In post 31, Furcolow wrote:you ALL are idiots
I think I'm gonna like this guy... ;D
In post 31, Furcolow wrote:you ALL are idiots
In post 69, shos wrote:so you have no reason to belive otherwise...that means your default is that everyone is scum? so the empty Zar slot for example, it is scum too? why not lynch it?
O_o
anyway, you're probably not retarded, so you're trolling.. oh well~
eh, ninja'd by three posts:
@uber:
firstly, I didn't see it was broken till next time I got to the page; if I'm not online with others like now, I just submit and ctrl w, I don't look at the post I made.
secondly, I suppose that even if I did see it I wouldn't care enough to fix it, since it was a random vote, not to be taken seriously.
third - are you seriously asking this?
In post 72, shos wrote:cuz I'm a town member?In post 70, Vi wrote:Actually my vote on you is quite serious. Why shouldn't you be lynched?In post 69, shos wrote:so you have no reason to belive otherwise...that means your default is that everyone is scum? so the empty Zar slot for example, it is scum too? why not lynch it?
O_o
anyway, you're probably not retarded, so you're trolling.. oh well~
In post 81, Vi wrote:UN promised me babies.Zar 80 wrote:Now seriously why are you all voting Parama and not the Ninja?Classybabies.
In post 41, Parama wrote:This is beautiful.
In post 88, Parama wrote:*sigh*
So you're basically a douchebag, alright.
unvote, vote: shos
back to voting scum then
In post 96, Parama wrote:In post 95, UberNinja wrote:My dilemma is that your wagon was a retroactive reaction test of both you and your wagoners.
So you never actually thought he was scum, huh.
Hmm.
Why do you think shos is town?
In post 59, UberNinja wrote:For clarity:Be it known that I am of the opinion that shos will flip scum (mostly because of this post right here).
But Istilldon't want a lynch anywhere near this early, as it'llreallythrow off our groove if he *does* flip town.
In post 98, Parama wrote:So then, you thought he was scum, yet his wagon was nothing more than a reaction test? :/
Also, what about that post stands out as scummy to you?
Are there any more of his posts that you find scummy?
In post 113, Parama wrote:Shh, don't vote him yet until I'm done with him. I have a hunch and I want to pursue it first.
In post 82, UberNinja wrote:@ Zar: If I was worried about looking good, I would have stuck to my guns and run the shos lynch into the ground, or lurked until a hammer was dropped and then said "omg you guys it was an RVS vote, you shouldn't have wagoneddddd" or some shit. Unfortunately since I have a fucking conscience and I want the game to turn out fun for everyone (and preferably with a win for me and my kind) I can't allow a lynch to go through this fucking early. Did you not read my explanation (with links to a game I just finished as scum where the exact same thing happened) or did you just not care?
In post 144, UberNinja wrote:Yos what are your opinions on other players in the game? The only people you have directly interacted with are the main two wagon targets.
In post 155, UberNinja wrote:Because I'm not Parama's scum buddy, obviously.
In post 138, Nuwen wrote:Whoa. Couldn't have asked for more textbook trashing.
In post 122, Quilford wrote:oh.
i thought that was a lynch but it's just L-1
Anyway. I'm not going to disagree with a Parama lynch butNuwen you suck seriously what is that shit vote
also I'm worried about Vi.VI YOU SCUM [COLLOQUIAL PRONOUN]???
In post 137, Quilford wrote:like i didn't even say ANYWHERE that i considered nuwen or yos scum
You are either lying or reversing your reads under pressure. Both are scummy.
Mafia is way too easy now.
~~~
I've also translated/transliterated the Hebrew tidbit in the opening flavor and submitted a PM. I don't want to reveal the "answer" because I don't know what it does or how it relates to scum, but I WILL say the result took about 20 minutes of fast googling to figure out.
In post 167, Yosarian2 wrote:In post 163, UberNinja wrote:
"odd vibes" + "shit vote" =/= saying both are scum
Nuwen is making shit up. Quilford didn't reverse anything.
Those are pretty clearly both attacks.
In post 112, Chiarosicada wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: uberninja
I have a feeling parama's going to give me headaches this game. I always had trouble reading belligerent players with bombastic posting styles.
In post 115, Chiarosicada wrote:i dislike the way uberninja is trying to get the wagon off of shos, but is setting up for an easy excuse to jump on with his "he's probably scum but I don't want to lynch him yet"
This, basically. I was holding off on my reasoning but meh.
In post 186, Chiarosicada wrote:Some of us need to post more. Like me. Will do so later tonight.
In post 133, Quilford wrote:In post 129, Nuwen wrote:So you wouldn't be opposed to a Parama lynch, but don't want it NOW
OF COURSE I DON'T FUCKING WANT IT NOW WE ARE 72 HOURS AND 6 PAGES INTO DAY 1
yeah yeah long days harm the town, /whatever/
short days are even worse. a handful of people have barely posted, the less you hear from people the less you can hold them accountable for wht they've said.
kindly fuck off with your 'i caught one live' bullshit, anyone who says that and means it on page 5 is deluding themselves
"You see this shit all the time now; scum don't know whether to commit to a defense of a townie or take the juicy hammer thrust in front of their faces. Instead, they waffle their reads on the wagon'd player ("he's probably scum... but I want more information first") player and try to shift suspicion onto the tail-end voters."
lol y u so dumb
IF I WERE SAYING BUT I WANT MORE INFORMATION FIRST ON PAGE FORTY FUCKING FIVE THAT WOULD BE A WAFFLED READ. SAYING IT ON PAGE FIVE IS NOT. HOW CAN YOU SHIFT SUSPICION ONTO THE TAIL END VOTERS OF A PLAYER WHO HASN'T EVEN FLIPPED? YOUR VOTE WAS AS SHIT AS ALL HELL AND I FOUND YOS VAGUELY SCUMMY IN HOW HE WAS COMING ACROSS NOT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE SAID ABOUT PARAMA
In post 209, Furcolow wrote:
I got a scumread on him, but I don't see that wagon going anywhere today
If it does pick up steam, I would jump on, because it has my support
I feel like he is flailing the same way shos did earlier in the game. Shos jumping onto your wagon, and then back off when it didn't build steam, has me questioning my read on you tbh.
In post 241, Zar wrote:In post 234, UberNinja wrote:Zar, are you scum?
Nope.
(Ninja: just go read your ROLE PM closely, you'll notice my name is not listed among your night time buddies. xD)
Okay Parama, please tell me you're not implying that RVS is a well-defined and separate game stage?
In post 258, Chiarosicada wrote:I don't think any player except maybe shos himself saw the wagon going anywhere, and I don't think you're an exception. As such, I see your words and unvote as oppotunistic white-knighting.
In post 258, Chiarosicada wrote:However, you were also the first to draw attention to Parama, who I'm also finding scummy for claiming scum. Frankly, I wasn't comfortable calling him out on it due to knowledge of his meta but Vi's vote gives me more confidence. I'm not sure what to make of your interactions with him.
In post 112, Chiarosicada wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: uberninja
I have a feeling parama's going to give me headaches this game. I always had trouble reading belligerent players with bombastic posting styles.
In post 194, UberNinja wrote:In post 112, Chiarosicada wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: uberninja
I have a feeling parama's going to give me headaches this game. I always had trouble reading belligerent players with bombastic posting styles.
Why votemewithout reasoning, and then say someoneelseis going to give you headaches?
In post 174, shos wrote:I'm actually also for a parama wagon, but at the moment a nnja wagon s more likely. these are the highest two on the list, followed by Kanya
In post 268, Vi wrote:after you play for a whileUberNinja 263 wrote:Unvote; Vote: shos
shos/Parama/Chiarosicada, anyone?
you'll wind up in a bunch of scenarios where you make a list and then vote for the only townie on the list, and then go back to square one only to find postgame that the rest of your list was correct
this is probably going to be one of those
In post 280, shos wrote:Furcolow wrote:shos's interaction to his wagon is scummy
why wouldn't he have addressed this in #224, nothing has changed since then
he's scum skimming, and milking the votecount
What was scummy there? Iirc I just asked wtf.
Uber and parama have already supplied their reasons for votirng me-parama thinks the whole saga was already out of RVS and uber either misread or misrepped me. But you and diddin im still waiting to hear from. Diddin just seems to be lurking behind his rvs vote and you-well answer the question above
Shitty Iphone posticng
In post 282, Quilford wrote:In post 268, Vi wrote:Quilford 262 wrote:vote nuwenbecause she's scum go go goare you seriously implying that you suck this much at mafias-lully 267 wrote:Nuwen (1): Quilford
Parama ([what could be): Vi,2]
if you are then that's okay, you can join a handful of other people itt
i just wanted to vote nuwen
In post 281, Furcolow wrote:In post 280, shos wrote:Furcolow wrote:shos's interaction to his wagon is scummy
why wouldn't he have addressed this in #224, nothing has changed since then
he's scum skimming, and milking the votecount
What was scummy there? Iirc I just asked wtf.
Uber and parama have already supplied their reasons for votirng me-parama thinks the whole saga was already out of RVS and uber either misread or misrepped me. But you and diddin im still waiting to hear from. Diddin just seems to be lurking behind his rvs vote and you-well answer the question above
Shitty Iphone posticng
the scumminess lies in the lack of you posting your wagon whining in 224
why did you wait to make this post:
In post 272, shos wrote:In post 267, springlullaby wrote:
May i be reninded of why i am being voted again?
You are clearly not following the game, and reading at a skim. You didn't even realize you had 4 votes until the mod edited it! This is the 2nd time you've been woe is me, and you've already flailed at me once.
In post 275, Chiarosicada wrote:UberNinja wrote:UberNinja wrote:Why vote me without reasoning, and then say someone else is going to give you headaches?
I voted you because I thought you were scummy. I said that Parama would give me headaches because I find players with his playstyle hard to read. I’m not sure why this distinction is lost on you.
As for why I didn’t state my reasons for voting you, I wanted to see who was thinking along the same lines as me so that I could identify them as more likely town, which I now see shos as.