Why brass and not hoctac?In post 1190, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: brass
Should go after the hood now that we know Quick was telling the truth
VOTE: brassherald L-1
Why brass and not hoctac?In post 1190, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: brass
Should go after the hood now that we know Quick was telling the truth
Clidd, what was the point of this if you weren't going to kill me?In post 1248, clidd wrote:I'll update this by Ame's response time:
[Umlaut] [Farside22]
[Looker] [Valoneast] [Hoctac]
[Reundo] [SirCakez]
[Brassherald] [Ame] [Zulfy]
Because I can mislynch you. Welcome to my game.In post 1264, Ame wrote:Clidd, what was the point of this if you weren't going to kill me?In post 1248, clidd wrote:I'll update this by Ame's response time:
[Umlaut] [Farside22]
[Looker] [Valoneast] [Hoctac]
[Reundo] [SirCakez]
[Brassherald] [Ame] [Zulfy]
The quick hammer implied that I was wrong about Cakez and that scum were going to kill me in order to frame him.In post 1265, Umlaut wrote:Ame, if you're 1-shot and you've used your shot then why shouldn't you be alive?
Interesting. This is only the case if Hoc is your partner. Since it is you + Looker this isn't the case. If you cannot convince Hoc I am scum, you will not be able to get it through.In post 1267, clidd wrote:Because I can mislynch you. Welcome to my game.
Yes.In post 1269, clidd wrote:Ame, are you really cop ?
If this were the case, why did you immediately vote Brass? This doesn't seem like the action of someone confused about the hood.In post 1225, SirCakez wrote:I missed itIn post 1221, farside22 wrote:Since when haven't you read a game?In post 1219, SirCakez wrote:I didn't realize that, no. I thought Klick/Quick was in the hood.In post 1215, Ame wrote:You knew there was scum in the hood regardless since Klick was aware of the hood. If Klick was scum, then he had a partner in the hood. Are you claiming you were not aware of this?In post 1212, SirCakez wrote:wasn't Quick's informed claim that there was scum in the hood?
I wasn't interested before because I was sure he was scum
but I was wrong :/Lucky wasn't exactly very townie.What is weird about it?In post 1213, SirCakez wrote:the Lucky kill is weird
You do realize multiple players pointed out the nighbor claim from hotoc. Which confirmed quicks claim. Your saying you ignored that?
I've been confused about the hood all game