[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 14149137 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Mini Normal 2334: trees (Day 5) - Mafiascum.net
The name is already contradictory, just like medical license!
I don't really understand why people do this early in DP1s unless they will gang as 3 out of the 13 here at least. It is junk activity and can hurt Town a lot more than help.
I am replying to you as you chose me, yes, however this is a habit many develop in Mafia and especially in a setup with 13, which is not 'mini' in a real sense, all these equate to is hellos aimed at people to achieve nothing.
My username can refer to different contexts of rationality and madness but in Mafiascum context it refers to that I calculate a lot but seem crazy to others I am sure. It isn't a contradiction.
I agree that RVS votes don't usually mean a whole lot, but I don't think they necessarily hurt town.
The whole stage is honestly the same thing as you are suggesting, generating conversations until people start saying things that are substantial, allowing us to progress the phase of the game into something more meaningful.
I remember when I played before there was the whole RVS/RQS argument, and I did always prefer RQS, but it seems like the site seems to have settled more on RVS at this point.
Post
Post #29 (isolation #1) » Fri Apr 05, 2024 7:02 pm
Postby Thomith »
In post 26, SaltiestCactus23 wrote:
Anyways quick ice breaker time since the only person I've played with before is camelcasedsnivy
How familiar is everyone with the other players in the game?
What would you say your playstyle as town/scum is like?
I've played with Elements, Hu Tao, Kay, cCS, Dann (he is who made the quote in my sig ) and ming before.
I think I've played the most games with Hu Tao, with 5 completed games.
As town I tend to question people a lot to gauge their reactions, try to understand people's mindsets and figure out if I think this mindset is more likely from town!them or scum!them.
I tend to be a more PoE player, attempting to figure out who I think is town and work backwards, rather than figuring out who I necessarily suspect right away.
As scum, I tend to try and play similarly to how town!me played in previous games with people I recognise on the playerlist.
If there was something in a previous game that made somebody on the playerlist think I was probably town, I try to replicate it (this has gotten me caught before, so maybe it's not the best thing - somebody alt slipped, and knowing I played like a VI in a previous game I played, my tone shifted to being more erratic than how calculated I was before that, and I got executed because the shift in play was not subtle at all)
Post
Post #30 (isolation #2) » Fri Apr 05, 2024 7:04 pm
Postby Thomith »
In post 18, RationalMadman wrote:
What I'd do instead is say we keep talking and gang on people as 3 to 4 to pressure them. It can be me, it can be others. Nobody should react until 3 to 4 votes are on them in a setup this big, not on DP1.
Pressure is from votes to eliminate fundamentally (or night actions, sure).
All other pressure is an illusion.
Idk how the right way to talk is but voting and saying silly stuff only benefits scum, not town. Always.
Regarding the bolded, to confirm, do you believe that there is no other way to apply pressure other than voting?
Probably a joke, but I'm not too sure how much I'm liking this post.
why
It feels like it could be performative in some way.
Either "look at me I'm town" or if SaltiestCactus does flip scum, immediately buddying to cCS to make cCS look bad.
Post
Post #54 (isolation #6) » Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:03 pm
Postby Thomith »
In post 40, RationalMadman wrote:
let PRs do things, let mafia play in the dark guessing who to use their powers on, the gamble is Town gains more than Mafia does from the blind NP1 shots in the dark than any extended period DP1. It's true we may end up voting off mafia but at what cost of leaking reads based on who did or didn't say what?
Leak nothing, let DP2 reports and claims dictate how things flow. If a strong PR dies NP1 that's bad luck and frankly DP1 random bandwagons are as much luck too but reveal more to mafia regarding how others respond.
We are also starving ourselves of information by not fading somebody day 1.
Even if we don't flip scum today, when we hopefully have some people flipped red later in the day, noting how people have voted, what wagons formed, whether scum got wagoned day 1 and then a counterwagon formed to get heat off of them, all of this is information we don't get if we just opt to immediately not eliminate during the first day.
because I feel like your vote was opportunistic, due to the ease in which I feel a vote on Madman could be explained away due to them having a non standard belief, that I don't think is necessarily scum indicative.
I think if RationalMadman truly holds the (wrong) belief that not eliminating Day 1 is best, he’s likely going to have a similar entrance as either alignment.
Town reading him over it feels like you might have too much information
I feel like reading Madman either way (scum or town) based on their posts is strange tbh.
Either, TMI like you are suggesting on a potential town read, or opportunistic on a scum read.
because I feel like your vote was opportunistic, due to the ease in which I feel a vote on Madman could be explained away due to them having a non standard belief, that I don't think is necessarily scum indicative.
why do I need to be oppertunistic on day 2?
The vote just seems weird, I don't understand a strong enough read either way to scumread/townread the Madman slot enough to either vote or defend it based on what has happened.
In post 89, Elements wrote:
you've played with me before, do you not rememebr how much of a reactionary player I am?
I'm not sure that this confirms your alignment either way though?
It doesn't
so by your smae reasoning on questioning me voting Rational for nothing alignment indicative, have you not done the same thing by voting me?
In post 89, Elements wrote:
you've played with me before, do you not rememebr how much of a reactionary player I am?
I'm not sure that this confirms your alignment either way though?
It doesn't
so by your smae reasoning on questioning me voting Rational for nothing alignment indicative, have you not done the same thing by voting me?
Good Point. UNVOTE:
I will say, scum are usually more worried about the optics of a vote
If there ever was a sketch unvote, I present exhibit A
Also, who is an alt? They allow that sort of thing around here??
If you find my unvote suspicious, why don't you pressure me, rather than just throw shade?
In post 89, Elements wrote:
you've played with me before, do you not rememebr how much of a reactionary player I am?
I'm not sure that this confirms your alignment either way though?
It doesn't
so by your smae reasoning on questioning me voting Rational for nothing alignment indicative, have you not done the same thing by voting me?
Good Point. UNVOTE:
I will say, scum are usually more worried about the optics of a vote
If there ever was a sketch unvote, I present exhibit A
Also, who is an alt? They allow that sort of thing around here??
I don't understand why you jumped to this conclusion, rather than think about it just me admitting I could have been wrong?
In post 151, KayJayQueue wrote:
It’s really odd to narrate your actions by saying “if I do this it would look like scum so I’m not going to”…why do you think that would make people townread you when that same logic could be given to the reason both town and scum wouldn’t do it - to look town.
Oh you mean why I won't vote Elements. It's not only that. I genuinely believe NoElim is best. elements as Scum will claim a PR when eventually voted. As real PR she will do the same. As Vanilla that's still a Townie. It's lose-lose, since it will force a PR to CC her if she is scum or have revealed a significant thing to scum if not.
There is very likely a roleblocker of sorts in a setup this big ('mini' is semantics this isn't a small game). There is huge reason to just NoElim and let's PRs do their thing with Mafia having toe guess so much.
Why would a PR CC in this scenario in a closed setup?
In post 151, KayJayQueue wrote:
It’s really odd to narrate your actions by saying “if I do this it would look like scum so I’m not going to”…why do you think that would make people townread you when that same logic could be given to the reason both town and scum wouldn’t do it - to look town.
Oh you mean why I won't vote Elements. It's not only that. I genuinely believe NoElim is best. elements as Scum will claim a PR when eventually voted. As real PR she will do the same. As Vanilla that's still a Townie. It's lose-lose, since it will force a PR to CC her if she is scum or have revealed a significant thing to scum if not.
There is very likely a roleblocker of sorts in a setup this big ('mini' is semantics this isn't a small game). There is huge reason to just NoElim and let's PRs do their thing with Mafia having toe guess so much.
Why would a PR CC in this scenario in a closed setup?
If someone claims either your role or a very similar PR, this is a normal setup meaning neither bastard modding nor realistic similar roles should be considered valid by you and not CCing early is gamethrowing as later you'll not be believed unless you were somehow revealed or killed.
I would like to direct you to Mini 2321, where there was both a Town Neapolitan and Town Role Cop in the game, both very similar roles that we doubted would exist together and threw off all of our setup spec that wound up costing up the game.
In post 169, RationalMadman wrote:
I am down to vote anyone that isn't Grovyle or Dann. If we're going to bandwagon, others lack Towntelling in my eyes.
I've changed my mind
Come VOTE: Thomith
Will help end the day
Why do you think it's a good idea to end the day quickly?
In post 169, RationalMadman wrote:
I am down to vote anyone that isn't Grovyle or Dann. If we're going to bandwagon, others lack Towntelling in my eyes.
I've changed my mind
Come VOTE: Thomith
Will help end the day
Why do you think it's a good idea to end the day quickly?
Post
Post #222 (isolation #22) » Sun Apr 07, 2024 6:20 am
Postby Thomith »
I feel like being able to analyse how wagons are formed or deformed during the day is more beneficial in the long run for us than speed no limming, where mafia get a kill, and town may also not use their PRs correctly, as they don't have anything to base their choices off of.
When we start getting flips, seeing how wagons formed and deformed does provide us information we can use to help solve the game.
In post 205, KayJayQueue wrote:I won’t be voting Elements D1 unless something spectacularly scummy comes from her which I don’t anticipate.
just gimmi some time xx
I’d actually be really funny if you did something that pinged me so hard that I did a 180 like “get her outttt!!! I’ll drive the bus!!!!” lol
while you're here can i ask about your thought's on thomith?
Since you're insinuating your play in previous games should make it clear you're town here, can you explain how my play differs to how it usually does as town to make you suspect me?
Post
Post #232 (isolation #24) » Sun Apr 07, 2024 8:10 am
Postby Thomith »
In post 230, RationalMadman wrote:
Outing role DP1 for no reason is antitown as fuck. Anyone who is not disgusted at that is just as bad unless they scumread it instead of assuming Town outed.
Oberbaalysing wagons is nonsense. Town unvote scum during DP1 wagons all the time and vice versa for joining wagons on Town. This is why later votes mean far more especially in clear this person vs that person dynamics. There, voting analysis begins to matter more.
Side note, very weird choice of words for Kayjayqueue to say driving a bus since that is solely used for one scum betraying a partner. Not sure what to even think of it as it is such a brutal slip it cannot be a real one.
Let's say we have 2 main wagons day 1.
Player A flips scum Day 3 in this example, and was a major wagon on Day 1.
Player A is almost executed, but near the end of the day, the wagon shifts onto Town Player B.
After Player A does end up flipping scum later, we now have that piece of information that we can analyse to see a) why this wagon flip happened and b) We have information of the main people that drove the wagon away from Scum Player A, and try and figure out why, potentially finding another scumbuddy in the process.
In post 230, RationalMadman wrote:
Side note, very weird choice of words for Kayjayqueue to say driving a bus since that is solely used for one scum betraying a partner. Not sure what to even think of it as it is such a brutal slip it cannot be a real one.
If that is true, I honestly didn’t know the implication of that wording. I was just trying to make a joke. You could look through my other games and search that phrase, I’m fairly certain I’ve never encountered it. I’m still technically “new” so there are a few things I’m not completely familiar with when it comes to acronyms and keywords. If you’re going to scumread me for being uninformed on the lingo, okay, but it wasn’t a slip or whatever you’re insinuating.
So I thought bus and wagon (I think I’ve also used the word train) were interchangeable words to describe people getting in a vote. I honestly had no idea. Thank you for the links I feel pretty dumb at the moment and I don’t really understand why no one else has corrected me on this faux pas.
Post
Post #314 (isolation #26) » Mon Apr 08, 2024 1:02 am
Postby Thomith »
In post 313, RationalMadman wrote:
I can't see a 'town Awesomeming' attacking me with ridicule there rather than with exploring the very idea he said he'd prove wrong.
I also noticed that he was rapid to switch from saying I'm town to saying oops he's not a noob and isn't Town just like he tried to say the interaction with me and Kayjay is weird and then goes 'oh stop talking mafia theory you're wasting effort and it's annoying and it was the length of reply'. Absolutely nothing from Awesomeming seems Towny.
I am also less sure Nick Riviera is Town but what Nick Riviera does that I prefer is he never pretended to give a shit what I'm writing. There is a significant difference between that and pretending to read it later and combat it while failing to. Lazy town that don't want to read and like to ridicule is still townreadable it's to do with consistency. Awesomeming tries to appear friendly while trying to rile others up, pretends to defend others while laying the foundation to scumread them and then backs out of it when attacked. Everything about it is textbook scum behaviour, nothing about Awesomeming's series of activity this day phase reads as Town to me. I am either massively wrong or right on the money.
If you were massively wrong, how would this change your reads/the direction you'd look to go in?
Post
Post #440 (isolation #27) » Mon Apr 08, 2024 7:14 pm
Postby Thomith »
In post 386, Elements wrote:
I wanna vote in Gibdo/Salty/Rational/Hu today
In no particular order
What changed from you wanting to vote me?
In post 406, Dannflor wrote:
it's not really the initial vote but the trajectory afterwards
people called it like opportunistic but i think an actually opportunistic!scum vote would have invented some reason for Rational to be scum, elements fully admits that she isn't voting Rational because she necessarily thinks he's scum, at least not until later in the game
Hard disagree.
Throwing a vote on someone then reasoning it away as not a scumread means you're jumping on an easy vote (in this case), then explaining it in a way where you don't need to be accountable for scumreading a town player if they flip town.
In post 386, Elements wrote:
I wanna vote in Gibdo/Salty/Rational/Hu today
In no particular order
Why do you Townread awesomeming
Why do you assume that not scumread implies townread?
Do you think this assumption is AI from RationalMadman?
Also @RationalMadman do you prefer us to call you RationalMadman? Is Madman okay? Is RM okay? How would you prefer us to refer to you, since you implied you didn't like being referred to as Rational.
In post 453, Thomith wrote:
Also @RationalMadman do you prefer us to call you RationalMadman? Is Madman okay? Is RM okay? How would you prefer us to refer to you, since you implied you didn't like being referred to as Rational.
I thought that was because I said "Radical" instead of "Rational"
Maybe. I was half asleep when I read that message the first time
In post 495, Thomith wrote:
I don't know why me claiming is being brought up, as I don't think I'm in range for a claim to be requested of me yet, but let me know if I'm wrong.
In post 180, RationalMadman wrote:
Awesoming came in clarifying to default me to Town for advocating for no elimination. This was followed by clarifying that it's Towny because it's uninformed and a noob thing (implying both that he now has grounds to vote me later for being wrong and that he is calling me stupid/ignorant without directly attacking me while seeming to side with me).
After this, Awesoming suddenly realises I'm not new. So, why say that then? After realising I'm not new, he leaves it dismissed rather than directly engaging me and attacking my logic (which is infallible and can't be argued against, sorry to flex it but it's true and I think he realised this as he read it but left it for later).
In fact, the strangest aspect of all was awesoming having the time to still make some posts but not have the time to read my posts and attack my sound logic for the no-elimination. It is exactly the kind of 'haven't got time sorry' post that Scum that wants to get away with not directly engaging people after saying 'this person is kind of wrong that person is kind of scummy but I don't have time to fully explore, peace out' do during DP1s, laying the groundwork to lead on anyone convenient later and really having sided with 0 people while appearing to.
1. Your first paragraph is incoherent to me; what are you even trying to say?
2. I said that I realized that you weren't new because I realized that you weren't new. If I realized that fact, why wouldn't I post that I made a mistake when initially making the townread on you? I certainly want to clarify my position on you especially if I think my previous logic is wrong. I didn't attack your logic because your logic has been attacked already. By numerous people. And I didn't want to dwell on the argument because it was a waste of time.
3. I was very busy traveling (hence the helpful v/la tag next to my username) and only skimmed your posts; I skimmed the posts because I wanted to stay at least slightly in the loop when I have time to do so, but I didn't have time to fully read. I came in an engaged with the thread as well as I can. Would you have suggested that I simply don't post instead? In fact, my posts were highly theoretical (along the lines of "generally, these people are town") because I didn't know the specifics and I still had a way to contribute, and that was to post this kind of generality - before realizing that I had overlooked one part of the issue. It's funny that you characterized my posts as "haven't got time sorry" scumposting when I genuinely just did not have time
RationalMadman wrote:
I both scumread you and you confronted me. I don't know why other people are passive, I am here to rip the Scum to pieces as they beg for mercy. That's how I approach Mafia. If other Townies get in the way of that they meet the same fierceness from me too. To temper this and avoid rule violations and stay calm is a combination most can't pull off so they either tone everything passive or try to play nice.
Streams of consciousness mockery of my high effort posts, which only Thomith is equalling effort of is not surprising Id then get stern or annoyed at you criticising both me and Kayjay and trying to frame us as scum.
I have probably the highest ratio of useful contributions Vs useless this game of any player here. You however said you'd read my posts and attack the logic later and never ever did.
As for the streams of consciousness remark, you aren't exactly wrong but I can't explain how other posts compare without insulting others. My posts tend to be productive if at times for nothing more than the chain events they set off in replies. If that is an issue for you, I couldn't care less and you can scumread me for being highly contributive in a way you don't like all you want. I have already explained why I scumread you anyway and am down to vote you off even.
1. Thank you for explaining your playstyle - something I never even asked for. I do not care that you have an aggressive playstyle that is not what I meant at all. I was referencing the way you are writing and articulating what you are saying, which is different than the way you are interacting with the thread.
2. What's the point of using the word "mockery"? I was not mocking; I was simply making an observation. Your posts come off to me as stream of consciousness. I said very clearly in my post "kinda meme" which means in no way was I intending to actually push that, so I do not see where you are coming from with the "trying to frame [you] as scum"
3. You most certainly do not have a high proportion of contribution. Most of your posts have been caught up with the annoying argument about no hang d1 and if you seriously think you're convincing anyone with any of your posts you're just wrong. It's funny that you think that your posts are contributive though. Furthermore, I never said that I'd attack your posts' logic so uhh.
You seem way too defensive over something that is not that serious. If you actually thought that me scumreading over
writing
style was something worth responding to so strongly (even bordering on OMGUS)- wow. Kind of furthers my point in my post saying "too small of a deal for that big of a conversation"
263, 265, 266 (ISO 64-66) are all more examples of overreaction on rational's part. The whole progression on me seems like trying to OMGUS without it actually seemingly like OMGUS.
In post 313, RationalMadman wrote:
I can't see a 'town Awesomeming' attacking me with ridicule there rather than with exploring the very idea he said he'd prove wrong.
I also noticed that he was rapid to switch from saying I'm town to saying oops he's not a noob and isn't Town just like he tried to say the interaction with me and Kayjay is weird and then goes 'oh stop talking mafia theory you're wasting effort and it's annoying and it was the length of reply'. Absolutely nothing from Awesomeming seems Towny.
I am also less sure Nick Riviera is Town but what Nick Riviera does that I prefer is he never pretended to give a shit what I'm writing. There is a significant difference between that and pretending to read it later and combat it while failing to. Lazy town that don't want to read and like to ridicule is still townreadable it's to do with consistency. Awesomeming tries to appear friendly while trying to rile others up, pretends to defend others while laying the foundation to scumread them and then backs out of it when attacked. Everything about it is textbook scum behaviour, nothing about Awesomeming's series of activity this day phase reads as Town to me. I am either massively wrong or right on the money.
1. Again, I never said I'd prove anything wrong.
2. Nice IIOA.
3. Literally give me quotes for any of these claims:
"tries to appear friendly while trying to rile others up"
"pretends to defend others while laying the foundation to scumread them"
"backs out of it when attacked"
TL;DR rational is pushing me on unfounded logic and false evidence, after overreacting and then OMGUSing to a meme-y scumread I had on him.
VOTE: Rational
I don't mind this vote, as the reasonings are explained, and it does seem as if there is more of an effort to sort, and not just a lazy way to vote someone who is voting/suspecting you.
In post 417, Grovyle in a Fedora wrote:
i dont buy the reasons for elements being town here, feels like cope more than actual analysis (or straight up BS from certain people) - but awesomeming's post has made me consider an angle i had previously discarded(that i'm personally weak to) and uh kinda awkward but they have a point im giving rational too little credit and shortcutting my read on the basis that i should not respect them which I tend to do too often
VOTE: RationalMadman
lets see how he handles one of his townreads turning on him at the very least
To me, it's unclear if this vote was due to a scumread on the RationalMadman slot, or just made out of annoyance, which I dislike - this was followed by the below vote:
This naked vote after the wagon seemed to be beginning to grow gives me pause, especially as the RationalMadman slot seems to be a controversial slot, that regardless of alignment, I feel will very likely either draw scum in if the slot is town, as it's an easy way to fade a mislim without having to be accountable for an incorrect read.
If the slot is scum and is facing heat, there is still a decent chance that RationalMadman ends up getting executed, and upon flipping scum, would give easy towncred for any scum on the wagon, and with how polarising the slot was, I'm not sure how much information that execution would actually give us.
For this reason, votes that are either unexplained, or seem to be for reasons that aren't to do with suspecting him are the reasons why my gut reaction was to dislike this wagon.
This is the same reason I didn't particularly like Elements vote on the slot early on, especially since at the time of her vote, I don't think the slot had done anything particularly AI.
Post
Post #509 (isolation #36) » Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:25 am
Postby Thomith »
In post 475, camelCasedSnivy wrote:
actually on top of thomith taking saltiest's remark about me and him seriously I'm looking at his early interactions with elements and it does NOT look town motivated
VOTE: Thomith
Why do you think my early interactions with elements aren't town motivated?
In post 508, Thomith wrote:
I'm not sure what the point of this post was?
hu tao said that she thought I was scum trying to get her out early because in previous games where she was town and I was scum I had been eliminated
which is like, factually true, but that also implies that I'm for some reason specifically afraid of hu tao "catching me," and I was dubious that hu tao would actually believe that
Gotcha, I missed 424 originally, this makes more sense.
Post
Post #515 (isolation #40) » Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:38 am
Postby Thomith »
I'm concerned that there is a world where RationalMadman is actually scum, and if he does flip scum, his aggressive defense of me after I defended him earlier is an attempt to frame me later.
Post
Post #519 (isolation #42) » Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:54 am
Postby Thomith »
In post 518, Dannflor wrote:
gun to head, do you have a read on Rational right now, Thomith?
Town.
My instinct says that scum likely don't draw this much attention to themselves this early. I understand this may be more of a playstyle thing, and this logic can be quite WIFOMy, but the fact that a lot of the early votes, or most recent wagon votes weren't necessarily due to scumreading Rational, and seemed more votes out of annoyance or general disagreement, I think this compounds into Rational being an easy wagon, which makes me inclined to think he is a scapegoat vote, so is more likely to be town.
In post 518, Dannflor wrote:
gun to head, do you have a read on Rational right now, Thomith?
Town.
My instinct says that scum likely don't draw this much attention to themselves this early. I understand this may be more of a playstyle thing, and this logic can be quite WIFOMy, but the fact that a lot of the early votes, or most recent wagon votes weren't necessarily due to scumreading Rational, and seemed more votes out of annoyance or general disagreement, I think this compounds into Rational being an easy wagon, which makes me inclined to think he is a scapegoat vote, so is more likely to be town.
On a separate note if you are Town, I am over 80% sure that one of dannflor, Elements or Snivy is scum. There was something totally out of where with how they just piled on you there. However, I believe ONLY one of the three is given how it went down.
I don't understand why of them suddenly voted you, seemed to be taking advantage of many outing suspicion on you (including me).
because I feel like your vote was opportunistic, due to the ease in which I feel a vote on Madman could be explained away due to them having a non standard belief, that I don't think is necessarily scum indicative.
because I feel like your vote was opportunistic, due to the ease in which I feel a vote on Madman could be explained away due to them having a non standard belief, that I don't think is necessarily scum indicative.
why do I need to be oppertunistic on day 2?
The vote just seems weird, I don't understand a strong enough read either way to scumread/townread the Madman slot enough to either vote or defend it based on what has happened.
I feel like these posts do show me trying to sort Elements and find out their reasons for their Madman vote that felt weird to me, so insinuating that I was not attempting to scumhunt, and was just voting Elements "just because" is false.
Probably a joke, but I'm not too sure how much I'm liking this post.
why
It feels like it could be performative in some way.
Either "look at me I'm town" or if SaltiestCactus does flip scum, immediately buddying to cCS to make cCS look bad.
Gotcha you were talking about this post.
A comment about one post seeming weird isn't trying to turn things into a read.
I still stand by this post coming off as weird/not understanding the point of it. On its own, it doesn't warrant a mead, but if later on there are further weird interactions, I felt it important to note.
In post 515, Thomith wrote:
I'm concerned that there is a world where RationalMadman is actually scum, and if he does flip scum, his aggressive defense of me after I defended him earlier is an attempt to frame me later.
Post
Post #746 (isolation #53) » Thu Apr 11, 2024 9:21 am
Postby Thomith »
In post 628, KayJayQueue wrote:
Ugh I’m feeling very off about one person that I usually always feel good about so I guess for now I’ll just listen to that gut feeling.
VOTE: Hu Tao
Since time has passed since this post now, do you still suspect Hu Tao? Why/Why Not?
In post 585, Thomith wrote:
VOTE: cCS
I think I dislike this vote on me the most.
also why exactly? I'm the only one who didn't wagon you for the sake of wagoning you
I'm biased but I believe you insinuating that I was not attempting to solve, when I feel like I have been, rubbed me the wrong way. The other votes were about disagreeing with my reasoning, or attempting to apply pressure, but I felt like your vote was for a reason I believed to be false.
In post 643, Hu Tao wrote:
I think this is scum camel. As town I remember him being different
In post 689, Dannflor wrote:
look rational if i was scum and wanted to get town read by you, believe me, i could
Yeah that’s what scares me most lol
What's your read on Dann?
In post 708, Elements wrote:
I can get behind a KayJay vote if anyone wanted to start a wagon there
Why do you suspect Kay?
In post 724, Hu Tao wrote:
I think Kay has been basically going with the flow of the game. And being sus of whoever is being voted in the moment. I think that's why that leads to her scum list not really sounding good
I don't think that's true, as she openly opposed the wagon on me if I remember correctly?
p-edit: I'm not taking out the Kay questions because I'm lazy
Post
Post #869 (isolation #56) » Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:13 pm
Postby Thomith »
In post 868, Black wrote:
Hu's scumread on KJQ feels as fake as her scumread on Dann. I understand the concept of wanting to give a replacement a chance to salvage the slot but she disregarded her KJQ scumread so easily. It doesn't feel like a natural reaction to me
I was about to dispute this as a harsh read of the situation, as I didn't think Hu Tao strongly scumread Kay and just felt weird about her, and the unvote made sense if she did genuinely think she would feel more confident reading you later.
I reread the Kay vote though, and that didn't seem to be the case, that felt like a "I'm pretty sure you're scum" reason for a vote.
I think I'm inclined to agree with you because of that.
Post
Post #872 (isolation #57) » Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:16 pm
Postby Thomith »
FWIW as town or scum I think the Rational wagon is such an easy one for scum to jump onto, either for Town credit for bussing, or just an easy wagon without much accountability afterwards. I want to reread that wagon specifically at some point I think.
In post 872, Thomith wrote:
FWIW as town or scum I think the Rational wagon is such an easy one for scum to jump onto, either for Town credit for bussing, or just an easy wagon without much accountability afterwards. I want to reread that wagon specifically at some point I think.
When was there a wagon on Rational?
Plus a fair few early game votes/unvotes from memory