Open 814: CultD3 CULT WINS
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I knew it lol.In post 10, Enchant wrote:Hello, i claim Mafia Goon.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I mean this seems unlikely, so I'm guessing you were trying to stir discussion, which is meh but somewhat LAMISTIn post 24, Flea The Magician wrote:RVS Breaker: My vote was serious. Discuss.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I've only played with town!flea (twice iirc), but they are a hard one to sort due to stuff exactly like this. While my first impression was LAMIST, its actually acheived its purpose of getting discussion going, so TR++ for thatIn post 44, Umlaut wrote:Actually this opening salvo by Flea is soprima faciesilly that only town could think it was a good idea.
VOTE: Lemons-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
This just feels like a low-effort consensus vote.
VOTE: T3
Why "strange" eg as opposed to scummy?-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Am lowkey sus of this slot - posts in the thread to refute criticism but doesn't add anything about the wider game or ask any new questions.In post 93, Major Minor wrote:
You could start by answering my post addressed to you!In post 77, Flea The Magician wrote:Anyone else is ??? and needs to do something.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I get the sentiment, just seemed an odd way to say scummy if that was the point you were making at the timeIn post 103, T3 wrote:The strange was more "i would be surprised if this logic came from town" strange.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Pipe down - yes, there's nothing wrong with following up on a question (in fact, it's actually towny), but when that is literally all the slot had done at that point it feels like hiding in plain sightIn post 114, osuka wrote:
this is a dogshit postIn post 101, Marky Mark wrote:
Am lowkey sus of this slot - posts in the thread to refute criticism but doesn't add anything about the wider game or ask any new questions.In post 93, Major Minor wrote:
You could start by answering my post addressed to you!In post 77, Flea The Magician wrote:Anyone else is ??? and needs to do something.
he's putting pressure on a slot that didn't answer his question and that is objectively a good thing-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Lemons strikes me as intense so far but I think calling checking the facts here busywork is a bit of a reachIn post 128, Raya36 wrote:
I would say busy work but I can also understand wanting to understandIn post 126, InsidiousLemons wrote:we're wasting time. enchant, i've confirmed that flea's information is correct. the push they've made has been responded to. there's no secret "role PM receipt status cop". what is the purpose of this line of questioning?-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
None spring to mind - perhaps you could enlighten me?In post 136, Major Minor wrote:There are other slots who had done less (and have still done less) and yet you're not applying the same scrutiny to them yet. Strange.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Let's start here with a side note. Can we tone the explicit/aggressive language down a bit please? It's supposed to be a gameIn post 151, osuka wrote:before i start catching up i just want to say that this dogshit pseudo-meta talk about whether or not whoever confirmed whatever the fuck role PM before or after they saw a role or didn't or whatever else is among the dumbest, most brain dead, shit-tier fucking dumpster fire conversation i have ever seen in my life
if you gave me a fucking lobotomy i'd lose less brain cells than i did reading through that trash-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
This really felt like you were trying to shade me here and accuse me of being disingenuous. Yet, when I replied to you in near real time, there was a significant pause before then you came up with 2 slots that I would argue had been notably more active than you at that point in the game and the backup mod.In post 136, Major Minor wrote:There are other slots who had done less (and have still done less) and yet you're not applying the same scrutiny to them yet. Strange.
If I genuinely felt like another player was singling me out, I would call them out based on their behaviours, but here it feels like you had to retrospectively find a justification for your accusation against me when I called you out on it.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
My point was that the slot had not made any effort to do anything else at all other than wait for the answer to their question. There was no reason why they couldn't advance the game in other ways while waiting for that player to respond - it just felt like coasting.In post 152, osuka wrote:this is contradictory
a slot cannot by definition _only_ follow up to a question they asked, because they can't follow up to a question they didn't ask. it follows, then, that they asked a question, which is something
why are you misrepresenting the slot's contributions?
Your last para in particular feels like it is being written in bad faith - I don't think I am misrepping MM here even if I disagree with them (and fwiw MM made a later point about why they wanted to focus on following that question through) but you seem keen to frame the situation as such-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Why setup A in particular? I feel like I'm missing something hereIn post 159, Flea The Magician wrote:Assuming Setup A, these are the potential setups.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
After some deliberation
VOTE: osuka
I'm pretty wary ofMMMajor Minor and could happily vote there after they tried to shade me hard for singling them out and then had to invent some less-active slots when called out on their accusation.
That being said, Osuka's 152 just feels very slimy and more likely to have been made in bad faith
--pedit lol Flea ref setup A
--pedit I totally hadn't twigged about the whole MM thing. Post updated.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
You'd made a couple of posts in quick succession so were clearly online. I then replied within 4 minutes but it took you 40 minutes to respond when I pushed you for actual examples. Of course, it could have just been unfortunate timing, I can't rule that out, but I hope you can see why it is sus.In post 206, Major Minor wrote:
...am I now being pushed because I had to step away from my computer for more than 10 minutes? Like, legitimately? Because I didn't respond to you 5 minutes after you responded to me?In post 190, Marky Mark wrote:
This really felt like you were trying to shade me here and accuse me of being disingenuous. Yet, when I replied to you in near real time, there was a significant pause before then you came up with 2 slots that I would argue had been notably more active than you at that point in the game and the backup mod.In post 136, Major Minor wrote:There are other slots who had done less (and have still done less) and yet you're not applying the same scrutiny to them yet. Strange.
If I genuinely felt like another player was singling me out, I would call them out based on their behaviours, but here it feels like you had to retrospectively find a justification for your accusation against me when I called you out on it.
I guess the deeper question is this:Did you have specific slots in mind at the time when you shaded me for singling you out?-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
If you didn't have specific slots in mind at the time (ie was more of a rough feeling) then why phrase your post to shade me over it before checking your facts?
If you did have those specific slots in mind then I would question your judgement as the non-mod examples you gave were more active than you at that point in time.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
That's a valid point ref activy != progressing the game and you're right that I was simplifying things somewhat in that regard when summarizing.In post 221, Major Minor wrote:But see, this wasn't a question of raw activity. In my mind, the accusation was less about activity and more about the implication that I wasn't "adding anything to the wider game" or "asking new questions". I still contend that I had done just as much as T3/osuka at that point, because I had tunneled in on one train of thought and was pursuing it. My reaction was "Wait, why is adding new questions a metric for engagement? And if that's the case, why am I getting shouted out for it? There are other low impact players out there that I can't name a single actual thing they've done." I had the Maruchan post in mind, though not necessarily Maruchan's name attached to it. Then upon going back to examine the playerlist, I saw all these names where I was like, I can't name a single thing this person has done of value or any questions they've added to the game state. Which lead to my summary post.
From your description of your thought process above, you more had a "fuzzy" awareness that there were other slots that had contributed less, rather than specific slots in mind (please correct me if you think I'm misrepping here). That being the case, it feels scummy that you tried to shade me over singling you out, without actually confirming your suspicions first to see if I actually was.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
You're trying to discredit my legitimate point here as OMGUS, which is a bit cheekyIn post 233, osuka wrote:
so your case on me is 152? the post where i nudged you?In post 196, Marky Mark wrote:After some deliberation
VOTE: osuka
I'm pretty wary ofMMMajor Minor and could happily vote there after they tried to shade me hard for singling them out and then had to invent some less-active slots when called out on their accusation.
That being said, Osuka's 152 just feels very slimy and more likely to have been made in bad faith
--pedit lol Flea ref setup A
--pedit I totally hadn't twigged about the whole MM thing. Post updated.
if the wiki ever needs an example of omgus, feel free to point here
I was making a serious point that you were opportunistically twisting my words about MajorMinor to push me. Aside from the tangent that it's often better to let the accused slot defend themselves to see how theyll react, I stand by my earlier point that I wasn't misrepping them and they could have done other things while waiting for an answer to their question.
If you had tried to refute my point or explain why you think I'm mistaken, I would get that, but just calling it omgus is trivialising the whole thing-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Rayna had felt towny prior to this, but I don't get why the whole not putting someone at E-1 thing. I don't think there's any real danger of hammer at this point of the day, and it just feels weird that they are voting avoiding voting the main slot that they are pushingIn post 224, Raya36 wrote:I'm getting a slight scumread on T3. I do think Major is much scummier though. I just don't want him at E-1 yet.
VOTE: T3-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Looking at the new posts from over the weekend, lemons is definitely climbing up my TRs in terms of the analytical thinking they are applying to the game (eg 262/264)
On that note, let me try and respond to a couple of things from Lemons (264) and MajorMinor (276) in terms of calling out vs singling out. I think a lot of this is due to poor wording/ambiguity from me in terms of not articulating my point clearly enough (ironically, one of the reasons I started playing again in 2020 was that I wanted to get better at expressing my thoughts in writing as it's something I'm trying to improve in the day job)
-I noticed that Major hadn't done much to advance the game. They'd asked a question, and rather than comment on other parts of the game or interact with other players while waiting, their next post was basically a holding pattern and reaction to Flea's post saying other slots needed to do more saying that they were waiting for an answer to the question.
-Icalled this out(ie brought it to the attention of the other players), as it looked like coasting to me, and seemed scummy.
-Major then accused me ofsingling them out unfairly(ie focussing on them in a biased manner) and heavily implied I was scummy because I wasn't calling out other players for similar behaviour (ie coasting, not advancing the game)
-I then queried who the alleged other slots that weren't advancing the game were that Major felt I wasn't treating equally as I genuinely couldn't think of any and wanted to understand who Major had in mind
-After a pause, Major came up with two slots that I would argue had done more to push the game forwards (this is subjective of course) and the backup mod
TL;DR - I think a lot of confusion is due to the fact that yes, I was singling out Major in 101 for not advancing the game, but no, I wasn't (IMO) singling them outunfairly, which is how Major tried to paint the picture in 136-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
A lot of the follow up posting on that strand of thinking was trying to understand Major's motivations behind shading me in 136, such as whether they had particular slots in mind, when they said I was unfairly picking on them compared to others. I've still got my eye on them, but I do think their posting since has been reasonably towny.
--pedit, I will get to the Enchant stuff in a minute, but let's not give the scum free information pls-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
The Enchant random vote thing is a bit weird but fairly NAI IMO. In terms of them more generally, I'm finding it hard to follow their motivations, especially in some of their more recent posting. I've only played against them with me town vs them scum, where they lurked/low-efforted for the majority of the game. I think their earlier point ref slots revealing any info they have if they have been hammered already seemed legit, but I'm not a massive fan of unnecessary claims and giving scum easy targets to recruit.
This was waaay back on page 3 - do you still think this is the most AI thing that has happened this game? Is there anything that has happened in the last 200 pages that has struck you as particularly AI?In post 272, Enchant wrote:I already pointed, osuka and you are main suspects from me, because of likelyhood of distancing.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Let me stick down a couple of general thoughts and then I'll stop spamming the thread for a bit.
1.) I still think that Osuka has been the slot who has been the most disingenuous in terms of misconstruing events and pushing in bad faith (eg their attempt to discredit/reduce my point against them to OMGUS). I'm keen to dig into this once they are back from VLA as I reckon we have a good chance of finding scum here.
2.) Having just returned from V/LA myself, I'm going to be a massive hypocrite and suggest that we try and inject some energy back into this game. With 6 days or so to deadline, leaving things to the last minute increases the chance of a miscalculation and just plays into scum's hands IMO. Of note, Major and Rayna both promised content over the weekend, so it will be good to hear from those slots soon.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I cannot CC.In post 333, InsidiousLemons wrote:for the sake of certainty, i think it's worth it for everyone to declare outright whether they can or cannot cc, using umlaut's post above as a guide. as long as no one declares their full role (DON'T do this), i don't think there's any disadvantage, because scum already knows the full setup now. if we don't get a cc, enchant is town and scum knows one tpr (enchant). if we do get a cc, enchant is scum and scum knows one tpr (the counterclaimer).
icannot cc, and i would have expected scum to claim either unrecruitable or VT in this situation. this is looking like a pretty bad position if no one counterclaims.
Fwiw, independent of CC shenanigans, I agree that Rolestopper would be a bold fakeclaim for scum here and in my experience. The claiming under minimal pressure aspect itself is NAI and I've seen it done by both factions (eg scum!T3 claiming BP and town!etine claiming babysitter in the large normal that Enchant, T3 and I have just finished).-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
A good place to start would be my point in 191, which you tried to write off as OMGUS at the time. Why not just give a response to my point, even if you disagreed with me, rather than trying to discredit me? I think most people would agree that the point I made went beyond OMGUS - it was theIn post 315, osuka wrote:hit me with any questions you have, i'll be back on later after work to respondmeansthat you pushed me by that was disingenuous.
I'm also keen to understand where your head is at atm in terms of top town/scumreads. You're not voting, and while you have commented on individual actions, I can't find much in your ISO in terms of how you are seeing the overall game.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Why Major?In post 334, T3 wrote:UNVOTE: ench
VOTE: major
Putting votes on separate lines for readability.
~ Kori-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I mean T3 literally fakeclaimed BP as scum in our recent large normal with minimal pressure on them so arguments over pressure and choice of role to fakeclaim do have some merit to them but nothing is impossibleIn post 352, Raya36 wrote:
Enchant only had 2 votes at the time if I recall correctly. I don't think scum would feel enough pressure to fake claim like that.In post 348, T3 wrote:
Enchants pr claim felt like a scum cop out claim earlier. Like that's the kind of thing I would do as scum in ENchants situation there.In post 346, Raya36 wrote:You posted that after the general PR claim but before the rolestopper claim-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
But what is more useful (and is leaning me towards thinking that Enchant's claim is legit) is the fact that nobody so far has stepped forward as being able to counter claim. AFAIK Lemons, Flea and I have all stated that we cannot counter claim (and Umlaut heavily implied that he couldn't) so if we can get the other slots to step up and state their position then we ought to be able to get a quasi-clear on the Enchant slot, which will then give us a useful baseline to scumhunt from.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
While I wait for Osuka to get back to me, I had a look over a couple of slots that have felt towny but have also been somewhat around the edges of the game, Umlaut and Raya. Umlaut looks very town throughout their ISO imo, but a couple of Raya's posts stood out when I was flicking back through them:
In post 291, Raya36 wrote:Is it possible Enchant is struggling to come up with reads because they're scum and know who town is? I thought Enchant was better than that but I can't remember specific meta off the top of my head.
In light of Enchant's claim and the likelihood of them now being town, the above in hindsight have a bit of a vibe of wanting to put the idea of Enchant being scum in people's minds, but without explicitly SRing Enchant or voting the slot. Maybe I'm reading too much into this but I could see how scum could pull this to try and encourage others to vote for Enchant without being in a bad spot themselves, should Enchant flip townIn post 298, Raya36 wrote:
Maybe but scum could easily do it as a way to keep posting without really giving any actual info. But then of course blah blah wifom as you said.In post 295, Umlaut wrote:Well this slowed down.
It's possible, sure. I have no meta one way or the other with Enchant so I can't say whether they find it hard to fake reads. I'm inclined to say that randing their vote is so conspicuous I wouldn't expect it from scum, but blah blah wifom who knows.In post 291, Raya36 wrote:Is it possible Enchant is struggling to come up with reads because they're scum and know who town is? I thought Enchant was better than that but I can't remember specific meta off the top of my head.
I do know Enchant can do better than just mechanics. Idk if this is just a newly gained frustration or if they're hiding behind the mechanics talk as scum-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Ok, let me unpick this from a different angle - did you or did you not SR Enchant when you made those comments? If you did, then why not say that rather than skirting around the subject?In post 357, Raya36 wrote:I think it was fair for me to be concerned when I know Enchant doesn't normally stick to only mechanics and is capable of much better. It makes a lot more sense that Enchant was so focused on mechanics now that they have claimed.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
In post 361, osuka wrote:
what do you want me to get back to you aboutIn post 355, Marky Mark wrote:While I wait for Osuka to get back to meIn post 339, Marky Mark wrote:
A good place to start would be my point in 191, which you tried to write off as OMGUS at the time. Why not just give a response to my point, even if you disagreed with me, rather than trying to discredit me? I think most people would agree that the point I made went beyond OMGUS - it was theIn post 315, osuka wrote:hit me with any questions you have, i'll be back on later after work to respondmeansthat you pushed me by that was disingenuous.
I'm also keen to understand where your head is at atm in terms of top town/scumreads. You're not voting, and while you have commented on individual actions, I can't find much in your ISO in terms of how you are seeing the overall game.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I mean I'm always in favour of promoting LGBT causes, but this is the first time I've seen it used as a vehicle to push someoneIn post 370, Flea The Magician wrote:Why do people insist on answering around my questions?
I know it's pride month T3, but I need a STRAIGHT ANSWER.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Seeing as you're online T3 and I'm already nudging people to actually answer my questions...In post 340, Marky Mark wrote:
Why Major?In post 334, T3 wrote:UNVOTE: ench
VOTE: major
Putting votes on separate lines for readability.
~ Kori-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
That neatly avoids the root of the question. Why is Major better than the other options in your opinion?In post 379, T3 wrote:
Honestly I don't know of anyone better at this point to vote.In post 378, Marky Mark wrote:
Seeing as you're online T3 and I'm already nudging people to actually answer my questions...In post 340, Marky Mark wrote:
Why Major?In post 334, T3 wrote:UNVOTE: ench
VOTE: major
Putting votes on separate lines for readability.
~ Kori-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
... so you're gonna cross-vote T3? (who incidentally has not responded to my question about why he's voting you, despite me asking it within ~1 minute of his previous post)In post 385, Major Minor wrote:VOTE: T3
Fuck it. I don't want to crossvote Osuka and I would prefer if you guys didn't eliminate town D1.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
This feels a bit off. It's pretty fence-sitty and markedly different to your progression on T3, where you explictly called out that you had a slight scumread on them from early on.In post 383, Raya36 wrote:I had a scumlean for sure but it wasn't strong. Sometimes I like to pick at players I scumlean by giving little bits of pressure that way without writing a whole case. Sometimes I post like that as reminders to myself later on, kind of like thinking out loud.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
I guess we should really start talking in terms of PoEs, given how close we are getting to deadline.
I still think we should be flipping osuka rn. Their ISO highlights include bending my words to try and push me (eg 152), trying to deflect my case on them as OMGUS rather than actually work through it (233), followed by acting like they were super open to questions (315), but then stalling and disappearing when I actually asked questions. I'd genuinely encourage people to go and look back at their ISO (it's not long) and make their own minds up.
Failing that, I'd settle for a compromise elim on T3 or Raya. I don't think they are scum together, but I reckon there is a decent chance that 1 of the 2 could be scum, especially with their recent posting.
I also need to go and look back at the Flea/Major interactions - Major's weird interaction with me where they said I singled them out unfairly but then struggled to back it up was scummy, but their posts otherwise have felt very towny, so I need to look back over why Flea is pushing them and whether it looks like it is in good faith or not.-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
Yet again you try to trivialise my points against you by calling it dogshit rather than arguing against it logically. You have 100% not addressed the questions I pointed your way (I guess your insinuation that flea is cult is a partial answer to the one about your reads, but certainly not a comprehensive one) so why act like you were happy to work with me and answer my questions if you're just going to try and trivialise them and bat them away?osuka wrote: yeah im sorry about my activity, i have been extremely busy with work. just yesterday, i was working until 3 am my time
that said, ive already addressed everything else youve mentioned here and i won't be doing it again because it's mostly dogshit and i can't be bothered to keep repeating myself-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-
-
Marky Mark Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: July 10, 2014
- Location: UK
-