In post 704, northsidegal wrote:i'd say i'm fully in this game now even if i still haven't gotten around to wall iso-ing everyone yet - feel free to engage. the same goes for keychain, who i believe said something along the same lines.
Why no vote? Also, I don't think you've given your read on the Cy/Espe slot, I'd like to hear that.
Regarding Dunnstral vs EE: For me, Dunnstral is null. Voting there is literally a lurker-lynch. It looks a lot like he's only skimming a couple of recent posts each time he says anything, from his response to me and his vote on Espe. Your
701 is seriously weird. Dunnstral is an awful lynch for today and I'm sure you can do better than that.
EE is also lurking but his actions have been considerably more scummy. Every time someone votes him he appears and splashes around a bit. It doesn't seem like uninvested town, who I don't think would be so bothered by a bit of pressure.
462 and
506 were particularly bad as posts that looked like he was trying to exist in the game but contributed exactly nothing.
What benefit do you get out of trying to equalise the two?
Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Espeonage
gut scummy
but why must you do this to the wagon
I'm
on
In post 706, northsidegal wrote:@keychain, can you explain your reads progression on cy? it seems like you came out of an early game interaction townreading him but there's about a 350 post gap where he doesn't come up at all until 517, where he's at the bottom of the list. what happened?
This can serve as my Cy case, which I promised I'd do last night but ah well.
517 was made after reviewing the ISOs of the players listed, which is when the change mostly occurred. However you've also missed signs of my townread wavering in
209.
Several things that I initially townread him for came across really scummy on reread. For example, I have no idea what I was thinking when I unvoted in
110 and said I "particularly liked point A" in
107. On reflection, the point takes some severe mental gymnastics. For reference:
In post 107, cytheflyguy wrote:A) My train of thought was not, "If I can trust this person, and Transcend has a higher than normal chance of being scum, then he should be prodded because he is more than likely scum in this game."
It was, "If I can trust this person, and Transcend has a higher than normal chance of being scum, he would probably have a higher chance of not playing because he is scum and does not want to play the same role once again, as he was the only person to not confirm." The reason I fell for the joke was because the statistics relied on behavior, especially the part about if someone replaced him. It's flimsy logic, yeah, but if you read my posts, I did not 100% agree with UC, I was just talking statistics so I could anticipate behavior.
Like ??? how did I townread this. The main problem I had with him was on him not reading the players in the game, and this is just a terribly convoluted excuse to have not been doing that.
The early Transcend meta thing still rings really false to me, though
18 suggests it really is a genuine misunderstanding because it looks like he thought that Transcend was less likely to stay in games where he's town so I'm conflicted over that one.
Then overly defensive in
61/
72 and easily persuaded to vote by Katya in
76.
96 A) is a really bad excuse, in that from an early game post he decided to throw out everything he'd ever known about mafia to engage in some meta speculation about a player he didn't know not confirming for alignment-related reasons because... he thought everyone was going to be doing this?
I still dislike the solid townread on me in
107 considering how unsure he seems to be of other reads, and renewing it in
143 comes across really appease-y.
381 "been meaning to move my vote somewhere else" doesn't look like a town thought process - his vote was on a scumread of his as I understand it (Firaja) and it looks like he cares an awful lot about what he looks like.
400's "Like...isn't that questionable logic? Like even more questionable than my original blunder" is pretty icky, because he's acknowledging that he looks scummy but is trying to shift people scumreading him for it onto Transcend.
Those are the reasons he was at the bottom of my list. At this point I'm finding it hard to see his actions as town-motivated.
@Zach
692:
You're under no obligation to be the same person you were 5 minutes ago.