VOTE: MoI
Phone posting, there isn't a proper tag for choosing is there?
In post 136, Staeg wrote:The time you took finding this picture could've been used for catching up.
In post 141, SnowStorm wrote:In post 69, Benmage wrote:In post 63, SnowStorm wrote:
So do you want to treat it like a policy lynch or a regular one?
VOTE: Benmage.
Doesn't matter.
It matters to me and I'd say it matters to everyone else since everyone is talking about it. Strangely enough, nobody picked on your noncommittal stance on the subject. You basically said you're 'ok' with both using it as a regular lynch to catch scum AND using it to lynch a policy lynch target; those two things don't match. So, again, which is it?
Well, I agree that we should use it as a regular lynch and send someone suspicious to kill Jon Snow.
In post 145, SnowStorm wrote:I'm not sure I'm following you. You're saying that you agree that we should use it as a second lynch, but you also want to have control over who the chosen person will vig?
In post 188, BBmolla wrote:In post 182, Benmage wrote:Sorry Molla that was terrible
I knew it would fail when Snowstorm didn't post anything I could remotely turn into a scumslip.
Shadow thinks I'm town because I caught his scum ass
In post 238, Benmage wrote:post 212
-Cow: I've played with cow a lot.. I think I can read him. His opener read as eager aggressive town. The continuation of the tone of his post re-enforce this initial read.
-Plessiearrus: This post is a town post: post 108 ... the continual posting reads town as well. He giving early reads and questioning people. Town.
-Starbuck: Her opening mindset was aligned with my own. Her defeatist self choose and essential VT claim screamed of town. Scum wouldn't yield so quickly. SB isn't the one to try and skillfully manipulate such a situation. She is genuinely town.
-BBmolla: Everything reads pretty standard town. Gonna have to go with gut mostly here on how I read him.
-Snow: Noobtown read for the moment.
-Plum: To easy a vote on SB. Just seems to comment on nothing... Its like fluff posting that scum can talk about things that don't really matter. Talking about vig targets, PL..agree with me 1-1 trade is good (duh). Although, Plum can often be verbose... The cow sheeping comment reads town to me. So Plum isn't someone I'd consider lynching atm.
-Shadoweh entered the game too cutesy.... I've seen scum not sure how to enter games and therefore enter trying to be cute or funny... Again... not really the strongest read here, because I don't give shadoweh the player much credit.
In post 354, Dolorous Edd wrote:You know, this would hold a lot more weight if
a) You gave a reason.
and b) If you have actually contributed fuck to this game.
In post 361, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Because that’s the only way you making a “we” statement makes any sense or has any credibility.
In post 368, Dolorous Edd wrote:I hated how he come right in and started defending Feynal...reeks of scumbuddies...
In post 379, Dolorous Edd wrote:Please, by all means, go on believing that makes her look town or whatever, but like Tammy said (I think?), there is not one thing that can be used as alignment indicative.
Just ftr, sucking on Day1 is not a reason for you not being lynched.
Neither is having a meta of acting scummy.
But tell me, what was your read on them before that?
Because unless you seeked council from the oracle of delphi, I really don't see how that post could've at all changed your thought at all...
In post 396, StefanB wrote:2. for his nice scummy post (I am so scummy, so of course I am not scum)
In post 398, StefanB wrote:That not but the defence of "I am so scummy, I can't be scum" is still worst.
So beeing unhelpful und checky is now a towntell?
Shadow try another explanation?
In post 403, StefanB wrote:Preview: I am trying to deal with you, Shadow. But I am afraid that isn't what you wanted.
So your defence is you are usless because it is so early in the game, so you have to be usless? When do you start to play?
In post 410, Tyene Sand wrote:Very much disagree with Shadow1psc that "too little has happened" on 17 pages that are very non-spammy, and not entirely sure why he's pushing that notion.
In post 412, Pandora wrote:It's all well and good to say that but if some of us didn't take it seriously the game would never progress to the point where people can get reads and have 'for serious' cases. (as far as I'm concerned it's been long enough, a few days and 17 pages should be more then enough to find scum)
In post 414, Tyene Sand wrote:Faraday this is your fault.In post 411, Shadow1psc wrote:Call me jaded maybe
@Shadow1psc:
Why are you arguing for the defusing of discussion and wagons in general?
Gun to the head, snap decision: who would you vig if you were chosen?
I can point you to Weather Mafia II where I got BBmolla-scum lynched D1 with decent pieces of evidence (why do you care if the evidence is 'right' when lynching scum, anyway? People make too much noise out of cases, and there's little point in giving your scumread ammunition against you). It happens, and it's not that rare.
There are several players who are focusing quite a bit on townreads over scumreads. See Regfan. See myself. You're making general arguments instead of pointing concrete fingers and it's quite slippery. Who is doing this messy D1 thing that you so abhor?
In post 417, Tyene Sand wrote:You should stop assuming stupid = scum, btw. The way your Salamence read progressed was a clear sign of that. (And yet, it was a clear BBtown, so that was nice.)
In post 428, Regfan wrote:In post 427, Shadow1psc wrote:Regfan, you didn't post a lot in Chrono Trigger Mafia, correct?
Content wise? Majority of it, anything that was more than 2-3 lines long was mine but post number wise I was only about 1/4th of it.
In post 436, Lyanna Stark wrote:Okay two things. Do you actually believe that Mina is so easy to read? Because I'm not sure where you're going with this. Mina is fairly readable, but she can play a decent scum game when she wants to. But you're acting like Mina fumbles along like an idiot when she's scum spilling so many scum tells it'll be obvious. If that were true, Plessiezarus wouldn't have added that they *think* they would have a better read of minimum if Mina started posting.
Second - I remember you in GvE having a couple of scum reads on day one. CooLDog especially, so I'm trying to figure out why you keep preaching that there's nothing to know.
In post 455, Minimum wrote:I buy Shadow's stance on me, and it makes me sad to turn on him when he's the only one white-knighting me (I could appreciate some buddying right now), but I find Shadow's early play here more similar to AFFC (where he was contrarian and petty in a conscious effort to mimic his town meta) than to ASoS and GvE (where he got tetchy at points, but was full of adorable protown eagerness). My scumread of him waned somewhat when he discussed his beliefs about D1 theory, but those could be genuine regardless of alignment.I also don't remember him being a hardline anti-D1 contributor before.That said, I'm willing to give him some time to see if he delivers on his promise to contribute later. Shadow's alignment will become apparent with time.
In post 514, mockingjaye wrote:Also Shadow, it’s kind of funny that you include AFFC in your list of past games where you tried to be helpful (Post 473 because you were super-scum there. Too bad the tigers ate most of that game because then the newer people could go check it out to get a good helping of Scum-Shadow (and MoI too, for that matter).
In post 473, Shadow1psc wrote:See previous post, but GvE, AFfC and Chrono Trigger (especially CT) have all really reinforced my stance here that I can try and be useful, but I may as well just be funny because my reads are dismissed (and rightly so, I'm not always right), though I think the bigger point to make here is I believe my play doesn't change because every game I've been in as scum as multiball, and I just genuinely scum hunt the other team. In CT I couldn't even talk to my own scum team, and for awhile I just didn't know who they were because there were so many people and replacements, and everyone just seemed to randomly turbo-mislynch. All of my 'shock' and 'outrage' was natural because it was one of the dumbest things I've ever seen happen.
In post 543, Plums Yo Mamma wrote:Shadow - Currently posting scores and scores of bullshit, and is focused mainly on defending himself and instead of scumhunting, insists that he always scumhunts when he's scum in multiball. Which is pretty fucking scummy not only because he's trying to confirm he's town through self meta, but he's trying to say that he's only a non-contributor when he's town, which is lies and lies and lies.
In post 419, Shadow1psc wrote:Snap decision, I vig someone like MoI, or hascow. Not for any reason other than they've burned me as scum before and I know they're crafty as hell.
In post 719, Minimum wrote:(I think it's somewhat disingenuous of Tammy to claim that we weren't in serious danger, particularly because of a bunch of people who replaced out AFTER that post and who, if anything, would make the game stagnate more--fine, not GUARANTEED to be lynched, just really, really, really fucking likely to get lynched? I was more worried about the wagon than I was letting on, but thought people would eventually just see I was town--or at least, more likely to be town than scum--and move onto actual substantial cases because the original premise of the wagon was so silly and flimsy.)
In post 721, bvoigt wrote:the scum motivation is that he's trying to avoid notice. He said himself that "posting alot makes me scummy," so he knows that if he stays in the background, he won't attract as much suspicion.
In post 558, Plums Yo Mamma wrote:Mina, I'm not so afraid of a shitty vig shot if shadow is chosen to be the assassin. After he's chosen and before the lynch is reached, he will have plenty of players giving him advice on who to shoot, and I'm sure he will not stubbornly shoot Cow or MoI if we yell at him not to. Luckily it doesn't matter cuz he's scum, so.
In post 723, bvoigt wrote:Nope....
In post 730, Benmage wrote:I'd bet my end of day list is more than 80% accurate.
In post 734, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Shadow’s latest I’ll shoot who I want is simply a very light Appeal To Fear for those who read either Cow or I as Town and should not be any reason to adjust Choosing him.
In post 738, StefanB wrote:But MoI we can make his appeal to fear go out in flame, we just have to lynch him instead of sending him to the wall.
Shadow: Your post were this was a boost and could be read as if you choose me, I will do what I want, not interesting in what the majority wants.
So your reaction is over the top.
In post 743, Lyanna Stark wrote:In post 720, Shadow1psc wrote:In post 719, Minimum wrote:(I think it's somewhat disingenuous of Tammy to claim that we weren't in serious danger, particularly because of a bunch of people who replaced out AFTER that post and who, if anything, would make the game stagnate more--fine, not GUARANTEED to be lynched, just really, really, really fucking likely to get lynched? I was more worried about the wagon than I was letting on, but thought people would eventually just see I was town--or at least, more likely to be town than scum--and move onto actual substantial cases because the original premise of the wagon was so silly and flimsy.)
Welcome to day 1. I like swords.
Do you have a point you'd like to make here.
On another note: Delorous Edd - this is what sniping from the sidelines looks like.
In post 747, hasdgfas wrote:In post 727, Benmage wrote:Cow what do you think of the scum logic in a posting style like the ones you quoted here: post 382
The first post I quoted there is him claiming scum, and as already mentioned, that's one of my policy votes when I see it.
Secondly, "too much is being taken too seriously" is a way for scum to say "don't pay attention to what I do early because it's unimportant". Basically, his scum logic is play "too scummy to be scum".
In post 797, hasdgfas wrote:I've contributed less because there's too much talking for me to contribute to.
In post 827, greenknight wrote:In post 826, Shadow1psc wrote:God, I can finally link this; http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22064
Read Salamence. Enjoy our free lynch. UNVOTE: VOTE: Salamence
Seriously Shadow? Have you been just trolling around waiting for that game to finish so you could link it and call for a policy lynch? Do you have any actual scum reads?
In post 278, Salamence20 wrote:Spoiler: Sala's Catchup
If there is anything else important that I miss, please do tell.
Meanwhile, I'll be waiting for BB's reasoning of Sal obvscum.
In post 433, Salamence20 wrote:In post 411, Shadow1psc wrote:Salamence we willfor sureknow about given a few more days (real days, not game days).
I don't like this statement, and I am sure I know why I don't like this statement.
I know what you are trying to do, you are waiting for some kind of post that is either scummy, VI, or both.
Staeg wrote:So, to sum it up, the following players should be dead come massclaim day (preferably within the next 4 days):
Salamence
Dolorous Edd
Hyperion
Shadow
I would still like starbuck to die (who STILL hasn't nameclaimed), but I'm more or less alone there.
Why should starbuck claim at all? He already claimed VT, what more is there for you to find out?
I would like to know why you want DE, Hyperion, and Shadow dead, because I am sure I know you want me dead because of my shitty LyLo play, which is more biased than actual scummyness.
-------------------------------------------------------
So anyways, lets get on to the reads.
Town:
MoI
Pandora
Tyene
Edd
Cow
Lyanna
Molla
Starbuck
Pless
Stefan
Salamence20
Regfan
Null:
Benmage
Staeg
Plum
Jal
Feysal
Pappums
SoO
MoS
Mocking
BV
RedFF
Petyr
Scum:
Minimum
Shadow
Snowstorm
Hyperion
In post 833, Plums Yo Mamma wrote:Mostly to note that Greenknight's behavior is confusing me and making me wonder what's up with him and if that says anything about the wagons (answer: quite possibly, but not something I can tell with current info).
In post 902, MagnaofIllusion wrote:All he's doing is basically prod-dodging and responding to votes with "I disagree".
In post 916, Benmage wrote:In post 913, Shadow1psc wrote:I don't know that I've seen town benmage exasperated at the amount of content in a game before.
Link exasperated scumBenmage please.
In post 922, kortul wrote:I am too tired to ISO my second strongest suspicion atm, and even if after the ISO i will believe he is also scum, using CHOOSE on him would be more sensible, therefore i will do the ISO tomorrow.
In post 998, Lyanna Stark wrote:So so so tired of Shadow doing nothing but sniping from the sidelines. Like really, I suppose according to Post 724 he's got some magnificent ~role~ he knows will keep him off the lynch/choose wagon but does that mean we have to be subjected to an entire game full of sniping/cutesy gifs/gloating type posts??? Like seriously, can we just lynch/choose him and be done with it? Please???
In post 785, MagnaofIllusion wrote:If I live past Night 1 maybe I'll be motivated to begin caring again. Until then I'll probably prod-dodge out the day so I don't have to see all the whining in thread.
In post 1030, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I'll just ignore your trying to draw parallels between the two of us since you are scum and all.