In post 11, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:OMG AP!! Play league with me later!!
So, you didn't know AP was on, yet he just happened to be on the account immediately after you posted ...?
What?
In post 11, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:OMG AP!! Play league with me later!!
In post 37, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:You know what TSO stands for? the scum, obviously!
In post 72, ZZZX wrote:Its not. Once we get a few flips you will see how good it is
In post 74, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:In post 70, T S O wrote:I have a theory where if I constantly point it out he may actually correct it.
good luck with that! lmao... I have given up on trying to change anyone. And he's not as terrible as some.
In post 74, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:In post 71, T S O wrote:This question about "who would YOU veto gaiz" is really bad and has no advantages.
meh. I wouldn't say it's really bad, and I wouldn't say it has no advantages, but I would say that the manner in which he went about it is not the usual useless question type thing he does as scum (see Organic Chemistry).
In post 74, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I've got a fairly decent townread on him at the moment for the fact that he seems interested in the answers, rather than just making town noises. Know what I mean?
In post 128, ZZZX wrote:In post 79, Flubbernugget wrote:and ZZZX is chosen.
THIS PINGS MY SCUMDAAAAAAARS
if I am ever lynched and was choosen lynch this thing.
In post 142, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 138, T S O wrote:Aren't you still calling me scum?
I mean, I don't think a Flubber-TSO team is -at all- likely, but you seem to think it is.
Why is a TSO-Flubber scum-team so unlikely?
In post 142, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
So because someone says 'Hey, scum is x,y or z' you feel the need to vote one of those three choices? You can't make your mind up for yourself?
In post 142, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You don't think scum exists outside of those three people?
In post 195, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:In post 194, T S O wrote:It kinda saddens me I'm not scum with LC, but hey.
So whoareyou scum with?
ETL
In post 210, Guilty Gunsmith wrote: The point is that the response is null because of this.
In post 206, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:
TSO's response could easily be interpreted as scummy,since it inherently comes off as defensive and distance-ybut being that it was prompted by BBT, I'm inclined to disregard the answer entirely.
In post 212, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:TSO - I don't think you understand what I'm saying. It LOOKS scummy, but it ISN'T ACTUALLY.
In post 215, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Whoa, what is going on here? Since when was I defending JB?
In post 215, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Note the use of plurals. This would imply that had TSO voted for JB, ZZZX or FN I would have asked the same question. I thought my stance on the situation and the direction my questioning was coming from was fairly obvious, my bad, it clearly wasn't.
In post 215, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I mean, at first I thought this was some sort of reaction test you were trying but I'm beginning to think you're purposefully trying to misrepresent my posts.
In post 160, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Also, I'm not satisfied.
Why exactly did you feel the need to;
a) vote within those three choices
b) vote there and then
In post 219, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
Holycrap TSO, are you serious?
If you don't want me to imply that you aren't reading, don't ask me questions I've already answered.
In post 227, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You could have voted in 138 if you thought he was scum. But you did it in 140.
In post 225, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:TSO - my intention was never to insult you but I am having a really hard time understanding what your confusion is and I don't know how else to explain it any better.