Sheeping me is dumb, don't be dumbIn post 14, Aureal wrote: I'm feeling kinda antisocial right now so I'm just gonna pre-emptively sheep Drew with a VOTE: biancospino 'cause I know that's what he's doing
Totally unrelated
VOTE: Bianco
Sheeping me is dumb, don't be dumbIn post 14, Aureal wrote: I'm feeling kinda antisocial right now so I'm just gonna pre-emptively sheep Drew with a VOTE: biancospino 'cause I know that's what he's doing
Mechanics get in the way of having a fun timeIn post 17, Flavor Leaf wrote: I have to figure out the mechanics of this game still
Nah nah.In post 19, Radical Rat wrote: Thoughts on massclaiming names?
I think it'd be a good idea to lock people into name claims early, prevent shenanigans on that front.
Yet there is the unknown on how the names work, and in this unknown you want everyone to mass claim their names.In post 26, Radical Rat wrote:Depends entirely on what kind of roles they have. I don't think there's enough information to make that kind of determination right now, but I assume there will be roles on both sides that benefit. Don't really want to get into role stuff yet though.In post 20, Theta Alpine wrote: oh right names are a thing
uh
what is the likelihood that it is helpful to scum
So why do you say it isn't scummy to phish for roles here?In post 30, Theta Alpine wrote:i was gonna say
fishing for scum role power usually is not that scummy
hmm
we do know that
wait how did i miss the word conversions in sign-ups
oh god
okay we do now that the scum factional power is non-standard and includes a bastard mechanic - conversions
so
what are the chances that it uses the names mechanic as well
Oh, why didn't you just say that from the start?In post 36, Radical Rat wrote: For what it's worth, I do not believe I am fishing for roles here.
In post 36, Radical Rat wrote: For what it's worth, I do not believe I am fishing for roles here.
Snark from me aside lolIn post 37, Doctor Drew wrote:Oh, why didn't you just say that from the start?In post 36, Radical Rat wrote: For what it's worth, I do not believe I am fishing for roles here.
My bad
Theta, maybe I wasn't clear lolIn post 39, Theta Alpine wrote: fishing for roles in general is scummy yes
i was specifically pondering out loud whether scum is likely to require the names for their purposes or not
which unfortunately i am not sure we can figure out
I might be able to fully Stockholm Syndrome you into voting yourself hahaIn post 38, Aureal wrote: I'm so glad I was astute enough to pick a game where Drew was going to be reasonable to sheep him in
VOTE: Radical Rat
Well clearly not since I have them all eating out of my palm muah hahaIn post 45, DeasVail wrote: I wonder if it’s apparent to anyone else that dr drew is role fishing even more than RR is
Somehow this doesn't answer how I was role phishing.In post 48, DeasVail wrote:When you actually think about it, this question has no practical purpose other than role-fishing.In post 40, Doctor Drew wrote:In post 36, Radical Rat wrote: For what it's worth, I do not believe I am fishing for roles here.Snark from me aside lolIn post 37, Doctor Drew wrote:Oh, why didn't you just say that from the start?In post 36, Radical Rat wrote: For what it's worth, I do not believe I am fishing for roles here.
My bad
We don't know how roles operate besides our own, mafia are a collective that know how each of their roles work and are for this reason more informed of how everything works here.
Why would you want to potentially give them more information at this point?
Now do I think Dr Drew is intentionally role-fishing? No, not at all. I don’t actually think it’s that common for scum to do that. But my point is that I don’t think RR is either.
UNVOTE:In post 72, Aureal wrote:What, you wanna like, brainstorm various possibilities? Even that is kinda role-fishy. Implications about someone's role can be drawn from their suggestions.In post 61, Radical Rat wrote: That does not mean we can't discuss, in the abstract, potential benefits/detriments of sharing names, as has been happening already, but it will ultimately be taking a chance. I believe it is a chance worth taking, but if everyone else is too afraid of the risks, that's fine. I don't think it's going to make or break the game either way at this point.
As long as you don't, ahem.....jump to any conclusions here I am good.In post 78, Flavor Leaf wrote: i am a frog in wolf's clothing
Do you really agree with my assessment? Or are you just keeping the gag going?In post 80, Aureal wrote:UNVOTE:In post 73, Doctor Drew wrote:UNVOTE:In post 72, Aureal wrote:What, you wanna like, brainstorm various possibilities? Even that is kinda role-fishy. Implications about someone's role can be drawn from their suggestions.In post 61, Radical Rat wrote: That does not mean we can't discuss, in the abstract, potential benefits/detriments of sharing names, as has been happening already, but it will ultimately be taking a chance. I believe it is a chance worth taking, but if everyone else is too afraid of the risks, that's fine. I don't think it's going to make or break the game either way at this point.
Thinking about it, still is role phishy, but willing to believe scum wouldn't be so brazen here.
Aureal, you must sheep me here.....per the rules.
Yup yup, that's definitely the rules and not me mind-controlling Drew to do my bidding
Nothing to see here, move along
In post 83, Aureal wrote: I decided I was townreading Rat before you came back XD
In post 69, DeasVail wrote: UNVOTE:
My point is still mostly that the discussion about mass nameclaiming and associated accusations of role-fishing are silly, but I also am not sure that there’s much else to talk about right now. Scum are probably more likely to be on the sidelines of the discussion rather than directly involved.
So......which one is it?In post 87, DeasVail wrote:I think nitpicking at nothing is a way to get things moving in the early game, and I liked that nk15 didn’t engage with the mass name claim discussion, because I feel like scum would feel the need to do thatIn post 70, Aureal wrote:Why? 55 seems like nitpicking at nothing to me.In post 58, DeasVail wrote: Also I think NK15 is town
How?In post 95, DeasVail wrote: I do not think my statements are as mutually exclusive as you present them to be
Fun Drew fact that I just realized:In post 119, DeasVail wrote: I wish I had more to say right now but I really don't
Are you actually trying to sheep my play style as well?In post 125, Aureal wrote:Have you played with Kitty before?In post 123, Radical Rat wrote: But yeah, I'm afraid I simply do not believe you. I lack anything specific to push on, but you've got the scummy scent about you I can't quite place yet.
VOTE: AurealIn post 128, Aureal wrote:One thing is for sure, I definitely have nothing to do with any role that gets power by following people's actions, not me... ever... for reals... end of story... period.In post 126, Doctor Drew wrote:Are you actually trying to sheep my play style as well?In post 125, Aureal wrote:Have you played with Kitty before?In post 123, Radical Rat wrote: But yeah, I'm afraid I simply do not believe you. I lack anything specific to push on, but you've got the scummy scent about you I can't quite place yet.
This feels so fucking werid
Hey man I tried, and got people talking. I can only lead a horse to water though.In post 144, Flavor Leaf wrote: It feels like every game I’ve been playing lately, i stand off early game, and then it’s super slow, so I’m like damn, i can’t even lurk most of early game because nobody does things to get pressure/cause scum to act
Lately I can't read them well, why scummy?In post 145, Flavor Leaf wrote: Bianco’s the scummiest slot so far
Personally, I feel like weird Aureal is town Aureal lol.In post 146, Flavor Leaf wrote: Aureal’s weird too, but idk if it’s scum
Alianna has some serious town tells, none of which she showed in the Jester game......it was my fault for not being more adamant about that.In post 159, Aureal wrote: And I still don't understand how Drew comes to the conclusions he does, seeing as he shouldn't have been able to get a sense of Alianna's scum game forever either. But he was saying the same thing in the jester game and he was town there so I believe that he thinks he does.
To roleplay as Flavor Leaf you at least have to have the paranoia that you could be scum and be worried about that.In post 168, Aureal wrote:NOT EVEN MY INCREDIBLE FLAVOR LEAF ROLEPLAY?!In post 165, SirCakez wrote: I'm around but nothing has really grabbed my attention enough to comment tbh
Fine, I'll just go play video games then
How would one know the real names?In post 173, Roden wrote:Assign a game to each real name in the set up, whoever gets voted out first is the decided game
Ya, but Roden kinda said that in a way that they know the real namesIn post 175, Flavor Leaf wrote:In theory a flip would showIn post 174, Doctor Drew wrote:How would one know the real names?In post 173, Roden wrote:Assign a game to each real name in the set up, whoever gets voted out first is the decided game
In post 178, Flavor Leaf wrote: Are you trying to fake a dumb tell right now?
I did not see that, nor did I know I could have chosen what my name could be lolIn post 179, Flavor Leaf wrote: All the names are in the setup post, even i saw that
Are you trying to dumbtell now?In post 181, Flavor Leaf wrote:You got to choose?!?In post 180, Doctor Drew wrote:In post 178, Flavor Leaf wrote: Are you trying to fake a dumb tell right now?I did not see that, nor did I know I could have chosen what my name could be lolIn post 179, Flavor Leaf wrote: All the names are in the setup post, even i saw that
You missed where I didn't know they were public knowledge in signupsIn post 188, Roden wrote: I'm confused
Drew you already knew the real names were public knowledge
Why throw shade towards me?
As I just stated I didn't know the names were public knowledge until this pointIn post 200, Radical Rat wrote:This isn't the first time the list of known names was mentioned. Why didn't you have anything to say about this before?In post 177, Doctor Drew wrote:Ya, but Roden kinda said that in a way that they know the real namesIn post 175, Flavor Leaf wrote:In theory a flip would showIn post 174, Doctor Drew wrote:How would one know the real names?In post 173, Roden wrote:Assign a game to each real name in the set up, whoever gets voted out first is the decided game
Rat wanted people to claim NamesIn post 208, Radical Rat wrote:Right, but someone else already implied knowing and you didn't care is my point. I don't remember who it was, but it was while we were discussing massclaiming namesIn post 204, Doctor Drew wrote:As I just stated I didn't know the names were public knowledge until this pointIn post 200, Radical Rat wrote:This isn't the first time the list of known names was mentioned. Why didn't you have anything to say about this before?In post 177, Doctor Drew wrote:Ya, but Roden kinda said that in a way that they know the real namesIn post 175, Flavor Leaf wrote:In theory a flip would showIn post 174, Doctor Drew wrote:How would one know the real names?In post 173, Roden wrote:Assign a game to each real name in the set up, whoever gets voted out first is the decided game
Oh you are Rat lolIn post 213, Doctor Drew wrote:Rat wanted people to claim NamesIn post 208, Radical Rat wrote:Right, but someone else already implied knowing and you didn't care is my point. I don't remember who it was, but it was while we were discussing massclaiming namesIn post 204, Doctor Drew wrote:As I just stated I didn't know the names were public knowledge until this pointIn post 200, Radical Rat wrote:This isn't the first time the list of known names was mentioned. Why didn't you have anything to say about this before?In post 177, Doctor Drew wrote:Ya, but Roden kinda said that in a way that they know the real namesIn post 175, Flavor Leaf wrote:In theory a flip would showIn post 174, Doctor Drew wrote:How would one know the real names?In post 173, Roden wrote:Assign a game to each real name in the set up, whoever gets voted out first is the decided game
I didn't know names were in the setup post
Who implied knowing?
I know my name and I know we all have a name.In post 215, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 22, Doctor Drew wrote:Nah nah.In post 19, Radical Rat wrote: Thoughts on massclaiming names?
I think it'd be a good idea to lock people into name claims early, prevent shenanigans on that front.
And out of RVS we go.
We don't know what the names do per se, this is role phishing.
Pre Edit: Titus knows the score
Why’d you talk about this if you didn’t know what names were?
Do you think I am sketch?In post 218, Flavor Leaf wrote: It’s probs NAI, Drew, but i think people can be in the right if they think you sketch here.
Not sure it applies to Titus, but I rarely read too much of a game setup unless I am scum. I didn't realize there was a 'cult' until it was talked about in game.In post 241, DeasVail wrote: See I feel like the natural thing would be to look at the game information? I don’t know
What's a dumb tell?In post 244, Flavor Leaf wrote: I think we insta kill next person who tries to dumb tell
I will take that town cred, kind sirIn post 246, Flavor Leaf wrote:Good thing it was a test, and was giving free town cred to the next person onlyIn post 245, Doctor Drew wrote:What's a dumb tell?In post 244, Flavor Leaf wrote: I think we insta kill next person who tries to dumb tell
Because of delicious booze.In post 261, Aureal wrote:Yeah but then you'd still be drinking lemonade and and rum instead of Mountain DewIn post 259, Theta Alpine wrote:i mean i could just drink some of it and then add more lemonade to balance it a bit moreIn post 257, Aureal wrote: Definitely mixed it wrong, throw it away and get a Mountain Dew
Why would anyone subject themself to that
I feel like she has been a bit flaky and distracted as of lateIn post 264, Flavor Leaf wrote:I missed that it was a cult game until the game started, but we were actively talking about it, and the way she questioned it was weird.In post 262, Theta Alpine wrote: also ew mountain dew is too close to being energy drink for my tastes
anyways
titus hmmm
i should probably not comment on that one later once drink sets in but for now uh
i can understand having missed that the game was a cult game considering the circumstances
I can see Titus town doing it, but i think it’s worth pressuring.
I also haven’t had to read Titus in a long time
You caught me, Rat is my super secret alt......my bad everyone.In post 310, Theta Alpine wrote: i think i might have read a post that quoted from doctor drew and thought it was quoted from you for some reason
Do itIn post 316, Titus wrote: I'd also shift to DV.
I also totally thought I already switched to DV lol
I am gonna claim 100% recruitable, I am open for bussiness lolIn post 364, Aureal wrote: Awww, you guys make me wanna fakeclaim unrecruitable now
I demand a formal apology on my desk first thing after DV screws us overIn post 509, Aureal wrote: Dreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew
Theta. Is. Right.
This is no time to be friggin paranoid about a pretty freaking confirmable slot that benefits us while it's here. Actually winning and leaving is likely the biggest harm it can inflict! And you guys want to self-inflict that when we need to use our votes on the enthusiast faction?!?
Oh, that is a big part of it as well, per my last sentence there.In post 514, Flavor Leaf wrote:im not even like that big on that on a mafilosophical level, i just feel like we have the opportunity to just deal with it now being so close to deadline anyways.In post 507, Doctor Drew wrote: I remember a game awhile back where 3p made a similar type 'Don't worry about me town, I totally am harmless' and the town let them live. In that game Titus was adamant that you should never let 3p live since they are by definition not town and not in the business of helping town.
I may be confusing a couple games but I seem to remember the 3p screwing over town and Titus was correct(maybe she can help me jog my memory).
Point is, DV is not town and DV should not live.
At best he is being truthful and won't directly hurt town(realistically in this case he is purposely hiding something more about his role, even in a best case). Worst case he is completely lying and can hurt us as town, or is just scum trying to claim benevolent 3p.
Either way, they should be disposed of today so he doesn't become a bigger issue going forward.
Well, if I could pipe in a bit, I got the ball rolling on DV and got the game moving way before you.In post 543, Flavor Leaf wrote:i just dont see these 2 as being the same at all. in the scenario with a, my push WAS right.In post 540, Gamma Emerald wrote:yeah but a) I correctly figured out you were scum searching for the other team and b) your push on DV here doesn’t feel rightIn post 533, Flavor Leaf wrote:in what way?In post 529, Gamma Emerald wrote: I think I will be voting Flavor Leaf today since this feels like NQN2!Flavor
because keep in mind, that was multiball, and I was essentially correct on 2 scum members there.
i admit, im overdoing it on purpose with pushing DV, but I still standby it's probs the best fade. I helped get this game moving like I do every game.
I have a hat that protects against bad ideas lolIn post 637, Aureal wrote: I'm gonna need to adopt a new bestie since my mind control rays have encountered a technical hiccup in trying to reach Drew at the moment.
VOTE: Titus
I meant the bad idea of trusting DVIn post 639, Aureal wrote: Why is voting Titus a bad idea?
Mafia Have a Cop PT 2?In post 711, Flavor Leaf wrote: I think this means that scum have a Cop of sorts and because of the way they convert, they don't know their team, and I can be a fake teammate for them.
Aww but that is always a fun part of the gameIn post 716, Flavor Leaf wrote: And before we get the Flavor paranoia push, there's way too many of yall who know me for me to pull this shit as scum here.
So quit the inkling.
VOTE: RatIn post 723, ActionDan wrote: VOTE: Radical rat
I suppose I can throw a kitchen sink if needed but suffice it to say the push against kitty was scummy and RR needs to burn for it