it could also be some of that leaking through.
In post 58, Elements wrote:If I wanted you dead this early I would be doing exactly what ruined the first game of forum mafia I played.
what was that?
Tunneled someone from very early day 1 and didn't stop the whole day. If you look at my last game (newbie 1912, still happening) it's very similar to what Enter did, but worse
Post
Post #68 (isolation #9) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:44 am
Postby Elements »
In post 63, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Ok, so along with the thing you wrote about random votes, I think I get it now. Was your vote on me prompted by something that seemed off and you wanted a new random vote, or did you really think I was scum?
The latter. Whether you are town or scum, that was a scummy post and it warranted a response. My vote on Salami was doing nothing so I changed it to you. I am slightly coming round to the idea of your inexperience getting the better of you, but you are still a scum lean for me.
Post
Post #69 (isolation #10) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:46 am
Postby Elements »
In post 32, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:You might be using your apparent newness as a cover to conceal your scumminess. It's probably unwise at the very least because it draws people's attention your way.
Post
Post #77 (isolation #11) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:50 am
Postby Elements »
In post 71, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:Possibly because Elements is scum and needed to point their finger anywhere but at themselves.
I don't really understand this. Are you saying i would've pointed my finger at myself if not for that post?
In post 73, skitter30 wrote:the name thing isn't a valid reason to suspect him imo
what's the scum incentive for fake-claiming vt here? i can understand that you think there's not town motivation, but i don't know the scum motivation there really either
the name thing isn't that important. It just gives the impression he has existed on forums before thus giving rise to suspicion he could have experience we don't know about. It's more incidental than anything else.
The post itself is more anti-town then scum coming from either side. But if they are scum it could be a "too scummy to be scum" esk post, or a way to say that scummy plays are from inexperience later in the game
In post 73, skitter30 wrote:don't refer to ongoing games please, it's against the site-rule of 'don't talk about ongoing games'. until it ends pretend it doesn't exist and don't bring it up
This is my 4th game of forum mafia, third on this site. My first was a role madness game with my uni's mafia society. Lets just say that didn't go well. I've played too much town of salem, secret hitler, resistance etc. but only started playing actual mafia in September.
Post
Post #79 (isolation #13) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 9:17 am
Postby Elements »
Better wording:
In post 77, Elements wrote:the name thing isn't that important. It just gives the impression he has existed on forums before thus giving rise to suspicion he could have experience we don't know about. It's more incidental than anything else.
The name is indicative of prior experience, imo. If true he is trying to play dumb and therefore most likely scum
Post
Post #85 (isolation #14) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 11:39 am
Postby Elements »
In post 84, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:It's not impossible that NMSA cut the cheese, but you dealt it. Meaning you might have pointed out that his post reeked of scumminess so none of us bother looking at you.
So I only looked for scummines and called it out because I wanted people to look at other people not me?
My post was 9 minutes after NMSA's post. I saw that post and wanted to point out its inherent anti-town vibes so I was looking for anything else that could possibly indicate that they are scum. As I've said, the player name is clearly from someone who's been on forums before so that could indicate lying about experience so I put that in there too.
I have since changed my mind, unsurprisingly, and given NMSA's more recent (after they calmed down) no longer consider that to be anything more than conjecture
Post
Post #131 (isolation #30) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 11:02 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 129, cbynumber wrote:I don't understand how it helps mafia at all if Elements thinks NMSA is mafia?
If you're not helping town, you're probably mafia. I think that is a fair assumption to make. The post is detrimental to town if NMSA is town so there's no reason to do it if they are town. If they are mafia they could be trying to build a wall of inexperience to hide behind - which if successful would help them
Post
Post #136 (isolation #32) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:27 am
Postby Elements »
In post 133, cbynumber wrote:So, to clarify,
As mafia, NMSA pretends not to read the thread (thereby ‘missing’ the post which explains why claiming your role is bad), claims vanilla townie and goes out of his way to ham up his newishness in order to raise suspicion on himself. This is all for the effect of playing up his ‘inexperience’ as a way to lower suspicion.
Do I have that right?
He posted something that was anti-town. That makes him look scummy
Post
Post #185 (isolation #46) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:36 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 183, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:I believe the lynch occurs when 5 players vote for the same person, up until 10 days. After 10 days, majority rules.
after 10 days, no lynch.
It is much more beneficial for town to keep the day going for as long as sensibly possible so there are lots of interactions to analyse and longer for scum to slip up
Post
Post #188 (isolation #47) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:52 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 187, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:I think we should keep talking until Tall1s is replaced and then do a lynch. Even if it's a mislynch, we'll have gathered some useful evidence to work with.
When we lynch someone the day ends instantly, no more discussion, and mafia get a night to talk to each other and plan and kill (assuming a mislynch). The longer we wait before we lynch the more information town can gather both before and as a result of the lynch.
Post
Post #199 (isolation #49) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:17 pm
Postby Elements »
Current Read List
Confirmed Town:
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
Town Read:
TTTT
Town Lean:
NotMySpamAccount, cbynumber
Null:
BBmolla, skitter30
Scum Lean:
Salami/color]
Scum Read:
MaryJoLisa2
BBmolla: i agree with reasoning behind opinions on MJL. posts seem like scum hunting but i don't understand their stance on Salami
Salami: Very agressive entry into the game with no reasoning other than "i'm right listen to me" which isn't reasoning
MaryJoLisa2: Indecisive and noncommittal posts could be newbieness or scumness. More recently suggesting we end the game early and post 191 are potential scum slips coming from inexperiance. - would change vote but don't want to put at L1 in case of a lol hammer
NotMySpamAccount: now believing that this is his first game, i can seen town reasoning behind his posts and vote changes
cbynumber: nice analysis of posts, asks probing questions
skitter30: probably IC paranoia stopping this from being a town lean, but i don't understand how LAMIST doesn't look scummy at all
TTTT: very much town driven posts and explanations. looking forward to the continuation from post 155
Post
Post #210 (isolation #54) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:29 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 208, Salami wrote:That's wrong though, while a lynch is usually preferable to no lynch for town they can be very harmful if chosen unwisely, we can't just pick any lynch. We have to figure out which is the scum
Post
Post #215 (isolation #55) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:32 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 207, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:I did, it just didn't add up to me. If I'm scum and Salami is also scum, then why would he vote to lynch me? Why would he come in, "lay down the law" only to find that his scum partner was giving him a hard time?
It doesn't necessarily have to be me or him, I just don't see why it's me and him.
My reads are based on how you have acted. It doesn't necessarily mean I think you and salami are scum partners, more that I think both of you are behaving scummily. It's slightly hard to explain.
Mafia sometimes vote their own buddies in order to distance themselves so if one is found the other isn't immediately scrutinised for defending and agreeing with them before.
Post
Post #223 (isolation #57) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:45 pm
Postby Elements »
Imo, questioning people's experience doesn't get town anywhere unless they are using it to cover up mistakes e.g. "oops, i didn't mean it like that. I'm new so that's why i did it" and only then if their experience is suspect
Post
Post #226 (isolation #59) » Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:48 pm
Postby Elements »
In post 224, cbynumber wrote:Yeah, on second thought, let's hold off on l1 under tall1s' replacement starts posting.
@MJL even more reason not to lynch early. If we lynch someone now we learn nothing about tall1s' slot. We effectively go into day two with the addition of a new player.