In post 1622, Gyre and Gimble wrote:You have been scumhunting pie for quite a large portion of the game and have made waves. What has muffinslot done?
Answered this?
In post 1622, Gyre and Gimble wrote:You have been scumhunting pie for quite a large portion of the game and have made waves. What has muffinslot done?
In post 1461, BBmolla wrote:Fairly confident Quil is playing to his scum meta btw
In post 854, Quilford wrote:In post 635, pieguyn wrote:I'm still trying to figure out what I make of Quil vs. S-S.
I agree with most of what S-S is posting. if he was "try hard scum", as Quil is saying, then it would make more sense that he would actually read the whole game, or pull up more than 3 quotes, or do anything that actually ... you know, requires trying hard. 605 also completely misses S-S' point (that Quil conveniently dropped that S-S' posts were "genuine" after he got accused of it being disingenuous), which I also agree with.
I also hate Quil's insistence that S-S is "agreeing" with him in 613. it's pretty obvious what S-S is saying there is that if he was scum he'd try to make a more effortful post than the one he made *in this game*; not that he'd try to make more effortful posts in general.
on the other hand, I disagree that Quil-town would need to unvote S-S at the point where he thought S-S was genuine. you'll notice my vote is still on GB despite reading them as town (lol). most of the time, if I don't have someone I feel strongly that I want to push/lynch, I don't care about where my vote is. if I scum read him, it wouldn't be for this.
@Quil:when did you supposedly "reread" S-S and why did you not mention it when you did so (since I don't remember you posting anything along the lines of "I looked at S-S again, I think I was wrong" until right at this point. correct me if I'm wrong)? also would like to know your thoughts on what I said in the 3rd paragraph here.
I'm continually rereading players. Especially when I start to get a sense that they could be scum, I'll go through their ISOs and look at their posts in context whenever I have a spare minute. I do remember rereading between #533 and #581 because I remember feeling like I had been disarmed by his posts around #529, #532 etc.
I think perhaps a lot of the problem here is that I've been using the word 'tryhard' to mean something that other people aren't quite picking up on. When I called Soft's first non two-sentence post 'tryhard' I meant that it contained no useful analysis and therefore looked like it had been posted for the sake of appearing active, engaged and therefore town.
Re your third paragraph, I didn't pick up on that interpretation of Soft's words at all. I thought he was repeating what I had said back at me in order to try and make a point about circularity.
In post 637, Gold Saucer wrote:In post 583, Quilford wrote:I do think people getting on my back about halting my Soft push are conspiracy theorising. Uh no, I think all my early points are valid, I think the slip is eminently fakeable (and am definitely going to look into it more when I'm not on my phone) and I don't like Soft's reaction to whomever posted that he likes making scummy entrances for the purposes of getting people's reactions (again will elaborate later). I still don't think he's scumhunted at all and I think the reasoning he gave for his townreads was weak.
Thinking my sigh was me not being able to conceal my irritation that another mislynch had escaped me is hilariously stupid. In actuality, it was because I was worried about adding another townread to an already large pile.
Starting to get a bit wary of GB.
In what regard?
-b
I didn't really like that he was content to give Soft townpoints based on the slip and EM meta (which as he's said cuts both ways, because apparently Soft on EM is quite capable of faking slips) despite Soft's scumhunting still being all but nonexistent... didn't really strike me as a Regfan thing to do. The EM meta discussion also had a softbuddying edge to it as well imo.
Still consider GB town on the whole though.
In post 638, Gold Saucer wrote:In post 601, Quilford wrote:Why would scum even bother to make a post that contains shit all if they didn't think they would get points for at least looking like they were doing something? Especially valid in your case considering it was already a couple pages in and it was your first post of the game that wouldn't be longer than two sentences or something.
You're begging the question here by assuming that he's scum and then attributing motivation here
Unless you think 'tryharding' (which feels just like a loaded phrase) is a thing that only scum would do?
Or that "posting a post" is some sort of tell because that's all you really seem to accuse him of doing here
I don't know this whole thing presupposes SS is scum and I don't understand why you're doing that
-b
It doesn't actually presuppose anything of the sort? I hope my explanation above of what I was trying to convey by use of the word 'tryhard' clears up your confusion.
In post 879, Quilford wrote:In post 876, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:I certainly do; I still have no real idea where where your thoughts are on a lot of the players in the game other then "Townish!", there's not a huge amount of detailed explanations behind reads listed and the larger parts of when you do touch on it is after I've pushed you for stances which is a huge problem I'm having with you. Also you wanted someone to be online at the same time as you, I popped on but there's not much you seem to want to discuss, I'm around for the next hour if you're still interested in discussing reads, tomorrow night works for me too.
Please. You haven't had to push me for stances, you've had to ask me for them. You certainly haven't had to be 'dragging them out' of me, as you originally said—that implies some sort of resistance on my end. Prompting people for their thoughts happens in Mafia games literally all the time.
My biggest problem, and it's one that others are having too, is that it's really hard to get a read off of people who seem to be doing a lot of scumhunting with the aid of meta. As my scumhunting style depends massively on the analysis of rhetoric and semantics, I'm often at a loss when looking at these large meta walls because I'm not familiar with players' histories and thus ill-equipped to judge the conviction and genuineness of the cases being made. Yes, I know I'm making excuses. I think they're pretty good ones tho.
I originally asked, what, six hours ago? Since then I've been dealing with study, dinner andThe Killing Season. If you want to shoot me a couple questions now go for it.
In post 1466, pieguyn wrote:in fact,
VOTE: S-S
I think basically everyone in this game has done a bunch of shit that's borderline unfakeable. go back and read S-S' posts. they all are pretty town, sure, but in terms of things that are absolutely-certainly coming from town? there's nothing there except possibly the town slip from the start and both heads of GB said that was fakeable coming from him.
if you disagree, comment on why I'm incorrect to town read RBD for adopting a strategy that doesn't make sense as scum. or why I'm wrong that it's really dumb for Quil to replace out as scum in this position. or why what I'm saying here about S-S' interactions with Yuriko doesn't make sense, or why you're reading them as town. or DO ANYTHING.
In post 1528, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:I actually read Muffins Post 1430 as town, won't elaborate on it just yet, want to talk with Empire and see if he picks what I'm reading town about it otherwise I'm worried he's just going to agree with me (It's probably the largest issue I've had with this game, I feel like my reads and thoughts are too influential on him).
In post 1563, pieguyn wrote:I maintain that if RBD is scum here they had what was potentially a free mislynch basically lined up already and then chose not to follow through with it for no apparent reason.
In post 478, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:In post 473, BBmolla wrote:I gotta tell you, being scum in this game would probably literally depress me
Having to deal with confirmed town nacho/regfan/ffery/empire/muffin/tammy etc. talking the entire game while I'm scum (depending on who my buddy would be obv)
like I'd just fucking quit
I'd take solace in the fact they'd lynch the people not in our clique like we do every game first, lol.
In post 1636, Gyre and Gimble wrote:Yuriko bus grows less surprising the more I look at it.
In post 1637, Gyre and Gimble wrote:In post 1636, Gyre and Gimble wrote:Yuriko bus grows less surprising the more I look at it.
even i didn't understand what you saw in 478... mind explaining ?
In post 1636, Gyre and Gimble wrote:Pie: Let's take the time to put your thoughts on RBD together. So you figure that one half of RBD locks on to Yuriko instantly, and that their two sentence thought about why YJ is scum was enough for them to feel totally done with pushing the issue (even though their very next paragrpah implies their read is turing back with "I'm ambivalent, want to see non-setup related thoughts.).
In post 1636, Gyre and Gimble wrote:Then, the other hydra head doesn't agree with the evaluation of YJ scum and pushes out elsewhere while continually pointing out "I think YJ's stuff are just newbtells." The hydra head who thinks YJ is scum could still put the vote in play elsewhere to appease their buddy, while seeing how YJ plays without the pressure. Or they could post additional justification for a YJ wagon in thread. Or they could sync up with their buddy until their reads are the same. But they do none of these things. Instead, their vote stays right the heck on YJ - who holds to their page 5 vote the entire day when they post 100 times?
.
.
.
And I mean, shit, look at their fucking walls like 316 and 658. When they wrote those walls, their vote was on YJ because "I kinda didn't like that early post, and they haven't caught up since then." What an absurd disconnect. But it makes a lot of sense if you're trying to lay groundwork for mislynches while making sure that YJ doesn't get lynched without you on her wagon.
In post 1639, Gyre and Gimble wrote:Scum knows how YJ is flipping.
Which one of these D1 voting histories seems more like a YJ sucmbuddy?