idk. that's what i'm gonna be scouring the thread for. join meIn post 3223, Nero Cain wrote:Zakk, who is the last team scum?
| The Divergent Series | Game Over |
-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
:goodposting:In post 3224, Hikari Link wrote:
Then pick someone else. And you keep acting like we're the only ones here. We're not. Let's all work together. You, zakk, shos, and make four votes. We could either join a current wagon or start a new one. Somebody would probably join it.In post 3217, Nero Cain wrote:
no matter how you want to slice it this is still effectively lynch Key or get lynched. Like even if I switched to Key there's not enough to support his wagon. It feels very dammed if I do dammed if I don't.In post 3207, Hikari Link wrote:But now I'm concerned that he just wants the wagon on him to die so that he can run out the clock. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until tonight-
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: December 6, 2009
on what?In post 3225, zakk wrote:join me
I already have my opinions and they are likely not to change.
IF we argue that you aren't scum then I'd think that the last scum is in Key, PV or Creature.
In post 3080, Nero Cain wrote:zakk
Keyser Söze
Nero Cain
PeregrineV
Creature
Ramcius
WhemeStar
Aronis
Lil Uzi Vert
momo
Hiraki
shos
^
is your lynch list. Like really I'm the last scum and I'm offering myself up as a lynch on the condition that both Zakk and Key flip town (wich won't happen) Let's go for the perfect win.Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit-
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: December 6, 2009
but I'd still like this answered.
In post 3220, Nero Cain wrote:If you think I'm the wrong lynch why are you only trying to get ppl off your wagon?Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit-
-
Creature Solve This Game
- Solve This Game
- Solve This Game
- Posts: 46072
- Joined: January 26, 2016
- Location: Lands of Fire
-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
*I* took MY vote off your wagon.In post 3220, Nero Cain wrote:I don't even know what you are suggesting. If you think I'm the wrong lynch why are you only trying to get ppl off your wagon? Who do you want to be lynched if not you and not me?
And I'm looking for another lynch as we speak.-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
I believe you're correct.In post 3229, Creature wrote:Aronis, Key, PV or LUV then.
I just got done with a triple-ISO of scum, and momo looks pretty un-scummy as a result.
Doing Whemestar next.-
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: December 6, 2009
but they are still voting me. If you think I'm a wrong lynch why are you comfortable with them voting me? Shouldn't you be trying to get them off my wagon just as much as you are trying to get others off your wagon?In post 3208, PeregrineV wrote:[3][L-4] Nero Cain: Lil Uzi Vert, momo, shos,
I have to go soon. I expect to see case on someone with detailed reasoning why they are scum by the time I get back.Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
Momo's appearances in scum ISOs
(Sorry, woulda spoilered this, but there are spoilers in it, and the code breaks)
In post 34, Srceenplay wrote:
I'm can hear Bernard speaking as I read your post.In post 32, Keyser Söze wrote:Hello WhemeStar. Did you think momo's vote was serious? Moreover, why do you think he picked you?In post 150, Ircher wrote:Momo on the otherhand reads as inexpeienced.In post 183, Srceenplay wrote:
Why would you read Momo this way but not wheme?In post 150, Ircher wrote:Momo on the otherhand reads as inexpeienced.In post 185, Ircher wrote:
Momo is classified as town. You have to pay attention to the sign in parenthesis for neutral and null. (+ = Townlean, - = Scumlean)In post 181, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
I thought it was weird that their readslist described Momo how I would describe someone that I am townreading them but put them in a non-towny category.In post 160, Ircher wrote:Apologizing in advanced for misgenders and this list includes the people who have stuck out to me.
Spoiler: ReadsIn post 187, Ircher wrote:
Possibly confirmation bias. Wheme's posts don't have quite the same atmosphere though.In post 183, Srceenplay wrote:
Why would you read Momo this way but not wheme?In post 150, Ircher wrote:Momo on the otherhand reads as inexpeienced.In post 217, Srceenplay wrote:In post 111, momo wrote:
What does this mean??In post 69, WhemeStar wrote:Does it matter?
Everything matters.
If you are not able to share reasoning, it means that either the reasoning I scummy or you have no reason but mislynch.In post 128, momo wrote:
No it is not.In post 113, WhemeStar wrote:Wow momo that post is bad
BTW, I started the wagon on Wheme as an rvs push. Why did people commit to it so hard??? I will be trying to find scum on that wagon??
Also, Not seems very flip floppy, trying to please everyone. First he followed me on wheme and the followed wheme on me. Looks like he wants to please everyone so that he is not lynched.
VOTE: NotMafiaIn post 142, momo wrote:Sorry, I meant can someone who is not scum (wheme/not) give me their thoughts........
You vote whemestarIn post 208, momo wrote:Guys unlike some of you people I am actively trying to solve the game. Not and Nero pushing the Wheme wagon that I meant as rvs strikes me as scummy. Thoughts on this????
You question him and his actions
You call it an RVS and people voting it are scumy
Then you call wheme and NotMafia scumy
Then you call it RVS again
That's my problem with it.
VOTE: MomoIn post 239, Aristophanes wrote:
Because I've never not scumread him, which gives me pause when a wagon on him grown like this!In post 228, Not_Mafia wrote:Why are not-momo votes a thing?In post 289, Ircher wrote:
True, but don't discount it completely either.In post 238, Ramcius wrote:
being lynchbait doesn't gives lynch immunity, and if you going bring this argument up, i will be more than happy prove you wrongIn post 225, momo wrote:F U guys.
It is generally agreed by many people on this site (including Transcend) that I am lynchbait. So be smart and see past it...
VOTE: Not Mafia
you wrong, i'm not scum, so you have to goIn post 341, Srceenplay wrote:Momo still hasn't gave me a reason to town read him. Calling him lynchbait loses its credibility when he is self aware of it and states it himself D1.In post 471, Ircher wrote:The Momo wagon is bad and you guys and gals know it.In post 555, Srceenplay wrote:@keyser
I have just played with Momo town and scum.
As town he was in 1v1. Ended up giving up and basically conceding. Lynched.
As scum he was mentioned as scum and then said " so vote yume?" Yume was the popular mislynch wagon.
So as town, concedes.
As scum throws attention somewhere else.In post 564, Srceenplay wrote:
I don't see it as genuine frustration.In post 557, Creature wrote:I haven't seen scum!momo get this frustated either.
His self meta as lynchbait comes across as an excuse.In post 571, Ircher wrote:
Ok, here we go.... (Sorry if I'm very incoherent...)In post 221, momo wrote:
The wagon STARTED with an rvs vote. 2nd post of p.2 I think.In post 217, Srceenplay wrote:You vote whemestar
You question him and his actions
You call it an RVS and people voting it are scumy
Then you call wheme and NotMafia scumy
Then you call it RVS again
Anyway, Wheme started reacting a bit scummy so I questioned him.
Then it suddenly became a huge deal and it looked like an early lynch was a possibility.
I stopped then because short D1 mislynch is never good for town.
Better safe than sorry.
Nero and Not seemed TOO eager.
Happy??????
Spoiler: Momo ISO - Day 1
While there could be more to say about individual posts, its kinda hard to, so I think I'm gonna wrap this up with overall things I'm noticing:
1. Lots of confirmation bias
2. Very little and usually weak explanations for reads
3. Though never a reliable tell, it feels "Too scummy to be scum".In post 584, Ircher wrote:Momo, Wheme, and Nero are who you should pay attention to.In post 588, Srceenplay wrote:
No. I thought it was NotMafia. He threw attention there. Granted he gave a reason to it seemed like deflection to me.In post 560, Keyser Söze wrote:Is 'alban' the 'Yume' in this scenario?
There were 2 votes on alban... momo added the third (Wheme and Ircher have since unvoted alban).In post 592, Srceenplay wrote:In post 577, momo wrote:Nothing at all. I just thought, and maybe I misinterpreted something, that is was going too far.
I genuinely thought you guys wanted a lynch instead of pressure.
What do you think of Nero's push on Keyser Not??
Can you show posts where you think it was going to far and they where just trying to lynch?
Show me what it is you seen.In post 607, Ircher wrote:
We obviously see it.In post 605, momo wrote:
Come on guys. He is doing this on purpose. How do you not see this?????In post 604, Not_Mafia wrote:There is no WIFOM, I'm scum
VOTE: Not_Mafia
In post 608, Srceenplay wrote:Momo still hasn't answered questionsIn post 618, Aristophanes wrote:
Well that was easy then! XDIn post 617, Not_Mafia wrote:
tl;dr, momo is scumIn post 616, Aristophanes wrote:Shit man, at page 15 of 25. I'll see if I can bang this out tn, but you're more likely to get something frome tomorrow!
Anyone else it just Momo?
And was it a slip or a Gameplay read?In post 747, Aristophanes wrote:In post 746, Not_Mafia wrote:You also counted momo's votes wrong, he has 11 votesIn post 758, Aristophanes wrote:
Hey Keyser! It's been a while!In post 554, Keyser Söze wrote:Hello, Aristophanes.Your vote is still in RVS. Are you trying to sort players in your faction PT?
You have offered two (town?) reads so far (two defences).
On momo:
And WhemeStar:In post 239, Aristophanes wrote:Because I've never not scumread him, which gives me pause when a wagon on him grown like this!
What are your actual thoughts on the arguments used against them? (Your thoughts on them concern only the speed/size of the wagon on them).In post 240, Aristophanes wrote:This whemestar fellow is clearly town tho. Why is this a wagon?
Momo is a tough read and I legit always scumread them. Momo was more a moment of pause, but the more i read the morning ei think they may be scum.
Where is still likely to be town, and I've liked what they have posted thus far. Of course, a further analysis of both slots is required, but this is what I have atm.
See what I mean, he's a hard read!Spoiler: Longass Keyser Post
I have seen him get frustrated as town iirc. But momo doesn't get disheartened as town, he just makes more noise until people follow him or lynch him.
435 sucks ass, and makes it obvious Alban and Momo aren't scum together. Either could be though, and from what I have read of Alban, as much as they could be, I done think they are. Momo is far more likely to be scum.In post 848, Aristophanes wrote:Oh, I was hoping you'd do that for me :S
I can't say I'm totally caught up yet.
However, sure!
What are your thoughts on the Zakk and Momo wagons, and if you dislike them, who among the voters do you think are scum?
What are your thoughts on Creature's potential intent to shut down the wagons and start fresh ones?In post 808, Creature wrote:Also, if this game stalls, I'll shut down both wagons and roll a dice to a new wagon.In post 866, Ircher wrote:
momo already has a wagon, has had one throughout the game, and wasn't a choice.In post 860, Not_Mafia wrote:
momoIn post 859, Ircher wrote:Out of {shos, Penguin, BTD6}, who should we flashwagon?
'Kay, w're flashwagoning Penguin then.
VOTE: PenguinIn post 869, Aristophanes wrote:
So, hard town on Zakk, Momo is what, null? What makes you so willing to lynch him regardless of alignment?In post 855, WhemeStar wrote:
I think Zakk is town.In post 848, Aristophanes wrote:Oh, I was hoping you'd do that for me :S
I can't say I'm totally caught up yet.
However, sure!
What are your thoughts on the Zakk and Momo wagons, and if you dislike them, who among the voters do you think are scum?
What are your thoughts on Creature's potential intent to shut down the wagons and start fresh ones?In post 808, Creature wrote:Also, if this game stalls, I'll shut down both wagons and roll a dice to a new wagon.
Momo is really hard to read. My gut is telling me he is scum, but I keep getting that feeling he could be town. Not against his lynch honestly. The earlier he is gone the better IMO.In post 944, Srceenplay wrote:Momo has dodge multiple questions.....In post 1039, Aristophanes wrote:
Best post of the game thus far! XDIn post 1026, rb wrote:4+8 = 12
12+1 = 13
13th letter of the alphabet is M
13-12 = 1
1st letter of the alphabet is A
Half of 12 is 6
6th letter of the alphabet is F
Half of 6 is 3. 3+6 = 9
9th letter of the alphabet is I
8 question marks. 9-8 = 1
1st letter of the alphabet is A
~
momo is confirmed mafiaIn post 1114, Ircher wrote:And actually, I do care.
Everyone needs to get off the obv ML bait Momo.
Zakk is by far the superior lynch due to the fact that he's only here at the most convenient of times and is non*entity elsewise.In post 1135, Ircher wrote:
Why have you not moved your vote throughout the game?In post 1115, BTD6_maker wrote:Radiant Moonlight gives very little for analysis. Overall they have three votes on Momo. The first was RVS, so I can ignore that. The next two still do not have reasoning attached. (You once claimed that Momo was Town). What is your reasoning for the Momo votes?
Transcend next. Transcend was merely sheeping. From what I can see, they were sheeping Radiant Moonlight, who gave very little in the way of reasoning. Transcend, why did you do this, and do you still agree with it?
PenguinPower gave virtually nothing.
Whemestar next. This is more interesting. It seems as though the main reason is meta. Exactly what is the main difference? I noticed that the Town Momo posted a huge wall very early on. Other than that, there was not much of a difference. If you noticed another difference, please explain it and then show that this is a pattern throughout Momo's games, not just in these two instances.In post 1152, Aristophanes wrote:Awww shit! Pagetop callout!
Momo, LUV, and Nero. However I still am so behind its not funny.In post 1525, Srceenplay wrote:In post 1521, Creature wrote:Btw, did you make other contributions besides 1519?In post 608, Srceenplay wrote:Momo still hasn't answered questionsIn post 1591, Aristophanes wrote:K, Momo Iso is actually scummy.In post 602, momo wrote:
He claimed scum!!!In post 599, Not_Mafia wrote:There is, I'm a mafia doctor
Okay here is the new and updated case.
Scum would normally not claim scum. Town would claim scum as joke maybe.
So Not is going to WIFOM us into thinking he is town.
But we can see past it. He is scum!!!!
This is probably the most laughable case I've seen. Like, seriously, acknowledging Wine and then drinking more of it is ridiculous, and NM, though he would do this as either alignment, I doubt would follow up like he did.In post 605, momo wrote:
Come on guys. He is doing this on purpose. How do you not see this?????In post 604, Not_Mafia wrote:There is no WIFOM, I'm scum
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Plus, this is supposedly a Slam Dunk, yet Momo stays with it for...3 posts?
He then switches to rb and abandoned NM because ???
I mean, I get the Iso gave him a scumread, but he stopped voting someone he thinksIn post 917, momo wrote:Spoiler: rb iso
Because reading his iso he is active, but refuses to post content. Kind of like scum acting like town by staying active but refusing to help. On top of this, he shows disregard of people pushing him, deflecting attention on another wagon. For this reason, as I dislike the other two wagons, I propose a new wagon to which the wagonee might finally respond to:
VOTE: rbClaimed a Scum Rolein order to vote here and never even mentions NM's supposed claim when doing so. How do you just forget you have "caught scum"!?
And even better is that this isn't his first time not following a Slam Dunk scumread.Like, Momo has had a 99% scum read and a scumclaim that he actually believed, yet he's not voting either!? That is scummy! He's blowing things out of proportion then abandoning them when they don't catch without ever mentioning them again! Literally throwing stuff at the wall until it sticks!
And then there's the self meta shit, twice:In post 225, momo wrote:F U guys.
It is generally agreed by many people on this site (including Transcend) that I am lynchbait. So be smart and see past it...
Like, once I get. It's a note about your self and is good for growing as a player.In post 567, momo wrote:This is self meta but I have been mislynched so many times I just get frustrated by the possibility. Like I can't always be scum people
Twice though?
That's scummy as its a form of Self Meta AtE! He's using it to manipulate votes off of him!
I'll likely end up voting here, but I want to look at everything else first.In post 1658, Aristophanes wrote:
Did I forget to change back? I got busy looking for a shiny Magikarp today...In post 1639, Ramcius wrote:VOTE: Ari
i always look susp to people, who have hard time reading few pages of tread a day (and this game was really slow on generating pages), his push on one of my strongest TRs alban for being not so active is weird in comparison to bunch of people doing much worse, his intent vote momo, but going alban instead so close to deadline is another red flag to me, i dunno if it's distancing or setting accusation for ML, if alban push not goes trough
Regardless,
VOTE: Momo
I can quote my case if you like.In post 1660, Aristophanes wrote:In post 1659, Nero Cain wrote:
please doIn post 1658, Aristophanes wrote:I can quote my case if you like.In post 1591, Aristophanes wrote:K, Momo Iso is actually scummy.In post 602, momo wrote:
He claimed scum!!!In post 599, Not_Mafia wrote:There is, I'm a mafia doctor
Okay here is the new and updated case.
Scum would normally not claim scum. Town would claim scum as joke maybe.
So Not is going to WIFOM us into thinking he is town.
But we can see past it. He is scum!!!!
This is probably the most laughable case I've seen. Like, seriously, acknowledging Wine and then drinking more of it is ridiculous, and NM, though he would do this as either alignment, I doubt would follow up like he did.In post 605, momo wrote:
Come on guys. He is doing this on purpose. How do you not see this?????In post 604, Not_Mafia wrote:There is no WIFOM, I'm scum
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Plus, this is supposedly a Slam Dunk, yet Momo stays with it for...3 posts?
He then switches to rb and abandoned NM because ???
I mean, I get the Iso gave him a scumread, but he stopped voting someone he thinksIn post 917, momo wrote:Spoiler: rb iso
Because reading his iso he is active, but refuses to post content. Kind of like scum acting like town by staying active but refusing to help. On top of this, he shows disregard of people pushing him, deflecting attention on another wagon. For this reason, as I dislike the other two wagons, I propose a new wagon to which the wagonee might finally respond to:
VOTE: rbClaimed a Scum Rolein order to vote here and never even mentions NM's supposed claim when doing so. How do you just forget you have "caught scum"!?
And even better is that this isn't his first time not following a Slam Dunk scumread.Like, Momo has had a 99% scum read and a scumclaim that he actually believed, yet he's not voting either!? That is scummy! He's blowing things out of proportion then abandoning them when they don't catch without ever mentioning them again! Literally throwing stuff at the wall until it sticks!
And then there's the self meta shit, twice:In post 225, momo wrote:F U guys.
It is generally agreed by many people on this site (including Transcend) that I am lynchbait. So be smart and see past it...
Like, once I get. It's a note about your self and is good for growing as a player.In post 567, momo wrote:This is self meta but I have been mislynched so many times I just get frustrated by the possibility. Like I can't always be scum people
Twice though?
That's scummy as its a form of Self Meta AtE! He's using it to manipulate votes off of him!
I'll likely end up voting here, but I want to look at everything else first.In post 1662, Aristophanes wrote:
I don't think this is VI Momo. He's a decent player and apparently cares a lot about the Large games he enters. So he should be putting thought and effort in, not just "saying stupid things"! I think his bringing up his playstyle twice shows he's using it to his advantage!In post 1661, Nero Cain wrote:oh that. I just think he's a vi that says stupid things. Could he be scum hiding behind a too scummy to be scum playstyle? Eh, maybe.In post 1718, Aristophanes wrote:Now can we please focus on the real scum: Momo!In post 1772, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Momo
Also, let's not waste our time on Radiant w/ their failed gambit.In post 1774, Ircher wrote:I could honestly care less who is lynched rn unless it's me, but objectively, momo is, imo, the most likely to be scum out of everyone who has a viable chance of being lynched within the following 20 or so hours.In post 1779, Ircher wrote:That's very weak momo.
Like, it's survivalistic in nature since ari's your counterwagon.In post 1791, Ircher wrote:
@MomoIn post 1788, Ircher wrote:Town can White Knight just as scum can.
Why can't Mewtaph be town WKing town Ari?
Pedit: Don't ragequit. You have potential, but people have to understand your viewpoint.
Please answer.In post 1805, Ircher wrote:Ah, but you misunderstand @momo.
Objectively, you are the scummiest. That's pretty much fact. But scummy != scum; you can be scummy but still town.In post 2058, Srceenplay wrote:
Wheme keeps saying Momo is town. Just because.In post 2056, Transcend wrote:
Bullshit.In post 2053, Srceenplay wrote:
I'm a Neopolitan and checked wheme last night.In post 2051, Ramcius wrote:
how we should know, if you refuse claim role?In post 2050, Srceenplay wrote:I don't know?
I'm trying to ask how can that happen. What makes it possible.
WhemeStar was obvious town.
Like, really, really obvious town.In post 2144, Srceenplay wrote:As Momo continues to avoid direct confrontation can someone explain a town read?
Wheme don't talk about who Town should vig, if scum has a doc or protective they can defend against it.
My solid town reads
Creature
Keyser
RM
Wheme
Scum
Momo
Zakk
NeoIn post 2186, Ircher wrote:
Yes.In post 2153, momo wrote:hard scumread shos right now.
When screenplay flips scum, we lynch shos.
Any objections????In post 2188, Ircher wrote:
Who did you cop?In post 2172, shos wrote:lol @ momo xD
guys
this is bleeding obvious for me suddenly and I can't believe I didn't see it earlier.
The following faction had scum in it. Scum have a framer. they knew everything that was going on, and used it exactly as they should have. Since when can a person perform two actions on one night? both kill and investigate? (btw screenplay please say your result. trust me.)
also don't call me nuts, I can link you to a game in a second where I said OMG I bet *crazy shit* and the conftown is actually an SK and voila! SK endgamed me.
after screenplay posts his results I will continue with what I have. and probably out our own guilty.
Anyway. My cop result is 100% unmeddled with;In post 2264, Ircher wrote:I claim compulsive bus driver.
I targeted RM and Srceen N1 and Creature and Momo N2.In post 2272, Ircher wrote:Player #1: Alban--> 32 posts
1. 13 --> "excited" -->RVS --> Null (0) / Null (0)
2. 236 --> 10 pages, can only catch up in evenings -->Too early o tell, but this post looks like just excuses --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
3. 275 --> Complains about spam; some other content as well -->Kinda don't understand what you are saying about me (what reads as naive in my 160?), the rest seems okay, but I feel that the post doesn't cover enough. Honestly though, you read more as just lazy right now. --> Null (0) / Null (0)
4. 392 and 393 --> Vote Wheme for spamming -->This was brought up before, but it's important to bring it up again in this ISO read as a player read is the sum of the reads I have on each post. Anyway, why are you prioritizing a lynch based on policy over looking for/lynching scum. It's not a huge alarm bell -- town do silly stuff all the time -- but it's an important to understand your perspective, and why you did things. --> Suspicious (-1) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
5. 483 --> Asks why Keyser presumes he hasn't presented his reads yet -->Maybe because you haven't? I mean, 275 was a start, but you haven't really presented any substandial reads (other than perhaps your policy-based one.) I don't like the hint of an accusatory tone in the post but it's by no means a definitive tell. --> Null (0) / Null (0)
6. 494 --> Stuff concerning people voting him cuz his Wheme vote -->Tell me this -- why shouldn't people want to policy lynch you for being useless if you want to policy lynch Wheme for spamming? I remember that I was one of the ones who voted you for your vote (which I admit was a bit foolish and policy based), but you have to admit that people are gonna policy vote the ones who play anti-town. The real question is -- why aren't you taking a more proactive stance in the game? You obviously seem to have reads -- why aren't you pursuing them or expounding upon them? Instead, you continue to pursue your Wheme PL to the exclusion of all else. --> Suspicious (-1) / Null (0)
7. 496 --> Admits to little content in his iso, but says it's better thasn the litle content in Wheme's cuz of a lower posting density -->I would like to know how you can make an RVS vote 200 posts into the game. This post honestly feels like a back-pedal from his vote, but at the same time, it feels town; the entire post reads as transparent and honest. An unvote would be nice (or some reads), but the post does show imo a pro-town outlook, just a controversial one. --> Town (+2) / Null (0)
8. 760 --> Something about wagons stalling -->Need context.
9. 765 --> Says he's "tempted to vote Momo" and will try to participate more -->Earlier you said Momo was lynchbait. What caused your stance to change OR am I misreading, and you don't really support the Momo wagon? --> Suspicious (-1) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
10. 766 --> Finds Keyser suspicious ("hunch") -->Just a hunch? Nothing more? Ah well, can't blame ya; I've kinda been like that all game. No substandial reads, just a few hunches and surface level reads. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
11. 783 --> Ramcius's vote looks like policy but wanna make sure -->I like this post. Alban admits that the vote is fair if it's policy-based, and rather than OMGUS, he tries to establish a conversation between Ramcius and himself. The approach used here just reads as town. --> Town (+2) / Null (0)
12. 788 --> Refutes Ramcius's scumcase against him and votes Ramcius -->I think this post takes a fair stance on the issue. It doesn't scream overtly town, but it does seem reasonable. --> Somewhat Town (+1) / Somewhat Content (+1)
13. 789 --> Laughs about Nero's post -->Completely useless. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
14. 792 --> Says Ramcius is tunnelling -->And back we are to no-content!you. Ugh. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
15. 794 --> Dares people to lynch him -->Typical WIFOM and other shenanigans that both town and scum employ. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
16. 1047 --> "I am back" -->100% fluff, 0 content --> Null (0) / Fluff (-2)
17. 1048 --> Townread creature for something in faction pt but don't wanna say cuz people might jump -->Explain to me how this makes logical sense. How can you townread a post yet think others will jump (aka scumread) him based on that post? --> Suspicious (-1) / Null (0)
18. 1305 --> Asks why Creature wants to incriminate you -->Another useless post. And not a single real scumread in this ISO yet. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
19. 1309 --> Asks if Rb finds him scummy -->See above comments. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
20. 1376 --> "I am bored" -->Says the one who has done absolutely nothing thi game. If you are bored, why don't you change that by providing some actual content? --> Null (0) / Fluff (-2)
21. 1377 --> Didn't mean to say that aloud -->But you did. And you are still doin' nothin' 'bout it. --> Null (0) / Fluff (-2)
22. 1383 --> "You wanna start a new wagon?" -->Tone is too ggressiv here for my likes given what Alban has done. That said, 1377 is by no means a slip. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
23. 1384 --> Can't remember why he voted Ramcius -->Zero content. Pretty much active lurking at this point. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
24. 1385 --> "This was for rb" -->Spamming a bit, don't you think? See above. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
25. 1436 --> Says he has nothing substandial to contribute at the moment among other things -->I don't like this post. 50+ pages in and nothing to say throughout the game? No. --> Suspicious (-1) / Active Lurking (-3)
26. 1438 and 1462 --> Not relevant to this game.
27. 1473 --> Scumreads: Ari y someone else -->Elaborate. --> Null (0) / Null (0)
28. 2011 y 2031 --> Stuff to the mod.
Alignment Score: 0
Activity Score: -29 over 28 items --> ~1.0357
Base Score: (0 - 1.0357)(1.0357) ~ -1.0727
Adjusted Score: -0.2145
Final Score: -34.52% --> Neutral Leaning ScumIn post 2291, Ircher wrote:Creature and Mewtaph are definitely town.
Wheme, momo, and Ramcius are probably town.
Keyser is lurking and more likely to be scum.
Zakk is town.
Alban is Neutral Scum.
Uzi is Neutral Scum.
Shos is possibly scum.
Rb is scum.-
-
Hikari Link Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: June 4, 2011
- Location: Long Beach, CA
-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
I don't think your wagon is going to go through without my vote or my support. shos I think will follow my reasoning, and I think if momo sees a good alternative he will join too. He hasn't really done much of anything this game except whine about people on his wagon, and then make posts here and there... I was the main driving force behind your wagon; notice as soon as I unvoted, so did Hikari?In post 3232, Nero Cain wrote:
but they are still voting me. If you think I'm a wrong lynch why are you comfortable with them voting me? Shouldn't you be trying to get them off my wagon just as much as you are trying to get others off your wagon?In post 3208, PeregrineV wrote:[3][L-4] Nero Cain: Lil Uzi Vert, momo, shos,
I have to go soon. I expect to see case on someone with detailed reasoning why they are scum by the time I get back.
If we work together and find a better alternative than one of us two (i.e. Ramcius would be my choice... his posts to me, parroting things you said but in a totally scummy way, and voting me, but then lining up your and my lynches... just felt SLIMY AF and gave me huge scum pings... but I doubt we could swing a Ramcius wagon today, given he's in Dauntless and we probably wouldn't get support from Keyser/LUV... )
Speaking of Keyser/LUV... I don't know why we all considered them for scum at some point, but Ramcius has never really been on the table for discussion. Why is that?
Anyway hit me back when you get back. You'll see some cool shit by then I hope I'll be on and off myself.-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
I would rather lynch Ramcius, Aronis, and LUV (and maybe even Wheme) than Keyser at this point.In post 3234, Hikari Link wrote:So far, these are the people who express a potential willingness to move on Keyser:
Creature
shos
Nero Cain
Hikari Link
zakk
In addition, Peregrine says he's willing to look into Keyser. That's potentially 6 votes.-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
-
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
first, i told many times Nero is my townlean and i rather not lynch him, as for you, i said many times too, it was PoE from early D4, it not looks like Pere or Aronis are possible to lynch, so i have to settle on your lynchIn post 3218, zakk wrote: Ramcius - looks increasingly like he's scum trying to line up me/Nero in whatever order possible, for whatever reasoning possible-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
Whemestar's appearances in scum ISOs
(Sorry, woulda spoilered this, but there are spoilers in it, and the code breaks)
In post 49, Ircher wrote:
I missed that he changed votes.In post 48, WhemeStar wrote:Zakk is voting me.In post 70, Ircher wrote:
How does lazy indicate scum?In post 67, WhemeStar wrote:Anyways, Ircher's vote was lazy so he can have my vote for now.In post 97, Ircher wrote:Let me get this straight Wheme:
1. I make an RVS vote on Radiant w/ a comment about bandwagoning
2. You comment that the vote was bad simply because more people were voting you at the time.
3. We go back and forth a little on the issue.
4. You vote me way after you initially call me out on the issue with the comment that my vote was lazy.
5. When called out for your late vote, you if honestly mattered
6. When I asked you how being lazyng implies I'm scum, you evade the point by stting that lazy doesn't imply town.
Tell me how this doesn't read as suspicious on your side?In post 98, Ircher wrote:See above.
In post 119, Srceenplay wrote:UNVOTE:
Wheme is not an alt. I would describe his play as "eh whatever" type of player. The games I have read he says and does stupid shit. I'm not lynching him for this.In post 124, Srceenplay wrote:
WrongIn post 121, Not_Mafia wrote:Wheme is an alt and hasn't done anything stupidIn post 132, Srceenplay wrote:
I'm giving you a fact, not an opinionIn post 126, Not_Mafia wrote:
I disagreeIn post 124, Srceenplay wrote:
WrongIn post 121, Not_Mafia wrote:Wheme is an alt and hasn't done anything stupidIn post 134, Ircher wrote:
1-3 are for completeness.In post 101, WhemeStar wrote:So 1-3 is not suspicious at all. Don't know why you included them but eh.
Do you not find lazy votes suspicious? If not, why not?
Its hard for me to explain why I read you as scum for being lazy, so I just won't explain it.
Lazy votesduring RVSare not suspicious at all because it isRVS.In post 154, Srceenplay wrote:
He's my son. I talked him into playing.In post 143, Not_Mafia wrote:
You can't know he's not an alt and the stupid thing is entirely subjective. What has he done that's stupid?In post 132, Srceenplay wrote:
I'm giving you a fact, not an opinionIn post 126, Not_Mafia wrote:
I disagreeIn post 124, Srceenplay wrote:
WrongIn post 121, Not_Mafia wrote:Wheme is an alt and hasn't done anything stupidIn post 164, Ircher wrote:
Not really. Maybe a little bit less involved in the scum one.In post 159, WhemeStar wrote:viewtopic.php?t=70799&f=23&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go - Here's a scum game of Momo's. He replaced in @ page 72.
viewtopic.php?p=8926674#p8926674 - Here was a game where he replaced in as town. Page 61
You can notice the differences in his play just by opening posts.In post 183, Srceenplay wrote:
Why would you read Momo this way but not wheme?In post 150, Ircher wrote:Momo on the otherhand reads as inexpeienced.In post 187, Ircher wrote:
Possibly confirmation bias. Wheme's posts don't have quite the same atmosphere though.In post 183, Srceenplay wrote:
Why would you read Momo this way but not wheme?In post 150, Ircher wrote:Momo on the otherhand reads as inexpeienced.In post 217, Srceenplay wrote:In post 111, momo wrote:
What does this mean??In post 69, WhemeStar wrote:Does it matter?
Everything matters.
If you are not able to share reasoning, it means that either the reasoning I scummy or you have no reason but mislynch.In post 128, momo wrote:
No it is not.In post 113, WhemeStar wrote:Wow momo that post is bad
BTW, I started the wagon on Wheme as an rvs push. Why did people commit to it so hard??? I will be trying to find scum on that wagon??
Also, Not seems very flip floppy, trying to please everyone. First he followed me on wheme and the followed wheme on me. Looks like he wants to please everyone so that he is not lynched.
VOTE: NotMafiaIn post 142, momo wrote:Sorry, I meant can someone who is not scum (wheme/not) give me their thoughts........
You vote whemestarIn post 208, momo wrote:Guys unlike some of you people I am actively trying to solve the game. Not and Nero pushing the Wheme wagon that I meant as rvs strikes me as scummy. Thoughts on this????
You question him and his actions
You call it an RVS and people voting it are scumy
Then you call wheme and NotMafia scumy
Then you call it RVS again
That's my problem with it.
VOTE: MomoIn post 340, Srceenplay wrote:I wasn't following the reasoning for Neo but if his entire point is because of a delayed vote by wheme then I agree that's a stretch. It wasn't some random vote. It's something he used reasoning with. I think that should give him more town cred confronting and going head to head. If he would have voted someone else randomly, I could see that as suspicious but he didn't.In post 346, Srceenplay wrote:
But it is a reason?In post 342, Nero Cain wrote:I was reading Wheme as scummy from before his delayed vote so its not the whole reason.
If he did vote immediately would you still have the same read?In post 389, Srceenplay wrote:In post 314, Creature wrote:Also, I'd rather vote someone I'm not finding town.In post 315, Creature wrote:Even if it means starting a vanity wagon.
It's early and any wagon can happen, just put your vote into it and maybe someone will join you and bam, a wagon appeared.
I read these as you are starting vanity wagon because you town read the others.In post 316, Creature wrote:
If I had to join one of these wagons, I guess only Transcend's I would join.In post 300, keyenpeydee wrote:[4] momo: Not_Mafia, Radiant Moonlight, zakk, Srceenplay,
[3] Nero Cain: Elena Fisher, Mewtaph, Keyser Söze,
[3] Not_Mafia: Aristophanes, momo, Ramcius,
[2] WhemeStar: Nero Cain, Ircher,
[2] Transcend: PenguinPower, WhemeStar,
Why would you join a transcend wagon?In post 407, Ircher wrote:
This can die for being extremely anti-town.In post 392, alban wrote:[post=Wheme]Wheme[/post]
Bloody spammer. 70+ posts. 3 pages out of 16 are yours. My priority is to hunt for spammers before hunting for scums.
VOTE: AlbanIn post 545, Ircher wrote:
I don't think you have presented your reads, and this make me want to return to wagoning you.In post 483, alban wrote:
That's highly presumptuous. Why would you think I have not already presented my reads?In post 395, Keyser Söze wrote:
Don't you think a replacement is more advisable if you think this is true? Why chase a policy lynch on D1, when the great harvest has already begun?In post 392, alban wrote:[post=Wheme]Wheme[/post]
Bloody spammer. 70+ posts. 3 pages out of 16 are yours.My priority is to hunt for spammers before hunting for scums.
I will take this as an avoidance to present your scum reads.In post 546, Ircher wrote:In post 494, alban wrote:Reasons.
Everyone who is voting for me or is suspecting me based on my vote for Wheme, I pity you. I am not lashing out but this is what I genuinely think. If one post can change your mind about whom to vote and who is worth suspecting, you are not only clueless about where you are in the game, but you second my point that these 20 pages of scumhunting -- if you can call it that -- are worthless.
100% agree with Wheme here.In post 495, WhemeStar wrote:Or maybe the fact that you haven't gave anything in 20 pages besides a vote on me that was purely based on the # of posts I haveIn post 571, Ircher wrote:
Ok, here we go.... (Sorry if I'm very incoherent...)In post 221, momo wrote:
The wagon STARTED with an rvs vote. 2nd post of p.2 I think.In post 217, Srceenplay wrote:You vote whemestar
You question him and his actions
You call it an RVS and people voting it are scumy
Then you call wheme and NotMafia scumy
Then you call it RVS again
Anyway, Wheme started reacting a bit scummy so I questioned him.
Then it suddenly became a huge deal and it looked like an early lynch was a possibility.
I stopped then because short D1 mislynch is never good for town.
Better safe than sorry.
Nero and Not seemed TOO eager.
Happy??????
Spoiler: Momo ISO - Day 1
While there could be more to say about individual posts, its kinda hard to, so I think I'm gonna wrap this up with overall things I'm noticing:
1. Lots of confirmation bias
2. Very little and usually weak explanations for reads
3. Though never a reliable tell, it feels "Too scummy to be scum".In post 584, Ircher wrote:Momo, Wheme, and Nero are who you should pay attention to.In post 588, Srceenplay wrote:
No. I thought it was NotMafia. He threw attention there. Granted he gave a reason to it seemed like deflection to me.In post 560, Keyser Söze wrote:Is 'alban' the 'Yume' in this scenario?
There were 2 votes on alban... momo added the third (Wheme and Ircher have since unvoted alban).In post 757, Aristophanes wrote:In post 537, WhemeStar wrote:VOTE: Keyser
I'll sheep you Nero because I can't tell if he's scum or not.Oh, it worked...
Inb4 one of these flips scum!In post 758, Aristophanes wrote:
Hey Keyser! It's been a while!In post 554, Keyser Söze wrote:Hello, Aristophanes.Your vote is still in RVS. Are you trying to sort players in your faction PT?
You have offered two (town?) reads so far (two defences).
On momo:
And WhemeStar:In post 239, Aristophanes wrote:Because I've never not scumread him, which gives me pause when a wagon on him grown like this!
What are your actual thoughts on the arguments used against them? (Your thoughts on them concern only the speed/size of the wagon on them).In post 240, Aristophanes wrote:This whemestar fellow is clearly town tho. Why is this a wagon?
Momo is a tough read and I legit always scumread them. Momo was more a moment of pause, but the more i read the morning ei think they may be scum.
Where is still likely to be town, and I've liked what they have posted thus far. Of course, a further analysis of both slots is required, but this is what I have atm.
See what I mean, he's a hard read!Spoiler: Longass Keyser Post
I have seen him get frustrated as town iirc. But momo doesn't get disheartened as town, he just makes more noise until people follow him or lynch him.
435 sucks ass, and makes it obvious Alban and Momo aren't scum together. Either could be though, and from what I have read of Alban, as much as they could be, I done think they are. Momo is far more likely to be scum.In post 869, Aristophanes wrote:
So, hard town on Zakk, Momo is what, null? What makes you so willing to lynch him regardless of alignment?In post 855, WhemeStar wrote:
I think Zakk is town.In post 848, Aristophanes wrote:Oh, I was hoping you'd do that for me :S
I can't say I'm totally caught up yet.
However, sure!
What are your thoughts on the Zakk and Momo wagons, and if you dislike them, who among the voters do you think are scum?
What are your thoughts on Creature's potential intent to shut down the wagons and start fresh ones?In post 808, Creature wrote:Also, if this game stalls, I'll shut down both wagons and roll a dice to a new wagon.
Momo is really hard to read. My gut is telling me he is scum, but I keep getting that feeling he could be town. Not against his lynch honestly. The earlier he is gone the better IMO.In post 1096, Srceenplay wrote:That's a great idea wheme.In post 1135, Ircher wrote:
Why have you not moved your vote throughout the game?In post 1115, BTD6_maker wrote:Radiant Moonlight gives very little for analysis. Overall they have three votes on Momo. The first was RVS, so I can ignore that. The next two still do not have reasoning attached. (You once claimed that Momo was Town). What is your reasoning for the Momo votes?
Transcend next. Transcend was merely sheeping. From what I can see, they were sheeping Radiant Moonlight, who gave very little in the way of reasoning. Transcend, why did you do this, and do you still agree with it?
PenguinPower gave virtually nothing.
Whemestar next. This is more interesting. It seems as though the main reason is meta. Exactly what is the main difference? I noticed that the Town Momo posted a huge wall very early on. Other than that, there was not much of a difference. If you noticed another difference, please explain it and then show that this is a pattern throughout Momo's games, not just in these two instances.In post 1590, Aristophanes wrote:
Why RC?In post 1589, RadiantCowbells wrote:I still vastly prefer an Aristophanes lynch, please stick this out Wheme.In post 1593, Aristophanes wrote:Lol wtf WhemeIn post 1595, Aristophanes wrote:Alban isn't worth quoting, but he's been contradictory in this game. First he complains about post counts, claims people are spamming, and even votes Wheme for being active. Then he changes tune, to note the lack of wagons (without actually making a push himself) and complaining he's bored.
The Ramiscus OMGUS is ugly and his OMGUS on me is likewise disgusting. And his "come at me bro" mentality is just weird.
The slip I noted may not be a slip, but this sloot is still not doing much but complain, OMGUS, and make empty posts.In post 2053, Srceenplay wrote:
I'm a Neopolitan and checked wheme last night.In post 2051, Ramcius wrote:
how we should know, if you refuse claim role?In post 2050, Srceenplay wrote:I don't know?
I'm trying to ask how can that happen. What makes it possible.In post 2058, Srceenplay wrote:
Wheme keeps saying Momo is town. Just because.In post 2056, Transcend wrote:
Bullshit.In post 2053, Srceenplay wrote:
I'm a Neopolitan and checked wheme last night.In post 2051, Ramcius wrote:
how we should know, if you refuse claim role?In post 2050, Srceenplay wrote:I don't know?
I'm trying to ask how can that happen. What makes it possible.
WhemeStar was obvious town.
Like, really, really obvious town.In post 2068, Srceenplay wrote:
Because wheme was hard defending him. Checking I thought could possibly be clearing two people.In post 2061, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Weren't you scum reading Mo, Screen? Why did you opt to check Wheme over him?In post 2144, Srceenplay wrote:As Momo continues to avoid direct confrontation can someone explain a town read?
Wheme don't talk about who Town should vig, if scum has a doc or protective they can defend against it.
My solid town reads
Creature
Keyser
RM
Wheme
Scum
Momo
Zakk
NeoIn post 2176, Srceenplay wrote:Whemestar is vanillaIn post 2272, Ircher wrote:Player #1: Alban--> 32 posts
1. 13 --> "excited" -->RVS --> Null (0) / Null (0)
2. 236 --> 10 pages, can only catch up in evenings -->Too early o tell, but this post looks like just excuses --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
3. 275 --> Complains about spam; some other content as well -->Kinda don't understand what you are saying about me (what reads as naive in my 160?), the rest seems okay, but I feel that the post doesn't cover enough. Honestly though, you read more as just lazy right now. --> Null (0) / Null (0)
4. 392 and 393 --> Vote Wheme for spamming -->This was brought up before, but it's important to bring it up again in this ISO read as a player read is the sum of the reads I have on each post. Anyway, why are you prioritizing a lynch based on policy over looking for/lynching scum. It's not a huge alarm bell -- town do silly stuff all the time -- but it's an important to understand your perspective, and why you did things. --> Suspicious (-1) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
5. 483 --> Asks why Keyser presumes he hasn't presented his reads yet -->Maybe because you haven't? I mean, 275 was a start, but you haven't really presented any substandial reads (other than perhaps your policy-based one.) I don't like the hint of an accusatory tone in the post but it's by no means a definitive tell. --> Null (0) / Null (0)
6. 494 --> Stuff concerning people voting him cuz his Wheme vote -->Tell me this -- why shouldn't people want to policy lynch you for being useless if you want to policy lynch Wheme for spamming? I remember that I was one of the ones who voted you for your vote (which I admit was a bit foolish and policy based), but you have to admit that people are gonna policy vote the ones who play anti-town. The real question is -- why aren't you taking a more proactive stance in the game? You obviously seem to have reads -- why aren't you pursuing them or expounding upon them? Instead, you continue to pursue your Wheme PL to the exclusion of all else. --> Suspicious (-1) / Null (0)
7. 496 --> Admits to little content in his iso, but says it's better thasn the litle content in Wheme's cuz of a lower posting density -->I would like to know how you can make an RVS vote 200 posts into the game. This post honestly feels like a back-pedal from his vote, but at the same time, it feels town; the entire post reads as transparent and honest. An unvote would be nice (or some reads), but the post does show imo a pro-town outlook, just a controversial one. --> Town (+2) / Null (0)
8. 760 --> Something about wagons stalling -->Need context.
9. 765 --> Says he's "tempted to vote Momo" and will try to participate more -->Earlier you said Momo was lynchbait. What caused your stance to change OR am I misreading, and you don't really support the Momo wagon? --> Suspicious (-1) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
10. 766 --> Finds Keyser suspicious ("hunch") -->Just a hunch? Nothing more? Ah well, can't blame ya; I've kinda been like that all game. No substandial reads, just a few hunches and surface level reads. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
11. 783 --> Ramcius's vote looks like policy but wanna make sure -->I like this post. Alban admits that the vote is fair if it's policy-based, and rather than OMGUS, he tries to establish a conversation between Ramcius and himself. The approach used here just reads as town. --> Town (+2) / Null (0)
12. 788 --> Refutes Ramcius's scumcase against him and votes Ramcius -->I think this post takes a fair stance on the issue. It doesn't scream overtly town, but it does seem reasonable. --> Somewhat Town (+1) / Somewhat Content (+1)
13. 789 --> Laughs about Nero's post -->Completely useless. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
14. 792 --> Says Ramcius is tunnelling -->And back we are to no-content!you. Ugh. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
15. 794 --> Dares people to lynch him -->Typical WIFOM and other shenanigans that both town and scum employ. --> Null (0) / Somewhat Fluffy (-1)
16. 1047 --> "I am back" -->100% fluff, 0 content --> Null (0) / Fluff (-2)
17. 1048 --> Townread creature for something in faction pt but don't wanna say cuz people might jump -->Explain to me how this makes logical sense. How can you townread a post yet think others will jump (aka scumread) him based on that post? --> Suspicious (-1) / Null (0)
18. 1305 --> Asks why Creature wants to incriminate you -->Another useless post. And not a single real scumread in this ISO yet. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
19. 1309 --> Asks if Rb finds him scummy -->See above comments. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
20. 1376 --> "I am bored" -->Says the one who has done absolutely nothing thi game. If you are bored, why don't you change that by providing some actual content? --> Null (0) / Fluff (-2)
21. 1377 --> Didn't mean to say that aloud -->But you did. And you are still doin' nothin' 'bout it. --> Null (0) / Fluff (-2)
22. 1383 --> "You wanna start a new wagon?" -->Tone is too ggressiv here for my likes given what Alban has done. That said, 1377 is by no means a slip. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
23. 1384 --> Can't remember why he voted Ramcius -->Zero content. Pretty much active lurking at this point. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
24. 1385 --> "This was for rb" -->Spamming a bit, don't you think? See above. --> Null (0) / Active Lurking (-3)
25. 1436 --> Says he has nothing substandial to contribute at the moment among other things -->I don't like this post. 50+ pages in and nothing to say throughout the game? No. --> Suspicious (-1) / Active Lurking (-3)
26. 1438 and 1462 --> Not relevant to this game.
27. 1473 --> Scumreads: Ari y someone else -->Elaborate. --> Null (0) / Null (0)
28. 2011 y 2031 --> Stuff to the mod.
Alignment Score: 0
Activity Score: -29 over 28 items --> ~1.0357
Base Score: (0 - 1.0357)(1.0357) ~ -1.0727
Adjusted Score: -0.2145
Final Score: -34.52% --> Neutral Leaning ScumIn post 2291, Ircher wrote:Creature and Mewtaph are definitely town.
Wheme, momo, and Ramcius are probably town.
Keyser is lurking and more likely to be scum.
Zakk is town.
Alban is Neutral Scum.
Uzi is Neutral Scum.
Shos is possibly scum.
Rb is scum.-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
I could definitely do an Aronis lynch.In post 3238, Ramcius wrote:
first, i told many times Nero is my townlean and i rather not lynch him, as for you, i said many times too, it was PoE from early D4, it not looks like Pere or Aronis are possible to lynch, so i have to settle on your lynchIn post 3218, zakk wrote: Ramcius - looks increasingly like he's scum trying to line up me/Nero in whatever order possible, for whatever reasoning possible
I wouldn't lynch PV today.-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
BTD6_maker's appearances in scum ISOs
(they never had a chance to mentionorThinkBig)Aronis
In post 859, Ircher wrote:Out of {shos, Penguin, BTD6}, who should we flashwagon?In post 866, Ircher wrote:
momo already has a wagon, has had one throughout the game, and wasn't a choice.In post 860, Not_Mafia wrote:
momoIn post 859, Ircher wrote:Out of {shos, Penguin, BTD6}, who should we flashwagon?
'Kay, w're flashwagoning Penguin then.
VOTE: PenguinIn post 873, Aristophanes wrote:
Been working and general end of the school year stuff. I'll finish my read up very soon I'm sure, but I'm trying to stay as relevant as possible while I do.In post 870, Nero Cain wrote:
Why haven't you caught up yet?In post 844, Aristophanes wrote:Sure, sup?
part of me is like "ewww lurker lynches" and then the other half is like "well I could see some scum intent to lurk it out and be useless"In post 859, Ircher wrote:Out of {shos, Penguin, BTD6}, who should we flashwagon?In post 913, Ircher wrote:
Explain why.In post 883, shos wrote:
VOTE: IrcherIn post 859, Ircher wrote:Out of {shos, Penguin, BTD6}, who should we flashwagon?
I voted Ircher because _____________________________.In post 1012, Ircher wrote:
Explain why.In post 935, shos wrote:
I voted Ircher becauseIn post 913, Ircher wrote:
Explain why.In post 883, shos wrote:
VOTE: IrcherIn post 859, Ircher wrote:Out of {shos, Penguin, BTD6}, who should we flashwagon?
I voted Ircher because _____________________________.he is scum______________.
Ircher is scum because __________________________________________.In post 1135, Ircher wrote:
Why have you not moved your vote throughout the game?In post 1115, BTD6_maker wrote:Radiant Moonlight gives very little for analysis. Overall they have three votes on Momo. The first was RVS, so I can ignore that. The next two still do not have reasoning attached. (You once claimed that Momo was Town). What is your reasoning for the Momo votes?
Transcend next. Transcend was merely sheeping. From what I can see, they were sheeping Radiant Moonlight, who gave very little in the way of reasoning. Transcend, why did you do this, and do you still agree with it?
PenguinPower gave virtually nothing.
Whemestar next. This is more interesting. It seems as though the main reason is meta. Exactly what is the main difference? I noticed that the Town Momo posted a huge wall very early on. Other than that, there was not much of a difference. If you noticed another difference, please explain it and then show that this is a pattern throughout Momo's games, not just in these two instances.In post 1137, Ircher wrote:Interesting. We coul lynch BTD6, but it isn't a very productive lynch given who BTD6 is.In post 1274, Ircher wrote:
Not w/ this game as I need to be. Despite how much time I may seem to have (and definitely used to have), school is catching up with me and is starting to be stressful. Furthemore, I just don't have the drive to try to sort through ISOs at the moment. Also, I signed up for too many games.In post 1268, Creature wrote:Ircher, where are you at?
? I wasn't voting rb unless you are referring to the distant past.In post 1269, Creature wrote:Ircher, why were you voting rb?
Decent enough to know he's very likely ML bait right now. I'm not imoressed w/ him rn, but I reserve further judgedment.In post 1270, Creature wrote:Ircher, how well do you know BTD6_Maker?
Fairly quiet, but I townread everyone posting there, including Zakk.In post 1271, Creature wrote:Ircher, how's your PT going?
I think that's no fun and not a foolproof idea. I like the idea of using serums N1 a lot more tbh, and giving people the freedom to change factions if they wish.In post 1273, Creature wrote:Ircher, what's your opinion on every player sticking with their birth factions?-
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: December 6, 2009
This worries the shit out of me. Yes, Zakk said the same thing and I thought it was dumb then too. I don't think I've ever seen a 5/15 setup. I don't think its impossible but I feel the evidence is clearly lacking for an SK and EVEN if there was an SK there's no fucking way this is only 3 team scum. There's a 4th.In post 3215, Nero Cain wrote:
viewtopic.php?f=56&t=68384In post 3204, PeregrineV wrote:20 players- 15 town, 5 scum
^
Was a 21 player, 4 groupscum, 1 traitor, 1 sk
viewtopic.php?f=56&t=67645
^
20 player, 4 group scum
viewtopic.php?f=56&t=67071
^
21 player, 5 group scum
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=65890
^
21 player, 4 group scum, 1 sk
could you like me to a 20 player game that had 5 scum in it?Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit-
-
Creature Solve This Game
- Solve This Game
- Solve This Game
- Posts: 46072
- Joined: January 26, 2016
- Location: Lands of Fire
-
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
because i wouldn't bus 2 of my scumbuddies D1 - i brought Ari and Srceen as candidates for serum, pushed Ari's wagon at end of D1, and it was my initiative to follow Srceen N1In post 3235, zakk wrote: Speaking of Keyser/LUV... I don't know why we all considered them for scum at some point, but Ramcius has never really been on the table for discussion. Why is that?-
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: December 6, 2009
of those, I'd only lynch LUV. I still don't exactly trust you and I don't really want to lynch ppl that find you scummy. If you are scum them lynching/nightkilling those that think you are scum is playing to your wincon. LUV seems like the only person that you are willing to lynch that's not scumreading you.In post 3236, zakk wrote:I would rather lynch Ramcius, Aronis, and LUV (and maybe even Wheme) than Keyser at this point.Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
After reading that in 294 posts, ALL THREE of Aristophanes, Ircher, and Screenplay only mention or respond to BTD6_maker SIX TIMES... clearly shows something.
When scum are under pressure, they try to point out lurkers and easy targets. BTD6 was both. He wasn't even a thought in their minds... they just said he was null and ignored him. And then once, Ircher asked him why he hadn't moved his vote throughout the entire game... but then never followed up on it. This reads more as scum prodding scum to do something, while also being like "hey look townies, I'm noticing bad things about this person!" ... instead of being like "BT6 hasn't moved his vote all game, and he's lurking, let's lynch him!"
I think Aronis is the last groupscum.-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
In post 3246, zakk wrote:After reading that in 294 posts, ALL THREE of Aristophanes, Ircher, and Screenplay only mention or respond to BTD6_maker SIX TIMES... clearly shows something.
When scum are under pressure, they try to point out lurkers and easy targets. BTD6 was both. He wasn't even a thought in their minds... they just said he was null and ignored him. And then once, Ircher asked him why he hadn't moved his vote throughout the entire game... but then never followed up on it. This reads more as scum prodding scum to do something, while also being like "hey look townies, I'm noticing bad things about this person!" ... instead of being like "BT6 hasn't moved his vote all game, and he's lurking, let's lynch him!"
I think Aronis is the last groupscum.@nero: Read this and do your own research here-
-
zakk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6235
- Joined: September 1, 2013
I typically hate "if i was scum i wouldn't / wouldn't have ..." arguments...In post 3244, Ramcius wrote:
because i wouldn't bus 2 of my scumbuddies D1 - i brought Ari and Srceen as candidates for serum, pushed Ari's wagon at end of D1, and it was my initiative to follow Srceen N1In post 3235, zakk wrote: Speaking of Keyser/LUV... I don't know why we all considered them for scum at some point, but Ramcius has never really been on the table for discussion. Why is that?
but... I understand where you're coming from.
So... please read what I have posted on Aronis. And opine thereon.
I think I just needed a kick in the pants.
And something felt wrong about me and Nero being the two main wagons... MOSTLY since we are the two most active players.-
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: December 6, 2009
So why are you not voting him?Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.