Yeah, and? I explained that in the case.In post 3932, Dunnstral wrote:The one where she went v/la......In post 3931, mastina wrote:But Titus is just scum this game and has been from her very first post.
Noooooooo, Titus is very much not scum with Ythan and for that matter, not scum with Bell.In post 3943, innocentvillager wrote:so mastina you think it's Ythan/Titus scumpair?
Titus very well could be scum, but if she is, it's not with either of them.
Ythan I don't think is scum at all, regardless of Titus's alignment, but if Titus were scum Ythan would go from "I don't think he's scum" to "locktown".
Bell I do think is scum, but I don't think he's scum with Titus.
The one and only way I can see Ythan as scum is if his toxicity is being used as a mask for being scum, a la Xtoxm's from last game. However, overall, Ythan's given a bunch that doesn't feel like it comes from scum. He has a bunch of trash pushes, but he has made dozens upon dozens OF pushes, and while most are trash, some of them were actually really damn good. And even the fact that he has so many pushes is a positive indicator. In this game, scum have no reason to push like 10 different people; town however can throw shit at the wall to see what sticks. Also, overall, just gut about him, plus a similarity to last game. Ythan looks a lot like he did last game.In post 3960, Titus wrote:@mastina, Explain your Ythan read please.
Simple:In post 3972, innocentvillager wrote:why did that one statement from Titus make you rethink your 4-5 hours on casing her?
In post 3955, mastina wrote:I think that this is literally the first thing Titus has said all game that I can see as possibly town from her, because as it so happens, yes, it is pretty much this.In post 3485, Titus wrote:Hopkirk doesn't post much compared to the rest of the game, but I just feel he's town when he does post.In post 3479, innocentvillager wrote:im not really sure why people strongly TR'd Hopkirk at all, maybe someone can enlighten me there
(Note that my vote's still there because I fully believe Titus as scum can and will say this, too, because saying it is a scum mediator move, it's just that it's the first thing Titus has said that I have shared her stance on.)
Titus said not one, but two, things that I happen to agree with: Hopkirk is just town whenever he posts, and Dannflor was suspicious of Bell at end of day when Bell's posts have been incredibly lackluster.In post 3551, Titus wrote:This makes me want to rethink Bell too.In post 2940, Dannflor wrote:Okay, but what points to Bell trying here? I was severely unimpressed by his catchup posts that even included team reads. And then he made an excuse for "all replacements are gonna be scummy."In post 2934, Titus wrote:It did. Scum!Bell doesn't try at all here. No need for him to.In post 2931, Dannflor wrote:Also, where did this come fromIn post 2906, Titus wrote:My read on Bell is improving.
Because I can't think it came from Bell directly
If you read my Titus case, do you remember what I said?
"When Titus and I agree on something, it is an incredibly promising sign for her being town. Sadly, a lack of agreement isn't alignment indicative", or something like that.
Prior to those two posts, Titus and I were not agreeing on literally anything--not a scumtell, but an absence of a strong towntell.
Those two posts have Titus and I having common ground--not absolute proof of the strong towntell, but potentially an indicator OF it.
In short: Titus and I mindmelding means that Titus is town. Titus hasn't approached full mindmeld territory, but she posted things that COULD be indicative of the start of a mindmeld--that's enough for me to have some benefit of the doubt, to second-guess my Titus case in favor of voting a common scumread in Bell.