Star Trek Deep Space Nine Season 1 Mafia(game over!)

[Senator]

Goddamnit. PB! Good to have you aboard. Now die

vote: Peacebringer

p.s.

Doesnt matter. aesthetic

[Senator]

I would very much like to remind you that I represent a person, place or thing; and not the glorious Senator Armstrong this time.



Pedit: Nooo. I'm still foggy, but he's rhyming a riddle. Which isn't completely out of character for the account I should add.

[Senator]

What content could you possibly expect with your silly RQS, a claimed Deep Space Nine, and Archmage's propensity to stageact?

Don't be daft, newb.

[Senator]

Lolol.

Me pointing out that Archmage has a history of 'the humanities' probably had a purpose too. But that wasn't content.

[Senator]

igmeou

[Senator]

I questioned you.

Please show.

[Senator]

I cant tell if you're just some tryhard kid or actually scum pushing where it doesn't belong.

[Senator]

I questioned you.

Please show.

Are you not able to show?

[Senator]

VOTE: Narninian

What is this?

[Senator]

So you didn't ask me a question you can point to,but feel the need to harp on my 'answer' or lack thereof? And then get stonefaced when confronted instead of apologizing or asking the question in a manner everyone can recognize?

[Senator]

VOTE: Licky

[Senator]

Nope.

[Senator]

I'm completely astounded that you jump on a player who voted in RVS for 'weak' reasons. It laughably silly.

[Senator]

I'm completely astounded that you jump on a player who voted in RVS for 'weak' reasons. It laughably silly.

you vote me for RVS
your vote for Licktey is not RVS and weak

o.o I see. I can only have one vote in RVS, and once that expires PB is allowed to vote me for establishing a read.

It doesn't have to be concrete, merely better than random.

[Senator]

The better question is who is Kirk.

[Senator]

1. Accusations of role fishing.
2. Inquiries of policy lynching.
3. Posts are all sizzle, no steak.

You're town.

[Senator]

We're not going to No Lynch. Its bad for town.

+all of it.

[Senator]

Also you should say some things that pertain to stuffs.

[Senator]

Lickety Wagon is a good wagon. It is serving its purpose.

[Senator]

It is going too fast, and the reasons are bad. But its the reactions to it that make it good.

[Senator]

I guess I should fall off it now that I'm talking about it.

unvote

[Senator]

Thats a PL sir.

[Senator]

Let's all claim negative role modifiers.

I'm actually an SS.

[Senator]

literally why did you feel the need to claim

I felt a strong argument was about to be used against me.

How?

[Senator]

Nope. That's a fairly anti-town thought train.

[Senator]

3 roles? We have a claimed Beloved Princess and a claimed Miller.

[Senator]

3 roles? We have a claimed Beloved Princess and a claimed Miller.

What is SS?

Jesus Christ, SuperStar

[Senator]

Looking up 'ss' on the wiki should redirect you to the page

[Senator]

Lickety. How many games have you played recently?

[Senator]

Im not actually SS you tard.

[Senator]

But I like how you're lining up like a scum in a PL buffet.

[Senator]

vote: CDB

[Senator]

Who is LQ? who is his character?

[Senator]

I'm claiming Beloved Miller next game I play. Nono, Ill claim Bulletproof Ascetic.

If there is a beloved princess in our game, than it stands to reason that the night will be hot.

[Senator]

vote: CDB

vote: ChannelDelibird

Y U NO COUNT IT?

[Senator]

Youre bad at mafia. I was HIs scumbuddy last game

Well blow me down. This is what I get for checking on my phone

[Senator]

The other party doesn't have to be active for you to tunnel.

VOTE: davesaz

Hi I was making a document so that my first Large theme might be easier.

WTF is this weaksauce reason to vote?

aww piss. Look at you being where you don't belong.

[Senator]

Nobody.

[Senator]

That's my sock yo.

[Senator]

Pisskop is referencing a PM between myself and them about a set up I have made. I was very clear it was a trimmed game and very complex and I asked if they could take a look at it and they seemed flabbergasted that the game was so complex and said it was way out of their experience to try and balance.

pisskop is making a excel document tracking notable events and posts; as well as his feels and people's read, so that he can crush you with his mighty might.

[Senator]

I want to make it abundantly clear that I am not referring to your proposed micro-theme setup or this game in progress.

[Senator]

Nooo, vote scum with me.

vote: Zabing

Also lol Im voted for making spreadsheets.

Do it for pisskop, Klingy

[Senator]

LQ just needs some more games on site to get a feel for the meta here.

[Senator]

like, I feel like hes one of them there Town of Salam migrants

[Senator]

Klingy, are you scum?

[Senator]

Its that stunning lexicon and the ease with which you talk thats new to me. Like Gawd

Im going to stop checking this from my phone

[Senator]

TAL wasnt forced to do anything by my reckoning. But to read too much into it is silly.

[Senator]

???

The worst part about LQ's claim is that he freely said it triggers upon NK. I don't know why anyone with any experience in mafia would tell scum that if they kill him they get a free night.

And even more, This early in the game, investigators don't have enough info to dig around, and x-shots get boned as well.

[Senator]

Not the point.

[Senator]

See, its like you don't even know how anti-town you are. I'm the 3 shot commuter.

[Senator]

wholly crap.

Think

before you say things. If I were really the commuter you'd have just given the scum more reason to figure it out.

[Senator]

From 594

Hello. I am Jeanne. I like anime. I am scum. Takeo Kinoshita and Okabe Rintarou are my scumbuddies. So come on, lynch us.

Like seriously.

[Senator]

Got any real content or just come to make posts?

[Senator]

Just relax and let others post so that you can see what they do. You're hogging up all the spotlight.

[Senator]

Just relax and let others post so that you can see what they do. You're hogging up all the spotlight.

And 'win con' is one of the most misused terms in this game.

[Senator]

We've got lightning over here, unusually large bolts, but no rain . . . yet.

[Senator]

People, stop enabling LQ.

LQ, don't take anyone's insults personally.

[Senator]

Why are you worried about a vig on you? Shouldn't our beloved princess be more concerned about the benefit scum gain from killing you?

[Senator]

o.o Connecticut. Halfway across the country. -.-

[Senator]

You have my prayers if they'll help.

pedit: I bet he's a miller too.

[Senator]

We get Florida's hurricanes, California's acid rain, and Canada's snow. Don't need your crap too.

[Senator]

CDB, you are trying to push this too hard. Its not like we only have 3 days to figure him or the game out. Killing him now is more detrimental to the town PRs than killing him day 2 or 3.

[Senator]

If we must have 2 days of night we should get infos for the investigators.

[Senator]

Bloody hell.

vote: Lickety

[Senator]

<3 HI is so full of themself.

[Senator]

That was a 'I swear to god if Scum CDB tricked us into lynching the Princess . . .' post.

[Senator]

HI, for the record, is super obvious when they're scum, because their motivations betray them.

[Senator]

Nope both ways. You should read the thread more.

[Senator]

Just so we all can see. HI has not been reading.

[Senator]

Titus, is Jeanne scum?

[Senator]

Hi HI.

[Senator]

The other party doesn't have to be active for you to tunnel.

VOTE: davesaz

Hi I was making a document so that my first Large theme might be easier.

WTF is this weaksauce reason to vote?

aww piss. Look at you being where you don't belong.

Things like this are why I voted Zabing.

[Senator]

A lot of people on Zabing are kind of weak.

[Senator]

And you like that wagon?

I like my vote on Zabing. The wagon is larger than warranted.

I scumread Klingy, Zabing, and TAL.

[Senator]

Read what I've said above. Your logic sucks.

Nope. Killing him today is bad for the town PRs, and no amount of pompous masturbation will make it better.

If mafia must take 2 blind shots than so must PRs. PRs outnumber mafia, and investigative roles are made random and useless. Your logic is bad.

[Senator]

Fantastic defense there, Senator. So you admit it's a weak lynch (it's not though), and that you were on it anyways? Hilarious.

I like the part where you took my words and made them into something they weren't. I'm fine with a Zabing lynch. A portion of the voters are on him for naked or weak reasons.

[Senator]

Try again, Senator. You defending a your voting with 'but a lot of the votes are weak' is exactly what happened there.

Is this an incorrect statement?

[Senator]

Are a good portion of the votes on Zabing not weak?

[Senator]

It's not a lie to say that your claimed flavour is not a character from season 1 of DS9, LQ.

Gene Roddenbury is the creator I believe. That makes sense for a BP claim because without the creator, none would exist.

Second, why would he claim that as scum? Surely the mod would provide a fakeclaim right?

Why besides the claim, is LQ scum?

Saint claimed Miller

[Senator]

Considering the flpow of the game, the period of time he posted, and his timely replace out I'm still more than okay with it. His content was bad. Not even uninvolved kinf of bad town can be when they can find time or energy to get into a game. The bad kind of poor reasoning that smokescreens scum motivation.

That and I didn't really pay too much attention to it until I got to that point with my spreadsheet. So it was a delayed vote.

[Senator]

Thats bad. You should also read.

[Senator]

I just don't want a repeat of Sweet Dreams. Why is TAL upsetting you?

pedit: Me.

[Senator]

unvote

[Senator]

@MAX

With everything else ging on in this game, I feel my vote is one of the better ones. Thus far, this game has been one weak vote after another. The wagon is way too large for such a case, and I acknowledge it. I'm not sure what you want to conclude from Titus/I, but :shrug:

And I have no clue why Saint defened my positions. Unless he is also defending Zabing.


@Titus.

I just don't want a repeat of Sweet Dreams. Why is TAL upsetting you?

pedit: Me.

[Senator]

My issue with Titus atm is she came in here and is now throwing around reads and implied accusations. Its a potential scumtell from here, afaic. And I've used it to catch her before.

[Senator]

Lolol. If you want to tread down the route where we smear each other with oil and then smoke cigarettes.

[Senator]

You haven't been scumhunting because you haven't read.

I saw a video.

[Senator]

Titus doesn't typically read threads she places into, and given the brief period of time since her place into here its more than fair to say she hasn't read more than select passages from the game.

Pedit: The above. How are you 'scumhunting' aside from pushing without evidence?

And I didn't. I unvoted LQ.

[Senator]

You came in her and shushed all the little fish up. About all you did. And you're trying to swing a scumread on me for honesty?
I really had hoped you knew better than that by now.

[Senator]

I didn't. I said you throwing your weigh around with assuredness is a potential scumtell. Why are you trying to say otherwise?

[Senator]

Your read on me is irrelevant to me, Quick. Simple as.

You're scum.

Who are you talking to?

[Senator]

So why didn't you say that instead of trying to misconstrue my words? Did you not understand before? It sounds like you did.

[Senator]

Opinions in every game change over time. Any player will usually have their reads shift according to events over the day. In addition, replacements are dichotomously loved/hated because of their ability to come into a game detached from past events. A person coming into a game and giving out 'opinions' without knowledge of the game's prior events is arrogance and usually wrong.

Would you care to show me her scumhunting? Like a particular 'scumhunting' she has done.

This is as much about me sorting her as her sorting me.

[Senator]

Spoiler: LQ

Double PEdit: Senator wasn't speaking to you, LQ.

Why is Senator kinda-sorta avoiding me then?

Senator, Do you not respect my play or something?

Given that I now see claiming was a bad move and I need to take J's advice about claiming day 1 do you still think that my play is bad?

I'm talking to Titus, who shares a history with me. Nothing to do with not respecting you, but I'm in several games besides this one so I do get spread thin.

It is going too fast, and the reasons are bad. But its the reactions to it that make it good.

You are saying this is your playstyle this game and you have been completely truthful about that.

Sure.

Lickety. How many games have you played recently?

Recently? Like before this one? I was a coach of sorts. then this one started before my newbie. Other than that, I suppose I've been turning the mill a bit.

I believed you when you said 6 before. 'Coaching'? As in online? Or in person?

Just relax and let others post so that you can see what they do. You're hogging up all the spotlight.

And 'win con' is one of the most misused terms in this game.

This is pro-town even though he didn't explain.

Okay. Why is it pro-town?

P-Edit X3: really convenient there Nero.

You have my prayers if they'll help.

pedit: I bet he's a miller too.

What do you mean by he's a miller too?

A sarcasm.

A lot of people on Zabing are kind of weak.

Were you even on the Zabing wagon? cuz I didn't see it.

unvote

And this tops it off as something I have no idea about... but I kinda get it and I am suppose to.

P-Edit X4: Senator, Titus does more better the more swingy the setup is.

Word, you know Titus?

P-Edit X2: I'm not talking about my read on you HI, I'm talking about your read on me. You have more than enough info to give me a town read. I am not scum this game.

HI, you are not saying anything really and have scum motivation. You have declined to explain anything and drawn out the game by not giving answers. This is Anti-Town or Scummy.

HI and I have a small amount of history.

[Senator]

@Titus

So why didn't you say that instead of trying to misconstrue my words? Did you not understand before? It sounds like you did.

@Max

Opinions in every game change over time. Any player will usually have their reads shift according to events over the day. In addition, replacements are dichotomously loved/hated because of their ability to come into a game detached from past events. A person coming into a game and giving out 'opinions' without knowledge of the game's prior events is arrogance and usually wrong.

Would you care to show me her scumhunting? Like a particular 'scumhunting' she has done.

This is as much about me sorting her as her sorting me.

[Senator]

Your read on me is irrelevant to me, Quick. Simple as.

You're scum.

Who are you talking to?

[Senator]

They aren't scumhunting. You're trying to ascribe something to her you won't even point out.

[Senator]

Know what; doesn't even matter. This isn't going to further the game any. She pulled her reads out of Magic Pony Land and then softly pushed them based on theory.

[Senator]

Titus is falling back to old reliable 'my meta isn't this thing'. w.e. She can keep dodging the question and I'll keep shouting it at you people.

Titus, why aren't you pushing us today? LQ is a bad lynch. Its like clear as day Gene created the show.

[Senator]

@Titus

@Titus

So why didn't you say that instead of trying to misconstrue my words? Did you not understand before? It sounds like you did.

[Senator]

The question isn't 'loaded', you just got caught up in your own inaccuracies. Why did you try to 'rephrase' my words instead of telling me how I was wrong about your meta? Was I also wrong in Sweet Dreams?

[Senator]

Titus can continue to dodge all she wants. Its not like I'm going to let her live it down.

[Senator]

Spoiler: post

The question isn't 'loaded', you just got caught up in your own inaccuracies. Why did you try to 'rephrase' my words instead of telling me how I was wrong about your meta? Was I also wrong in Sweet Dreams?

I didn't rephrase anything.

You ought know by now

. Your push is merely a

dodge

and a

smokescreen

.

You argued I was not scumhunting because I didn't read. I highlight I never read and you should know this.

Not a misrep. Not a rephrase. Just facts.

Considering the flpow of the game, the period of time he posted, and his timely replace out I'm still more than okay with it. His content was bad. Not even uninvolved kinf of bad town can be when they can find time or energy to get into a game. The bad kind of poor reasoning that

smokescreens

scum motivation.

You came in her and shushed all the little fish up. About all you did. And you're trying to swing a scumread on me for honesty?

I really had hoped you knew better than that by now.

Titus can continue to

dodge

all she wants. Its not like I'm going to let her live it down.

Titus can keep parroting.

Titus isn't scumhunting. She's ripping off other's reads and lexicons. Now I'm suddenly 'pushing' her.

[Senator]

Spoiler: .

You argued I was not scumhunting because I didn't read. I highlight I never read and you should know this.

^And I asked why you felt the need to try to misconstrue my words.

So if you know I never read upon subbing in, how can you argue with a straight face that my lack of reading is scum motivated or not scumhunting?

^This is what you said, and I asked you why you felt the need to purposely misconstrue my words.

You haven't been scumhunting because you haven't read.

^Now suddenly you backpedal to this earlier post?

Titus is going from my quote which says 'She isn't scumhunting because she didn't read' to her version which is 'I'm scumreading her because she isn't reading'. She has a history of being bad at context on occasion. Maybe this is one of them.

[Senator]

ugh she's impossible. If she doesn't make distinctions that aren't even that fine. You can't think they are the same, this site's meta is living proof you're being dense or a liar.

[Senator]

Wholly shit nobody is calling her scum. Its her inability to distinguish between 2 concepts that give her away as scum.

But thanks for calling it pedantry.

[Senator]

Like, the whole purpose of pushing the very distinction was to check he motive.

[Senator]

You arse. If I want to be pedantic about it I will. :v

[Senator]

Wholly shit nobody is calling her scum. Its her inability to distinguish between 2 concepts that give her away as scum.

But thanks for calling it pedantry.

can

I tend to develop poor grammar when I get frustrated.

[Senator]

It is easy to tell HI is town.

[Senator]

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=61136

[Senator]

LQ shut up and let other people post. :V

[Senator]

There will be plenty of time later to do that. On D2. Then in the dead thread. Because you claimed and then told scum you had a bullseye on your back.

We're happy to have him back. Let 'em stay.

[Senator]

Ahh, its nice to see Im not the only one who grasps distnctions of concepts. Maxs defense of Titus is noted

[Senator]

So you're going to settle for lynching toen because you're afraid to hunt scum?

[Senator]

Frak.

Intent.

Intent to hammer

[Senator]

If HI is somehow insane, a simple question we already know the answer to will determine that.

[Senator]

CDB is the only person who fits, and its highly convenient that Lick claimed so early, played so bad, and CDB is so capable of pushing it through.

But yea, I'd set up a game where a lyncher is trying to lynch such a negative role. It makes the lyncher very anti-town instead of 3P

[Senator]

If HI is somehow insane, a simple question we already know the answer to will determine that.

should have responded to this then I was Pedited, but potato.

What kind of question would that be, though?

Like, character flavor, episode inclusion, any flipped role. The order of resolution, etc.

[Senator]

2 question per day?

[Senator]

vote: LQ

Java doesn't work in Firefox, so I got to chrome for all my java needs :\

[Senator]

That was Hammzors. If you had read. :b

[Senator]

Lets focus on if Gene really is LQ's character. T'would raise an eyebrow or three.

[Senator]

I'm going to get you tomorrow. Or two days from now. Whatever the case.

[Senator]

I don't like Kligs vote on me.

Klingon is an oddfellow this game.

[Senator]

At least Narn will be here as the voice of reason Tomorrow. I don't trust anyone else to do things sensibly after this ridiculous Day

Ouch.

Dont hold it against him. Hes more interested in a policy lynch than finding teh infos.

[Senator]

Nope. on a theory basis we should have lynched for scum today and then tried to let the scum off LQ themselves. We have like a whole game week till lylo. Plenty of time to policy a BP. After we have some idea who is scum.

[Senator]

In a game like this one I expect there to be more town PRs than scum all together. Therefore, getting them some info to use is more important than getting a rager for LQ. We aren't ignoring his role and the impact it could have. Instead we are intelligently minimizing its negative aspects.

[Senator]

See, we've just sent Town cops, weak hiders, Trackers, Docs, and w.e. else into a blind night. They dont know who scum is. The scum know who town is , however.

[Senator]

*2 blind nights.

[Senator]

Are you just scared of a lylo you know isn't for at least 5 days.

[Senator]

Our job as town is to buy Investigators time and info to use. To wish for an extended night period without flip info is unforgivable. You, Sinsun, are unforgivable.

[Senator]

Are you just scared of a lylo you know isn't for at least 5 days.

And we know this how?

Like you don't know how theme games work. Do they flow differently than large normals? Has any large game been ended in less than?

[Senator]

See, we've just sent Town cops, weak hiders, Trackers, Docs, and w.e. else into a blind night. They dont know who scum is. The scum know who town is , however.

And this is a better scenario at D3 or D4 because...

Because one D2 or 3 we have our choice flips, our reactions the very next day, and then we have wagons. You like those.

[Senator]

Lol. Sinsun is getting lynched D3 when we get back from our BLIND extended night.

[Senator]

Why am I cursed to play with the fucking morons of MS?

[Senator]

Are you just scared of a lylo you know isn't for at least 5 days.

And we know this how?

Like you don't know how theme games work. Do they flow differently than large normals? Has any large game been ended in less than?

See, we've just sent Town cops, weak hiders, Trackers, Docs, and w.e. else into a blind night. They dont know who scum is. The scum know who town is , however.

And this is a better scenario at D3 or D4 because...

Because one D2 or 3 we have our choice flips, our reactions the very next day, and then we have wagons. You like those.

Titus,you gonna get back to me on this, or are you capitulating?

*Yet again, no less.

[Senator]

That's a cop-out. 'I like wagons' is you trying to justify the lack of information we're stuck with.

Its hardly anti-town to let LQ flail in a corner like bait while we get actual role info. Your logic is at least flawed and at most indicative of scum

[Senator]

That's crap, Titus. That's misuse of a D1 lynch. And once again I see you're content to misconstrue my statements.

I don't want to let LQ live his life. I want to not xenophobically lynch it D1 in such a fervor that scum can blend in and we get no info.

-We've provided evidence that lynching it is worse than letting scum NK it.
-We've shown that a double-night without info will be harder on town than scum.
-There's obvious scum motivation in wanting it lynched. Not only do scum retain this night's kill, they get another one as well.

There is no reason to think scum wouldn't happily jump onto the wagon of a Beloved Princess. I suggest you explain why they would.
-The reason I got from the thread is that the scum could endgame us early with him. That's bull. Thats a best-case scenario for them.

Explain your shit logic, lass.

[Senator]

'Wrong again'.

Ohh, clearly we can all see Titus' superior logic at work today, folks.

[Senator]

What is the scum motivation for defending the LQ lynch?

[Senator]

1) NO there is no evidence to the contrary. Scum shooting in the dark > Scum shooting with info.

As this is the only thing you could even be assed to semi-answer, Ill respond.

Nope. In a vacuum where only scum act at night this is true. But we've already been over how the town is likely to have more PRs acting than scum have on their team. Thus the more info we can get them before they must act in complete darkness

twice

the better they can do their job.

You're taking our half the equation and then calling yourself the winner. Thats bad.

[Senator]

Your logic is shit, your rebuttal is designed to the attention-deficit, and the worst part is I'm not getting overly scummy vibes from you. You're just that terribad today.

[Senator]

1) NO there is no evidence to the contrary. Scum shooting in the dark > Scum shooting with info.

As this is the only thing you could even be assed to semi-answer, Ill respond.

Nope. In a vacuum where only scum act at night this is true. But we've already been over how the town is likely to have more PRs acting than scum have on their team. Thus the more info we can get them before they must act in complete darkness

twice

the better they can do their job.

You're taking our half the equation and then calling yourself the winner. Thats bad.

Except the collorary is true for scum as well. They can act twice, with the knowlege and crumbs of who is a PR in that setup.

PRs acting in the twice today in this setup is much better than on day 3 or 4 having them act with knowledge but being corpses.

That's weak. You're acting as if all of them would be wiped out, or that they couldn't keep themselves relatively concealed. Its fairly well known that scum can PR-hunt better than PRs can Scumhunt at night.

[Senator]

You just spout out worst case scenerios and act as if they are inevitable. I can't. Its like you're happy losing the PRs now and going '' instead of trying to get the town some info. info before the flip, so that the weaker roles like X-shots and Trackers can actually hit scum to begin with.

[Senator]

But no, scarred Titus wants to hide behind the safe lynch instead of sort people. Thats chill.

[Senator]

You and the scum both feel the right move was made.

[Senator]

Whoa. Self depreciation isn't cool. HI is noting your inexperience with the site. Just play a few games here and you'll be lynching her.

[Senator]

We don't wanna chase it off. just beat it up.

[Senator]

The fun is

always

in the chase, not the kill. If the chase is weak the kill is pointless.

[Senator]

You couldn't handle me.

[Senator]

Besides, you're a townread.

[Senator]

The fun is

always

in the chase, not the kill. If the chase is weak the kill is pointless.

Well we'll see how it was upon my flip.

What did you mean when you said playing to win con is misunderstood? I have my own theory on this but want to hear what you have to say about it.

What? on both accounts.

[Senator]

I would like to begin by saying anyone who thinks Id off any of those people is a sillyhead.

Like its great scum practice to murderize people you argue with

[Senator]

Next

YOU ALL ARE TERRIBLE PEOPLE FOR SENDING US TO DOUBLENIGHT BLIND!!1!

[Senator]

Kling's vote is trash.

[Senator]

like the kind of trash that is decaying and moldy and all scummy.

[Senator]

Klings seen my scumgame. Shes trying to be cute

[Senator]

btw, I was roleblocked last night but not N1.

[Senator]

Kling has yet to explain her vote.

In 566 she seems to buddy me.
In 601 she defends zabing.
thats all she says about me

vote: Klingoncelt

[Senator]

oh, also this is an omgus from her for my critique of her bad play ths game

[Senator]

1) a real shame about your rl events. I know a couple people who were hlspitalized for pneunomia, and even a case that bad is jarring :'(

2) nope, HI wanted to '1v1' me, and its fairly obvious what they meant now

[Senator]

I think that scum kill got blocked N1, as a claimed miller and hider are unliikrly scum kills.

So I think our blockers should consider that

also I

think

max targeted Saint N1. In the abscence of info a a miller is a good weak cop check

[Senator]

Jusy think of it as a reverse hydra

[Senator]

ugh. Did I ever tell you guyz Titus has a huge tendency to tunnel me?

Townreading Kling "on tone" is bad too. You scumread her in Boonskiies' game. And me

[Senator]

klingons iso is a sackof emptiness and weaksauce. Youdbetter come up woth a better reason than magicponySuddenlyshestown

[Senator]

TALs little moral lesson is silly. I wat content from him, not sweettalk.

ugh.

ugh. Did I ever tell you guyz Titus has a huge tendency to tunnel me?

Townreading Kling "on tone" is bad too. You scumread her in Boonskiies' game. And me

Well how about I actually trained Grandma and I have seen her scumhunt now when I had not before? :p

I also lead a tunnel on Grandma/Klingon in another game and it was right there. It gave me a scum meta foundation. Hint: if you use meta personality, update it.

Also, act town if you want townread. Why so flatly, if this is a tunnel like any other? You should just shrug it off and scumhunt.

I'm not saying you cant townread Klingy. I'm saying I don't see it, and it wasn't long ago we were both wrong about her. Its bad form. Also I'm kind of willing to lynch her.

[TheoryTalk]Meta is only a guide, not a rule.[/TheoryTalk]

wrt me 'shrugging it off'. who says I'm not scumhunting? You're acting as though anything I've done this game isn't what I've done in any other game. Right down to picking fights.

[Senator]

It's my greatest sad not to have been confscum in a game w/you yet.

[Senator]

Wow.

[Senator]

Its like you got beat with the stupid stick.

[Senator]

Also its cute how you waited until after the VC to drop the vote.

[Senator]

Lol at being L-2 on D2 in a large when less than 10 people have responded.

Good story.

[Senator]

So? I've softed my role and you dummies don't pick up on it too bad.

[Senator]

wat ._.

[Senator]

So Nero Confirms for not reading 2 posts above his own or what?

[Senator]

Fine. Im not interested in making this day about me. You're simply voting an easy vote instead of scumhunting.

[Senator]

Like if my debate with Titus looked faked or something I'd get the vote. But it looks to me like you're taking the lazy way out of producing content.

[Senator]

Lol. That added nothing of note to the discussion.

[Senator]

C'mon. You voted me. So far you've produced one quote and a narration. I could do that with just about anyone and justify a vote as weak as yours.

[Senator]

IF he is town and Beloved prince and they kill him. They will get 2 night kills, LQ + 1 other town.
If he is town and beloved prince and we lynch him. They will get 2 nights kills (2 other town members).

The extra kill you're referring to is our lynch, not a nightkill.
So in summary we if we lynch a town person, a town person dies. This is not an extra nightkill for scum, its just a myslynch. Obviously we want to avoid mislynches, but if I was convinced LQ was town, I would be more willing to entertain holding off on his lynch. I *still* think its better he dies earlier than later if he's town though.

This is admittedly a silly argument and semantics but you brought up 'extra nightkill' which isn't a thing that is going to happen from lynching vs death at night.

Nope. this is one reason why.

He just doesn't get it. It can't be helped.

[Senator]

But just because he doesn't get to choose 2 kills instead of using one on LQ an getting a second one doesn't mean I can't dig at him.

[Senator]

But just because he doesn't get *that scum get* to choose 2 kills instead of using one on LQ an getting a second one doesn't mean I can't dig at him.

eb wop

[Senator]

I have niggling doubts about you though.

[Senator]

How easy it was for cum to hide on the wagon, how little info would be gained from the lynch, the logic I don't agree with behind why he should die D1, how he was like a lost sheep.

[Senator]

<3

[Senator]

Im get ya.

[Senator]

Lol not even a little sensical. What's flailish?

[Senator]

How easy it was for cum to hide on the wagon, how little info would be gained from the lynch, the logic I don't agree with behind why he should die D1, how he was like a lost sheep.

Why was it easy for scum to hide on the protown lynch?
The fact we got little info is bullshit. The wagons still talk.
I can't believe you are utterly incapable of weighing scenarios.
Everyone is like a lost sheep Day 1. Try again.

Seriously?

1) you're asking why it is easy to hide on an unresisted town wagon?
2) What does LQ's wagon say? Because from where I'm sitting it doesn't say much of anything on its own.
3) Ugh. You're kidding about this. It wasn't optimal to leave our town hanging like that.
4) Lol @ everyone is lost sheep on D1. Thats poor logic Titus. I've pegged scum you on D1 before.

[Senator]

Titus, your push is laughably weak. Its like you don't really believe it.

[Senator]

Titus would have you believe it wasn't obvious that LQ was new to our mafia. She's being silly.

[Senator]

You guys all suck eggs.

[Senator]

That's bad. You're generalizing in addition to downplaying my role thus far. You yourself have done little else than sit on your thumb today.

[Senator]

Also those weren't crumbs you sorry excuse for a scum.

[Senator]

That's bad. You're generalizing in addition to downplaying my role thus far. You yourself have done little else than sit on your thumb *This game*.

Just so we are clear. Your ISO is a barren wasteland of nothing. Klingon has more content than you.

[Senator]

Right now you're avoiding making any content.

[Senator]

You haven't even called it properly scummy or done more than listed things you. You haven't commented on the LQ wagon, stated your opinion of the wagon on me today, or even commented on the gamestate.

[Senator]

Like you are seriously claiming that 'an obsession with Titus' is a scummy thing?

Titus' ISO is just reciprocal. Yet you have no stated opinion of that.

[Senator]

PB isn't saying anythign that can be tied to him tomorrow or in the case I actually am lynched. I call that not making content.

[Senator]

Rather than give opinions about other events in the game he makes a push for a lynch and while he has his target engaged he chooses instead to avoid discussion in favor of besmirching them

[Senator]

PB is here to make posts and look busy. He has an agenda he is pushing, not an interest in solving the game.